The EXPLOSION of lifelong allergies in our kids: ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS in VACCINES.
Aluminum doesn’t “boost” immunity — it provokes a permanent allergic response to ANY protein it’s injected with.
Vaccines are loaded with proteins from:
Egg
Beef
Pork
Dairy (casein)
Mix those with ALUMINUM… and you get lifelong allergies to those exact foods.
They’ve even done it deliberately in labs: aluminum from the Hep B vaccine + latex molecule = rats with permanent latex allergy. Same with peanuts, dairy — you name it.
Even worse? Whatever is floating in the environment the day your child gets the shot becomes a lifelong trigger. Pollen. Dust. Mold. Pet dander. Peanut particles in the air. It doesn’t matter. Aluminum locks it in.
This is why we suddenly have a generation of kids allergic to everything. The studies RFK Jr. cites show vaccinated kids have 30X higher rates of allergic rhinitis. The food allergy epidemic tracks exactly with the rollout of aluminum-containing shots.
We’ve been conducting a massive, uncontrolled experiment on our children — and the result is an entire generation hooked on EpiPens, inhalers, and avoidance diets.
If you are still pro-vaccine, you are anti-science because the truth is out.
The allergy explosion isn’t random. It was engineered into the shots.
Until the concept of reuptake inhibition is recognized fundamentally as propaganda instead of science, no one is going to understand why these drugs cause birth defects and alterations to fetal brain development or why they stop you from being able to feel your genitals and nipples or why tapering from long-term use causes catastrophic new-onset syndromes that have little to do with why anyone took them in the first place.
Serotonin was first named “enteramine” in 1935 meaning “an amino acid derivative present in the gut.”
It was named “serotonin” in 1948, meaning “substance in the blood (sero- for serum) that increases vasoconstriction (-tonin for vascular tone).
In 1952, it was established that entermaine and serotonin were the same compound.
Had serotonin research not been completely perverted by Pharma, it would have become rapidly apparent that these are deeply connected: serotonin’s one role in the entire body is to coordinate mitochondrial function in response to variation in the supply and demand of oxygen. It regulates motility in the gut to prevent local hypoxia. It coordinates blood flow to maximize efficiency of oxygen delivery.
But when SSRIs were released in 1986, Pharma solidified the destruction of these lines of inquiry by selecting a thread started by the influence of LSD in the 1950s that claimed serotonin was a lever to be pulled to manipulate the state of the brain.
The “R” in SSRIs is an insidious lie.
It implies that SSRIs specifically inhibit “reuptake” of serotonin, a phenomenon only relevant to the first neuron of a synapse.
This created the total mythology that the one thing they do is keep serotonin in the synapse longer to have greater activity on the receiving neuron.
They knew this was false.
They knew these are generic inhibitors of the serotonin transporter, which is not primarily found in the brain and is not primarily found in neurons.
Its has tremendous expression in the gut, lungs, and reproductive organs.
It’s found inside cells, most likely mediating the established direct transport of serotonin into mitochondria.
On a cellular basis the highest expression is in enterocytes, not in enteric neurons, and in the placenta.
The word “SSRI” is pure propaganda meant to cut out almost all of the relevant serotonin research in the way that Stalin cut out Trotsky from all the pictures of the two of them with Lenin to paint himself as Lenin’s true successor.
They are “serotonin transporter inhibitors.”
Until the concept of reuptake inhibition is recognized fundamentally as propaganda instead of science, no one is going to understand why these drugs cause birth defects and alterations to fetal brain development or why they stop you from being able to feel your genitals and nipples or why tapering from long-term use causes catastrophic new-onset syndromes that have little to do with why anyone took them in the first place.
This article is misleading and is dangerous to infants.
It ignores the hazards of injecting newborns with toxins such as propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, benzyl alcohol and highly neurotoxic aluminum in vitamin K shots given hours after birth.
It fails to acknowledge the high vitamin K in colostrum, available to infants as soon as born, the earliest breast milk.
It fails to acknowledge much safer vitamin K orally to the mother within the days before birth.
Blood needs to be thinner at birth, and cord-cutting needs to be delayed a few minutes so blood shunted back to the placenta in birth canal can return to the infant with the infant’s own stem cells for lifelong benefit.
But pharma-allied Pro Publica hides all that in their shameful and dangerous propaganda piece, because there is huge $$ for stealing cord blood and placenta from mother and baby, to sell for profit to the “anti-aging” industry.
Newborns come into the world with LOW vitamin K on purpose — it’s not a flaw.
