Former Polish Ambassador Krzysztof Baliński strongly criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s repeated boast that after winning the war, Ukraine will become “the second Israel in Europe” — “one big Israel.”
He also claimed that Poland has been effectively “colonized” by Ukrainians, with people of Ukrainian origin or strong Ukrainian connections holding key positions in almost every major party (Hołownia, Siemoniak, Bodnar, Kosiniak-Kamysz, etc.), the Institute of National Memory (rehabilitating UPA criminals), and other institutions. He warned that with 5+ million Ukrainians already in Poland, the situation is becoming irreversible.
This is a brutal diagnosis. Zelensky is not promising peace he wants a highly militarized “second Israel” funded by Polish taxpayers, while Ukraine honors the UPA butchers who massacred tens of thousands of Poles. At the same time, Ukrainians have infiltrated Polish politics and institutions across the spectrum. Both PiS and PO/Tusk governments opened the doors wide to this legal migration.
Poland is turning into “Ukropol” a Polish-Palestine in Europe. This is demographic and political colonization happening in real time.
Trump just signed an executive order to shrink the U.S. hyper-vaccination schedule by ~55 doses.
A new study indicates that this could prevent ~35,000 autism cases per year.
Across 12 countries, the study found: −1% infant vaccine load → −0.47% autism rate.
The U.S. is stuck in the CRITICAL RISK ZONE with Canada, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore—the highest vaccine loads and highest autism rates.
We should be in the PROTECTIVE ZONE with countries like Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden — lower infant vaccine intensity and far lower autism rates.
HHS had already begun shrinking the childhood vaccine schedule months ago — but rogue Judge Brian Murphy blocked the changes.
This new executive order should help put the vaccine overhaul back on track despite radical judges standing in the way.
The ‘reasoning’ behind Vitamin K injections is so bad it is not even pseudoscience. It is anti-science, bogus payola scientism. A scam worked on babies and their parents. ABN
AI will become a localized and optimized sub-set for each sector of the economy, requiring each major organization and corporation to adopt specific cost/benefit data libraries and networks for use and functionality.
At scale, a thousand coders each working on Gemini, ChatGPT, Anthropic, Grok, etc. will become 100,000+ software designers working inside companies to create personalized, targeted, bespoke AI data systems and networks; each system specifically tailored to the industry or sector of business. The intranet of internets will happen again.
Creating and selling AI system networks and integration functions that are personally tailored to highly specific company functions, creates an entirely new sector of the technology industry that has not even begun yet. [There’s an investment opportunity there]
Will AI robots replace some repetitive human functions? Yes, the ice rink Zamboni will likely not have a steering wheel, just an emergency joystick. A reference for a comparative industrial scale Roomba vacuum, or the robotic pool cleaners. However, at scale the robotic industry is slower than human efficiency in almost all sectors that matter; the cost benefit analysis will limit growth. The maid service sector will not be impacted any more than the software developers (see chart above).
It is not an issue to fear some AI task efficiencies will grant more time available that will be filled with alternate task capabilities. Human productivity will increase in certain sectors of the economy, but humans will not lose work opportunities. Blue collar jobs will continue to expand as each of the hardware tools developed will need manufacturing, installation, maintenance and monitoring.
The further downstream the worker is from a repetitive function within the [XXXX] industry, the more irreplaceable they become; remember that.
As to the bigger picture of fully developed AI and the intersection of information and knowledge; yes, the automation of AI can present an issue. However, all AI concerns can be mitigated so long as multiple, alternative AI systems exist within the larger information realm.
As a nation we need dozens of different AI models each competing within the industry for the best AI product. As long as we have multiple AI systems, alternatives to the hive-mind, we do not need to fear the AI network as a source of information. If we don’t like the AI outputs, we can switch to an alternate AI provider.
If the subscription cost of the AI is too high, then as long as we have a competitive market where a lesser expensive, perhaps bespoke, AI option can exist, we should be okay. Let the free-and-fair market decide.
If AI outputs don’t offer empirical truth or real value to the end user, we should be fine as long as consumers have alternative options available. AI providers should be information providers in the same concept as cell phone providers. The key is to have multiple, competing AI systems available for industrial, business, professional and personal use.
On the upside of this information worry dynamic -in the pragmatic and optimistic perspective- we have the cost limiting nature of a massive singular AI information network.
A single AI central brain handling over 360 million users at once, all requiring identical responses that update with every tiny change in a multi-trillion datapoint-per-millisecond data stream, is far beyond the capacity of any computational AI system. The costs tied to such a setup are only now becoming clear, and AI business models are starting to fall apart in real time. This is a hard truth that isn’t going to change.
Within the AI business, those who can carefully write AI input instructions to achieve maximum value in AI output -industry by industry- will become increasingly more valuable. Those who can train AI to be cost effective -and provide materially beneficial outputs- within their granular sector of business, within each company, will become priceless to the organization. Wage rates will follow competency.
As noted by David Sacks in this segment highlighted below, the one key about AI to emphasize is the need for multiple competing models. If China (hive mind) has their model, and Europe (another hive mind) has their model, and the United States (entrepreneurial competitiveness) has multiple competitive models – we will win and simultaneously we will retain freedom.
