I am focusing on Maine a bit more than other states because I am fairly familiar with it and because it is the last state in USA to have the ‘diversity is our strength’ ideology pathology imposed on it. These ‘refugees’ were flown in with Mayorkas’ help and US and Maine tax dollars. Mills sought the refugees out out because she claims it was her election mandate to ‘diversify’ the state at public expense. In her opening statement above, to my ear, Mills mocks Maine openly while also inadvertently mocking herself. The curse of the left is their greedy belief in the moralistic mind-control that has been programmed into them, and then following that mind-control by imposing it on everyone else. Watch the real-world results above. ABN
Psychobabble plus ideological doublespeak — why sane people hate NPR, not to mention beta cuck voices and constantly lying, as much by omission as commission. That said, sometimes it is OK and rarely even pretty good. Tax dollars should not be funding leftist propaganda, especially when the CEO believes it is more important than what’s true. ABN
If you are familiar with Bryant’s previous work and/or most interested in new the Diddy info, that part starts at 1:06:45. I have watched only one-half so far. I have personal foul information related to several aspects of Bryant’s work and more. This stuff is true and way worse than most realize. ABN
This refers to ‘refugees’ brought into the state to make it ‘less white’, which Mills has publicly stated ‘is what I was elected to do’, which is decidedly not true unless she means the people who stole the election for her wanted her to do that. Politicians and societal leaders should work solely to help their constituents thrive and this does not mean working to change them based on totalitarian ideology, which is the curse of the left. Societies are not changed for the better by ideologies imposed from the top down but rather ruined. Maine today still enjoys the lowest violent crime rate in USA, but not for long if these policies continue. ABN
The obligation to alleviate others’ pain can be found in most of the world’s moral systems. It also appears to be built into the structure of the mind by evolution, as evidenced by the human tendency to feel distress at signs of suffering. It is therefore not surprising that many people are motivated to help perceived victims of misfortune or disadvantage. But the downside of this proclivity is that it can also lead people to be easily persuaded that all victim signals are accurate signals, particularly when they perceive the alleged victim as being a “good person.” When this occurs, well-meaning people might allocate their material and social resources to those who are neither victims nor virtuous, which necessarily diverts resources from those who are legitimately in need. Effective altruism requires the ability to differentiate between false and true victims. Credulous acceptance of all virtuous victim signals as genuine can also enable and reward fraudulent claims, particularly by those with antisocial personality traits. Our work raises this possibility and by doing so it advances our understanding of how the moral goals of those who seek to minimize human suffering can be most effectively pursued.
This study and this one—Virtuous victimhood as a Dark Triad resource transfer strategy—both detail the psychological mechanisms that underly successful strategies of group parasitism. Understanding the semi-complex nature of this strategy is important because USA and the West are today infested with a proliferation of parasitic groups working precisely this strategy. From BLM, to Soros et al funded DAs, to Jewish supremacists, to beta cuck feminists who have overrun academia and state governments, parasitism that feeds on public kindness and government boondoggle money (see also Catholic and Hebrew ‘virtuous’ illegal immigration orgs and the scams they work) has never been more serious or widespread. In Buddhist terms, each one of us is a ‘locus of imagination’ wandering in a realm of delusion. And each one of us chooses between living authentically by our own lights or by those of others. This paradoxical condition does not seem to have changed throughout all of human history, and history itself is also subject to this paradox, as is religion. ABN
The idea that virtuous victim signalling is a strategic behavior manipulating moral agents to achieve resource transfer was tested and supported. Results were robust across both a direct replication and a test of robustness to alternative measures of tendency to victim signal. The effect sizes are substantial, suggesting that much of observed proclivity to victim signal likely is driven by narcissism and Machiavellianism. Evidence that the strategy is effective, and that the effect is robust to actual moral status and victimization implies that significant aid is being directed to narcissists who are not victims rather than to those legitimately deserving of aid. Sadism apparently extends this exploitation beyond exploiting those triggered to offering resource release, into a license to attack the accused.
Within this summary, we outline a novel theory, the result of 25 years of research on the part of its author, comprising three primary novel hypotheses that link recent climate changes to specific alterations in the Earth’s core and mantle. These changes are proposed to lead to a decoupling of Earth’s core and mantle, which may result in a recurrence of the cataclysmic inundations mentioned in many cultural mythologies. The three hypotheses are summarized in the articles below.
The linked article is brief, succinct and very clearly written. I highly recommend familiarizing yourself with the ideas presented. It’s a good read. ABN
“We are going to decide whether we are going to grow our way out of this debt burden, and I think we can, through deregulation, energy independence & dominance in the US, and a growth mindset. I feel very strongly that this is the last chance to grow ourselves out of this.”
Sounds great for future America but not for risk assets overall… Say bye bye to deficit and gov spending that created this decades long enormous bubble.
There will be a transition period which may take year(s) and risk assets will suffer greatly. Undoing decades long policy mistakes will have a price. And remember outliers revert with velocity.
Did market know what was coming ? I absolutely think so. Otherwise why growth stocks would suffer since Trump’s lead in polls.
You see, Bessent talks about bringing growth back but ironically growth stocks are underperforming. Why? Because the market knows that without deficit spending, bubble will burst. And as always hot money / smart money is now leaving high beta growth names before major market turn. They always lead.
While I have doubts that Trump administration and new Treasury Secretary do as they say, if they do, it will be great for the future America but during the transition period, the bubble will burst with velocity.
American Buddhist Net 