Cord blood is loaded with stem cells meant to repair the stress of birth, and thin blood lets those stem cells travel exactly where they’re needed.
Then nature delivers the perfect dose: colostrum — rich in natural vitamin K, given orally, slow and gentle.
Instead, we cut the cord early (stealing up to 30% of baby’s blood volume) and inject synthetic vitamin K packed with polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol, and sometimes aluminum… straight into an immune system that’s barely online.
Why are we “fixing” a system that was perfectly designed?
Think about it before you consent. Nature already had the plan.
Rather than treat his mental illness, they told him he was a woman. This is the weaponry of psychological warfare, mind-control and the poisoning of USA and the West. MKULTRA, JSULTRA, PSYCHOULTRA; we are living it and dying from it. ABN
Jesse shot 35 innocent people yesterday including his mother, sister, a teacher & young children.
10 are dead & many are fighting for their lives.
The Government decided that instead of supporting Jesse’s mental health & helping a disturbed child that they would tell Jesse that he was a girl & pump him full of cross sex hormones & SSRI’s instead.
The Government, its institutions & agencies KNEW that Jesse was a mentally unwell, disturbed individual, that he was a danger to himself & others but allowed him to remain out in the community & continued encouraging his delusions & they intentionally poisoned his mind & body.
All across the West we are surrounded by mentally ill people that are dangerous to society, we are surrounded by violent criminals & predators.
In addition to all of the problems Whitaker describes in the linked article—failed diagnostics, failed theories, failed “disease models,” failed treatments, making matters worse for the mentally ill, and drugging children and minors without their consent—I would further submit that our generally accepted model of the human mind itself is as deeply flawed.
Rather than starting with the idea that humans have or develop personalities that do or don’t adapt well to some ambiguous social standard, we would do better to start with the idea that humans are fundamentally interactive beings, beings that communicate.
If our interactions are good, we will be well enough. If our communications with even one other person are deeply satisfying and as truthful as we are able, we will be even better than well enough.
People go crazy because their relations to no one are satisfying. In a very real sense, poor communication and shallow interaction condemn most humans to a sort of solitary confinement, where the inner network of semiotic reality cannot interface satisfactorily with the network of any other person’s semiotic reality.
For individuals who are fortunate enough to have a suitable partner, FIML practice will likely fix this problem while also fixing most emotional dissatisfaction. It accomplishes this by providing a means for people to fully engage their inner semiotic networks with each other.
The dead end of the traditional mental health model of a “personality-being-well-adapted-to-a-group-or-culture” is, sadly, best illustrated by the profession of psychiatry itself. I believe Whitaker is right in saying that
… it is going to be so hard for psychiatry to reform. Diagnosis and the prescribing of drugs constitute the main function of psychiatrists today in our society. From a guild perspective, the profession needs to maintain the public’s belief in the value of that function. So I don’t believe it will be possible for psychiatry to change unless it identifies a new function that would be marketable, so to speak. Psychiatry needs to identify a change that would be consistent with its interests as a guild.
If even psychiatry as a group needs to “identify a change… consistent with its interests as a guild,” it is clear that groups cannot be taken as a standard for wellness.
If even a group of doctors of the mind cannot get it right, how can any other group be expected to?
And if groups cannot, neither can cultures. And if none of that is right, neither is the notion of a “personality” that “adapts” to those vague standards.
This is an important point: groups can be and are just as crazy as individuals. In fact, many groups are crazier than individuals. The idea that people have “personalities” that must “adapt” in a way that is “satisfying” to an extremely dubious group standard is bankrupt and cannot be fixed. Of course individuals can adapt to laws and clearly stated mores and taboos, but adaptations based on such emotionally unsatisfying generalities will never produce wellness.
The individual can only be well when the individual can communicate their authentic semiotic reality with another, and in turn, receive similar communication from that other.
Semiotics is the right word to use here because its definition includes communicative signs and the meanings of those signs as they are variously interpreted by the individuals using them. Furthermore, the term semiotics implies, or necessarily extends to, networks of communicative signs and their inevitably differing individual interpretations.
Bill Gates has called for a “strategic pivot” in the effort against the climate crisis, writing that the world should shift away from trying to limit rising temperatures to instead focusing on efforts to prevent disease and poverty.
Writing on his Gates Notes website, the billionaire Microsoft co-founder criticized what he described as a “doomsday view of climate change” which is focusing “too much on near-term emissions goals”.
Gates’s memo comes a day after the UN said humanity had missed its target of limiting global heating to 1.5C, with the UN secretary general warning of “devastating consequences” for the world.
American Buddhist Net 