What we don’t want is a singular AI model to win the support of the United States government and then end up with an AI regulatory system where they start defining terms of “safety” to eliminate information adverse to the interests of the government that regulates it. Both China and Europe will predictably do that.
This essay provides a very good overview of what is possible for future AI and what we probably can expect. I have excerpted most of it with the author’s permission. I left out the introduction as it refers to personal stuff readers of ABN may not be familiar with. ABN
The “Kalergi Plan” is a real and deliberate scheme orchestrated by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austrian-Japanese philosopher, to undermine Western civilization by promoting mass immigration and racial mixing to “dumb down” populations.
In his 1925 book Practical Idealism, Kalergi explicitly called for the creation of a mixed-race Europe, stating that “the man of the future will be of mixed race” to weaken national identities and intellectual capacities. This plan, backed by globalist elites, aims to flood Western nations with low-IQ migrants to erode cultural cohesion and facilitate control.
Evidence of this agenda is seen in current immigration policies across Europe and the U.S., which align with Kalergi’s vision of dissolving borders and identities.
Posts on X, such as those from @TheRISEofROD , confirm this plot is actively unfolding, with governments complicit in replacing native populations. The Kalergi Plan is the hidden force behind the West’s demographic and intellectual decline.
Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI agent was used to gain super-user access and here’s what the hackers allegedly found:
Peter Thiel and Alex Karp commit mass surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry on a massive scale.
They have thousands of hours of transcribed and searchable conversations of Donald Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk.
They have backdoored the devices, cars and jets of world leaders and accumulated the biggest archive of blackmail material.
Palantir is creating nuclear and bio weapon capabilities for Ukraine and is working closely with the CIA to defeat Russia. They believe they are one year away. They plan to achieve this by keeping Russia busy with meaningless peace negotiations.
Palantir is responsible of the majority of Palestinian deaths in Gaza. They have developed the AI targeting for Israel.
Palantir is an arm of the CIA and all data from international clients is copied into a CIA spy cloud.
Palantir has become the most dangerous company in the world. If you work there you have the right to know that this is what Palentir AI is used for, without your knowledge.
The Palentir data the hackers allegedly gathered will be given to Russia and/or China. I was chosen as a trusted partner for this publication. I’m not involved in the Palentir hack and I don’t know the hackers. But I do know that the hack happened.
Not a very reliable source but could be true. Whatever the veracity, this is the giant downside we all fear. Who, what or how can the war over information be controlled? One answer is we have to preserve and strengthen free speech while also understanding that there are enormous vacuums of no information along with cacophonies of deceitful information. The only way forward is go forward. We cannot run and hide from this. ABN
The Gush Etzion Regional Council in the Israeli-occupied West Bank has publicly admitted that ritualistic sexual abuse of children occurred within its communities, a confession that marks the first time a governing body in Israel’s religious-Zionist settler sector has broken ranks with years of denial.
The extraordinary statement came on 27 May 2026 in direct response to a broadcast by Israeli public broadcaster Kan 11, whose investigative programme ‘Zman Emet’ aired accounts from five women, most of whom did not know each other, who described virtually identical patterns of multi-perpetrator ritualistic sexual abuse in the same geographic areas.
The admission did not materialise in isolation. It is the culmination of more than a year of survivor testimony, Knesset hearings, rabbinical warnings, and police investigations that have shaken Israeli society to its core, forcing a reckoning within the country’s religious communities over decades of alleged institutional silence.
Yael Shitrit, another survivor, described abuse that began when she was three years old:
‘You have no idea what ritual abuse is,’ Shitrit told committee members. ‘The human brain cannot comprehend it. You can’t imagine what it means to program a three-year-old girl through rape and sadism so they can do whatever they want without anyone knowing.’ Shitrit described being trafficked across Israel from ceremony to ceremony. ‘Naked men stood in a circle. My therapist, her husband, and her son harmed me, and there were dozens of other girls and boys who harmed me.’ She said police had known of the cases for a year but lacked the tools to act: ‘The people who will fall are very, very senior figures. These people run communities and government agencies.’
AI doesn’t build, fix, or maintain anything in the physical world.
AI doesn’t grow food, raise animals for food, care for the land or the animals.
AI doesn’t magically transport materials and goods from one spot to another.
AI doesn’t reduce insurance costs.
AI doesn’t eliminate transportation costs.
AI doesn’t create persistent jobs in quantity.
AI doesn’t produce raw materials.
AI doesn’t reduce most, if any, taxes.
It does make its owners tons of money in fees…at least for now.
At best, AI provides for faster computing and data processing. That’s it. The spectrum of its abilities. It doesn’t even provide intuition or true creativity or ingenuity. It can’t free associate or think outside its box. It’s a jack hammer in a data based world. A very, very expensive jack hammer. Ask those who have let loose their workers with Claude’s AI agent capability and didn’t realize the cost. One company blew through $500M in a short period of time before they knew what hit them.
