US intelligence agencies reportedly concluded that Alice Huang, a senior Megaspeed executive with ties to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, was passing information to Beijing. President Donald Trump was briefed about the findings but did not act. Megaspeed has begun an internal investigation, while Nvidia said Huang’s interactions with Alice were ordinary business contact.
American intelligence agencies concluded that a businesswoman with ties to Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang was passing information to Beijing. President Donald Trump was briefed on the findings about a year ago and chose not to act on them.
Who she is and what officials found
The woman is Alice Huang, also known as Huang Le, a Chinese citizen and a senior executive at Megaspeed, a Singapore-based data center company, the Times reported. US officials had already suspected Megaspeed of helping China obtain advanced Nvidia chips. Surveillance then led them to conclude she was an intelligence asset, and it showed she had built a close relationship with Jensen Huang. The two are unrelated, as far as the report indicates.
Surveillance picked up her contact with an American citizen, the Times said, and a process called unmasking identified that person as Huang.
Alice Huang, Close Friend Of Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, Is Believed To Be A Chinese Spy; Trump Was Briefed But Took No Action: Report | X/ Byron_Wan
In the earliest annals of Jewish history a people known as the Amalekites had their name and reputation forever infamed by the kosher chronicles of the Pentateuch. These Hamitic-Arab speakers south of the Negev desert became the first mortal enemies of the Israelites in a neighborhood trend that continues to this day. The Amalekites were vanquished on orders from the Hebrew God, but you wouldn’t know it listening to the bellicose screeds of modern Israeli politicians. For the memory of the Amalekites was morbidly preserved by the Jews over the ages and employed like a wandering specter, projected onto their main enemy of the day via the collective metaphor Amalek.
…Several Jewish outlets and organizations keep lists of individuals disturbing the politically correct peace, and as of 2026 two ethnic Armenians regularly appear at the top of the antisemitism charts: political commentator Ana Kasparian and entrepreneur Dan Bilzerian. While Kasparian earned her mantle solely for being a strong critic of Israel, Bilzerian has gone supernova in railing against all aspects of Jewish power, subversion of morals, ethnoreligious supremacism and the corruption of Congress.
Much has been made of the murky origins of Dan Bilzerian’s wealth, being the son of corporate raider Paul Bilzerian who for many years has avoided paying a $62 million judgment. In the meantime, Dan allegedly won millions playing high-stakes poker against businessmen. What can’t be denied is that Bilzerian Jr. has become his own brand, the King of Instagram, and he has parlayed that into a diverse business portfolio. For several years he indulged in and promoted a playboy lifestyle, juggling an unholy trinity of addictions to drugs, sex and gambling. By the age of 25, he had already suffered two heart attacks.
Those on the hard right see a lot in his character profile that could be described as Trumpian, or even Jewish, but by his own admission “12% doesn’t make you a jew.” Interestingly, his surname is one of the few in Armenia of unknown etymology, with the patronym Bilzer sounding like it was plucked from the lyrics of Bohemian Rhapsody. But beggars can’t be choosers when it comes to influential figures willing to take on Jewish power, no holds barred, so for this we ought to be grateful. By all accounts, Bilzerian has left behind his lifestyle of debased values to commit to a cause beyond self-interest, with a political agenda that is, as the youth say, based.
…according to Jewish semantics and theological taxonomy, goyim are considered livestock. The right approach for gentiles, therefore, is not to adapt the linguistic trappings of their antagonists. Bilzerian would be the first to point out that by appropriating such derogatory designations, the people who benefit most from making Amalek great again are the likes of Netanyahu, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir. Nevertheless, understanding that on some level we are all perceived as Amalek—either dormant, passive or active—is a lesson on Jewish projection and parapsychosis not to be ignored.
Hostile and violent religious beliefs when carried by whole communities are a form of soft-terrorism, psycholinguistic psycho-terrorism. When these beliefs are carried over centuries into the present day and refer to essentially everyone else, they are a sure sign of a merciless, immoral culture. ABN
Not a single person at his “conference” was elected by the people of the nation from which they originate.
Not a single participant is a representative of the citizens. Every participant is an appointed, unelected member of the western global national security system.
… A system that considers themselves totally detached and more powerful than the social network within the nation from which they originate. They are members of the authoritarian club, the omnipotent police state.
Bongino spreads his wings as a proud new member of this global club. They are unelected, but they will protect you from the scary thing, the dark imagining they promote, in order to express their power….
…. And you will cheer for them.
What exactly is this global security network protecting you from? And why do you need to be protected from it?
Ask Jair Bolsonaro. Ask Marine LePen. Ask Donald Trump. Ask Romania. Ask the AfD party in Germany. The western global security network is protecting us from all of these ‘threats.’
Bongino buys into this global IC belief system 100%, and shares how important his protection is.
