The Devil’s Trick: Unmasking the God of Israel

“The finest trick of the devil is to persuade you that he does not exist,” wrote Charles Baudelaire (Paris Spleen). He was wrong: the devil’s finest trick is to persuade you that he is God.

Do I believe in the existence of the devil? It depends on the definition. I believe that humans are under the influence of the ideas that they have collectively engendered over the ages, for ideas are spiritual forces. And from that standpoint, I regard Yahweh’s impersonation of the Divine Creator as the most devastating deception ever played on the human race, a crime against divinity.

Am I a Gnostic? Not in the strict sense. If we are to believe their detractors, the early Gnostics taught that the God of the Old Testament was the evil demiurge who created the world from which Christ came to free us. I do not take Yahweh that seriously. On the contrary, I lament that he has been taken seriously by billions of people, Jews, Christians and Muslims. Yahweh is a character of fiction, but one that has gained tremendous influence over a huge portion of mankind, either directly or indirectly.

What I wish to demonstrate here is that Yahweh has the character of the devil as most people imagine it. That goes a long way towards explaining the satanic quality of Jewish Power that is becoming more and more apparent every day—a quality that Alain Soral is exposing in his most recent videos (now avalaible with English subtitles on the new ERTV International YouTube channel). If I were a Christian, I would quote John 8:44. But I am not arguing from a Christian viewpoint, for although I accept the principle that the Gospel story was designed as a cure for the Jews’ mental enslavement by the Torah, I also consider that, unless it could vomit the Old Testament, Christianity will remain forever infected by the virus it was intended to combat.

link

Evidence Of Foreign Nationals Accessing Dominion Voting Machines Leaked To Public

A defamation lawsuit between Dominion Voting Systems and former Overstock.com CEO and Donald Trump supporter Patrick Byrne has descended into chaos after one of Byrne’s attorneys leaked evidence that foreign nationals remotely accessed voting machines used in Michigan in the 2020 elections.

The leaked evidence has been floating around social media for about the last week. The evidence includes emails between Dominion workers about voting machines being accessed remotely from people in Kosovo and elsewhere.

link

Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territory

When I took over as the director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, I inherited a project that tracks temperature changes since 1880. Using this trove of data, I’ve made climate predictions at the start of every year since 2016. It’s humbling, and a bit worrying, to admit that no year has confounded climate scientists’ predictive capabilities more than 2023 has.

…In general, the 2023 temperature anomaly has come out of the blue, revealing an unprecedented knowledge gap perhaps for the first time since about 40 years ago, when satellite data began offering modellers an unparalleled, real-time view of Earth’s climate system. If the anomaly does not stabilize by August — a reasonable expectation based on previous El Niño events — then the world will be in uncharted territory. It could imply that a warming planet is already fundamentally altering how the climate system operates, much sooner than scientists had anticipated. It could also mean that statistical inferences based on past events are less reliable than we thought, adding more uncertainty to seasonal predictions of droughts and rainfall patterns.

Much of the world’s climate is driven by intricate, long-distance links — known as teleconnections — fuelled by sea and atmospheric currents. If their behaviour is in flux or markedly diverging from previous observations, we need to know about such changes in real time. We need answers for why 2023 turned out to be the warmest year in possibly the past 100,000 years. And we need them quickly.

link

This article is weird as it discusses all the usual possibilities for the temperature anomaly of 2023, but ignores the less usual but eminently possible explanation that thermal transmission from earth’s core via abyssal ocean depths is the cause. The author is none other than the director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. ABN

Cybernetics — (the basic theory underlying woke/ totalitarian control of language and behavior today)

Cyberneticscontrol theory as it is applied to complex systems. Cybernetics is associated with models in which a monitor compares what is happening to a system at various sampling times with some standard of what should be happening, and a controller adjusts the system’s behaviour accordingly.

The term cybernetics comes from the ancient Greek word kybernetikos (“good at steering”), referring to the art of the helmsman. In the first half of the 19th century, the French physicist André-Marie Ampère, in his classification of the sciences, suggested that the still nonexistent science of the control of governments be called cybernetics. The term was soon forgotten, however, and it was not used again until the American mathematician Norbert Wiener published his book Cybernetics in 1948. In that book Wiener made reference to an 1868 article by the British physicist James Clerk Maxwell on governors and pointed out that the term governor is derived, via Latin, from the same Greek word that gives rise to cybernetics. The date of Wiener’s publication is generally accepted as marking the birth of cybernetics as an independent science.