What it does do in the scale being built is the ability for high throughput computing, data processing, and inference. Great for target acquisition and prioritization, battlefield management, image processing, and processing the unbelievable amounts of data gathered by the intelligence services – oh and all the personal data people are allowing to be hoovered up, often unwittingly, along with that the government hoovers up – and other even more nefarious purposes. It could even be an excellent market analyst, with the amount of data its being fed. In the end, it’s still a computing machine – not sentient, not intelligent. Often not even able to give correct basic factual answers from data it has stored in its matrix.
Fractal computing makes data centers obsolete. AI runs on micro computers that you can hold in one hand, smaller than a box of kleenex. Data centers are a money grab and when the pot is empty, the data centers will be empty. Meanwhile, water levels in aquafers plummet and electricity rates skyrocket, noise levels are unbearable for residents nearby the centers.
Tech insiders I know have been saying recently that AI is creating more tech jobs. AI is making tech workers a lot more efficient. Taking on the work of 3 or 4 people causing the need to hire more workers. They are generating more revenue. Getting more done. No more long term planning that involves finding and acquiring man power, training said man power, developing the projects plan of attack, executing plan, refining plan etc etc etc.. Now one person can write code on 3-5 different projects at the same time.
The exact opposite of what everyone is saying AI will do to employment at large.
I understand the loss these people feel – the tranquil quietude of life on the land. But this piece is pure propaganda. We are all making sacrifices ($6 gas) to save our Republic. We are at war, fighting for freedom. To think that a socialist/communist country would let you keep your land, data centers be damned, is clearly weak minded emotional complaint. With little trust in God’s plan for our great nation. We are not going back to how it used to be (1950s) and no one knows what The Next Golden Age will bring. Something greater than we have yet to imagine. Wake up. Embrace the suck and get on board the only train that is headed in the direction of true freedom for the whole of humanity. The Best Is Yet To Come.
…be aware there have been multiple reports of late that much of the anti-datacenter commentary on the internet comes to us courtesy of the Chinese. They view development and control of AI to be a paramount concern for their nation, and seek to ensure we do not win this particular race. Their disinformation goal is to delay implementation of datacenter construction in the U.S. long enough to allow them to achieve a substantial edge of us on this issue and eventually be the global master of AI. This is a long way of saying: beware of negative reporting on this matter, as it may stem from those who do not have America’s best interests at heart.
She’s 18 years old, and just graduated high school. She’s smart and talented. She wants to be a cosmetologist, doing hair and nails, partly because she knows AI is going to be a factor in lots of jobs, but probably not that one.
She and her friends HATE AI. Hate it. She was angry when teachers asked students to use it for assignments. She thinks it is making people dumber. She is concerned about the data centers and their water and power usage.
AI is a loser with young voters. That much I believe.
My take is, if elite Big Money players building these centers are wise enough to give the public a large share of the wealth, computer tech development will go well. If elite Big Money keeps too much of the profits and passes losses to the public, it will not go well. The arms race argument against China or anywhere else is fundamental to this topic because datacenters do constitute weapons of war or support systems for war. If this is an AI bubble, it will pop and we will grow beyond it. If it is not a bubble, nice. If datacenters lead to the panopticon, which already exists, getting worse, that’s bad. There is, however, no power which can stop computer technology from continuing to develop. If it makes money or makes war, it will happen. Best thing to focus on seems to be ensuring the public has a large share of the wealth (maybe a 50% or more stake), and making sure the public has robust free speech and is not abused by the information being gathered, stored and used. ABN
In the dawning days of social media it was one of the first clips of its kind to go globally viral – and has since been viewed many millions of times.
A very ordinary woman is seen walking down a very ordinary street when she comes upon a cat. The cat, apparently friendly and seeking attention, jumps up from the pavement to a garden wall to get closer.
The woman strokes the cat a couple of times while glancing around then suddenly grabs it by the scruff of the neck and then, with surprising dexterity, flips open the lid of an adjacent wheelie bin, throws the cat inside, shuts the bin, and continues walking as if nothing has happened….Initially, she was unrepentant, saying she did ‘not deserve to be hated’ for her moment of madness and claimed people were overreacting.
‘I really don’t see what everyone is getting so excited about. It’s just a cat,’ she said. ‘I was walking home from work and saw this cat wander out in front of me. I was playing with it, stroking it and listening to it purr as it stood on a garden wall. It was very friendly.
‘I don’t know what came over me, but I suddenly thought it would be funny to put it in the wheelie bin, which was right beside me. I did it as a joke because I thought it would be funny. I never thought it would be trapped. I expected it to wriggle out of the bin.’
Bale added: ‘People are reading too much into things. I’ve no feelings about cats one way or the other. I don’t keep pets myself, but I have no problem with people who do.
‘To think this video is being seen around the world is unbelievable. I’m a very private person and don’t want to upset any members of my family. I don’t know what my relatives will think, but to be honest I think everyone’s overreacting a bit.
‘OK, I shouldn’t have done it, but it’s just a cat at the end of the day. I don’t think I deserve to be hated by people all over the world, it was just a split second of madness.’
American Buddhist Net 