Covid may have been an accidental release of a bioweapon in 2017 in China or it may have been deliberate. In either case, Chinese and neighboring populations were largely inoculated (80%) against covid by this early release, while other parts of the world were less inoculated (30-50%) though they also had early exposure to the virus. This hypothesis is supported by “flu” data from 2017-2019 which shows a marked increase during those years in the green areas in the map above. ABN
South Korea is in their 4th year of something which is killing 65+ yr-olds faster. But I am 100% sure it's not Covid, because it can't be Covid, therefore it is not Covid.
Except that it is Covid after Feb 2020, but before that it is the well-known-but-mysterious 65sulp virus.
The Ethical Skeptic has much more on this hypothesis here: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018. A deeply sinister interpretation of this is China deliberately released covid or something similar in 2017 to inoculate its population for their planned 2019 release of covid19. A less sinister but also nasty interpretation is covid or something similar escaped from the Wuhan lab in 2017 and China allowed it to adventitiously inoculate its population, a circumstance they used in 2019 with full release of the bioweapon. Another possibility is they simply concealed the (accidental or deliberate) release of covid in 2017 and then did psyop theater on the world in 2020 causing everyone else to panic. A very important unanswered question is why has the West reacted to covid in such a stupid and self-destructive manner? Have we become weak, a hill of mediocrities that has grown rotten over many decades? Or is the West itself deeply sinister and is using covid to subdue the world by first enervating Western societies?
The above is part of a larger site by mathematician Kathy Dopp found here: Compilation of Scientific and Medical Research, Data, and Reports.
These links are well-worth reviewing and saving as Dopp has collected a wealth of information. ABN
[Everything below this bracket is an excerpt from: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018 ABN]
How do we infer that the Chinese Communist Party both reacted to and concealed the existence of SARS-CoV-2 as far back as March 2018? There is a critical path of query and dependency necessary and sufficient in prosecuting this problem from a deductive perspective. The questions which compose this pathway are exhibited in detail within this article. To summarize in advance, the critical arguments within this article involve eight key avenues of consilient inference:
- The mismatch in timing of Chinese SARS-CoV-2 B.1 and B.1.617.2 variant global rates of spread
- The conclusive evidence of both risk and culpability that SARS-CoV-2 was released (not zoonotic) from a Chinese BSL gain-of-function lab (during a U.S. ‘pause’ in such research)
- The elevated rates of unidentified ‘flu’ in longitude E65-180 nations during 2018/19, matching geographic pathogenic history
- The observed footprint of Covid prior immunity in longitude E65-180 nations (up until Delta variant prior natural-immunity breakthrough infections)
- The genetics of SARS-CoV-2 itself, which strongly suggest an inception case date of March 2018
- The CCP’s social response to an unknown, which resulted in unprecedented CO2 ppm reductions during 2018/19
- The CCP’s reactive social disruption patterns exhibited during 2019
- The CCP’s concerted efforts to conceal the critical databases, genomes, and lab production logs which pertain to SARS-CoV-2 origins.
To evaluate the risk/benefit of a vaccine for treating a virus, such as covid-19, we can compare the all-cause mortality rate of vaccinated against unvaccinated people on a periodic basis. If the mortality rate for those vaccinated is consistently lower than that for unvaccinated then we might conclude the vaccine must be beneficial.link
The author elegantly argues it is a statistical illusion. Well-worth reading and not hard to follow. ABN
For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.
If the FDA or CDC want to calculate a different NNTV [Number Needed To Vaccinate] (and explain how they arrived at that number) I’m all ears. But we all know that the FDA refused to calculate an NNTV not because they forgot, but because they knew the number was so high that it would destroy the case for mRNA vaccines in children this age. Your move CDC — your own Guidance document states that you must provide this number.link
Sad to say, “evidence-based medicine” has morphed into “authoritarian medicine by unaccountable federal agency decree.” Killing small children to protect profits or vanity is as bad as it gets. This is a crime against humanity. No parent, doctor, teacher, or human being should allow this to happen. One of the most effective things we all can do is talk to people about this. Share these ideas with your grapevine. There is a vast oral culture in America to which we can all contribute. Nowadays, knowing what we know about information, it seems stimulating your grapevine works better than demonstrating, though that helps too. ABN
Vitamin D deficiency is so widespread, and so predictive of bad health outcomes, that it has itself been called a pandemic by many scientists, even in the title of at least one peer-reviewed scientific paper1. Others have argued that widespread vitamin D deficiency may be a symptom, not a cause, of ill-health2. In A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century, Bret Weinstein and I contend that the rush to supplement with vitamin D is yet another example of reductionist, metric-heavy thinking that passes for modern medicine and science (excerpted here). Our broader point stands, including that we moderns are making matters worse with many of our lifestyle choices, such as spending too much time inside, and slathering ourselves with sunscreen when we do venture out. But with particular regard to whether WEIRDos3 ought to supplement with vitamin D, we (both Bret and I) now believe that we were wrong.link
I’ve been curious about climate change ever since I first saw Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth”. Back then I flirted with doing a deep dive but considered the topic way too complicated.
I finally decided to look into Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC) because it’s now a driving force for policy and it will cost each of us a lot of money moving forward while fundamentally transforming our society.link
Well-worth reading. ABN
A new analysis of mail-in ballots in Pima County, Arizona means the election was Rigged and Stolen from the Republican Party in 2020, and in particular, its Presidential Candidate.
This analysis, derived from publicly available election data, shows staggering anomalies and fictitious votes in Pima County’s mail-in returns, making it clear they stuffed the ballot box (in some precincts with more ballots than were ever sent!).link
Below is the analysis Trump is referring to: Dr. Shiva Analysis of Mail-In Ballots Pima County, Arizona.
This one of those ‘must explain’ scenario’s, which when left unaddressed, erodes the credibility of authorities…
You have no claim to science, if you cannot explain even a basic observation.
Mongolia is a fantastic experiment.
They clearly got Covaxid-21 and not Covid-19. But I am not qualified to cite the mechanism involved, only the observation of the effect.
Ignoring this however, will build mistrust in the population. It will be your fault, not theirs.
I am not qualified to name the mechanism either, but we know Covax suppresses the immune system. ABN
Covid spread to entire world in just 1 month in Apr 2020…
Yet Delta has taken 16 months to do the same thing, despite being twice as communicable than that Apr 2020 variant. Hmm… Wow.
This tells me that the spread in April 2020 was observation effect.
Prior spread, 100%.
I'll modify this to 4 months vs. 14 months, just to ensure apples-to-apples… but the argument still stands. Add to this a 4 month spread during the most extreme mitigation measures.
Arizona audit final report was watered down: reports from Cyber Ninjas were edited, most damning statements were removed. One removed section was as follows : “In the 2020 presidential election, the margin of victory was only 10,457 votes, a small fraction of the 57,734 ballots with known issues. Again, this is almost 6 times the margin of victory in the Presidential race and is multiples of the margin of victory in other races. Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable.”link
Many theories as to why this happened and whether it’s a good or bad thing can be found here. ABN