Wiener defined cybernetics as “the science of control and communications in the animal and machine.” This definition relates cybernetics closely with the theory of automatic control and also with physiology, particularly the physiology of the nervous system. For instance, a “controller” might be the human brain, which might receive signals from a “monitor” (the eyes) regarding the distance between a reaching hand and an object to be picked up. The information sent by the monitor to the controller is called feedback, and on the basis of this feedback the controller might issue instructions to bring the observed behaviour (the reach of the hand) closer to the desired behaviour (the picking up of the object). Indeed, some of the earliest work done in cybernetics was the study of control rules by which human action takes place, with the goal of constructing artificial limbs that could be tied in with the brain.

In subsequent years the computer and the areas of mathematics related to it (e.g., mathematical logic) had a great influence on the development of cybernetics—for the simple reason that computers can be used not only for automatic calculation but also for all conversions of information, including the various types of information processing used in control systems. This enhanced ability of computers has made possible two different views of cybernetics. The narrower view, common in Western countries, defines cybernetics as the science of the control of complex systems of various types—technical, biological, or social. In many Western countries particular emphasis is given to aspects of cybernetics used in the generation of control systems in technology and in living organisms. A broader view of cybernetics arose in Russia and the other Soviet republics and prevailed there for many years. In this broader definition, cybernetics includes not only the science of control but all forms of information processing as well. In this way computer science, considered a separate discipline in the West, is included as one of the component parts of cybernetics.

link

By seizing control of the psycholinguistic constellation of words and concepts within societies and fractally within individuals, societies and individuals are controlled by a cybernetic feedback loop that is self-sustaining.

This fully explains the why of speech controls (censorship, shaming, invention of new terms, etc) and how this leads very quickly to formation of a control mechanism for all of society.

The algorithms that control search engines and social media posts are extremely powerful cybernetic control mechanisms. As of today and probably well into whatever future arises, everything depends on the people (and their digital machines) that control societal cybernetics. As of today, there is no way to control those people.

It will probably always be easy for independent thinkers to see what is happening but never possible for them to effect change unless they are at the very top of the hierarchy which controls the cybernetics.

At the same time, it will always be all but impossible for independent thinkers lower down in the hierarchy to bring enough of the population to see what is happening and effect change from the bottom.

Independents and a responsive base of people at the bottom may occasionally effect some change, but the top has so much more control none of those bottom-up changes will matter for long if they matter at all. Everything we see in the world today supports this view. ABN

Swedish politician regrets ‘refugees welcome’ policy: ‘We were fundamentally wrong on the immigration issue’

Louise Meijer, an MP for Sweden’s centrist Moderate party, apologised to voters for her previous position on open borders. She regrets “making mistakes” by “pleading for openness and refugees [being] welcome”, she says.

Meijer says she “changed her mind” over her views, in an opinion piece for Expressen this week.

“Now, instead, I am advocating an even stricter migration policy than the one I opposed at the time,” she says.

Political sentiments around migration have shifted swiftly in Sweden, with now even leaders of the Social Democrats saying they favour more strict migration policies.

Sweden today is a “completely different country than it was at the end of the 20th century”. Per capita, it has “received the most immigrants in the Western world” in modern times, Meijer writes.

Today, “more than a third of Sweden’s population has a foreign background. In 1987, the corresponding figure was 11 per cent.”

link

She should be forgiven her mistake because she has admitted it and wants to make amends. We need much more of this in Western politics, particularly in USA. ABN

Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020, and a global genetic vaccination program has been rapidly implemented as a fundamental solution. However, many countries around the world have reported that so-called genetic vaccines, such as those using modified mRNA encoding the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles as the drug delivery system, have resulted in post-vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage, as well as a wide variety of diseases involving all organs and systems, including the nervous system. In this article, based on these circumstances and the volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines, and we make proposals regarding specific tests, testing methods, and regulations to deal with these risks. We expect that this proposal will serve as a basis for discussion on how to address post-vaccination syndrome and its consequences following these genetic vaccination programs.

