The other reasons you might se a motorcyclist weaving is to buff the sides of their tires or just to have some fun. A rider weaving almost never is asking you to get out of the way. It’s fun to do, helps cars see you, and is good for the sides of the tires for several reasons (cold, mud, distribute wear more evenly). ABN
A sweeping sexual privacy scandal has triggered national outrage and exposed critical gaps in China‘s legal and digital frameworks. Known online as ‘Sister Hong,’ a man from Nanjing allegedly lured more than 1,600 unsuspecting men into sexual encounters, secretly recording them and distributing the footage for profit.
The perpetrator, 38-year-old Jiao, crafted a convincing female persona through wigs, makeup, dresses, voice modulation, and beauty filters.
Posing as a married woman, he attracted mostly heterosexual men seeking discreet affairs. These encounters were secretly filmed with hidden cameras in Jiao’s home, violating the privacy and consent of his partners.
Mossad’s Ulysses Project’s secret operatives took on false identities, married Palestinians, had children – all while feeding intelligence to Israeli operators
Uri Yisrael served as a fighter in Caesarea, the Mossad Special Operations Division, and has a unique record: He lived under an assumed identity for the longest time period – 15 years.Yisrael and another fighter dubbed “Isaac” (his name is still under censorship) were part of the Ulysses Project – a secret Israeli intelligence project in the 1950s and 1960s.
They were planted as Arabs, married Palestinians, had children and were incorporated into the Palestinian community as businessmen. They were the first to provide intelligence regarding the establishment of Fatah, and took part in the first plans to kill Yasser Arafat and Abu Jihad.
Uri Yisrael’s son is 50-years-old today and lives abroad. To this day, he does not know that his father is not a nationalistic Palestinian but an Israeli Mossad agent. He also does not know he has a half-brother: Shai Yisrael, a lawyer, Uri’s son from a Jewish woman.
The story begins in 1950, when Isser Harel, then the director of the Mossad, set up a unit called Ulysses, with the purpose of planting agents within the Palestinian refugee community in the West Bank and in the neighboring countries. The recruits were Jewish Zionists, recent immigrants from Arab countries. They joined the secret unit after Harel and his men convinced them it was a “top priority national mission.”
They did the same thing in USA and are still doing it.
It’s covert warfare and includes interpersonal covert violence almost no one notices because individuals (millions of them) are targeted one by one.
The people who did and are still doing this are all Jewish Supremists acting out of a JS ‘morality’ that lauds poisoning or lobotomizing perceived ‘potential enemies’. They also support killing babies, disabling young people, doing anything at all that might be ‘best for Jews’, in their estimation.
I strongly favor using the term Jewish Supremist for the perps rather than ‘the Jews’ because obviously not all Jews are directly involved in these clandestine attacks.
Worth noting is that by poisoning, lobotomizing, bribing or blackmailing their rivals, rather than killing them outright, the fruits of covert warfare are sweeter because the compromised victims live on to yield long-term benefit to Jewish Supremist goals.
No one doubts the reality of widespread deliberate poisoning of USA with fentanyl by the CCP and others. Many can see that the opioid crisis was backed by JS money and people. Covid and covid vaxxes also appear to be bioweapons to a great number of us.
It is not hard to extrapolate from those datapoints to widespread covert targeting of talented or prominent individuals, one by one over many decades.
Things are looking up for being able to be honest about Jewish issues in mainstream forums. I couldn’t be happier that this is coming out from a mainstream conservative at a major mainstream conservative conference. It’s been a long time coming, and we are still not there. But there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Carlson is much hated by the ADL which oddly has not commented on this latest faux pas. But they have lots to say about Turker’s endorsement of the great replacement “conspiracy theory.”
Carlson claimed that Epstein had “connections to a foreign government”:
“It’s extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government.” “Now no one’s allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that’s naughty.”
Lots of Jewish angst about this — and about Carlson’s statement that Jews who served in the IDF should lost their U.S. citizenship. Common sense, but since when has common sense been relevant to anything related to Jewish power. Any accusation of dual loyalty is considered anti-Semitism according to the official definition of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, so I guess Carlson is now officially an anti-Semite, along with Charlie Kirk and a whole lot of people who attended the conference.
The refrain on the right is that Epstein matters because he is a window into who rules the U.S. And one would be forgiven for thinking that the reason for the cover-up is to hide the involvement of Mossad in an elaborate blackmail scheme. We also deserve to know what the deep state is hiding about the JFK assassination—another phenomenally important event in which there is good reason to think that Israel and the CIA were involved, and another incident where Trump said he would be completely transparent.
I would add that at some point people are going to figure out that Jewish Supremists are not just bribing and blackmailing but also poisoning and doing psychosurgery in USA. ABN
Researchers connected another Arizona geographical feature, the Meteor Crater to the Grand Canyon’s formation.
The Meteor Crater, located about 130 miles southeast of the Grand Canyon’s South Rim, was formed more than 56,000 years ago by a large iron-nickel asteroid.
The study hypothesizes that the impact triggered landslides in the Grand Canyon that accounted for a hefty portion of its shaping.
These landslides supposedly blocked off the Colorado River and formed a ‘paleolake,’ which is ancient lake that no longer exists, in the canyon.
Ultimately, researchers deemed that since all of these timelines appear to match up, the asteroid that created the massive crater also caused the landslide.
