Many have taken for granted that research in Sweden is free. So did the research doctor Kristina Sundquist – until she became the subject of a criminal investigation for having conducted prohibited research on who commits rape in Sweden. After living with a criminal stamp on him for two years, the investigation is now closed. However, Sundquist does not receive any apology or compensation for how she was affected.
Kristina Sundquist is a doctor in general medicine. By chance, she discovered in connection with a research project that there is a large over-representation of migrants as perpetrators of rape and chose to draw attention to this. She wouldn’t have done that.
The fact that this information was not withheld was not looked upon with kindly eyes higher up in the research world. The Appeals Board for Ethics Review (Önep) decided on its own initiative to report Sundquist for “unethical” research and thus put an end to it.
“Not permission” to research
According to the report, Sundquist “did not have permission” to mention such things in his research and the case was handed over to prosecutors for criminal investigation. For two years, she has been forced to live with a degrading criminal label on her in the world of research, with the consequences for her career.
But now the yoke is lifted from Sundquist’s shoulders, at least partially, when Eva-Marie Persson, chief prosecutor at the Public Prosecutor’s Office’s development centre, announces that the investigation is closed. However, this does not happen because it has been concluded that it is not possible to prove that Sundquist committed any crime.
The reason is instead that the prescription period has expired. This means that Sundquist will never be completely washed clean and receive redress. This may mean that she may also find it difficult to conduct research in the future.
link
The original article is in Swedish. The excerpt above is from a Google translation of the article. This kind of repressive official behavior (even in the sciences) is due to centuries of clan-busting policies first from Catholics and then other Christians. The result is a society incapable of understanding most of the rest of the world which is societally clan-based. Western peoples are for the most part incapable of defending themselves against clan-based aggression, infiltration, takeover, domination. You can see for yourself how bad this situation is by simply raising this topic within a group of Westerners. Chances are you will be socially censured immediately and ostracized if you repeat the behavior. Just as clannishness has been ingrained into most human beings for tens or thousands of years, so clannishness has been extirpated from Westerners who now react violently against it. Shows that cultural conditioning is a big deal. At the bottom somewhere is a strong instinct. ABN
You must be logged in to post a comment.