While Brian Harpool attempts to use “lawfare” to silence the investigation by suing@RealCandaceO for defamation, we are putting the actual footage of September 10th up against the standard of medical science.
One of the central claims in Harpool’s defamation suit is the allegation that he did perform first aid on Charlie Kirk. But “performing first aid” isn’t a subjective opinioN—it is a medical procedure.
We’ve juxtaposed the footage from that day with an expert emergency medical instructor to show you what should have happened versus what actually did.
The Medical Standard:The Injury: Charlie’s carotid artery was hit. As the instructor explains, carotid blood is bright red and spurts. Without immediate intervention, a person goes unconscious in 20 seconds and dies within 60 seconds.
The Fix: The only way to stop a carotid bleed is to create a gauze “ball,” squish the vessel down, pack the wound, and wrap it in plastic to prevent air bubbles (air embolisms) from entering the bloodstream and stopping the lungs.
The Reality: When you watch the footage of Brian Harpool and the inner circle around Charlie, you don’t see wound packing. You don’t see the specific, high-pressure “squish” required to hold back a carotid spurt. You see a bunch of buffoons who’s main priority seemed to be getting him out of the public eye and chucking him into the back their suv like a sack of luggage. ZERO attempt at first aid.
The Most damning of all is the footage showing the actual EMTs on scene being refused access to Charlie. Why why would they prevent professionals with the proper equipment—gauze, clamps, and plastic seals—from taking over?
The Truth Isn’t Defamation Brian Harpool can sue all he wants, but he can’t sue the anatomy of the human neck. If the carotid was hit, and the protocol shown by the medical instructor was not followed, then “first aid” was not performed. TPUSA is trying to use the legal system to rewrite what our own eyes saw on that video. They want to punish the “noticing” community for pointing out that the people closest to Charlie did the exact opposite of what was needed to save his life.
If a man is spurting bright red blood from the neck, and you spend 60 seconds blocking the medics instead of packing the wound, that isn’t “first aid”—it’s a choice.
RT to demand the full, unedited medical examiner’s report. They can’t sue the facts.
I have wondered about their claim of doing first-aid. Is the spelling Harpool deliberate? I am a world-class, extremely bad speller, so can understand. ABN
So if Trump knows, his apparent demotion of Israel is explained. If he knows, his end-run around Europe and Israel, makes sense. There are many other signs Trump knows the Middle East and Israel and more, and is reorganizing world geopolitics based on pragmatics and USA’s best interests. As a global top hegemon, Trump is doing what he has to do (by KOBK rules). I am speculating. I want the best for USA and the world, in that order. ABN
…[After WW2], monopoly capitalism absorbed the world through debt, trade, media, technology, and corporate consolidation.
The result is the strange hybrid we live under today: corporate communism from above.
Private ownership for the few. Managed dependency for the many.
Who Won World War II?
The ordinary soldier did not win.
The bombed civilians did not win.
The raped women of Eastern Europe did not win.
The Christians sent to gulags did not win.
The British public did not win. Despite Britain’s continued role within the postwar international order, the public was left with heavy debt and prolonged austerity.
The American people did not win either—over 400,000 were killed, while U.S. institutions emerged with unprecedented federal debt and a permanently expanded war economy.
Poland suffered catastrophic losses during the war, with an estimated 5.5 to 6 million people killed—around one-sixth of its population—yet did not emerge as a fully independent state in the postwar settlement, but became part of the communist sphere of influence.
The Germans did not win. The country and its major urban and civilian centres were devastated by sustained bombing, millions were displaced or expelled from Eastern Europe. An estimated 6–7 million German soldiers and civilians lost their lives during the war and its immediate aftermath, and between 12 and 14 million ethnic Germans were displaced or expelled from Eastern Europe, with many forced into occupied Germany while others were deported eastward into communist labour camps or used as forced labour.
With over 20 million deaths, the Soviet population—including Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Baltic peoples, and others—certainly did not win, if by “victory” we mean the experience of the people rather than the outcome for the Soviet state.
The winners were the institutions that emerged stronger: central banks, military contractors, intelligence agencies, supranational bodies, ideological bureaucracies, and the financial interests able to profit from destruction and reconstruction alike.
The war did not end in 1945. It changed form.
The battlefield shifted—from territory to finance, from armies to institutions, from open conflict to systems of management and global governance.
The old empires flew flags. The modern order operates through frameworks.
Institutions such as the United Nations matter not because they command openly, but because they reflect a broader postwar principle: that sovereignty is increasingly shaped, guided, and constrained through supranational structures.
I believe almost all thoughtful people can agree with the highlighted paragraph above. Who are the strongest players inside that system and what goals are they pursuing — these are the questions which face us today. Who controls the propaganda, who owns its outlets; who advocates for censorship; who uses established institutions to control large populations; who controls those institutions and how were they built, and how have they been taken over? What can possibly replace insider control of major institutions, and where does the power lie to do that? I don’t see it. We the people cannot do that. We the people can only act effectively when largely united, a rare occurrence. There may be a role for some future iteration of AI to remove most if not all of the corruption, contradictions, frictions and inefficiencies within regional and global systems. I imagine we humans will try to do that and might succeed. A good version of a world like that will provide for everyone without stifling anyone. At core, most of our problems are fairly simple, so it could happen. ABN
Sent by a friend, who commented ‘mildly interesting’, which I agree with. Still mildly worth a look because we rarely get honest views of Israel from people who live there or know it well ABN
“Soluble vs insoluble” is one of the most enduring oversimplifications in nutrition. Two fibers in the same label bucket can do completely opposite things in your body.
