The Covid pandemic has been used as an opportunity for elites with particular global economic and political interests to accelerate the process of arranging the infrastructure for a new biosecurity surveillance regime.

1/ The Covid pandemic has been used as an opportunity for elites with particular global economic and political interests to accelerate the process of arranging the infrastructure for a new biosecurity surveillance regime.

2/ This novel paradigm of governance will be directed and managed largely by unelected technocrats. This regime will increasingly demand ever more intrusive and burdensome interventions into the lives and bodies of individuals.

3/ Citizens will no longer conceived as persons with inherent dignity, but as fungible elements of an undifferentiated “mass” to be guided by supposedly benevolent health and security policies.

4/ The marriage of global public health with novel technologies of surveillance, personal data extraction, and control now makes possible novel forms of domination unimaginable in the totalitarian regimes of the past.

5/ In our present circumstances, resisting this regime will require critiquing and rejecting some of the most disastrous Covid policies of the past two years, including widespread lockdowns and vaccine mandates/passports.

6/ These efforts are necessary to slow the rapid acceptance of this new paradigm by demonstrating the limits to what can be required of citizens under the guise of a public health emergency. So we have delineated few to no limits.

7/ The means of surveillance and control will become ever more refined and invasive, with QR codes giving way to retinal scans, and climate change and other social issues overtaking Covid as the “public health crisis” of the day.

8/ The urgent task today is to help those around us see why we should, and how we can (1) recognize, (2) understand, and (3) reject and resist this new despotism.

Things are moving very fast, so the time to begin is now.

@threadreaderapp unroll

More here…

Originally tweeted by Aaron Kheriaty, MD (@akheriaty) on November 29, 2021.

The afterlife

If you are a hard no-afterlife-is-possible, you will never actually experience it. If you are right, death = end of all experience.

If you are open to there being an afterlife, you will be better prepared for one if it happens. If there is no afterlife, you will never know you were wrong.

Given the above, it is reasonable to presume that our instincts and inklings that morality matters should be heeded. It is reasonable to look for signs of an afterlife. It is reasonable to prepare for an afterlife.

Geert Vanden Bossche: My opinion on the new African variants

The world may be taken by surprise but that doesn’t include us. It remains to be seen whether Omicron can outcompete Delta (to be confirmed). If that’s the case, we’re definitely not in good shape.

In case of CoV, innate immunity protects the individual and the ‘herd’ ( sterilizing immunity, no natural selection pressure, herd immunity) whereas adaptive immunity induced with leaky vaccines has exactly the opposite effect.

THE big Q is whether such an immune escape variant could even resist naturally acquired Abs in people who recovered from C19 disease. I am, indeed, cautious and worried about ADE, even in the unvaccinated who recovered from C-19 disease as they may no longer be able to control viral infection. ADE would equal ‘enhanced virulence’. Difficult to predict.

Mass vaccination has compressed the evolutionary trajectory of the virus from a few hundred years (?) down to one year. Hope that naturally primed individuals can deal with that speed.


South Korea excess deaths begin at the end of 2017 and segue cleanly into covid deaths in 2020, indicating high probability covid was active starting in China much earlier than 2019

South Korea is in their 4th year of something which is killing 65+ yr-olds faster. But I am 100% sure it's not Covid, because it can't be Covid, therefore it is not Covid.

Except that it is Covid after Feb 2020, but before that it is the well-known-but-mysterious 65sulp virus.

Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on November 24, 2021.

The Ethical Skeptic has much more on this hypothesis here: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018. A deeply sinister interpretation of this is China deliberately released covid or something similar in 2017 to inoculate its population for their planned 2019 release of covid19. A less sinister but also nasty interpretation is covid or something similar escaped from the Wuhan lab in 2017 and China allowed it to adventitiously inoculate its population, a circumstance they used in 2019 with full release of the bioweapon. Another possibility is they simply concealed the (accidental or deliberate) release of covid in 2017 and then did psyop theater on the world in 2020 causing everyone else to panic. A very important unanswered question is why has the West reacted to covid in such a stupid and self-destructive manner? Have we become weak, a hill of mediocrities that has grown rotten over many decades? Or is the West itself deeply sinister and is using covid to subdue the world by first enervating Western societies?

How envy causes conflict

…The most cursory look at the sort of thinking now dominant in the West shows that it is doing the reverse. Anti-racism never concerns itself with the spiritual self-improvement of its beneficiaries. It is concerned with worldly goods, but does nothing to help people improve their lot through effective means such as learning skills or deferring gratification and planning for the future. Its constant message is: You have less because the white man has more, and he has more because he has rigged the game in his favor.

Critical race theory inculcates resentment among children to whom it might otherwise not have occurred to compare themselves invidiously with their white neighbors, and directs their attention away from practical ways to improve their own lives. As we have seen, many societies have been dominated by envy, but I cannot think of another case of a regime systematically trying to maximize envy in the rising generation. It is genuinely cruel to the non-white children who are supposedly its intended beneficiaries, but as we would expect from envy-inspired behavior, the aim appears to be to harm us rather than to help them.