link

‘The anger is real, and much of it is justified… and if we’re not able to have honest and difficult conversations soon, I strongly suspect we’re all headed to a very dark place’ — Asha Logos

In my few  years on this platform, I’ve never received such an outpouring of hate for a post.. and on one hand, I get it – I spoke a bit harshly, flippantly and inartfully, and a cathartic post I thought might get just a handful of likes and largely be ignored was passed through networks of tens of thousands of folks who have no idea of who I am or where I’m coming from.

link to post mentioned above

I also said some jarring things.. that I’m sure even upset a handful of genuine and well-meaning people.  

but.. along with the outpouring of hatred, it’s also near 10k ‘likes’, indicating that I’m far from alone, here.. even if most who agree would rather stay silent, for the moment.

I wanted to just say a few words about this divide, because I think it’s an exceptionally significant and era-defining one:

Many of you have absolutely no idea how disconnected many young men feel – especially White males – when it comes to the general trajectory of their nation(s), over recent decades. It no longer feels familiar, comfortable, or like home.

As some of my recently posted images show, we’re being essentially locked out of the corporate world, with Bloomberg bragging about how 95% of new hires are non-White.. we’re now (by far – and it’s not even close) the most aggressively discriminated against group with regard to Ivy league admissions. Hollywood and corporate media has long been completely dominated by a hostile group, so there aren’t options there.. trying to get a job in tech – esp in a place like SF, as a non ‘woke’ White male – is the steepest of uphill battles.. one could go on listing examples here for quite awhile.

A great many now openly laugh at and mock these hopeless and disaffected, as the income of White Americans plummets (now far below the Indian and Chinese migrants our corporations import – and no longer even in the same ballpark as Jewish-Americans), depression and suicide and drug addiction rates skyrocket, and we’re increasingly locked out of this new world being created by the Finks, Soros’, Rothschilds, and their political/financial class allies and puppets.

In a very real sense, it’s killing many of us.. and a large subset on the other side actually seems thrilled by this.

Moreover, historical cycles seem to be repeating.. a leading reason Rome fell is because she essentially opened her floodgates, granted citizenship to all, and eventually lost her unique spirit. In attempting to represent absolutely everything and everyone, she ended up representing no one, and a nihilistic apathy inevitably came to dominate. Late stage Rome became a mere corporate/economic construct – empty, void of substance, seeking power only to enrich the grasping/ambitious parasites and vultures feeding off of her once great corpse.

Not only are our own borders wide open, in the U.S., but we’re now openly discussing the prospect of allowing the tens of millions of illegals to enlist.. a shift that would’ve been unbelievable, even just a decade ago. Every day this nation feels less and less recognizable, and less like home, to so many of us.

Anyone who thinks our founding fathers – or those courageous (if misled) men who stormed Normandy – would look at this trajectory and applaud it, is either ignorant or foolish.

In the absence of substantive unifying factors, we’re told we should rally around vague ideas, and concepts – for example, many still claim our armed forces fight for ‘our freedoms’.. even as members of our political class literally fly to Israel, to sign bills restricting the speech of their own citizens, and as nearly half the nation loses all faith in the legitimacy of our elections, while our gov’t increasingly openly speaks of us as the enemy.

Many of us feel our political class (and our nation as a whole) has essentially been captured, and we intuit only hatred and malevolence emanating from the top, from men like Mayorkas, or our puppet President.. and virtually nothing about this new world resonates with us, or inspires or energizes – as we watch our streets get ever dirtier and less safe, IQ and life expectancy falling, our quality of life and general standards of behavior drop to ever new lows, those who dare say a word about it tend to be met with a conditioned response of ‘incel’, or accusations of being a hateful racist/misogynist.. or, just told we’re generally terrible people.

You can mock, deride, cheer on this wholesale replacement and aggressive disempowerment – but don’t expect us to join you in the cheering this brutally disheartening downward spiral and civilizational collapse.. and I’d suggest you mock (or completely ignore) these voices at your own peril.

The anger is real, and much of it is justified.. and if we’re not able to have honest and difficult conversations soon, I strongly suspect we’re all headed to a very dark place.

link