Two Utah men have been arrested on terrorism and weapons of mass destruction charges after federal authorities say they planted an incendiary device under a news van in Salt Lake City.
Adeeb Nasir, 58, and his co-suspect identified as “Adil” were taken into custody following a multiagency investigation led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Salt Lake City Police (SLCPD), according to reports from local news stations KUTV and ABC4.
Nasir faces eight felony counts including attempted aggravated arson and weapons of mass destruction violations.
This incident represents a dangerous escalation in threats against news media, coming just days after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University (UVU) on September 10.
Video taken from Kirk’s left make a shot from the right look plausible but 1) that’s an impossible shot and 2) foreshortening of distance between Kirk and the alleged right-side shooter are deceptive. There are many missing pieces in the story as of now but that Kirk was shot at close-range from his right side is not one of them. ABN
UPDATE: Anti-immigration is spreading across the first world. The sooner the better because waiting only makes it worse.
For readers who understand FIML, it should at some point become very clear that all people everywhere live mentally inside psycholinguistic cages and have essentially no way to escape except to crawl into yet another psycholinguistic cage.
It is ultimately this massive flaw in human language processing that will lead to societal chaos and civil wars.
The people in Japan opposing the importation of another kind of people trapped in an alien psycholinguistic (and semiotic) cage are right. They may not fully understand why, but they are protecting Japan against the gradual and inevitable annihilation the West is now experiencing.
It’s still not too late for the West, but the hour is late. ABN
I doubt most know anything about him or the other guy unfortunately. Charlie started to wander off the plantation. He was becoming a liability. This was a warning to others.
Until these questions are answered, I don’t believe one word of it. The writing on the bullet casings and finding out he lives with a trans is a nice and easy deflection. This story has more holes than a loaf of sourdough. Expect another Butler type “investigation”. And they have already planted the seed the kid is suicidal. Jus sayin.
Ian Smith, Sr. @iansmithfitness People get upset for not accepting the official government narrative of Kirk’s death – as if questioning a government that has done nothing but lie is somehow disrespectful. If anything, blindly accepting the cute gift-wrapped narrative is. Charlie was a man who encouraged questioning. Let’s walk through some of the contradictions and questions. 1) Discord evidence. Officials claim digital chats were found mapping the plan, but Discord says it’s not on their servers. So where is it? Screenshots? Forensics? Chain of custody? If a planner is smart enough to scout/escape, why leave a confession on a public platform? 2) No ballistics and caliber. We still don’t have a lab match between the rifle and the bullet that killed Charlie. Until there’s rifling/toolmark confirmation, everything else is noise. Officials can end this instantly with the fired bullet’s measured lands/grooves and a simple one-page lab prelim. Why haven’t they? 3) Rifle fairy tale. Video shows the runner without a rifle at several points. So he had to disassemble it. Are we supposed to believe he then re-assembled it just to dump it in the woods? 4) Family contradiction. Grandmother claims nobody in the family is a leftist and she’s never seen him touch a gun. That clashes with the leftist narrative and the story of a calm, competent shooter. 5) Confession theater. Shooter executes the plan under pressure, escapes, then immediately tells on himself via dad/minister. You don’t pull off a precise shot and then sprint home for a group confession circle. 6) Decoys. Two decoy arrests/contacts the same night. If this was a lone impulsive student, why the extra moving parts? Who coordinated this? 7) The plane. A private jet near the scene “disappears” from public tracking right after the shooting. We’re told “nothing to see here.” Cool, then release the ADS-B raw logs, tower audio, and a simple flight timeline. 8) Security. Clips show odd hand signals and movements around Charlie seconds before the shot. If that’s normal, let’s see an official breakdown of who those people were and what they were signaling. 9) Motive tangle. Information suggests Charlie had public disagreements with major donors and was pivoting harder to America-First fights. Ask the most basic question: cui bono? Who benefits from the story we’re being sold? 10) Wardrobe shift. Rooftop figure is head-to-toe black. The suspect appears in different clothing. If the shooter changed, where are the discarded clothes? Recovered? Tested for GSR/DNA? Logged? Show the evidence tags. 11) Rooftop access unclear. Which door, hatch, or ladder? Card swipe? Alarm trip? Camera angles? If the route is “known,” release the complete path with timestamps. A campus roof isn’t a bus stop. 12) Camera gaps. We get a few convenient snippets but no uninterrupted multi-angle sequence from roof to woods. Where’s the full pull from all cams? Redactions can protect privacy but cuts protect narratives. 13) Forensics. No GSR [Gun Shot Residue] results from the suspect’s hands/clothes. No latent prints/DNA announced on the rifle, scope, or towel. No matching shoe prints/soil transfer from the roof. These are day-one tests. Where are they? 14) Geodata. If the FBI has the right man, they have his location history, pings, and IP logs. Publish the warrant returns (redacted) that place his device at the roof and along the dump route. 15) Backpack & gear. Backpack color/cut in roof footage vs later images of the suspect aren’t a clean match. Was the pack recovered? Contents? Gloves? Optic cover? Sling? Any of it booked into evidence? 16) Media choreography. The most cinematic detail (the father/minister pipeline) was rolled out before forensics. That primes the public with a tidy moral arc while the science lags. Classic play. If the FBI has the shooter, show the receipts. Not some “I’ll see you in Valhalla” bullshit. Until then this case is a puzzle with pieces hammered to fit. We don’t need another polished narrative. We need proof. 11:30 AM · Sep 13, 2025 · 117.3K Views
In other words, reading between the lines: The night before Kirk’s talk at UVU, rabbi Wolicki asked to have a one-hour Zoom conversation with him, to go through his pro-Israel “talking points”, because many of his fans “were turning on Israel” and “there were prominent people … actively working to [get him to] drop his support for Israel on a daily basis.” (In other words, Kirk was pushed in an anti-Israel direction by his followers and by people like Carlson and Owens, and needed strong opposite pressure to stay in line.) Kirk was “in a combative mood”, “playing the role of devil’s advocate.” (In other words, the conversation turned into an argument.) Kirk was assassinated the next day.
