Sundance on Peter Thiel and geopolitics

Ordinarily the opinions of one tech billionaire would, perhaps, not matter much to the life of an ordinary American.  However, in this era of 2024 election and the Technocracy influence, maybe this interview discussion carries a different set of values.

Tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, an AI enhanced data processing system that streamlines the organization of technological surveillance methods, gives his views on a variety of current political aspects.

I find the interview as little interesting from a few perspectives.  First, while generally supporting President Trump, Peter Thiel says he is choosing to stay out of the political influence game in the 2024 general election.  Considering the scale of Thiels prior advocacy and specific action he undertook to put JD Vance into office and then into the VP nominee position for Trump – this decision to now ‘step back’ from 2024 seems a big disingenuous.

Second, and directly related to the first point, Thiel -through Palantir contracts- is now directly enmeshed in the Intelligence Community effort to capture and organize surveillance metadata of Americans.  Perhaps, just perhaps, this new financial dependency plays a role in influencing his ‘step back’ decision. 

Other points worth noting relate to how Thiel outlines his perspectives on geopolitical events.  When you look at Thiel’s communication abilities and perspectives it really shows you how shallow, small and generally naïve these top-tier influence agents can be.

Continue reading “Sundance on Peter Thiel and geopolitics”

Douglas Macgregor on GLOBALISTS and their lust to destroy Russia and why

He is right and also his statements prove: 1) the core of globalist thinking is anti-Western and thus this core is not itself Western; smarmy Western toadies, opportunists, traitors and hangers-on are numerous and being used at all levels but they are not at the core; 2) the core globalists are not just anti-Western, they are anti-everyone in the world who is not them and thus they will not stop until they have achieved global domination, the essence of the word globalist. In this light, all peoples in the world who are not part of the core anti-Western/ anti-everyone who is not them globalists should fear and oppose core globalists. All peoples in the world who are not them are grossly mistaken to frame the world’s plight in anti-Western or anti-White or anti-Christian terms because after Russia falls and the West is entirely cucked, destroyed and conquered, they will be next. ABN

Putin on threat of NATO missiles fired from Ukraine into Russia: ‘This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, are at war with Russia’

This is the inevitable escalation Western cabal has been working towards. Possible consequences are numerous — full-scale nuclear war; less drastically, prolonged war between Europe and Russia; thus keeping Russia occupied while Israel-USA do full-scale conventional war in Middle East; elections in USA cancelled or postponed; economic chaos throughout the world as chaos always benefits the strongest, which is how Western cabal (probably rightly for now) sees itself. It must also be considered that the West has a super-weapon which global chaos will both facilitate and conceal the use of. This is possibly that super-weapon, outlandish as that may seem. It could also be something else. ABN

NETHERLANDS: Announces strictest migration policy yet; will opt-out of EU common policy on asylum next week

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof on Friday unveiled the Netherlands’ strictest migration policy yet, saying the country will request an opt-out from EU common policy on asylum next week.

A four-party coalition dominated by far-right MP Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party wants to declare an “asylum crisis” to curb the influx of migrants through a set of tough rules, including border controls.

“We cannot continue to bear the large influx of migrants into our country,” Schoof told journalists at a press conference in The Hague.

“People are experiencing an asylum crisis,” the premier said at the presentation of the government’s plans for the next three years.

“That is why we will soon introduce an emergency measure consisting of multiple procedures to make migration and asylum stricter,” he said.

“We will focus on the rapid departure of those who cannot stay and an accelerated procedure for asylum applications that have no chance of success,” added Schoof.

link

In defense of Jeffrey Sachs — Ron Unz

A few agitated commenters have once again begun denouncing Prof. Jeffrey Sachs for allegedly being responsible for the Western looting of Russia during the 1990s.

Frankly, a decade or two ago I’d vaguely had the same opinion since I’d always seen him described in the newspapers as one of the key economic advisors to the Russian government of that period and had read some article somewhere making that claim. But I’d never explored this matter and over the last couple of years I’ve become convinced that my impression was entirely mistaken.

Therefore, I’d urge that people read Sachs’ article providing his version of the history, very similar to what he’d said in his 2005 book, which I’d read earlier this year. I’d also strongly suggest that people watch his detailed interview, which he apparently arranged after Taibbi and the other hosts had casually made that same mistaken accusation in a previous show.

Over the last couple of years I’ve watched a number of his interviews in which he discussed these matters, and all I can say is that he’s either being honest or he’s about the best liar in the history of the human species.

