‘If HCQ did not work, these governments and these people wouldn’t care… They actually took illegal actions to prevent people from receiving HCQ’ — Dr Peter McCullough

FDA Finds Evidence of Serious Safety Signal for COVID Vaccines in Young Kids — Says It Proves Shots Are ‘Safe’

Children ages 12 to 17 who received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine face a heightened risk of heart inflammation, according to a new U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study.

But because the study only identified a safety signal for two heart conditions — myocarditis and pericarditis — in children “these results provide additional evidence for the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in the pediatric population,” FDA researchers concluded.

Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said he disagreed. “My concern is that these data represent a gross under-reporting of the frequency and severity of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis,” McCullough told The Epoch Times.

“There have been > 200 papers in the peer-reviewed literature and over 100 fatal documented cases largely among young men, peak ages 18-24 years, some with autopsy-proven COVID-19 vaccine heart inflammation resulting in death,” McCullough added.

In the study, published Monday in JAMA Pediatrics, FDA researchers examined health outcomes in more than 3 million children who received the Pfizer mRNA vaccine through mid-2022.


2+2 = 5. ABN

Astronomical autism rate increase still uninvestigated by government authorities and academic institutions

Since NIH refuses to investigate this or fund research, I believe we should assume childhood vaccines are a major cause if not the only cause of astronomical autism rate increases. Lack of governmental concern and fear among academics of even looking into this is a clear sign of knowing where not to look. Add to this the horrid anti-science of the covid response and we have even more reason to believe govt authorities and academics have been bought off and/or are afraid to look at the evidence. ABN

Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers

We’ve been tracking retractions of papers about COVID-19 as part of our database. Here’s a running list, which will be updated as needed. (For some context on these figures, see this post, our letter in Accountability in Research and the last section of this Nature news article. Also see a note about the terminology regarding preprint servers at the end.)


Retraction of a published paper from a journal is its removal from the journal.  It is typically done after findings of malfeasance, such as fabrication of data, substantial plagiarism, etc.  However, in the era of COVID-19, retractions have taken on a new (or perhaps previously hidden) politically-driven dimension.  Papers of high technical quality have been retracted if they question the government-industry approach to the treatment of COVID-19, and especially adverse effects resulting from the COVID-19 “vaccines”.


Retracting or ‘disappearing’ scientific papers based on a vax agenda is anti-science. This is a form of psycholinguistic control of individuals and society at large. I want to emphasize how words are being used to defeat reason, science, a healthy society. Fighting words like the R-word or N-word are used to rile crowds and individuals. Sciencey words are used to justify proscriptions on speech and research while also signaling individual scientists that disobeying will mean loss of credentials. These are forms of mind-control leading to chaos and takeover of the nation. The only way out is reasonable government based on rational laws enforced by well-trained police—a very tall order in today’s USA & West & world. ABN