[Everything below is an intro excerpt from an essay by Matthew Crawford linked at bottom. ABN]
“The struggle between centralization and decentralization is at the core of American history.” -Anthony Gregory, PhD
Central to numerous fundamental debates during the pandemic is data.
- Why do central authorities choose not to collect and examine early treatment data on therapies largely dismissed by late treatment studies?
- How different would vaccine efficacy statistics and risk-benefit analyses look if we do not take the strange and historically unprecedented step of dismissing the first 14 days after vaccination? Would we find out there are Type II COVID cases caused by vaccines that are inappropriately counted against the unvaccinated?
When definitions and access to data are centrally controlled, so too is any narrative based on that data. That power can often be leveraged in the short term, but take valuable time to unwind. Such was the case with the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” myth.
SAE means Serious Adverse Event. ABN
OK. I’m tired of the emotional reasoning, so I went to the CDC’s website and sorted through the data myself. Here are the cold, hard facts as of 9/4/21.
TOTAL CASES (US): 40,048,255
TOTAL DEATHS (US): 643,858
DEATHS BY AGE:
50-64 years: 106,674 (.27% of total cases)
65-74 years: 144,020 (.36% of total cases)
75-84 years: 173,655 (.43% of total cases)
85+ years: 185,188 (.46% of total cases)
•TOTAL DEATHS account for 1.6% of total cases.
•78.1% of TOTAL DEATHS are over the age of 65.
•94.7% of TOTAL DEATHS are over the age of 50.
•6% of TOTAL DEATHS are attributed to Covid only.
•94% of TOTAL DEATHS have an average of 2.9 co-morbidities (12/6/20).
You’re scared. I get it. We all were at the beginning. But the data does not justify almost two years of cowering in fear, and it certainly does not justify mandates, especially for our children (188 total deaths ages 1-14).Continue reading “COVID: Here are the cold, hard facts as of 9/4/21”
DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY The Intercept contain new evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the nearby Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, along with their collaborator, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them, despite stipulations from a U.S. funding agency that the money not be used for that purpose.
Grant money for the controversial experiment came from the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Anthony Fauci. The award to EcoHealth Alliance, a research organization which studies the spread of viruses from animals to humans, included subawards to Wuhan Institute of Virology and East China Normal University. The principal investigator on the grant is EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, who has been a key voice in the search for Covid-19’s origins.link
Ultimately, under the assumption that there are 664,000 official COVID-19 deaths and essentially all excess deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines were so categorized, then I compute the number of excess deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines to be in the ballpark of
Note that this number is greater than the remaining number of COVID-19 deaths since vaccination began (by around 5,700).link
Be sure to read Probable Misclassification of Vaccine Deaths as COVID-19 Deaths for background on how covid deaths are categorized and the above figures were arrived at. My guess is FDA decisions to approve the vaccines are made in committee meetings where members listen to oral arguments or just talk and then vote on decisions already made. The atmosphere is probably staid bureaucratic mixed with Big Pharma and MSM assumptions. It’s an instance of micro group-think reflecting mainstream group-think, and a tragic example of how this kind of governance is failing across many agencies.
If the above figures are even half-right they show that mortality rates for vaccinated-who-get-covid look a little bit good only because the vaccine itself has already killed off the most vulnerable of that cohort. ABN
At some point, when the potential for conflicts of interest are high and the point of failure is fundamental to the task of those doing the job, incompetence should no longer be differentiated from criminal intent. Mathematicians and statisticians worthy of the title do not miss the kind of scale invariance or mean-reversion we see embedded in the PRR—particularly not when working in a dedicated group on a serious problem. There is a pride among geeks in identifying subtle mathematical or logical flaws in a system, and this is not subtle at all. Given that even psychologists have a need to pay attention to scale invariance, this is not an easily excused mistake. In fact, a computational check of the PRR function against past data likely would have clued in a middling programmer without the fundamental mathematical training. And we’re not done, yet…
…Calling this a safety system is decidedly unsafe. Even worse—given that numerous academics, including statisticians, reviewed this document, it is hard to believe that the scale invariance embedded in the definition of PRR, or the logic that includes meeting multiple criteria at the same time, went unnoticed. It certainly appears that the CDC’s goal was to establish an illusion of safety, and a reason to ignore the true signs of danger. At best, they unfathomably hired nobody whose job it was to remain independently-minded who could clue them in?
If my understanding of this situation is correct, the mass vaccination program should be immediately halted until the safety data is gathered, cleaned, and examined. We cannot tolerate a misleading statement of “vaccines are safe and effective” in the face of regulatory agencies defining away the responsibility of performing the risk analysis needed to verify safety. The CDC leadership should be immediately replaced and investigated, and independent analysts should reformulate the task of tracking vaccine safety results.Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals
Scientists and mathematicians, please read this paper. This is an intellectual smoking gun! Ordinary readers, it is not hard to follow this analysis. Well worth reading. Here is Crawford’s spicy rebuttal to critics: Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals Part 2. ABN
Kirsch is asking for input before he turns this outline into a video. He presents a strong case against no case having ever been presented by the other side. He welcomes criticism and has requested a response from the FDA, which only brushed him off. ABN
The bottom line is this…. AG Merrick Garland knows a powder keg is very likely to explode as soon as the majority of American people discover just how manipulated the election of 2020 was. His announcement to double the staff of the DOJ Civil Rights Division voter unit is not to protect election integrity, but rather to position his resources for a war against a looming storm of election review outcomes…. and the White House is so far exposed, they are positioning to use the military to protect their position.
The deep and irrefutable research has been taking place, mostly very quietly, in the background. I would expect the government response to this will be a combination of the DOJ/FBI “domestic extremist” narratives, combined with racism accusations and claims of election disinformation.
The Alinsky model: Isolate, Ridicule and Marginalize your political opposition, in combination with the use of arrests and threats by the justice department.Breitbart, Steve Bannon and John Fredericks Reporting on Leaked Ballot Mule Investigation
This is an important piece by Sundance. It’s an overview of how the election fraud audits have been conducted using cell phone data, surveillance videos, mappings of ballot dumping, and more. We all know this is going to be a hot topic, so best to keep informed. Highly recommend reading this article. ABN
‘Science is not supposed to be about intimidating, or abusing, or censoring data … There is never supposed to be ‘an accepted view’ of science.’link
We all have the right to make this risk-assessment for ourselves. In addition to mortality age-rates, there are also the short, mid, and long-term dangers of the vaccines. Whatever you do, there is risk. Know thyself, know your own conditions, make your own decision and be open to change as conditions change. ABN
The virus that causes COVID-19 mutates almost once a week—significantly higher than the rate estimated previously—according to a new study by scientists from the Universities of Bath and Edinburgh. Their findings indicate that new variants could emerge more quickly than thought previously.link