DOCTORS: View and sign the Physicians Declaration

We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a crossroad, are compelled to declare the following;

WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;

WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;

WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;

WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;

WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;

WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease.  Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;

WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:

RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care. 

RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.

RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.

RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.

RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.

RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical care.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Declaration as of the date first written.

link to declaration

Israeli cardiologist: “I see many vaccinated patients with myocarditis”

💉I see many vaccinated patients with #myocarditis
💉The MoH data about myo was NOT precise
💉I saw a young patient yesterday, 50% of her heart was damaged due to the vaccine

Suddenly Docs break silence.. BETTER LATE THAN NEVER
#pfisrael #vaxexposed

Watch this also:

Continue reading “Israeli cardiologist: “I see many vaccinated patients with myocarditis””

Information on Ivermectin from variety of sources

[Everything below is quoted from the source linked at the end. Good to have this info in one place. ABN]

I made this post to share information about Ivermectin (IVM) that is being censored on the internet or not being reported by the mainstream media. Medical choices should be well informed and not forced. Silencing individuals for talking about Ivermectin is an attack on our ability to think for ourselves and to make our own choices as free people.

Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech. – Benjamin Franklin 

Ivermectin Overview

Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic that also has anti-viral properties. It was discovered in the late 70s and since then has won a Nobel prize in 2015 for being a great benefit to humankind. The World Health Organization (WHO) has Ivermectin on their list of essential medicines.

Nobel Prize: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/campbell/lecture/

WHO Essential Medicines 2019: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHOMVPEMPIAU2019.06

This article will give you a detailed overview of Ivermectin (pre-covid). https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/pjab/87/2/87_2_13/_pdf/-char/en

Continue reading “Information on Ivermectin from variety of sources”

San Juan Summit: Undertreatment Cited as Cause for Deaths

“We are in a pandemic of undertreatment,” said intensive care specialist, Pierre Kory, M.D., Former Director of the Center for Trauma and Life Support at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and winner of the British Medical Association’s President’s Choice Award. What drives him and the other doctors and scientists attending is the overarching principle to “first, do no harm”.

“Everything else that we’ve discovered, everything that’s in our protocols is because we have used good clinical sense, lots of experience, and we’ve used trial and error using our best judgments of risks and benefits.” For him, undertreatment and nontreatment is harm. In his view, long-haul Covid and hospitalizations are caused by undertreatment and a lack of an effective prevention strategy.

link

Explanation of paper showing grave harm from covid vaxxes

A new hero has emerged. Mostly-retired scientist Ronald Kostoff, PhD, and a highly experienced team, just had their paper published. The appropriate, if understated title of the paper is

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Let us appreciate his restraint in never using the word “assholes” anywhere in the paper. At the age of 84, he maintains a level of polite discipline in the face of assholes I can scarcely muster on my better days.

Kostoff worked in the past as a Georgia Tech affiliated researcher (or consultant or whatever the correct term is now), has 30 years of government service, and a long publication history that includes an amazing breadth of topics including neuropsychology, information science, research and development management, molecular mass spectrometry, citation analysis, competitive intelligence, natural language processing, naval engineering, text analysis, and now analysis of what assholes refuse to analyze (soon to be a new category at researchgate). He published on disruptive technologies before it was cool.

link

The linked essay by Matthew Crawford is well-worth reading as the original paper is long and scholarly, obscuring major points for most readers. Crawford chooses good excerpts from the paper to show how damning the paper is. I am going to repeat some of them here: ABN

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.

For example, the trials and VAERS reported clots that resulted in serious symptoms and deaths but gave no indication of the enhanced predisposition to forming serious clots in the future with a higher base of micro-clots formed because of the mRNA intervention. The latter is particularly relevant to children, who have a long future that could be seriously affected by having an increased predisposition to multiple clot-based (and other) serious diseases resulting from these inoculations.

What does this mean in the real world? In the USA, there are approximately 4,000,000 children in each age year for adolescents. Thus, there are ˜16,000,000 children in the 12–15 age band. A serious adverse event, including death, that occurred at a 1/800 rate would not be detectable with high confidence in a sample of 1005 people. Thus, the results of the trials for 1005 children would allow for 20,000 children to suffer a non-trial-detected serious adverse event, including death, when extrapolated to potential inoculation of all children in the 12–15 age group! Given that the risk of contracting COVID-19 with serious outcomes is negligible in this population, proceeding with mass inoculation of children 12–15 years old based on the trials that were conducted cannot be justified on any cost-benefit ratio findings.

Kirsch, Crawford, and now Kostoff are seeing grave harm being caused by the vaccines. If you are paying full attention to this topic, this is the core issue that tells us what is really going on. ABN

It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.

It is becoming clear that the central ingredient of the injection, the recipe for the spike protein, will produce a product that can have three effects. Two of the three occur with the production of antibodies to the spike protein. These antibodies could allegedly offer protection against the virus (although with all the “breakthrough” cases reported, that is questionable), or could suppress serious symptoms to some extent. They could also cross-react with human tissue antigen, leading to potential autoimmune effects. The third occurs when the injected material enters the bloodstream and circulates widely, which is enabled by the highly vascular injection site and the use of the PEG-2000 coating.

This allows spike protein to be manufactured/expressed in endothelial cells at any location in the body, both activating platelets to cause clotting and causing vascular damage. It is difficult to believe this effect is unknown to the manufacturer, and in any case, has been demonstrated in myriad locations in the body using VAERS data. There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk, no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations to both populations. It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

I posted this paper a couple of days ago, but today noticed that Steve Kirsch is promoting it as corroborating his own findings that the vaxxes are causing more harm than good. This is an extremely important conclusion because it destroys any reason for mass vaxxing and even for most people to vax at all. ABN

Gov DeSantis: No Noble COVID Lies

direct link

On monoclonal antibodies, this is how a politician should sound overall on all issues. I wonder about DeSantis’ less than fully candid support for vaxxes, though, which are showing considerable short-term harm and death, thus diabolically skewing statistics to make them look better since vax deaths are counted as covid “unvaxxed” deaths. This area of inquiry is cloudy because CDC is also doing Noble Lies on the data of infection and death. On top of the short term, we have many indications that the vaxxes are initiating disease processes that will yield long-term harms: cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc. As far as American politicians go, DeSantis is one of the best, but that is not saying much. I think he could do an even better job if he would dig deeper into all aspects of covid malfeasance. ABN

Early Covid Care Experts

Here at earlycovidcare.org you can learn about the history, safety and current usage of effective drug treatments for COVID-19, and find doctors who are available either in person or by telemedicine to provide expert early outpatient treatment for COVID patients. Just scroll down to review the evidence in support of COVID treatments, find guidance for clinicians, or see the latest from the Early COVID Care Experts.

link

VERMONT: Hospitalization higher than last year following widespread vax compliance

Vermont has the 2nd highest vaccination rate in the country. What is happening?

Originally tweeted by Justin Hart (@justin_hart) on September 22, 2021.

Why be coy and ask when the answer is the vaccines have failed, they are leaky, they appear very solidly to be causing Vaccine Enhanced Disease and possibly Antibody Dependent Enhancement. My friend went to the doctor today and they discussed vaccines. The doctor, who was promoting the vax, did not know what Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) is. Just a local data-point, but says a lot about our health industry where so many are content to be complacent incurious functionaries. How can an MD promote something they do not understand?