AG Merrick Garland Announces DAG Lisa Monaco Will Lead DOJ Effort to Frame Political Opposition as Domestic Terrorists, Equates January 6th DC Protest to 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing

The coordination of narrative engineering across all agencies of the U.S. government is quite remarkable. Today Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that Deputy AG Lisa Monaco (Obama crew) will lead a “whole of government” effort to label any political opposition to the Biden regime as “domestic terrorists”.

To facilitate that objective, Garland announced that DAG Monaco is reconstituting “the domestic terrorism executive committee“, an investigative agency process used in the aftermath of the Oklahoma bombing in 1995. Additionally, Garland is noting the January 6th Capitol Hill protest was the current equivalent of the 1995 bombing that killed 168 people and injured 680. The Domestic Terrorism committee, led by Monaco, will focus their efforts at ensuring the center of U.S. government is never again put at risk.

continue reading…

“Notice where their power to demand these things come from…”

From here, “ExxonMobil’s Neglected Shareholders” : “Larry Fink, Blackrock’s billionaire CEO who oversees $8.7 trillion in investors’ assets, demands that all companies focus on “the transition to a net zero economy – one that emits no more carbon dioxide than it removes from the atmosphere by 2050, the scientifically-established threshold necessary to keep global warming well below 2ºC.” As members of the Climate Action 100+ group, Vanguard and State Street echo these sentiments.” Notice where their power to demand these things come from – your pension funds (probably invested with them), your bank balances (probably invested with them), other people’s investments with them, and so on. Cabal probably rigs the market to get them a return above average, and in return, everyone gives their money to them. They then use the money to create a voice to drive Cabal policies, and additionally, the situation renders all those people who gave them money voice-less.


Who controls the investments?

An article on Blackrock buying up houses, which segues into how institutional investors take people’s money to invest, and then use it as leverage for control. So you want to buy some Coke stock, or your pension fund decides to pick it up. Suddenly Coke goes woke, at risk of damaging the company. But shareholders can’t bitch, because everyone who bought in did so through Blackrock or Vanguard, and if Blackrock and Vanguard don’t complain, there is no pushback on the corporation’s self-destructive woke posturing. So those institutional investors are taking your money and using it to support leftism in culture. I found it interesting, as I never realized institutional investors may have been created as a means of transferring investor control over the actions of companies to whoever runs the institution, or rather whoever appointed them. Nobody whose money is being used has any say. What I don’t understand is how a competing company does not spontaneously arise, and whether that is just an aspect of their control of the media and other companies like NFL and NBA, of if there might be a deeper level of control.


Indian paper published in January 2020 showing unique and “unconventional evolution” of covid-19

Despite its restrained wording, this study strongly indicated a laboratory origin of covid-19. It came out in January 2020 but was quickly memory-holed by MSM, govt agencies, and mainstream Western science. Taken together with recently released Fauci emails from that time period, we can see that US scientists knew of the probable lab origin of the virus in early 2020 but said nothing publicly. That can mean they knew or suspected several things: either the virus escaped or was deliberately released; either it was released by China, the USA, or someone else. Was Fauci covering his own role in the creation of covid or was he covering for China? I have long tended to believe a deliberate release of covid by China following their loss of the trade war to Trump is the most likely explanation. But after more than a year of very bad US policy on covid, I have gradually begun to consider more seriously that US and/or Western actors played a central, nefarious role in starting the pandemic.


Our analysis of the spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV revealed several interesting findings: First, we identified 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein that are not present in any other coronavirus reported till date. To our surprise, all the 4 inserts in the 2019-nCoV mapped to short segments of amino acids in the HIV-1 gp120 and Gag among all annotated virus proteins in the NCBI database. This uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous. Further, 3D modelling suggests that atleast 3 of the unique inserts which are non-contiguous in the primary protein sequence of the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein converge to constitute the key components of the receptor binding site. Of note, all the 4 inserts have pI values of around 10 that may facilitate virus-host interactions. Taken together, our findings suggest unconventional evolution of 2019-nCoV that warrants further investigation. Our work highlights novel evolutionary aspects of the 2019-nCoV and has implications on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of this virus.

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Lockdowns: “…the central most pernicious thing that came out of the Chinese experience with this.”

As the world begins to take seriously the idea that covid is a bioweapon that came from the Wuhan Biolab, we should also begin to take seriously the idea that vivid news and film of strict lockdowns in China last winter was a Chinese psyop deliberately enacted to fool the West (and world). A worse possibility, which must also be considered, is Western elites deliberately seized the opportunity to lockdown their societies in order to gain more power; recall that lockdowns produced the largest transfer of wealth into elite hands in world history. Another possibility to consider is that covid was deliberately used as a bioweapon by China or Western elites or rogue operators. On this site, I have mentioned all possibilities for over a year. The lack of covid and bioweapon information in MSM and Big Tech during this whole time period is solid proof, incontrovertible proof, that they are propaganda outlets and little more. The Western response to covid, I don’t mind saying, is very suspicious and lends credence to the idea that the bioweapon attack was begun by the West or that Western powers somehow colluded with China or went along with circumstances. We are faced with a Bayesian pie with many probability slices. I tend to weigh covid being a bioweapon from Wuhan, either deliberate or escaped, as the largest slice. But without question there are other possibilities.

The accident hypothesis is hard to believe


I love these voice of the people posts. Cuts to the chase and makes more sense than the NYT or US health agencies. I would add that there is mounting evidence that China and its neighbors had covid or a precursor of it in 2018-19, maybe sooner; another version of this is much of the world had it. This hypothesis explains China’s very low covid mortality and infection rates. It also explains why so many people elsewhere, including USA, have prior immunity to covid.

That said, statistics from China are generally never true and never can be relied on. They may have had much larger mortality and death rates. Another way to look at this is China did a planned release of covid or similar in 2018-19 to inoculate their population before releasing covid-19 in fall of 2019.

The truth about Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

While more revelations about the Bill Gates–Jeffrey Epstein relationship have begun trickling out following the Gates’s divorce announcement, the strong evidence pointing to their relationship beginning decades prior to 2011 continues to be covered up by the media—not necessarily to protect Bill but to protect Microsoft.

The Cover-Up Continues: The Truth About Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

End of the road for Dorky’s Section 230 free ride?

Because Dr. Ayyadurai did not argue about Twitter’s “Terms of Service” everything will instead hinge on the degree of interaction between Twitter and the state government of Massachusetts. 

And according to Dr. Ayyadurai, those links have already been proven in testimony, since Twitter has built a special portal offered to certain governmental entities so that government officials can flag and delete content they dislike for any reason, as part of what they call “Twitter Partner Status.”

This sets the stage for this court asking whether CDA 230 can be used to violate someone’s civil rights by letting the government do something via a private company that it could not otherwise do: silence their political speech.

Federal Judge Moves to End Twitter’s Immunity in Censoring Content