When Canada becomes a platform for transnational networks to project coercion, intimidation, or violence outward, the country faces a sovereignty threat that deserves a name: reverse foreign interference.
Canada has spent years asking who is interfering inside its borders. Operation Hard Ball raises a harder question: who is using Canada to interfere, intimidate, or operate beyond them?
That is the core of reverse foreign interference. The term is not yet part of Canadian law, but it belongs in Canada’s national-security vocabulary. It describes cases in which transnational criminal, extremist, or digitally enabled networks use Canadian territory, legal protections, diaspora communities, transport routes, immigration systems, or digital space to target people, institutions, or foreign jurisdictions from Canadian soil.
The usual foreign-interference debate asks who is targeting Canada. Reverse foreign interference asks who is exploiting Canada as a platform.
That question now matters after Operation Hard Ball, the US-led crackdown against India-based organized crime networks operating across the United States, Canada, and Europe. For Canada, this is not simply a foreign gang case. It is a sovereignty warning.
Operation Hard Ball and the Canadian platform
Western Standardreported this week that an unsealed Los Angeles indictment accuses Indian gang leaders of ordering the 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar outside a Sikh temple in Surrey, British Columbia. The indictment marks the first formal US charging document to directly implicate Bishnoi gang leadership in the killing.
The wider US case is larger still. According to the US Department of Justice, prosecutors charged 37 defendants tied to three transnational criminal groups. The operation produced 24 arrests, including arrests in Canada, and involved accusations of assassination, murder, extortion, kidnapping, drug trafficking, human smuggling, weapons trafficking, and firearms offences.
Don’t call me racist, it’s not the color of your skin I object to. It’s your violent ideology, your savage culture, the way you behave. I’m tired of your loud, hateful, violent and obnoxious 3rd world ghetto behaviour. I’m not a racist, you’re a fucking animal.
This appears to be aimed at street-level migrant invaders, but my guess is Alix understands her statement applies even more to the elite SOBs who are forcing this invasion on us. ABN
An Italian translator who says he was ‘fired by the Vatican’ for his interpretation of the original Hebrew Bible has revealed a radical reinterpretation of what God in scripture really is.
Mauro Biglino pointed to the word ‘Elohim,’ found 2,570 times in the Holy Book, which translates to ‘God’ or, in his opinion, ‘Gods.’
Pointing out that Elohim is often treated as a singular name for God despite its plural form, he argued that the Bible describes multiple divine figures rather than one supreme being.
‘There are multiple divine figures, with different names of God,’ he said.
The word also appears throughout the Old Testament with both singular and plural verbs, which he says suggests it cannot always refer to a single deity.
One passage central to his theory is Psalm 82, where God appears to stand among other divine beings before declaring: ‘You are “gods”; you are all sons of the Most High.’ But you will die like mere mortals; you will fall like every other ruler.’
To Biglino, the passage describes an assembly of the Elohim rather than a lone, all-powerful God.
He argued it reflects a council of powerful beings, not a single divine ruler. Biblical scholar Michael S Heiser also interpreted Psalm 82 as describing a divine council, although he viewed its members as spiritual beings rather than extraterrestrials.
🚨 Here is the full 53 minutes of my crew and I exposing New York fraud, we uncovered over $190,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters use the elderly and needy to commit fraud through adult and personal home care scams in NYC. Your tax dollars are paying for elderly Koreans and… pic.twitter.com/9OiTL5p9zx
In the Whitehall II study, 6,538 adults without diabetes were tracked for years, and the researchers reconstructed the path of those who developed type 2 diabetes up to 13 years before diagnosis. Insulin sensitivity fell steeply over the five years before diagnosis. Fasting glucose stayed flat and only began its sharp climb about three years out, rising from 5.79 to 7.40 mmol/L. Beta-cell function actually rose first, the pancreas compensating, then collapsed as diagnosis closed in.
Glucose reads normal for years because insulin is quietly working overtime to hold it there. As tissues resist insulin, the pancreas pumps out more to keep the line. Fasting glucose is a lagging indicator: it only moves once the beta cells can’t keep up. Fasting insulin, or HOMA-IR, captures the compensation phase a glucose test misses entirely. By the time glucose crosses the diabetic threshold, the machinery has been straining for years.
Whitehall II was 71% male and 91% white, an occupational cohort, and the pattern can run faster in other populations, as the companion South Asian analysis showed. It’s observational, mapping natural history, not proof that measuring insulin earlier changes anything. Fasting insulin assays aren’t standardized, part of why it isn’t a routine test, and HOMA-IR is a surrogate, not a gold-standard clamp.
insulin resistance is measurable years before fasting glucose moves, so a normal glucose says little about the insulin behind it, and fasting insulin opens a much longer runway to catch dysglycemia early. However, that fasting insulin is a validated screening test with agreed cutoffs, or that acting on it sooner improves hard outcomes. The open question is whether routine fasting-insulin screening plus early intervention lowers diabetes incidence. That trial hasn’t been run.
