…The authors of this study argue that physical sensations form the core of any emotional experience. When people feel an emotion, they experience interoceptive states, which are the brain’s internal perceptions of signals from inside the body, like a racing heart or a tense stomach. The researchers wanted to map these self-aware, physical feelings, known as somatosensory experiences, to see what a state of political anger or political hope actually feels like in the human body.
Understanding these bodily sensations can shed light on how political contexts alter basic psychological responses. To explore these physical patterns, the researchers conducted a study with 992 adult participants from the United States. The sample was designed to be nationally representative in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, and political party affiliation. The median age of the participants was 46 years, and the group included exactly 50 percent women.
The scientists used a validated digital mapping technique called the emBODY tool to measure physical reactions. During the experiment, participants viewed digital silhouettes of the human body and used a coloring tool to indicate exactly where they felt physical sensations. They painted regions red to show increased activation, such as warmth or tension, and they used blue to show decreased activation, such as numbness or physical heaviness.
Political disgust produced an entirely different physical map compared to everyday disgust. Everyday disgust, such as the natural physical reaction to spoiled food, tends to be felt heavily in the stomach and throat. When participants mapped political disgust, the physical sensation looked remarkably similar to anger, with high activation concentrated in the head and upper body.
Democrat-leaning participants reported stronger bodily sensations for negative political emotions compared to Republican-leaning participants. For political anger, anxiety, depression, and disgust, Democrat-leaning individuals showed much higher physical activation, primarily concentrated in the head and upper torso.
Whatever you think of this administration it’s worth listening to them once in awhile. I’ve watched about 20 min of this and it’s informative. Vance is a good speaker. ABN
Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed.
Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it.
The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain.
This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone.
Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do.
What we have instead is a wall.
And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real.
While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product.
The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide.
It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence.
Politicians represent the ruling elite or are part of it. The ruling elite manages and exploits the populations politicians pretend to represent. It shows in everything they do. The covid vax was a bioweapon that yielded mind-control and a further weakening of the populations politicians pretend to represent. ABN
President Trump announces “Project Freedom,” directing the U.S. Navy to escort neutral-country ships through the Strait of Hormuz starting Monday and warning that interference will be attacked, while noting positive U.S.-Iran discussions and framing the move as a test of whether Iran’s negotiators control the IRGC.
The episode argues Trump is using oil and gas to rebuild the U.S. economy and to displace London’s oil-pricing power, citing April 20 Presidential Determinations under the Defense Production Act, a National Energy Dominance Council led by Doug Burgum and Chris Wright, and rising U.S. production (EIA March 2026: ~24 million bpd) driving lower prices, a manufacturing revival, and a shrinking trade deficit.
It contrasts this with post-1971 “petrodollar” strategy, OPEC shocks, “controlled disintegration,” and Iran-related destabilization, and claims modern media propaganda—from Lippmann to Operation Mockingbird to recent censorship networks—drives anti-Trump narratives.
Luna appeared on the Pod Force One podcast with New York Post columnist Miranda Devine on Wednesday and theorized that former President Joe Biden‘s administration orchestrated the Butler rally assassination attempt on the president.
‘I think what is interesting about the initial investigation is A, it was done under Biden, period,’ Luna began.
The lawmaker went on to criticize the FBI for being unable to ‘locate who actually owned that bag of cocaine that was found in the White House‘ and then ‘also destroying the evidence.’
‘Specifically, what was interesting about the Butler assassination [attempt] and I’ve said this before, I think that was intentional negligence,’ she continued.
‘I was one of the individuals to actually ask questions of the former Secret Service Director [Kimberly Cheatle]. We actually had whistleblowers from within the Secret Service that came out, that stated that, you know, they were basically not present or told to stand down at the actual – there was a group of snipers that were actually met that day, that was coordinated by the local law enforcement, and they just so happened to not show up.’
Luna went on to say that the area that was ‘left open’ was ‘literally the perfect location to take a shot and, basically, assassinate someone.’
This could be the start of something big. Could be her simply saying the obvious, but let’s hope it is an opening move in a strategy to expose a plot they already have evidence for. If Trump and his administration has real power, and are not totally controlled by secret malefactors, this may lead to uncovering much more. Moves against Comey may also signal more is coming before the midterms. ABN
American Buddhist Net 