Another point I have not seen brought up is the timing of the shot is said to have been .23 seconds, which comes from an audio measurement of the shot from firing to hitting Kirk.
How do we know the audio has not been doctored?
That would be an easy thing to do. That .23 seconds yields a distance of 143 yards, precisely the distance the sniper is said to have been away from Kirk.
But that ‘sniper’ ran off with no apparent gun in hand.
Also, no bullet has been recovered and there appear to be no signs of it exiting, which should have been conspicuous.
Why did Kirk’s security immediately clean up the scene? And why did Zinn act like a decoy immediately after the shot?
There are numerous anomalies like these in the so-far official story of what happened. ABN
Remember when Donald Trump visited Schneerson’s grave, together with Ben Shapiro? Many people don’t realize Schneerson made the following statements about ‘gentiles’:
“The entire creation [of the world] is for the sake of the Jews. The nations of the world exist only to serve the needs of the Jewish people.”
“Only the Jewish people have the capability to transform the material world into holiness. The nations of the world do not have this power.”
“All of creation was created solely to serve the Jews.”
“The difference between a Jewish person’s soul and the soul of all gentiles is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the soul of an animal.”
So why would Trump make a pilgrimage to honor the Lubavitcher Rebbe who, by his own theology, would have seen him as a subhuman?
In just a couple of days, an impressive amount of information has been brought to light pointing to Israel’s strong motive to take out Charlie Kirk ASAP. I will here compile that information, as I found it on X and other Internet outlets.
In doing so, I am not influenced by my personal opinion on Kirk. I hardly ever listened to him before the last three days, and my opinion was mostly negative. Today, I still feel that Nick Fuentes was right in his very severe judgment of him as a traitor to his country paid by Israel to keep the MAGA movement in line with Israel’s interests, even when he was doing some “damage control”. That doesn’t mean, in my view, that Kirk was not sincere in his defense of Israel. As an evangelical Christian, he probably really saw this as a calling from God. On the other hand, I think that ambitious men are never exclusively interested by truth, that men in general (women included) are very good at lying to themselves about their true motivations, and that religion is a very practical way to lie to yourself. I also think that Kirk, although an energetic and talented fast talker, was not extremely intelligent—less intelligent than Fuentes, in my view. Like Fuentes, I don’t think anybody who supports Israel because the Bible tells him so can be very intelligent.
So based on what I have seen recently, I believe that Kirk was turning, but I wouldn’t be able to say to what extent his turning was motivated by his love for truth and morality, or by his concern for keeping the trust of his base of followers, and saving his political future. I suppose he was feeling opposite pressures from two sides: from his pro-Israel backers on the top, demanding that he keeps his unconditional support of Israel, and from his grass-root followers on the bottom, who find Israel’s actions and Israel’s influence on U.S. policies more and more unbearable (Kirk’s followers also listen to Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes).
Whatever his motivations were, and no matter how far he was planning to go in his critics of Israel, the fact is that he had gone quite far already.
Researchers from a large health care system in Michigan found that vaccinated children were more likely to develop a chronic health condition, but never published the findings, according to a copy of the study obtained by The Epoch Times.
Henry Ford Health System, whose employees carried out the study, said it was deficient.
Dr. Marcus Zervos, an infectious disease specialist at the Henry Ford Health, and colleagues studied 18,468 children born between 2000 and 2016 who were enrolled in the health system’s insurance plan, drawing data from medical, clinical, and payer records and supplementing with information from Michigan’s immunization registry.
After 10 years, 57 percent of the vaccinated children had a chronic health condition such as asthma, compared to just 17 percent of the unvaccinated children.
“This study found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, when compared to children unexposed to vaccination,” the authors wrote. “This association was primarily driven by asthma, atopic disease, eczema, autoimmune disease and neurodevelopmental disorders. This suggests that in certain children, exposure to vaccination may increase the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, particularly for one of these conditions.”
American Buddhist Net 