1- iPhone messages don’t touch or overlap like they do here. There is a clear space between normal messages. Not here. 2- Look at the bottom message. The letters are way too large, even for all caps 3 – There are clear bubble overlaps. Look at bottom message. This is so bad. They need to get the actual phone records bc these are so fake it’s embarrassing.
BPPV is the most common cause of vertigo, and one of the most common things I see misdiagnosed. It can be diagnosed and treated in the office – but if you go to the hospital with “dizziness,” you’ll get a CT scan and a prescription for meclizine. Every ER doctor, neurologist and PCP needs to learn the Dix-hallpike and Epley maneuver!
NEW YORK (AP) — The former chief financial officer of The Epoch Times, a conservative multinational media company, interrupted jury selection at his money laundering trial on Thursday to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge in a $67 million fraud scheme.
Weidong “Bill” Guan, 63, of Secaucus, New Jersey, entered the plea in Manhattan federal court, admitting his participation in what prosecutors described as a scheme to launder fraudulently obtained unemployment benefits and other funds through the New York-based media company’s bank accounts and related entities.
The conspiracy charge relating to illegal financial transactions carries a potential prison sentence of up to 10 years in prison, but the deal with prosecutors spares him from the possibility that he would be convicted of other charges at trial and face the chance of more than a decade in prison.
When a significant portion of society loses trust in the police then that society is in serious trouble. In that direction lies the rise of protection rackets and the collapse of a unified society. This is precisely what has happened in the UK since 1999 and the MacPherson Report which accused the police of “institutional racism” based mainly on its mishandling of the murder of a Black teenager in London in 1993. Since 1999, the police have effectively been inculcated with the idea that their purpose is to protect ethnic minorities from the native population, that nothing is worse than “racism,” that any allegation of it must automatically be taken extremely seriously and that, in effect, the White man must be assumed to be guilty. It’s gone so far that I’ve now had my own run in with the UK police.
Two recent examples serve to illustrate the state of the British constabulary. In December 2025 in Southampton, a White student called Henry Nowak was stabbed by a Sikh. The Sikh then rang the police and dishonestly accused Nowak of having made racist remarks. When the police turned up, Nowak was lying on the ground bleeding to death. “I’ve been stabbed,” he mumbled. Such was the police’s contempt for him that the male officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate” before arresting him and even handcuffing him. The Sikh, who was ultimately convicted of murder, was at no point handcuffed, even when he was eventually arrested.
Film has emerged, taken in June in Birmingham, of a young White man being beaten up by a group of Blacks. The Blacks are seen dispersing as a young, short female police officer rushes in to attack the White man as he gets up from the ground. Clearly disorientated and not knowing it’s a police officer he strikes back, knocking off her hat. She arrests him, adding, “Walk to the fucking car, you dick!” The police initially denied that anything was wrong with this incident—before putting out another press release claiming that the arrestee had been the victim of an assault and they were now looking for the suspects, whom they’d permitted to run away.
If it wasn’t for members of the public filming these things, and putting them on Twitter, we would never know about this police corruption — this Two-Tier Policing, as it’s commonly termed — so it is no wonder that the British government is interested in restricting social media access under the pretence of protecting children from “harmful content.” Studies on the kinds of people who become police officers indicate that they are not very intelligent (their IQ is about average) and that they are relatively high in Narcissistic traits (which would predict their wanting power and authority over people).
One of the ways in which we can expect them to deal with their understandable insecurity about their intelligence and status is to proclaim that they are more “moral” than others; to take the current morality — Woke — and strongly believe it and signal it in order to reassure themselves that they matter. This is precisely what we see with the UK police. In the 1990s, they weren’t trusted by the Black minority and they were widely regarded as “racist.” This has now been completely reversed. They are an arm of the Woke Deep State and are not trusted by White people or, at least, not be politically conservative White people.
Decent article but too much emphasis on psychology of the police and presumed trepidation of the authorities above them, when a more inclusive analysis would include what appears to be happening all across Europe and the West — an anti-White, anti-Western replacement mass migration invasion. The invasion is literally an act of war with abundant corroborating evidence at every level of European policy. It’s not just a bunch of dumb cops and a mesmerized police force. It is terrible, deeply compromised European ‘leaders’ whose super-narcissistic psychologies are being manipulated through bribes, blackmail, flattery, and banishment if they refuse. ABN