Hacking the human system with FIML

In a previous post (Certitude/Coherence), I said that the interpersonal certitude and coherence that result from FIML practice is amazing. It is amazing because FIML shows that when we achieve clear and excellent communication with our partner, many other things will change for the better. FIML gives us access to our most fundamental understanding of who we are, and in doing that it allows us to sort of hack into the center of the human operating system. It gives us the power/ability to change and reconstruct ourselves in a very fundamental way with the help of our partner.

Certitude/Coherence

Humans all need to feel certain about at least some things. We also need to have basic mental and emotional coherence. FIML practice gives partners a very reliable level of mutual certainty and coherence.

Since FIML practice is a process—something you do with your partner—partners will be able to check and recheck their mutual understandings as often as they like. The interpersonal certitude and coherence that result from this process is amazing. It is amazing in and of itself but also because having reliable interpersonal coherence with your partner will have a deep influence on you. It will affect how you understand yourself and how you feel about yourself. It will also affect how you understand and feel about your place in the world, your place in society.

People who do not practice FIML ordinarily get certitude and coherence from outside of themselves–from TV, movies, newspapers, schools, churches, clubs, and so on. The external semiotics of cultures and subcultures created by other people give most individuals the certitude and coherence they need for psychological well-being. Insofar as external semiotics are not sufficient for the individual (and they rarely can do it all), most people fill in whatever is missing with personal interpretations. In many other posts, we have discussed how these personal interpretations are usually based on mistaken impressions. They are usually neurotic, or constitute the kleshas (wrong views, toxic fixations, mistaken interpretations, etc.) described in Buddhist literature.

FIML practice allows partners to correct their neuroses by disconfirming them with their partners. If you disconfirm a neurosis, you effectively confirm that it is/was not true and can therefore be discarded.

FIML practice also helps partners free themselves from the need to find certitude and coherence outside of themselves. As you become more secure in your communication with your partner, both of you will begin to notice that you are becoming less dependent on external semiotics.

FIML emphasizes the certitude and coherence of truth between two caring people above certitude and coherence based on conformance to social norms. FIML helps partners co-form their own subculture rather than conform to a culture created by someone else.

FIML as art

Some signs that a person might be interested in FIML and able to do it

Here is a short checklist that might help you assess your own openness to FIML practice or the openness of your SO or other friends. Of course, none of this is written in stone.

  • Practices Buddhism, or understands it and is sympathetic to it; understands and practices mindfulness of speech, listening, and behavior
  • Wants to have best possible communication with SO
  • Likes to use and think about language or human behavior
  • Likes to talk or write
  • Is able to understand language and language use objectively; can see self objectively
  • Enjoys thinking practically about life, existence
  • Has training in the sciences, psychology, linguistics, anthropology, etc.; might be best if self-taught
  • Can think independently
  • Is open about changing their concept of who they are; changing their inner biography
  • Is not fully invested in a subculture that also employs them (most careers, as these require a large investment in time and conformity)
  • Is not so “polite” that there are several yards of pleasant upholstery around them all the time; this sort of person is less likely be truthful or to know what they really think or want
  • Not overly sensitive; able to listen to another point of view without taking it personally; this is especially important because FIML practice requires that partners understand how what they say is being heard and how what they have heard may not be what was intended
  • Is not an alcoholic; we can see again the genius of the Buddha in this; alcoholism causes so much mental dulling it is a profound impediment to FIML practice
  • Does not have a static view of the world and of other people; understands that life is changeable, dynamic; that life is a process; that people are not static fixtures with permanent traits