This image was used on a social anxiety site to illustrate what it says. My take on it is virtually everyone in the world is like this if you expand social anxiety to mean inner confusion.
Under current worldwide social norms, inner confusion reigns because there is no way for individuals to communicate with profound authenticity, no way to connect on authentic levels. The closest most people can get is shared ideals, shared vows, shared beliefs, all mere pale shadows of true authenticity.
Those who lack profound authentic communication must needs necessarily also lack authentic self-knowledge. You cannot know thyself all alone. You must be able to communicate it, communicate with it, interact with it to know it. And you must be able to do this with a knowing other who is doing the same with you. This is so because our psychologies are based on interpersonal communication. There is no other way.
FIML practice can correct virtually all interpersonal communication problems between two people. FIML optimizes interpersonal communication and by so doing optimizes self-knowledge as well.
Motivated reasoning means reasoning to gain. Speaking to effect means speaking to cause something.
Both are the most common forms of thought and speech for all people with few exceptions.
Speaking to effect and motivated reasoning maintain personas.
Because it is difficult to tell truths and because trying to do so brings calamity, we don’t. We narrow thought instead; our voices dull faceless muffled sounds with no meaning.
This is the tone and timbre of samsara, the feeling of group delusion, the Suffering of the First Noble Truth.
Surely it’s in the top few.
In the Buddhist tradition, shame is sometimes called the greatest emotion because shame makes us open to changing for the better.
But shame can also be felt and avoided or hidden or misdirected. Shame here generally means something bothers our conscience.
Correcting our own mistakes often follows shame but not always. Someone may tell us of a mistake that does not make us feel ashamed.
Taking pleasure, even delight, in correcting our own mistakes is very close in time and psychology to actually making the correction.
Whether it is the greatest or not, the emotion that accompanies self-correction is well-worth cultivating.
Would she allow sixth graders to walk out in favor of the Second Amendment? Will this father’s son suffer at school because his dad confronted the principal? Why doesn’t the principal give a straight answer to a simple question?
Do reclusive and monastic religious practices foster wisdom about the human condition?
A new study indicates that they may.
Insights into social psychological phenomena have been thought of as solely attainable through empirical research. Our findings, however, indicate that some lay individuals can reliably judge established social psychological phenomena without any experience in social psychology. These results raise the striking possibility that certain individuals can predict the accuracy of unexplored social psychological phenomena better than others. (Social Psychological Skill and Its Correlates)
In an article about this study, its authors say that introverted people tend to be better at observing others because they are good at introspection and have fewer motivational biases. Here’s that article: Yale Study: Sad, Lonely Introverts Are Natural Born Social Psychologists.
Did his father, Śuddhodana, in shielding him from knowledge of suffering effectively gaslight his son?
And did his son by freeing himself from the illusions of his father’s palace further realize that all human beings live in delusion?
And is his enlightenment then an ultimate sublimation of the original illusions of his childhood and youth?
The answers can all be yes without demeaning the Buddha in any way. Indeed, we can see in this how profoundly human he was and how much he was able to do with the conditions he had.