Controlled covid information is and was information promoted by the US government, US mainstream media, mainstream science, mainstream academia, Big Pharma, most state governments, school systems, etc.
Uncontrolled covid information is and was all the information that disagreed with the above and sometimes agreed with the above.
Everyone—all of us—had skin in the game. The debate between controlled and uncontrolled information has been waging since early 2020 and continues today.
It is very important and significant that today we can say that uncontrolled information won the debate conclusively. We beat the crap out of controlled information. The nudgers lost very badly.
I bring this up and emphasize it because it is important that we all reflect on this and seal it in our minds. Uncontrolled—anarchic—information is the path to truth, justice, and the American way. We winnowed out the bullshit, considered many ideas that did not pan out, were afraid of no thoughts whatever, yet rarely if ever supported or promoted anything that was not sound information.
Covid is the single best example in our lifetimes of the power and brilliance of the free exchange of uncensored information. Compared to the controlled and restricted information demanded by the parties described in paragraph one above, uncensored information has won the debate decisively and been on the winning side for the duration of the argument.
I believe this very large example involving the entire world can serve as an example for all kinds of information and all kinds of debates.
Clearly, we must work very hard to ensure free speech, free information, no censorship, no governmental control of information. There is no single issue that is more important and covid has proved it. ABN
Sceptical scientists from around the world are flocking to sign the World Climate Declaration (WCD) that states there is no climate emergency. The WCD notes that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound, self-critical science. Over 100 scientists and professionals have signed the Declaration since August 18th, when the Daily Sceptichighlighted the project and interest soared across social media.
The WCD is particularly critical of climate models that provide the ‘evidence’ for most of the Net Zero agenda. “We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models,” says the WCD. Models have many shortcomings and “are not remotely plausible as global policy tools”, it adds. The WCD started with 500 signatories and has now grown to over 1,200. The lead author is the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize winner Professor Ivar Giaever.
I have Asperger’s and my “special interest” is gender ideology, which means I spend every waking minute thinking and problem-solving on how to quell this monster. Everything points to exposing the abysmal quality of “scientific evidence” that props up their beliefs. 🧵
The concept that one has a “gender identity” rooted in sex-based stereotypes that can differ from the body is complete pseudoscience that hails from the most intellectually bankrupt sectors of the social sciences. There is absolutely no biological basis to support that claim.
Activists claim that gray matter studies prove there is a biological basis for trans identities, but they didn’t control for homosexuality. Similar studies were done that did control for homosexuality. Guess what? There’s a biological basis for homosexuality—not trans identities!
The claim that “gender affirming” care is “life saving” and that trans-identified people are more likely to kill themselves if they don’t receive it is a lie based on a bad interpretation of statistics.
The studies these activist-researchers put out are genuinely worthless. Biased samples, poor experiment design, bad methodology & erroneously drawn conclusions from their data. Yet they are picked up by mainstream media and hailed as irrefutable proof.
@UWMedicine found that the use of puberty blockers and hormones didn't improve the mental health of trans-identified teens, but published a study claiming they did. When they were caught, they conspired to conceal it.
The scientists who claim sex is a spectrum use hermaphroditism in animals and irrelevant developmental conditions in humans to support their beliefs. There are two sexes because there are two sex cells that the anatomy is organized around in development.
I’m telling you guys, all of the “evidence” propping up gender ideology is junk that must be exposed if we want to see any real change. They use the authority of “science” to stifle debate, affect policy and influence social media platforms’ rules on censorship.
We need a task force to critique the studies they use to support their beliefs. We need to amplify the work that’s already done by unbiased researchers & make it more accessible to lay people by breaking down main points. We need a central hub where all this info can be located.
Recently a person claiming to represent 'Covid Science' did a sleight-of-hand hack job on my Cancer tracking chart that I derive from CDC data.
We take you through that parade of deception & incompetence in 5 panels, after exemplifying how this work is professionally done below.
The 1st sleight-of-hand he used involves decrementing UCoD depressed cancer deaths from the totals.
He failed to us the Wonder Database to double-check and see if the lowered Cancer death rates were real, or merely an Underlying Cause of Death effect (i.e. Died 'with' Covid).
However, it also shows something much larger: Confirmation that the vaccines have no (mortality) efficacy. That’s what I’ll make clear in this article. The results also point to my recent observation that all of the U.S. statistics appear to be confounded by wealth effects for which no agencies are making statistical corrections.
…The findings revealed that speech rhythm could reliably classify autistic participants versus neurotypical participants among both the English and Cantonese samples. However, speech intonation could only classify autistic participants versus neurotypical participants in the English sample. Further, when the researchers analyzed a combined dataset of both English and Cantonese speakers, only speech rhythm reliably classified autistic individuals from neurotypical participants.
To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old. Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”
Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”
It is not too complicated to explain why these too small, too smooth, too old and too numerous galaxies are completely incompatible with the Big Bang hypothesis. Let’s begin with “too small”. If the universe is expanding, a strange optical illusion must exist. Galaxies (or any other objects) in expanding space do not continue to look smaller and smaller with increasing distance. Beyond a certain point, they start looking larger and larger. (This is because their light is supposed to have left them when they were closer to us.) This is in sharp contrast to ordinary, non-expanding space, where objects look smaller in proportion to their distance.
Seven of the major eleven International Classification of Diseases codes tracked by the US National Center for Health Statistics exhibit stark increase trends beginning in the first week of April 2021 – featuring exceptional growth more robust than during even the Covid-19 pandemic time frame. This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the US population. These seven pronounced increases in mortality alarmingly persist even now.
The following work is the result of thousands of hours of dynamic data tracking and research on the part of its author. The reader should anticipate herein, a journey which will take them through the methods and metrics which serve to identify this problem, along with a deductive assessment of the candidate causal mechanisms behind it. Alternatives as to cause which include one mechanism in particular, that is embargoed from being allowed as an explanation, nor even mere mention in some forums.
At the end of this process, we will be left with one inescapable conclusion. One which threatens the very fabric and future of health policy in the US for decades to come.
American Buddhist Net 