The article discusses the historical and contemporary roles of three prominent Jewish libertarians—Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand, and Ludwig von Mises—in shaping libertarian thought and their connections to the ruling elite. Friedman and Rand are noted for their strong Jewish identities and Zionist beliefs, while Mises, although rooted in his Jewish heritage, emphasized individual freedom over ethnic concerns. The piece delves into the broader libertarian critique of the state, which is portrayed as an oppressive force driven by an exploitative ruling elite that privatizes gains while socializing losses. This elite is accused of manipulating public perception to support its policies, leading to perpetual conflict and the looming threat of nuclear warfare.
The author argues that exposing the ruling elite’s machinations is essential for reducing state power and preventing war. However, libertarian scholars often shy away from this analysis due to fears of being labeled as conspiratorial or politically incorrect. The article highlights Murray Rothbard as a notable exception, who actively critiqued the ruling elite’s influence and sought to understand its dynamics without succumbing to mainstream taboos. Rothbard’s contributions are framed as an essential framework for analyzing the intersection of economic interests and political power, emphasizing that elite actors engage in purposeful, self-interested behavior rather than acting randomly.
Rothbard identified three ethnic power blocs within the ruling elite: the WASP elite, the Jewish elite, and the Rockefeller dynasty. Each bloc is characterized by its distinct cultural and economic foundations, contributing to a complex interplay of competition and collaboration among these groups. The article elaborates on how these power blocs have historically influenced U.S. foreign policy and domestic governance, particularly during the World Wars, where their conflicting interests dictated the alignment of the U.S. in global conflicts. Rothbard’s analysis suggests that while these factions often cooperated for mutual benefit, their internal rivalries also shaped the course of American history.
The discussion shifts to the role of the Jewish elite in shaping state behavior, particularly in the context of the modern geopolitical landscape. The article posits that the Jewish elite has historically leveraged their position to navigate power dynamics while maintaining a distinct identity. The rise of neoconservative influence within the Republican Party is highlighted as a significant shift, with Rothbard noting the increasing prominence of Jewish interests in shaping U.S. foreign policy towards Israel and broader Middle Eastern engagements. The conclusion emphasizes the current geopolitical tensions and the need for libertarians to critically engage with the ruling elite’s influence, especially as conflicts in Gaza and elsewhere escalate, posing risks of genocide and nuclear war. The author calls for a more open discourse within libertarian circles regarding the Jewish elite’s role, arguing that self-censorship could lead to dire consequences for global peace and individual freedoms.
The next psychological step is naming Jewish Supremacy which is Israel’s controller.
JS is fundamentally an international cabal, an international controller. Its power is lies in that. The next, next step is to say that without apology.
An interesting aside is you can see the power of psycholinguistics in how an entire civilization, the West, has allowed its speech to be cowed by this vicious cabal. ABN
This is a very informative interview. I put it up a few days ago but had not had time to view it until last night.
Since Maine is a large state area-wise but tiny based on its population of 1.3 million, it is a good metric of what is happening nation-wide and even across the Western world.
At the top of Maine’s information and money chain is George Soros.
Robinson, ‘Maine’s only journalist’, tells the sad tale in this video of profound Chinese gang activity infiltrating the state, and the minds of Maine’s politicians.
Robinson believes Main’s corruption and lawlessness can only be fixed by the federal government. With Trump in office, this is a real possibility. ABN
President Donald Trump’s FBI head Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino are both ready to call it quits if Attorney General Pam Bondi keeps her job after the debacle over releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Bongino, the agency’s deputy director, made the ultimatum after an epic clash with Bondi on Wednesday over the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, the Daily Mail can reveal.
The rift was so bad that Bongino took the day off work on Friday, leading some to think that he had already left his post, Axios first reported.
And now, an insider at the DOJ tells the Daily Mail that Bongino will quit if Bondi doesn’t step down or get fired.
‘I don’t see a scenario where Dan stays if Bondi remains,’ the insider said.
It all stems from an unsigned memo released on Sunday with DOJ and FBI seals that concluded a review of the files resulted in confirmation that Epstein did not get murdered in prison and that none of the available evidence included a so-called ‘client list.’
This is what needs to happen in the West, particularly between and among Russia, Europe and USA.
I hope and believe Trump is working on both of these deals to the best of his ability.
Signs of success in ME. Signs of transition in Europe-USA-Russia.
From a game theory KOBK point of view, violent Western divisiveness if pursued without stopping is suicide for the West.
Western leaders must know this.
Those who are furthering violent divisiveness are either: 1) taking profits while they still can; or 2) are not real Westerners but either traitors of foreigners. ABN
My understanding is this protest was organized by Unionists in Northern Ireland. That’s an important point, and so is the point that people in the West are displaying vivid resistance to their fast approaching demise. Irish authorities are calling the protest ‘vile and racist’. I call it incendiary. ABN
On 10 July, around 11:30, Lithuanian Armed Forces detected an object approaching from the direction of Belarus. The Armed Forces said the Air Force activated NATO fighter jets already in the air by switching them from training to mission mode.
