Patrick Byrne on his meeting with Trump and the Nov 3 election

I have a lot of faith in Byrne. I know some have their doubts about his motives and question his having worked for the FBI, but I don’t. I can see how that happened and why he did what he did. I also respect his sometimes awkward retelling of his past as well as his descriptions of Trump. Having lived in China myself, I can relate to that side of him as well. Beyond that, he just seems honest to me. I think he is doing his best to tell difficult truths and using his wealth and status for the good of others.

The excerpt below is the beginning of a series of essays he plans to write on what he saw in and around the November 3 election.

I had a ringside seat to election events from November 3, 2019 to January 6, 2021, and feel a duty to explain to the world what really happened. I will not be regurgitating the headline events anyone can read, but will aim to explain what was going on behind the scenes, and give my best account of why things played out as they did.

Out of an interest in not letting the public suffer any longer from my procrastination and weakness (I tested negative today after a 13-day bout with Covid) , I will be writing and publishing this story in installments, reserving  the right to re-edit as I go. Once complete and final, I will let the public know that it is final. Thus, you might think of this exercise as an odd one, where I am drafting a long magazine article for the world but doing so publicly, that the public need not wait to begin having its understandable curiosity addressed.

It will be natural for the reader to question my motives, my background, to wonder if I have some ax to grind or might wish to accomplish something in writing this other than what I claim (that I simply feel a duty to my country and to history to give an honest account of what I saw over those nine weeks).  So I will close this preface with four short statements that may clarify to some from where I am coming from philosophically…

DRAFT 1.0 – THE INSIDE STORY OF THE STEAL

Unique American voice: Anonymous

What we wanted was an audit, signature verification, ID requirement for voting. They called us extremists.

What we wanted was transparency in elections and real democracy. They called us extremists, nazis and conspiracy theorists.

Meanwhile, Antifa and BLM can bash us all they want and still get out of jail with no consequences.

You guys know what’s happening right?

They’re trying to take away your rights. Your second amendment, your right to vote, your freedom of speech.

Especially, they’ll be targeting your ability to vote the coming 4 years. Their goal is to be a totalitarian party. Same as the CCP, but they’re using other methods.

link to original

The worst thing about the humanities

The worst thing about the humanities is so many of our insights and discoveries are used to harm people, manipulate them, propagandize them.

Another bad thing is the open, confessional, and exploratory styles of artists too often are used against them by gaslighters, scammers, back-biters.

If we cannot even allow artists and social scientists to speak openly, all of us suffer from the reduced culture that results.

________________

first posted on AUGUST 22, 2017

Propaganda, subtracted votes, illusions of votes

Not on Nov 3, silly, we know that could never happen, but on YT yesterday:

Could be due to vote botting but, comrades, how lucky we are that bad bots are always defeated by wise moderators, who stopped the voting in the middle of the night.

UPDATE: Way to go! They caught another one. Good work comrades! Clearly evil bots beamed in by counter-revolutionaries. War is information. Information is war.

Guidance on the left, renders the ‘facts’ (raw numbers) on the right, complete misinformation

Inflation of case numbers is due to PCR misuse as diagnostic tool; same problem for many months.

Thoughtful piece on what may be coming to DC & USA

I like this kind of thinking; best we can do when facing a future even more uncertain than usual. All rational thought about large subjects is speculative, centered around important possibilities and their probabilities of happening. Clearly, there are many unknowns before us today, including prohibitions against saying what some of them are.

The link below will take you to the right page but you have to scroll down a bit to find the entry for today 01/21/2021. There is more and it is worth reading.

Biden was sworn in. I am surprised it has gone this far, given Biden now has an incredible capability to sell everything to China and damage America for more Renminbi to Hunter. I find it hard to believe a plan could not be conceived that did not require this risk.

But there are still unusual data-points, pointing away from a normal transition of power. 25,000 troops are still in a DC ringed in concertina wire and seven foot tall non-scalable fencing, and they never had to be there in the first place. There was never even supposed to be a crowd of democrat civilians to attend the inauguration. That does not point to normalcy. I have checked FlightAware, and see no signs of planes to take them home approaching DC, nobody is talking about them leaving, and one anon said their orders were to be there for one month. I do find it interesting they have set up checkpoints, and are checking IDs of people leaving, as if they were making sure that during this period, no classified data could be smuggled out by dirty actors.

The interesting aspect of it all is the troops were deployed on President Trump’s watch, and are being kept on under Biden. Possible explanations I see are Biden and Trump agree on something and are working together (highly unlikely, although not impossible if Biden’s blackmail was used by some intelligence/NatSec group to get him to acquiesce to something), or Biden lacks the power to send them home, or possibly the military/NatSec apparatus has been calling the shots all along (and still is) and they called it out and are keeping it. I do not see how Biden can’t immediately send them home, to show himself “restoring normalcy,” but it would appear he cannot or will not.

What the 26,000 Guardsmen are doing, or why 2,000 have been sworn in as Marshals, is also still a mystery, but it does not point to the same old, same old. In addition, Durham is still out there as a Special Prosecutor beyond Biden’s reach, his mandate was expanded to election fraud prior to the most fraudulent election in history, there are a raft of over 200,000 sealed indictments at last count, as shown below election audits are continuing, and there is still an election fraud case about to go before the Supreme Court. It would feel strange even if a Chinese asset, owned by Beijing through both bribes and blackmail did not just waltz into our Presidency under the nose of our National Security machinery. Probabilities have shifted, and it is now anybody’s guess which equally unlikely prediction will prove to be correct.

Anonymous Conservative: News Briefs – 01/21/2021

Is quo warranto is the legal route for Trump?

…Note that the United States Supreme Court’s opinion here itself put these words in italics; all; and any office, civil or military.

And the 9th Circuit affirmed that the federal quo warranto statute is the proper means by which a Presidential election can be challenged after the suspect POTUS is sworn in…

Review the federal quo warranto statute here.

Prior research reports are here and here.

The law provides an answer. If President Trump refuses to initiate quo warranto, then he can never claim to have given our law and Judiciary a chance to make things right. This is the exact law enacted for this moment. And SCOTUS knows this. Perhaps it’s why they haven’t dismissed any of the election law suits still pending for mootness.

And perhaps this is why SCOTUS denied all motions to expedite yesterday. While expedition was denied, it’s important to note that SCOTUS did not dismiss the actions brought by President Trump, Lin Wood or Sidney Powell as being moot. Why didn’t SCOTUS dismiss all of the election cases as being moot? It’s a fair question. The answer must be that determinations in those cases can be used as evidence in a quo warranto action.

The pending election actions at SCOTUS do not require expedition at this time, because quo warranto can be used to oust a usurper only after they take office. This is also why these cases aren’t moot. Perhaps we will all owe SCOTUS an apology when this done. I would love to be wrong. I will get down on my knees and beg forgiveness if it plays out like this.

Let’s give the law a chance to work, America. Our nation is based on one legal document, the Constitution. It may yet save us.

“THE CONSTITUTION MAY YET SAVE US”