They hate us. If you haven’t figured it out yet, you are not paying attention, or are not good at pattern recognition. Pretty much everything that seems to be invented specifically to hurt us comes from them. There are exceptions, but the every-single-time rule applies almost every single time.
Their hatred comes from the ancestral depth of their being. It is absolute, organized and persistent. They think it is divine. God himself, they are certain, loves them and hates us.
They are waging a total war, killing us at every level or our being. They flood our cities with mobs of downtrodden aliens, whom they train to hate us too. They hit us hard in our genetic heritage by their constant pro-miscegenation propaganda. They corrupt our youth with sexual liberation, feminism, pornography and gender ideology. They target our children, at an ever younger age. They tell us to kill our offspring in the wombs ourselves. They are so confident that they will finish us soon that they now spit their hatred in our face, but still demand that we call it love.
Their hatred is ugly, and we’re rather not look at it. It’s an unpleasant and complicated subject, hard to comprehend. There is a bottomless quality to it, which reminds me of this remark by Eric Hoffer in The True Believer: “There is perhaps no surer way of infecting ourselves with virulent hatred toward a person than by doing him a grave injustice. That others have a just grievance against us is a more potent reason for hating them than that we have a just grievance against them.”[1] If we complain about their Goy-hatred, they call our complaints Jew-hatred.
There is no more urgent task than to analyze this hatred rationally, scientifically. We must study its historical origin, its cognitive patterns, its psychological mechanisms. We need to get to the bottom of it. This, or we let them destroy us, body and soul.
The recent military advances by the Houthis, an Islamic rebel group in Yemen, have significantly reshaped the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and global oil markets. The Houthis, also known as the Ansar Allah movement, have rapidly captured key coastal towns and islands along the Red Sea, easily overwhelming Saudi proxy forces. This has allowed them to consolidate control over critical shipping routes, particularly the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which is vital for oil shipments. Their newfound dominance coincided with a wave of drone attacks from Iraqi forces aligned with Iran, which severely damaged Saudi oil pipelines, further crippling Saudi exports and causing oil prices to spike globally. This confluence of events has plunged the world into an immediate fuel shortage and has raised questions about the long-term ramifications of the Iran war and its effects on the broader Middle Eastern geopolitical dynamics.
Historically, the Houthis have been depicted as mere rebels, but a closer examination reveals that they have effectively become Yemen’s de facto government. Initially emerging as a movement against the Yemeni government, they gained significant territory and political power, controlling around 70-80% of the population by 2014. Despite facing a harsh blockade imposed by Saudi Arabia and its allies, the Houthis have managed to maintain their influence and resist foreign intervention. The media’s portrayal of the Houthis as rebellious tribesmen has obscured the reality of their governance over Yemen, leading to misconceptions about the nature of the conflict, which is essentially a struggle between Yemen and Saudi Arabia for territorial and political control.
As the region grapples with these changes, predictions about the potential collapse of Saudi Arabia have emerged. Analysts have pointed out that the Houthis’ military successes could embolden other minority groups within Saudi Arabia, particularly the Shia population, which has been historically marginalized. If the Houthis can demonstrate military superiority over the Saudi forces, it could trigger unrest among the various tribes and factions within Saudi Arabia, leading to a possible disintegration of the kingdom. Reports suggest that various tribal groups, feeling empowered by the Houthi victories, may seek to reclaim territories lost during Ibn Saud’s consolidation of power in the early 20th century. The historical grievances of these tribes, combined with the current vulnerability of the Saudi state, may present an opportunity for significant shifts in the regional power balance.
The impact of these developments could extend beyond Saudi Arabia, potentially altering the political landscape in the entire Gulf region. The historical context of the Saudi state and its relationship with neighboring countries highlights the fragility of its power. The recent military actions by the Houthis and the broader implications of Iran’s growing influence may lead to a reconfiguration of alliances and territorial claims among Gulf states. As the Houthis continue to assert their military capabilities and influence, the risk of a broader regional conflict involving Iran and its allies could escalate, leading to a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy in the region. The ongoing conflict may also prompt a reconsideration of the strategic importance of oil routes and the geopolitical significance of the Gulf, indicating that the consequences of these developments will be felt far beyond the immediate vicinity of Yemen.
The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.
According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.
The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.
The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.
The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.
As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.
The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.
As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.
A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.
The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.
This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.
How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, live where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN
“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”
And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.
How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion
In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.
But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?
This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.
Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.
I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN
UPDATE: I have read the article and found it well-argued and interesting. The author’s final claim is:
My own conclusion is that the greatest fraud in Christian history was persuading countless generations that an institutional religion, which gradually evolved under the influence of imperial power, theological development, and ecclesiastical authority, was identical with the original spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth.
If you are interested in the history of religion or the history of Christianity, this essay is well-worth reading. The conclusion quoted above is well-supported. ABN