Shortly after detection, the object fell to the ground. The mission was canceled. Military units notified the State Border Guard Service (VSAT), and troops were sent to the crash site.
The Gerbera drone that crashed in Lithuania after crossing from Belarus. Photo: Lithuanian Ministry of Defense via Delfi.
Russia targets Ukraine daily with hundreds of Gerbera drones, used as decoys alongside explosive Shaheds to overwhelm air defenses. Recently, some of these cheap styrofoam Gerberas have begun carrying small warheads, increasing civilian casualties.
The drone that crashed in Lithuania may have veered off course during last night’s Russian attack on Ukraine — or it may have been a deliberate probe to test Lithuania’s and NATO’s response ahead of potential future aggression against the Baltic States.
He does not want the war but he cannot resist the forces within NATO and USA that do want the war.
Some of those forces are economic, some KOBK game theory aimed at destroying Russia AND Europe, and some, perhaps the most influential, are Jewish Supremist forces.
We have seen JS play their hand in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union and in Ukraine during the long run-up to the Ukraine War.
Starmer is Jewish as is Boris Johnson, just two of many who appear to be wholehearted Jewish Supremists and who have fought against peace and in favor of continuing the War. Victorina Nuland in USA is similar.
I have seen analyses saying Trump is fighting against the ‘inertia of war’. Some truth in that but there are people applying force to that ‘inertia’, lots of force. They have an agenda and it is not to benefit Russia or Europe or USA. ABN
She flew into the hearts of global audiences and the annals of cinematic history as her nightgown-clad heroine soared over the skyline of metropolis alongside Christopher Reeve when Superman hit theaters in 1978.
Actress Margot Kidder’s Lois Lane – a mixture of journalistic feistiness and besotted comic book-girlfriend vulnerability – became instantly iconic and recognizable. She starred in four of the franchise’s blockbusters, gracing the covers of countless magazines and making shoeless appearances for TV interviews as the world couldn’t seem to get enough of the ethereal Canadian star.
As legions of fans envied her aerial on-screen escapades with one of Hollywood’s then-hottest heartthrobs, however, Kidder was grappling with a lifetime of what she called ‘mind flights.’
Margot Kidder and Christopher Reeve played Lois Lane and Superman in 1978 film Superman
She would only come to accept a bipolar diagnosis later in life, but Kidder, from childhood, was plagued by mental struggles that would at one point in the 1990s leave her homeless and near toothless in California, committed to psychiatric care th and rummaging through garbage for food.
…In the early days of her international stardom, in the wake of the Superman box office behemoth, she described to Rolling Stone ‘a constant sense of conflict: if I think about what I believe is important, I’ll be crazy; and if I don’t think about it, I find myself denying, denying, denying in order to be normal.’
…‘The reality of my life has been grand and wonderful, punctuated by these odd blips and burps of madness.’.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the sidelines of a meeting of foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Kuala Lumpur today. Against the backdrop of multiple questions to him about the outcome of their discussion, let us first discuss the problem being avoided.
In the mind of President Putin, and in the growing awareness of the American electorate, the President of the United States does not control the Intelligence Community. It is entirely possible for the USIC to take America deeper toward war despite the President and people of America not wanting that to happen. Putin is simply prepared for that outcome.
This reality explains a dynamic where President Trump engages with President Putin in an effort to stop the war in Ukraine, yet President Putin continues the war in Ukraine; because ultimately he knows President Trump does not control the elements that facilitate the Ukraine military.
People struggle to accept this dynamic. However, I would remind everyone that right now YOU are paying for the entire government of Ukraine to exist. Including the Ukraine govt payrolls, retirement benefits, healthcare and operational budget of Ukraine overall.
Americans do not want to pay for that. President Trump does not want to pay for that. Yet, here we are, paying for that.
The same inertia process applies to the literal Ukraine war and conflict with Russia.
You might not want it. President Trump might not want it. Yet, here again we are providing weapons, intelligence, satellite communication, personnel and systems for the war.
This is the reality of the situation regardless of your/my willingness to accept it. This reality is what President Vladimir Putin discusses and accepts.
The problem for President Trump is not that this reality exists; the bigger political problem for President Trump is that people are increasingly becoming aware of this reality.
Now, many people are recently arguing against this reality. However, these are the same voices who previously stated President Trump could unilaterally declassify information within the same silo process that is designed to control his declassification authority. Empirically, and in reality, these voices are wrong.
Something needs to change. That something is generally that President Trump has to either: 1. admit publicly he does not control the U.S. Intelligence Community (very ugly); or 2. take control of that intelligence community (even uglier).
In this element of consideration you would be well served to insert the recent experience of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard; who, intentionally or not, opened the pandora’s box containing this issue, and look what happened to her.
There was a reason DNI Tulsi Gabbard sat silently recently in the very public Cabinet meeting. I will return to this in a moment.
♦ President Trump does not have control over the USIC activity in Ukraine. If he did, he would have been fully aware of the drone strikes against the Russian strategic bomber fleet before it was carried out. By his own admission he did not know.
American Buddhist Net 