I do not have a sophisticated understanding of Huckabee’s theology but have read it is called Dispensational Christianity, which was crystalized by the dubious Scofield Reference Bible in USA.
Whatever the case, Huckabee’s obeisance does not seem appropriate to me, especially while Israel’s savage assault on Gaza is ongoing and he is representing USA.
I know it is too much to ask of any mainstream prominent American, but it would be good if at least a few of them openly recognized that both USA and Israel had to have had foreknowledge of the 10/07 attack and that Israel clearly delayed reacting to it and was responsible for the majority of Israelis killed that day. This profoundly undermines the ersatz ‘moral basis’ of the slaughter and starvation of so many Gazan women, children and civilians.
I am fine with religion and government mixing on abstract and some practical levels, but Huckabee is taking this much too far into dangerous intellectual and theological territory. ABN
They are showing us this today. What is available to governments and wealthy orgs also today is surely much smaller and quieter with even more capabilities.
We do see a probable muzzle flash behind Charlie Kirk which aligns with the shot that hits him, but let’s keep in mind a tiny drone is also a possibility. ABN
…a few hours after hearing of Kirk’s death, I very gingerly raised these possibilities with someone well situated in conservative circles who personally knew Kirk, and was shocked by his response. He unequivocally told me that everyone in Kirk’s circle, even including important Trump Administration officials, suspected that Israel had probably killed the young conservative leader.
UPDATE 9/19: I have learned that the guy removing the camera is Kirk’s videographer and that he has turned the SD card over to the FBI. It’s very probable that guy is the videographer but it’s also probable the FBI will not allow us to view the vid, claim it was lost or damaged, or alter it. As of today, the FBI has not been credible or forthcoming in this investigation. ABN
This video appears to show the shot came from above and a bit behind on Kirk’s right.
The streak near his right ear is his earpiece wire flying away from his ear upon impact from the bullet.
The impact of the bullet also pulls a further and thicker length of the cord running to his earpiece up, and it is this cord that you see sort of circling upward under the front of his shirt and around the back of his neck.
The wound on his neck’s left side is the exit wound and conforms precisely with how exit wounds appear but not entry wounds.
There have been many reports and videos of super fast, very small drones present at the rally during his talk.
It may be that one of those drones fired the shot that killed Kirk. Mercifully, if that was the case, he would have died instantly.
Another point worth making is that if he was killed by a miniature, military-grade attack-drone, we can be sure his assailants were professionally trained and equipped. And there was more than one.
This video appears to invalidate the lone sniper on the roof story. ABN
As of today, there is no way to be certain who shot Kirk and why.
But there is also no way it is not suspicious so many influencers are asserting the radical trans left did it.
There’s plenty more than just those four names singing that tune.
Free speech isn’t free when it costs $150 million.
I respect Kirk for turning down the bribe.
Congress is bribed, influencers are bribed, legacy media is bribed, universities are bribed.
It’s either the carrot or a bullet in the neck.
If Israel or US IC killed Kirk, it was not just to stop him and blame the left.
It was also to scare the sh*t out of anyone who turns down the bribes to tell what they see as the truth, as Kirk did.
There are so many holes in the official story as of today, no one should be claiming they know who did it or telling others to stop noticing patterns or the absurdity of the story to date.
I will never believe a word of this story if they don’t release the video from the camera behind Kirk when he was shot. ABN
Eighty years after the first and only use of nuclear weapons during the Second World War, the proliferation of the world’s most powerful explosives has continued to provide a growing number of countries with increasingly diverse means of launching nuclear attacks.
Although the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons has restricted just five counties to owning nuclear weapons, namely the United States, China, Russia, France and the United Kingdom, a total of fifteen countries today retain at least a limited known capability to launch nuclear attacks.
These include both four non-signatories of the treaty, and six countries that are part of nuclear sharing agreements, meaning they train to use either American or Russian nuclear weapons stored on their territory in the expectation that they will be provided access to these in the event that a high intensity conflict breaks out.
Countries with nuclear weapons can broadly be divided into four categories depending on the sizes, capabilities and diversity of their arsenals and means of delivery. An overview of the capabilities of the world’s nuclear arsenals is provided below.
Level One: United States, Russia and China
The United States, Russia and China are currently the only nuclear weapons states with both robust nuclear triads and intercontinental range strike capabilities, meaning they deploy nuclear weapons on ground launched missile systems, from strategic bombers, and from submarines all of which can engage targets 5,600 km away.
All three deploy both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons, although China’s arsenal is under a fifth the size of the other two nuclear superpowers, while its doctrine for nuclear weapons use is among the most conservative and defensive in the world.
The three countries each have various strengths and shortcomings in their arsenals, with Russia deploying more warheads, a large arsenal of nuclear armed tactical ballistic missiles, and intercontinental range hypersonic glide vehicles, while the United States is the only country to deploy tactical nuclear weapons using radar evading stealth fighters and bombers.
The United States suffers from growing obsolescence of arsenal of nuclear armed intercontinental range ballistic missiles, which dates back to the 1970s, while Russia has sought to counter the threat from American bombers by arming its interceptors with the world’s only known nuclear-armed air-to-air missiles.
US Army Places US Typhon Missiles In Japan For First Time, Enraging China
The United States continues using regional Asian allies to counter-signal China and flex its military might, following President Xi Jinping’s massive military parade marking the 80th anniversary of World War II, which gripped the world’s attention two weeks ago.
This week the US Army has unveiled a midrange Typhon missile system on a Japanese base for the first time. The deployment comes in the context of the annual bilateral exercise Resolute Dragon; however, US officials have made clear the Typhon won’t be fired, but is only there for training purposes.
Typhon missile
We previewed earlier that the Typhon, also dubbed ‘Mid-Range Capability’, is a land-based missile launcher that can fire nuclear-capable Tomahawk missiles, which have a range exceeding 1,000 miles, and SM-6 missiles, which can hit targets up to 290 miles away.
The missile system would have been banned under the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, a treaty with Russia that the US withdrew from in 2019. This has naturally caused immense alarm in Beijing, as has Washington’s deepening military relationship with Japan.
American Buddhist Net 