Other levels could be added — performance, humor, recollection, story-telling, etc..
I believe a major value of religion is to expose and teach people how to speak and hear spiritual/profound speech.
That is a psycholinguistic core of most if not all religions. Religions are where most of us engage in spiritual/profound speech and where most of us learn it.
Consider an honest wholesome prayer as an example.
Buddhism engages spiritual/profound speech on many levels, but does not package any level as an absolute truth because the highest or deepest levels are not verbal and can only be experienced.
Religious profound speech leads us to experience the profundity of existence.
Remove all of the words and keep the experience and you have Buddhism.
Nawrocki argued that the state should not be allowed to decide what its citizens are permitted to say or think
Polish President Karol Nawrocki (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
WARSAW – Poland’s President Karol Nawrocki on Friday vetoed legislation meant to implement the EU’s Digital Services Act, despite the bill having been adopted by parliament at the end of 2025.
I agree with this. Jewish Supremacy is very real and profoundly destructive. It is an arrogant, self-declared enemy of both American Whites and American Blacks, and thus a natural cause for both groups of to unite against it. ABN
Using mathematics in a novel way in neuroscience, the Blue Brain Project shows that the brain operates on many dimensions, not just the three dimensions that we are accustomed to.
For most people, it is a stretch of the imagination to understand the world in four dimensions but a new study has discovered structures in the brain with up to eleven dimensions – ground-breaking work that is beginning to reveal the brain’s deepest architectural secrets.
Using algebraic topology in a way that it has never been used before in neuroscience, a team from the Blue Brain Project has uncovered a universe of multi-dimensional geometrical structures and spaces within the networks of the brain.
The research, published today in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience__, shows that these structures arise when a group of neurons forms a clique: each neuron connects to every other neuron in the group in a very specific way that generates a precise geometric object. The more neurons there are in a clique, the higher the dimension of the geometric object.
Topology in neuroscience: The image attempts to illustrate something that can not be imaged – a universe of multi-dimensional structures and spaces. On the left is a digital copy of a part of the neocortex, the most evolved part of the brain. On the right are shapes of different sizes and geometries in an attempt to represent structures ranging from 1D to 7D and beyond. The “black-hole” in the middle is used to symbolise a complex x of multi-dimensional spaces, or cavities. Courtesy of the Blue Brain Project
When the researchers presented the virtual brain tissue with a stimulus, cliques of progressively higher dimensions assembled momentarily to enclose high-dimensional holes, that the researchers refer to as cavities. “The appearance of high-dimensional cavities when the brain is processing information means that the neurons in the network react to stimuli in an extremely organized manner,” says Levi. “It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks, starting with rods (1D), then planks (2D), then cubes (3D), and then more complex geometries with 4D, 5D, etc. The progression of activity through the brain resembles a multi-dimensional sandcastle that materializes out of the sand and then disintegrates.”
Sent by an alert reader. This describes what probably happens when a FIML query interrupts a stimulus, thus preventing an erroneous interpretation, either habitual or just arising, to flourish in the mind. If the querier’s interpretation is correct, a FIML query will confirm that to the benefit of both partners. If it is incorrect, the wrong interpretation can be corrected, also to the benefit of both partners. Hundreds of FIML queries increasingly establish a very secure ground for communication and mutual psychological understanding. There is not another way to get there but through FIML practice. FIML will completely change how you understand human psychology because the practice is based on real-world, real-time objective (agreed upon by both partners) data. ABN
Hillary Clinton has furiously attacked a top Republican in a dispute over how her and her husband’s Jeffrey Epstein testimony will be recorded by Congress.
Bill and Hillary are set to testify on their relationship with the pedophile later this month before the House Oversight Committee.
Hillary on Thursday accused Oversight Chair James Comer, a Republican, of ‘moving the goalposts’, alleging that he is now demanding that the Clintons’ depositions – originally agreed to be held behind closed doors – be filmed as well as transcribed.
‘Let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it—in public,’ the former Secretary of State posted on X.
‘You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on. We will be there.’
The flight logs. The visitor records. The names that confirm what people suspected for years about certain islands and certain planes and certain parties where the guest list was curated for maximum leverage.
That’s what everyone’s combing through.
But there’s another list. It’s in the same three million files . It’s not hidden. It’s just less interesting to people who came looking for scandal.
The proposals.
The Edge Foundation was John Brockman’s intellectual salon. Annual gatherings of the world’s most influential scientific minds. Dinner parties where Nobel laureates met tech billionaires. Richard Dawkins. Lawrence Krauss. Steven Pinker. A contact sheet for people who shape the future without ever running for office.
