Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan appeared on Capitol Hill to request a ten percent increase in Supreme Court budget spending. The intent is to hire additional security to protect themselves from the outcome of their rulings.
Justice Barrett talked about the harrowing threats to herself and her family as the Court wants to bolster security. The overall appearance before congress is slightly ironic considering the increase in threats is a direct consequence of court rulings that have opened borders, blocked deportation, stalled law enforcement, granted illegal aliens rights to citizenship and generally undermined our nation’s domestic tranquility.
Sorry, but my opinion on the matter has adjusted to new information. The Supreme Court should have to live in the reality of the world they judicially create. No additional public security should be afforded. They have a security detail that supersedes any security level a taxpaying American citizen might be afforded.
No expanded security details should be afforded to government employees, just to avoid the consequences of their ideology.
Mrs Barrett and her family can carry self-defense firearms, wear protective vests and worry about their security in the parking lot of the local supermarket just like we do. Not to be obtuse, but the Constitution equally applies.
This is a controversial opinion and I am not sure I agree with it. Barrett has been a self-imploding disaster on the court. She appears to have deeply misrepresented her ‘conservative’ legal beliefs and values before her appointment, and has ruled disgracefully many times since. Her ruling on birthright citizenship is absurd. I would love to see her resign in disgrace and be replaced with a judge who will do what Barrett appeared to have promised. That said, I do not want to see her killed or her family terrorized. Her rulings have, indeed, brought terror to many Americans, but still. And that said, how can she possibly not understand the danger she has brought to USA? Maybe Sundance is right, maybe not. Barrett should feel the frightening weight of her bad decisions along with the weight of her immoral presentation of herself before being appointed. Bottom line, it is probably good Sundance and others oppose providing her with more security even if some of us don’t. Too many in government are living in elite bubbles and spiritual vacuums. ABN
I do not know anything about this site but am seeing it recommended by people I trust. Worth a look if you need an excuse to prevent harming yourself or loved ones due to some ignorant boob overseeing something they are incapable of understanding. Supposed to cover all 50 USA states for vax exemptions. I hope this means for children too. ABN
This ladies and gentlemen is a war for you mind ~ Candace
UPDATE: Whether you are new to this series or have been following it all along, this episode is of major importance because it short-circuits the mind-control fraud that (paid for) reportage on this hearing is overwhelmingly filled with. We are watching a psyop in real-time along with real-time debunking of that psyop. ABN
1- iPhone messages don’t touch or overlap like they do here. There is a clear space between normal messages. Not here. 2- Look at the bottom message. The letters are way too large, even for all caps 3 – There are clear bubble overlaps. Look at bottom message. This is so bad. They need to get the actual phone records bc these are so fake it’s embarrassing.
When a significant portion of society loses trust in the police then that society is in serious trouble. In that direction lies the rise of protection rackets and the collapse of a unified society. This is precisely what has happened in the UK since 1999 and the MacPherson Report which accused the police of “institutional racism” based mainly on its mishandling of the murder of a Black teenager in London in 1993. Since 1999, the police have effectively been inculcated with the idea that their purpose is to protect ethnic minorities from the native population, that nothing is worse than “racism,” that any allegation of it must automatically be taken extremely seriously and that, in effect, the White man must be assumed to be guilty. It’s gone so far that I’ve now had my own run in with the UK police.
Two recent examples serve to illustrate the state of the British constabulary. In December 2025 in Southampton, a White student called Henry Nowak was stabbed by a Sikh. The Sikh then rang the police and dishonestly accused Nowak of having made racist remarks. When the police turned up, Nowak was lying on the ground bleeding to death. “I’ve been stabbed,” he mumbled. Such was the police’s contempt for him that the male officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate” before arresting him and even handcuffing him. The Sikh, who was ultimately convicted of murder, was at no point handcuffed, even when he was eventually arrested.
Film has emerged, taken in June in Birmingham, of a young White man being beaten up by a group of Blacks. The Blacks are seen dispersing as a young, short female police officer rushes in to attack the White man as he gets up from the ground. Clearly disorientated and not knowing it’s a police officer he strikes back, knocking off her hat. She arrests him, adding, “Walk to the fucking car, you dick!” The police initially denied that anything was wrong with this incident—before putting out another press release claiming that the arrestee had been the victim of an assault and they were now looking for the suspects, whom they’d permitted to run away.
If it wasn’t for members of the public filming these things, and putting them on Twitter, we would never know about this police corruption — this Two-Tier Policing, as it’s commonly termed — so it is no wonder that the British government is interested in restricting social media access under the pretence of protecting children from “harmful content.” Studies on the kinds of people who become police officers indicate that they are not very intelligent (their IQ is about average) and that they are relatively high in Narcissistic traits (which would predict their wanting power and authority over people).
One of the ways in which we can expect them to deal with their understandable insecurity about their intelligence and status is to proclaim that they are more “moral” than others; to take the current morality — Woke — and strongly believe it and signal it in order to reassure themselves that they matter. This is precisely what we see with the UK police. In the 1990s, they weren’t trusted by the Black minority and they were widely regarded as “racist.” This has now been completely reversed. They are an arm of the Woke Deep State and are not trusted by White people or, at least, not be politically conservative White people.