While you may not agree with all of this article, it is worth reading just for having raised the issue of envy and focusing on it. Personally, I can truthfully say that not understanding the power of envy has caused me many problems. If you do not feel envy or do not feel it much or often, it may not occur to you how often it distorts the thinking of others. A Buddhist nun, who is a good friend, often used to tell me that “jealousy” or “envy” were the root causes of much of what we were seeing around us. For years, I always countered her statements with some anodyne explanation but no longer do. Envy over talent or status and sexual jealousy are among the strongest negative emotions we humans have. If you are blessed with decent looks and brains and some ability to work productively, you may not realize how much others may be seething with envy. If you feel envy, practice Buddhism. It will cure that malady well. If you do not feel envy or do not feel it much, Buddhist contemplations on others—intellectual empathy—may help in understanding that the karma or conditions endured by others can be very difficult for them to bear. Buddhist monks live simply and have “left home” (the world) both to keep themselves from feeling envy and to keep others from envying them, among other reasons. If you are blessed (or have earned) a mind rarely sullied by envy, be careful not to be oblivious of it in others. ABN

“The children are our last hope.” By mass vaxxing them we are “Depriving the children of both their innate immunity and their vaccinal protection [thus] preventing the population in an irrevocable way from ever generating herd immunity”: Geert Vanden Bossche

Vanden Bossche further states that: “We are giving the virus an opportunity to do natural selection on the human race—those who have natural immunity and those who have none, none left [due to vax]… I know this is very strong… This is going to be a major disaster… Only people who have their natural immunity intact have a chance to survive.”

direct link

China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018

[Everything below this bracket is an excerpt from: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018 ABN]

How do we infer that the Chinese Communist Party both reacted to and concealed the existence of SARS-CoV-2 as far back as March 2018? There is a critical path of query and dependency necessary and sufficient in prosecuting this problem from a deductive perspective. The questions which compose this pathway are exhibited in detail within this article. To summarize in advance, the critical arguments within this article involve eight key avenues of consilient inference:

  1. The mismatch in timing of Chinese SARS-CoV-2 B.1 and B.1.617.2 variant global rates of spread
  2. The conclusive evidence of both risk and culpability that SARS-CoV-2 was released (not zoonotic) from a Chinese BSL gain-of-function lab (during a U.S. ‘pause’ in such research)
  3. The elevated rates of unidentified ‘flu’ in longitude E65-180 nations during 2018/19, matching geographic pathogenic history
  4. The observed footprint of Covid prior immunity in longitude E65-180 nations (up until Delta variant prior natural-immunity breakthrough infections)
  5. The genetics of SARS-CoV-2 itself, which strongly suggest an inception case date of March 2018
  6. The CCP’s social response to an unknown, which resulted in unprecedented CO2 ppm reductions during 2018/19
  7. The CCP’s reactive social disruption patterns exhibited during 2019
  8. The CCP’s concerted efforts to conceal the critical databases, genomes, and lab production logs which pertain to SARS-CoV-2 origins.

link to original

Is vaccine efficacy a statistical illusion?

To evaluate the risk/benefit of a vaccine for treating a virus, such as covid-19, we can compare the all-cause mortality rate of vaccinated against unvaccinated people on a periodic basis. If the mortality rate for those vaccinated is consistently lower than that for unvaccinated then we might conclude the vaccine must be beneficial.


The author elegantly argues it is a statistical illusion. Well-worth reading and not hard to follow. ABN

Email to a friend wherein I propose that we are infested with a “large parasite that is ineradicable but also not so efficient or smart at establishing a new form of control”

I do wonder what happened at the top. could top ppl have been so stupid to make their plan depend on a shit vax? or are top ppl mostly bumblers like Gates, Fauci? or are the top ppl above Gates, Fauci but only have approx plans and can work with the present situation; throw Fauci overboard if need be? I do see an extensive spy, poison, and control system at all levels (see the AZ school story on ABN) but maybe they are large and strong but not very efficient and have shit plans… that would jibe if they are fundamentally a parasitic org, which they appear strongly to be. so we are infected with an extensive, large parasite that is ineradicable but also not so efficient or smart at establishing a new form of control. it’s best at parasitizing something already established and well-functioning; hence the unrelenting decline of the West with no good or clear prospects at the bottom of the hill

In this interpretation, an all-powerful corporatocracy or secret society or rogue intelligence agency poised to seize world power is not the chief cause of our rapid demise. Rather a parasite with those features which has infested our society is. If this is true, we can expect more bad policies and bleeding away of wealth, power, and genius from our world. But probably need not fear so much that we will be locked down forever under a strict regime that is efficiently turning us all into zombies (which is still a real possibility). ABN

Continue reading “Email to a friend wherein I propose that we are infested with a “large parasite that is ineradicable but also not so efficient or smart at establishing a new form of control””

Comment I received in an email

My hypothesis what’s going on. Many people default to trusting socially accredited experts. They trust the government acts in our interests. Holding this view requires much less energy and causes much less stress than being critical. It’s essentially an avoidance strategy and a bias for humans to seek a state of comfort and energy conservation. Also information targeting our stem brain and instincts travel much faster through society than information that requires our neo cortex. So once somebody instills fear in a group, that group will not respond to rationally presented information.

I’ve never heard or thought of the part in red. Seems right to me. Interestingly, I just posted this: Dr. Stephen Porges speaks about spirituality concepts from a Polyvagal perspective. Porges talks about the brain stem and how proper or right stimulation of it lights up the upper vagal nerve, which must include the neocortex. ABN

UPDATE: If you know about chakras that will help understanding what Porges is saying. He presents a kind of chakra explanation of bodily energy states that manifest in consciousness. His system relies on the vagus nerve, which he describes as having three levels of potential “centrality”; levels in which the bodily vagus and associated organs can dominate with different effects that much resemble how the chakras operate. ABN