Fiber has at least four properties that vary independently:
Solubility (does it dissolve in water?)
Viscosity (does it form a gel?)
Fermentability (do colon bacteria eat it?)
Physical structure (intact or particulate?) Each property drives a different outcome. The label binary collapses all four into one.
β-Glucan (oats, barley). Soluble, highly viscous, moderately fermented. Lowers LDL via bile acid sequestration. The FDA-approved oat health claim is built on this property.
Psyllium. Soluble, highly viscous, poorly fermented. Survives intact through the colon. Lowers LDL. Normalizes stool (works for both constipation and diarrhea).
Inulin / FOS (chicory, onions, garlic). Soluble but non-viscous. Highly fermentable. Bifidobacteria use it as substrate to produce SCFAs. Minimal LDL effect. Can bloat.
Resistant starch (cooked-cooled potato, green banana). Insoluble but highly fermentable. Produces butyrate, the primary fuel for colonocytes (~70% of their ATP).
Why the binary fails:
Inulin and psyllium are both labeled “soluble fiber.” Inulin ferments completely, produces SCFAs, has only minimal LDL effects. Psyllium passes through largely intact and lowers LDL via bile acid sequestration. They share one property and differ on every other one that matters. Practical translation. Match the fiber to the outcome:
LDL drop → viscous fibers (psyllium, β-glucan, raw guar gum)
Microbiome support → fermentable fibers (inulin, FOS, resistant starch)
Regular stools → either viscous gel-formers or coarse insoluble particles
The label binary doesn’t tell you which is which. The properties do.
This article is misleading and is dangerous to infants.
It ignores the hazards of injecting newborns with toxins such as propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, benzyl alcohol and highly neurotoxic aluminum in vitamin K shots given hours after birth.
It fails to acknowledge the high vitamin K in colostrum, available to infants as soon as born, the earliest breast milk.
It fails to acknowledge much safer vitamin K orally to the mother within the days before birth.
Blood needs to be thinner at birth, and cord-cutting needs to be delayed a few minutes so blood shunted back to the placenta in birth canal can return to the infant with the infant’s own stem cells for lifelong benefit.
But pharma-allied Pro Publica hides all that in their shameful and dangerous propaganda piece, because there is huge $$ for stealing cord blood and placenta from mother and baby, to sell for profit to the “anti-aging” industry.
She is the loudest, most aggressive pro-Israel voice in Donald Trump‘s orbit.
So when Laura Loomer leaned in close to the President two months ago and warned him that the American public was giving up on the Jewish State, his two-word reply landed like a thunderclap, carrying an ominous message for Benjamin Netanyahu.
‘You’re probably going to be the last pro-Israel President we ever have,’ Loomer recounted telling Trump, in an interview with the New York Times.
Trump, she says, replied: ‘You’re right.’
The White House pointedly did not deny the exchange. Spokeswoman Anna Kelly instead offered a boilerplate response that Israel ‘has always been a great ally to the United States’ and that its military was an ‘incredible partner’ in Iran.
Even Loomer, the far-right firebrand who has made it her mission to purge MAGA of anyone who wavers on Israel, concedes there has been a marked shift in public opinion, notably among Republicans.
She went so far as to suggest Israel should accept the elimination of US military aid, currently a $38 billion 10-year package set to expire in 2028.
Facing skeptical questions from MAGA-aligned college students about US support for Israel, JD Vance recently suggested his support for Jerusalem is not unequivocal.
‘Israel, sometimes they have similar interests to the United States, and we’re going to work with them in that case. Sometimes, they don’t have similar interests,’ he said at the University of Mississippi in October.
That this is a top story this morning and that Laura Loomer is a significant part of it is amazing and also a deep sign of the times. She is a bizarre character to be speaking with the president of USA at all and also to be a center-piece of the apparent decline of Israel. All of this provides even more credence to this video and others like it from the Promethean group. ABN
We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.
The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.
The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:
Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.
Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.
Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.
“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.
This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.
Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.
We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.
The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.
Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.
A major flawin the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN
The day will come when AI can answer almost all of our questions.
I doubt it will be able to know on its own what questions we want to ask. In that respect, we will have knowledge or information AI does not have.
AI will also not know what we humans are going to ask each other or say to each other. And only a human interlocutor can answer a subjective question we ask them about themself.
Only humans have complex subjectivity which is difficult for us to figure out. AI may be able to help us with that to some degree.
But how will it help us with the complex subjectivity that exists between two or more humans?
With the help of some sort of brain monitoring device worn or embedded in a human, AI will have some calculable grasp on our subjectivity.
Would it ever be good enough to be a substitute for a human companion?
Is subjectivity anything else but confusion within the human system? Or is it a nonrational transient appraisal or measure of the system?
Subjectivity can be beautiful, ugly, inspiring, boring, intriguing, illusory.
FIML may wind up being the only thing humans can do that AI cannot do. ABN
American Buddhist Net 