Decent article but too much emphasis on psychology of the police and presumed trepidation of the authorities above them, when a more inclusive analysis would include what appears to be happening all across Europe and the West — an anti-White, anti-Western replacement mass migration invasion. The invasion is literally an act of war with abundant corroborating evidence at every level of European policy. It’s not just a bunch of dumb cops and a mesmerized police force. It is terrible, deeply compromised European ‘leaders’ whose super-narcissistic psychologies are being manipulated through bribes, blackmail, flattery, and banishment if they refuse. ABN
Early one Saturday morning, career criminal Alexander Dickey, a thug with nearly 40 prior charges and a rap sheet full of felonies, breaks into the home at 3 a.m.
He steals a gun, walks into the room where Logan is, and shoots her in the chest while she’s on her knees begging for her life.
Then he keeps going on his little crime spree.
Zero national outrage. Media is completely silent. No wall-to-wall coverage. No protests. Nothing.
Because the victim was a beautiful young White woman and the killer is Black. That doesn’t fit the script.
This is what happens when you let violent predators out over and over again.
Soft-on-crime policies and a broken system that protects the animals instead of the innocent.
Her father is fighting like hell in Congress so Logan’s name isn’t forgotten. We should all be doing the same.
RIP Logan Federico. These pieces of garbage need to be locked up for good. No more second chances.
‘We would be opening up the possibility of Israel having influence over a $1.5 TRILLION annual budget.’
I have not yet watched this but the very idea strikes me as treasonous. ABN
UPDATE: I watched the first half. The bill is as bad as you can imagine. It’s an American Nightmare. The talk declines into predictable lachrymose moralizing, so I stopped watching. If this bill passes, adios USA. ABN
This independent journalist shows up at a public office building with a legal freedom of information request. He finds himself surrounded by seven or eight cops asking him to leave for no reason.. he’s not broken any laws.. There’s a lot of back-and-forth here, and it may sound redundant, but he is brilliantly, politely, and assertively making his case. He systematically disarmed all of them with his knowledge of the law. We all need to be more like this guy, and PS this has a very satisfying ending.
This is an interesting video. It’s a particularly well-done version of this genre, which most of us have seen before. It’s very good when citizens do stuff like this politely, forcefully, correctly and successfully. I hope the supervisor watches this video many times and learns deep lessons from it. Few citizens are strong enough or knowledgeable enough to pull this off while facing eight cops, so it’s great when someone does it and films all of it for everyone to see. ABN
Alexander Hamilton’s Secret Jewish Family, Patrons and Mission
Image: Summary of the article emphasizing the banking and geopolitical aspects of the American Revolution.
Thesis: Alexander Hamilton served as a crypto-Jewish instrument of the Jewish Franks dynasty in the long-term Jewish “master plan” of transforming America into the philosemitic safe haven and power center of the diaspora through the creation of the American central bank.
Introduction
With the 250-year celebration of America’s independence, interest in the Founding Fathers has greatly increased. However, there is one taboo that has stood the test of those 250 years: Alexander Hamilton’s possible Jewishness and the Jewish origins of the American Revolution and USA. This topic is still often treated as a “Nazi conspiracy theory.” However, perhaps understanding American history requires looking through the lenses of both liberty and ethnicity.
The Austro-Libertarian economist and historian Murray Rothbard famously argued that America was conceived in liberty.
This new frontier emerged largely unburdened by government taxes and monopolistic regulations, setting the stage for a vigorous intellectual contest between proponents of small and big government.[2] This ideological struggle has been vividly embodied by two opposite Founding Fathers: Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. This intellectual divide has also manifested among historians, with advocates of expansive government championing Hamilton, while defenders of limited government extol Jefferson.[3]
Both camps agree that Hamilton was the architect of the U.S. government and financial system, yet they evaluate his legacy in diametrically opposed ways.
A group of feral [black] teenagers were caught on camera assaulting a female police officer at a Fourth of July event.
The horrific footage of the brutal assault emerged following a block party in North Charleston, South Carolina, on Saturday night.
The officer was seen being punched in the face by a female while a young man held her down, before another woman attacked her with what looked like a baton.
Another officer managed to intervene as the officer is dragged away, by pushing the woman with the baton to the ground and grabbing another of the teens.
He then resorted to using his taser which caused the horde of teens assaulting the officer to flee.
The officer was seen being punched in the face by a female while a young man held her down, before another woman attacked her with what looked like a baton
…Mark Jungers, a former Major Lindsey managing partner, told Politico that the firm hired Mrs. Roberts because it hoped to benefit from her being married to the Chief Justice, observing that her network was his network and vice versa.
He later assured Business Insider that he never saw her use the connection inappropriately, and of course he did. He is a recruiting executive protecting the industry’s most famous hire, and his denial is precisely what a denial would sound like whether or not it were true. The admission that matters is the first one. The market priced her marriage. Sophisticated law firms understood that hiring through the Chief Justice’s wife purchased something, and whether that something was influence or merely the appearance of access is beside the point, because federal ethics rules exist precisely to police the appearance. They captured none of it.
…John Roberts has done almost nothing wrong, and that is the problem. The rules let the money in, kept the names out, kept the amounts secret, and asked nothing when the forms proved incomplete. A system that a careful man can satisfy while the public learns nothing is not an ethics regime. It is camouflage, and it is a legal architecture for buying proximity to a lifetime appointee. Congress should change the rules, and conservatives should hold the pen.
American Buddhist Net 