Prediction: The next (bogus) indictment of President Trump will be Friday or soon after

Obviously, I am going to have a lot more to say about this shortly.  I like to stay quiet at times like this and just sit atop the bluff as the crowd starts to realize things.

When you think you know the apex of how Machiavellian and corrupt the DC system is, you need to reevaluate your reference; it’s way worse.

Remember, there are trillions at stake, ‘trillions’.  With the entire geopolitical dynamic being threatened, and with trillions of dollars at stake, nothing is ever off the table.  When you think the people who control the world of finance and politics couldn’t possibly be organizing, coordinating and manipulating certain events, again, reevaluate your reference, because they do.

Its a large network of aligned interests.  It doesn’t take a lot of organization and creation of some massive global conspiracy to create outcomes of mutual benefit to all parties, when the interests of those parties are all aligned inside the economics of the issue.  Instead, the simple process they use has two components:

(1) – Identify the common enemy. Thereby everyone can act according to their institutional interests to undermine and attack that enemy.

(2) – Identify the common solution. Thereby, everyone can align to support the common objective according to their institutional capability.

Making accurate predictions simply falls into a process.  How will this [fill_in_blank] impact the global agents and the control agenda?   What will each element within the institutions do to support the removal of risk?  What will each element within the institutions of power do to align with a common solution?

Generally speaking, when an inflection point is organized by the systems of power, such as a Ron DeSantis 2024 announcement, the traditional rulebook they follow instructs them to allow the introduced variable a full media cycle [36hour window] for the new narrative to settle as it dominates the news and public psyche.  After the full media cycle, the support operation begins.

If the traditional process is followed, and with Ron DeSantis making his announcement tomorrow, that puts the next indictment of President Trump on a scheduled for Friday (ish).  I say “ish” because if the indictment people see positive value in the RdS rollout, they may delay a weekend media cycle.   So Friday or Monday, depending on how they view the success of the created inflection point.

It’s not a conspiracy folks, it’s just watching things as they are; reevaluating prior steps with new information; and ultimately knowing what to look for in the next logical sequence of events.

More soon….


‘It’s a great vindication, it feels good!’ Donald Trump hails John Durham report slamming FBI for pursuing baseless Russian collusion theory and blames sore-loser Hillary for scandal

Donald Trump has responded to Justice Department special counsel John Durham’s report on the origins of the FBI‘s Trump-Russia probe, saying the findings vindicate his claims of baseless persecution.

‘It’s a great vindication and it feels good, and the report has been widely praised,’ Trump told Newsmax in a phone interview on Tuesday night.

‘All of these people are — I guess you could call it treason. You could call it a lot of different things. But this should never be allowed to happen in our country again,’ added Trump.

The former president when on to heap blame his 2016 election opponent, Hillary Clinton, for the controversial FBI probe into his own campaign.

‘This was really started by, when she lost the election,’ said Trump. ‘They call this a big, big surprise, and they didn’t know what to say. And they said, Let’s blame it on Russia. Somehow somebody came up with the idea let’s blame her loss on Russia.’

‘This was really an excuse for why she lost the election. She blamed it on Russia. And it’s very sad, very very bad for our country,’ added Trump.


John Durham Releases 316 Page Report About FBI, DOJ, Intelligence Community and U.S. Govt Targeting Donald Trump

Conclusion: ‘The justice system in DC is designed to protect itself’

…Former FBI Director James Comey is a criminal.  Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe is a criminal. Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok is a criminal.  Current Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman, Senator Mark Warner, is a criminal.

Any criminal conduct that is discovered by a person who is not the direct victim of the criminal conduct does not penetrate the DC system.  Meaning, just because you can show criminal activity in Washington DC, that doesn’t mean anyone has a responsibility to investigate it.

If the criminal conduct is not identified by the investigators inside the DC system, the criminal conduct essentially does not exist – unless the evidence of criminal conduct in DC, is provided by a specific victim of the crime being reported.

There is a silo effect in place within the DC system that permits the investigative authorities to dismiss claims of institutional or administrative criminal conduct from outside entities, including ‘whistleblowers.’  The DOJ/FBI arbiters of what constitutes crime are the same DOJ/FBI arbiters in charge of protecting the institutional system.

If the DC system is threatened by the conduct of an outside entity, a crime may have been committed.  However, if an agent, operator, official or politician representing the DC system is the one threatening, there is no crime.  The justice system in DC is designed to protect itself.


The above is an excerpt from an article that is probably the best article to read on the Durham report. It explains why nothing will be done even though serious malfeasance, even sedition and election interference, have been clearly and unambiguously uncovered. All along conspiracy theorists have been right, as usual: ‘The justice system in DC is designed to protect itself.’ ABN

Ex-CIA chief admits the ‘Dirty 51’ letter ‘WAS POLITICAL’ and agency conspired with Biden campaign to produce it and FALSELY claim emails on Hunter Biden’s laptop were Russian disinformation

Former CIA director John Brennan has admitted that an infamous letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials that sought to discredit reporting on Hunter Biden‘s laptop ‘was political’.

Brennan, the CIA chief during Obama’s administration, admitted to the House Judiciary Committee investigators in a four-hour closed-door deposition that the letter, which falsely claimed that emails on Hunter Biden’s laptop were Russian disinformation, was ‘political’, Fox News reports.

Both Brennan and Clapper signed a letter by 51 former intelligence officials who claimed Hunter’s laptop had ‘all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation’.

An email shows Brennan agreeing to have his name added to the letter of signatories by the then acting CIA Director Mike Morell. 