Epstein funded Edge. But Edge wasn’t the operation.
Edge was the talent show.
You host dinners. You watch who’s brilliant. You note who’s ambitious, who’s frustrated by institutional constraints, who talks about what they’d do if funding weren’t an issue. Then you invite the interesting ones somewhere more private.
A jet. An island. A ranch in New Mexico.
The emails in the new files aren’t dinner invitations. They’re pitches.
August 2018 . A Bitcoin developer named Bryan Bishop writes to Epstein about “garage biology”. His plan to create the first human designer baby and possibly a human clone within five years. He outlines mouse testing at a lab in Ukraine, amateur human sperm work in Mississippi. He asks for one to three million dollars. He notes that once the first birth happens, “everything changes and the world will never be the same.”
Bishop discusses secrecy requirements. Anonymity about the babies would be essential. Identifying them publicly “would brand the child as a freak for life in the media.”
This wasn’t a grant application to the NIH.
December 2018. Robert Trivers, Harvard evolutionary biologist, writes to Epstein about hormone intervention in children. The subject line is “Trans.” The email discusses blocking testosterone receptors, increasing estrogen production. Trivers notes they’re “pushing the intervention earlier” and mentions identifying “trans tendencies” in children as young as three years old.
“I would be frightened to do that,” Trivers writes. “But who knows?”
December 2015. Epstein emails about designing a pig with non-cloven hoofs to make kosher bacon. Gene editing as intellectual amusement.
These aren’t academic discussions. They’re project updates sent to a man with funding, facilities, and reasons to keep everyone quiet.
The pattern emerges when you stop looking for the salacious details.
Wine and dine to identify the talent. Private invitations sorted who was willing to work outside institutional oversight. The islands and ranches and jets provided venues where proposals could be discussed without record. And the compromising situations that happened in those venues, the ones everyone’s reading about now, those weren’t the product.
They were the insurance policy.
You don’t fund off-books research with people who can walk away.
Alvi makes a very good point — Most people are not psychopaths lusting after power at any cost. Most of us want to be good and live wholesome, moral lives. The problem with this is most of us also do not develop enough global street-smarts to realize we are being robbed and destroyed at a societal level by peoples and cultures that do not share our humble values. ABN
The official narrative claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a bullet, but key details don’t add up. My analysis reveals an explosive device hidden in his RØDE Wireless microphone—likely a shaped charge with PETN. Here are the 4 pillars that shatter the official story.
Pillar 1: The Shirt Deformation
The shirt expands rapidly from an epicenter under the collar, mapped via modified pixel flow analysis. This happens in milliseconds, with smoke puffing from the front and back collar lifting away. Videos show shockwaves rippling through flesh—impossible for a distant bullet, but perfect for an internal blast. Inconsistent with official trajectory.
Pillar 2: The Posturing
Seconds after the event, decorticate posturing sets in: arms flexed, legs extended—classic sign of severe brain trauma or massive internal damage. A grazing bullet wouldn’t cause this instantly, but shockwaves from an explosive device can propagate through the body, directly injuring the brain via shear and stress waves, leading to concussion, hemorrhage, edema, and diffuse axonal injury without any penetration. Numerous cases from IED blasts in Iraq and Afghanistan wars document warfighters killed or severely injured by primary blast waves alone, with no external wounds. Official narrative can’t explain the speed or severity.
Pillar 3: The Shrapnel
Fragmentation is visible in multiple videos and photos: pieces falling from the shirt bottom, circuit board bits caught in the collar, and black shrapnel scattered in the SUV that transported him. Explosive residue transfers to the shirt. A bullet doesn’t produce widespread debris like this—only an exploding device does. Documented from stage to vehicle.
Pillar 4: The Necklace
The necklace snaps under the right collarbone, blasts up and around the back of the head, and lands resting on the left shoulder—seen hanging from his shirt en route to the SUV. Expansive gas from the detonation (8,000 m/s force) explains this trajectory. Official bullet story? No way it selectively snaps and flings a necklace like that.
Why These Pillars Matter Together
Individually odd; combined, undeniable. Shirt epicenter ties to mic location; posturing confirms internal lethality; shrapnel matches explosive fragmentation; necklace path traces blast force. Official narrative crumbles—no bullet explains all four. We need recreations with licensed experts to confirm. What are they hiding?
Many of the Epstein files are marred with redactions that should not be there. It’s possible the allegations in this note are not true and thus the name was redacted. It could also be that the redacted name married someone to big to fall. ABN
American Buddhist Net 