The landslide led to the paleolake, which created a dam in the Colorado River.
This dam allowed for water to build up and eventually cause surging floods that flooded caves in the canyon, causing further erosion.
…Consider the following regarding the absurdity and cruelty of Holocaust Denial laws. At the post-WWII Nuremberg Trials, the Soviet delegation was led by Andrey Vyshinsky, the same judge who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Show Trials’ (1936-1938) where defendants, including Lenin’s close friends (Kamenev, Zinoviev, Bukharin and more), were tortured into confessing their guilt, and were then executed.
At the Nuremberg Trials, Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced “evidence” blaming the Germans for the massacre of 20,000+ leading Poles near Katyn and elsewhere, which many at the time, including Churchill, knew had been done by Stalin.
Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced obviously fabricated “evidence,” which can be easily verified in the official trial documentation, and has been gathered by Carlos Porter in his book Made In Russia: The Holocaust.
During that trial, the Soviets claimed that the evil non-homo sapiens maniacal Hitler-Nazis killed people via steam chambers, electrical chambers, atomic bomb-like device, having people climb trees and then cutting them down, a pedal-driven brain bashing machine, and a bone-grinding machine among other absurd-fabricated methods.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the total number of people estimated by the “official” coerced-competition-immune narrative to have been killed in Auschwitz was revised from 4 million to 1.5 million, and soon after to 1.1 million.
All alleged extermination camps have experienced similar large downward revisions. Given the above, and prior to these massive “revisions,” someone doing their moral duty of speaking the truth as they saw it, saying that the 4 million figure was a gross exaggeration, or error, or Soviet-Communist fabrication by Stalin’s legal team at the post-World-War-Two Nuremberg Trials to punish the Germans, would have been erroneously, unjustly vilified, sent to prison, or killed for resisting arrest.
Elon Musk‘s xAI announced “Grok for Government” on Monday.
The company signed a contract with the Department of Defense for up to $200 million.
The service will also be made available to other federal government agencies.
Elon Musk’s xAI is launching a new government-facing service. Its first client happens to be the largest employer on Earth.
The Department of Defense will pay up to $200 million for “Grok for Government,” a new collection of AI products geared toward use by federal, local, and state governments.
The department has also awarded similar contracts to Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI, which launched its own government-facing initiative last month.
In recent months, Ron Unz has been extensively utilizing OpenAI’s Deep Research AI for fact-checking his controversial articles, which often explore contentious historical topics like the JFK assassination, 9/11 attacks, and the origins of COVID-19. This advanced AI system, known for its computational resources and depth in research, has become an invaluable tool for Unz, allowing him to substantiate his claims and refine his body of work. Despite its limitations, such as occasional failures in processing complex inquiries and producing garbled outputs, the AI has consistently validated a significant portion of Unz’s assertions, providing a level of confidence in his work that he believes will encourage readers to engage with his findings.
Unz’s articles touch on various controversial subjects, often challenging mainstream narratives. He asserts that the AI’s analyses have generally confirmed the accuracy of his claims, particularly regarding politically sensitive issues, including allegations about the influence of Israeli intelligence in major historical events. For instance, he highlights the AI’s positive evaluations of his pieces on the assassination of prominent figures and the role of sexual blackmail in politics, emphasizing how it has supported his conclusions with credible evidence. This validation serves to bolster his position in a landscape where many of his views are dismissed or ridiculed, especially by the mainstream media.
However, Unz also notes that the AI’s evaluations can be inconsistent, especially concerning topics deemed sensitive or controversial, such as the Holocaust narrative. While the AI has largely endorsed his factual claims, it issued strong critiques when his articles contained skepticism regarding established historical accounts. This discrepancy raises questions about the potential biases ingrained in the AI’s programming, suggesting that it might be conditioned to respond negatively to certain subjects while maintaining a more favorable stance on others. Unz points out that when his articles focus comprehensively on controversial subjects, the AI tends to validate them more favorably, which could indicate an underlying complexity in how the AI processes sensitive content.
The broader implications of Unz’s findings extend into the realm of AI ethics and the reliability of automated fact-checking systems. His experiences suggest that while AI can significantly enhance research and verification processes, it must be carefully monitored to avoid biases that could distort factual accuracy. As Unz continues to publish articles that challenge mainstream narratives, the interplay between his provocative hypotheses and the AI’s evaluations highlights the importance of rigorous scrutiny in both human and machine-generated analyses. The ongoing dialogue about the role of AI in journalism and research, particularly in relation to controversial topics, remains a critical area for future exploration.
On the same day Dimon raised the alarm with clients about the risks, JPMorgan released a statement confirming it was increasing its ‘direct lending commitment to $50 billion.’
‘This strategic move is designed to extend the firm’s direct lending capabilities and provide tailored private credit solutions to meet the evolving needs of clients,’ the firm said.
Under the new plan, corporate clients have the option to either take on a traditional loan or a private lending option, which could grant them access to more cash but see them saddled with a higher interest rate.
‘Since 2021, J.P. Morgan has successfully deployed over $10 billion across more than 100 private credit transactions, serving both corporate and sponsor clients,’ JPMorgan said in a February statement.
‘This latest commitment underscores the bank’s dedication to being a leader in both the broadly syndicated and private credit markets.’
JPMorgan holds onto private loans and collects interest until it matures.