Let the Blue Cities Die

The Democrat cities are urine-soaked hellholes that reek of pot where criminals stalk unmolested while the full fury of what is supposed to be the law hangs over the head of any citizen who dares do something about it, and that’s good. The idiots who live there voted for turning their urban landscapes into petri dishes of social pathologies, and they should enjoy the full benefits of their decisions. We normal people should avoid these socialist wastelands and elect legislators to Congress who will starve them of the federal funds that enable their decline. In red states, our legislators should wage warfare on the blue tumors in their midst lest they metastasize outside the city limits. And we should ruthlessly point to them as the future Democrats want, which they are, a vision of a psychotic hobo taking a dump on the sidewalk out in front of your house forever.


The House Oversight Committee is there to make money and give the illusion of accountability

The point of  the House Oversight Committee (HOC) hearings is to create what are now described as “viral moments” that can be used to generate money.   The second, and lesser objective, is to give the illusion of accountability while not actually ever holding anyone or anything accountable.  See prior HOC reference points like Fast and Furious, IRS targeting, Benghazi, the Twitter File review or the current Joe/Hunter Biden crime syndicate investigation.

If you watch the HOC through the prism of expecting some form of accountability for the violations of law, you will be frustrated and disappointed.   However, if you watch the HOC through the prism of how well the members will do at raising money from their performances, then you can evaluate the effectiveness – the proverbial winning and losing.

The HOC is designed by House leadership to perform the same basic function for both Democrats and Republicans.  The HOC committee assignments are selected based on the theatrical skills of each representative.  This is not to say the motives of the members are sullied or impure, it is simply to point out the motive of the committee itself is to generate fundraising from the skillsets of the members on the committee.

Once you fully grasp what the intent of the House Oversight Committee is about, and once you drop the expectation that any accountability in oversight is the intent, then you can watch the performances through the entertainment prism of partisan politics and genuinely enjoy them – or hate them.


Health is more than influenza — WHO webpage, now removed

The repeated pandemic health scares caused by an avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus are part of the culture of fear.13 Worst-case thinking replaced balanced risk assessment. Worst-case thinking is motivated by the belief that the danger we face is so overwhelmingly catastrophic that we must act immediately. Rather than wait for information, we need a pre-emptive strike. But if resources buy lives, wasting resources wastes lives. The precautionary stocking of largely useless antivirals and the irrational vaccination policies against an unusually benign H1N1 virus wasted many billions of euros and eroded the trust of the public in health officials.46 The pandemic policy was never informed by evidence, but by fear of worst-case scenarios.

In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. The pharmaceutical industry and the media only reacted to this welcome boon. We therefore need fewer, not more “pandemic preparedness” plans or definitions. Vertical influenza planning in the face of speculative catastrophes is a recipe for repeated waste of resources and health scares, induced by influenza experts with vested interests in exaggeration. There is no reason for expecting any upcoming pandemic to be worse than the mild ones of 1957 or 1968,7 no reason for striking pre-emptively, no reason for believing that a proportional and balanced response would risk lives.

The key to responsible policy-making is not bureaucracy but accountability and independence from interest groups. Decisions must be based on adaptive responses to emerging problems, not on definitions. WHO should learn to be NICE: accountable for reasonableness in a process of openness, transparency and dialogue with all the stakeholders, and particularly the public.9


RFK Jr interview

UPDATE: This is a good interview. RFK Jr brings a new perspective to US politics along with deep roots to the past. His answers are quite good and he is willing to say let me think about that more, which is good to hear. He did not once deceptively answer a different question or fluff over the substance of a query. He seems not to be owned by special interests and his father and uncle were both murdered by state actors. It will be interesting to see how he plays with Trump. I can imagine a Trump/Kennedy ticket with the promise that Trump handles foreign policy, trade, the border, and much of the economy while Kennedy handles domestic and social problems. I hope they don’t start fighting. My sense is Trump will not attack unless he is attacked first. If they can get along without slinging dirt, they will lift this country up. Four more years of Trump with Kennedy followed by eight years of Kennedy would resurrect a genuine American ethos and bring it up to date. ABN

Second Biden Removal Leverage Deployed and Timed to Coincide with First – Prosecutors Near Decision on Hunter Biden Indictment

If you think about Joe Biden’s 4-year term in office as an intentionally constructed single term with no limits or consequences to the cascading damage inflicted; and if you think about the ideologues behind the plan to use cognitively challenged Biden as a tool to achieve their agenda; then everything from the way he was selected in 2020, to the disconnected and fragmented policy and Biden’s interpretation of them, just makes sense.

As our friend Lee Smith summed up in early 2021, “Joe Biden is an avatar for Barack Obama’s third term.”  That is what we have been witnessing.  A term in office where every policy wish list and far-left agenda item could be triggered without any care or consequence of political damage.

The people behind Biden are ideologues using this unique opportunity to further the “fundamental change.”  From that perspective every single granular move during the Biden term makes sense.  However, this also means there’s no term two in the design.   The damage will be so great, there’s no way for a second term.

Again, if you accept that background, and ignore the puppet presentations, everything currently underway that seemingly makes Biden look vulnerable and disposable makes sense.  It’s not Republicans trying to take him down, it’s Democrats – who will use republicans to assist them.

Into this landscape comes the second leverage point for the removal.  The vulnerability represented by Hunter Biden.  This approach also explains why the Hunter Biden investigation was completed long ago, and the Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco/Obama-minds were simply waiting for the timing of the election calendar.  Earlier today a Main Justice whistleblower provided the triggering mechanism for one removal approach.  Here is another:


UPDATE: I greatly admire Sundance and this essay is well-worth reading. But I do not believe Obummer is at the top. He, too, is an actor, maybe a director, certainly a puppet doing the bidding of others. That said, everything else Sundance points out in this piece is very likely 100% on target. It’s all staged. I only disagree on who is the producer. ABN