As far as I can tell, the only reason people believe Sachs was responsible was one 1998 article published in the Nation plus portions of Naomi Klein’s 2007 book. Mistaken ideas sometimes get into circulation and are then repeated back and forth so many times that everyone assumes they’re correct. But I’ve carefully read those two sources and I found Sachs’ account much more persuasive.

More importantly, President Putin and the top Russian leaders have denounced the 1990s policies as one of the greatest economic disasters of the 20th century and have been scathing in their denunciations of the American advisors who they blamed for the looting of their country and the total impoverishment of the Russian population. However, they’ve never included Sachs in that category, and instead they have always treated him with respect and friendship.

I think that Putin and his leadership team have a much better idea of what really happened during the 1990s than any of us do, and the identities of the heroes and the villains. So I trust Putin’s judgment on such things.

This issue has major importance because of Sachs’ current status as one of the foremost critics of American policies. Indeed, in my articles I’ve made that point that Sachs has probably now become the highest-ranking American ideological defector of the last one hundred years, or at least no other obvious names come to mind:

link

I have been extremely suspicious of Sachs and avoided posting any of his material on this site. I am willing to consider Ron’s argument but also can’t not notice, once again, it’s one Jew defending another. ‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead them’. If you click on the link to Ron’s comments and read some other comments, you will get a fuller picture of this issue. I, for one, remember the rape of Russia and that Sachs was a prominent exponent of economic ‘shock therapy’ not only in Russia but also South America, if memory serves. I may be wrong and am willing to change my view of Sachs but am not eager to do so. Below is a recent video of Sachs commenting on Ukraine. In that video, he blames everything on ‘USA’ when the reality appears to be different and rife with his tribe always at or near the top. So, I dunno. Best to be suspicious, yet at the same time ready to forgive anyone who honestly repents and changes their ways. Of course, Sachs is claiming he never was doing bad things in Russia and Ron’s use of Putin’s non-criticism of Sachs is illuminating, but there are surely many dark wrinkles inside of that. A non-confession, non-repentance, I-was-always-right-and-good argument might be true, but consider the sources. ABN

Continue reading “In defense of Jeffrey Sachs — Ron Unz”

‘Ukraine must defend itself’: Washington leaders dismiss Putin’s war talk

US officials and lawmakers shot back after Vladimir Putin said that Nato’s potential lifting of restrictions on Ukraine to launch long-range strikes over the border into Russian territory would mean Nato countries were “at war” with Russia.

The prime minister, Keir Starmer, met with the US president, Joe Biden, on Friday at the White House, where the two were expected to discuss – though not necessarily announce – a loosening of restrictions on Storm Shadow missiles that would allow Ukraine to strike targets as far as 155 miles inside Russia.

“This will mean that Nato countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia,” Putin told Russian reporters on Thursday. “And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.”

The missiles are jointly produced in the UK and France, and both countries appear to be seeking Biden’s go-ahead to loosen restrictions on the use of the long-range missiles. Western officials have indicated that the US is not planning to allow its own missiles to be used to strike targets deeper inside Russia.

link

Like all things political, there are many shells in this game. Escalation of the KOBK ultimate goal of world domination is one shell, while another is interference with the US 2024 elections. In real-world game theory, chaos benefits the strongest player and will be pursued by the player that believes they are the strongest. Hence, endless wars in the Middle east, escalating chaos and war in Europe. Escalating chaotic immigration in Western countries proves the top KOBK rulers of the West are not themselves Westerners. ABN

UK has decided to allow Ukraine to use Storm Shadow missiles in long-range strikes on Russia

The U.K. has already privately decided to allow Ukraine to use its British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles for long-range strikes deep into Russia, the Guardian reported on Sept. 11, citing unnamed U.K. officials.

Kyiv has long argued that restrictions on the use of long-range weapons are stifling its war effort, while Washington has claimed that allowing Ukraine to hit deep into Russian territory with its weapons could escalate the situation.

During a joint press conference in Kyiv on Sept. 11, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said that Russia is responsible for escalating the war.

link

Ukraine: The GOAL has been to destroy it

Russia and Europe are next. These are the results of an ongoing KOBK battle at the top of the world power structure. It has ever been escalating and will continue escalating. There are more fronts than kinetic war. As people are displaced in the Middle East, they are transported into Europe where whites are displaced. NATO is now planning bombing from Ukraine deep inside Russia. Putin says that means war with Europe. Chaos, escalation, it won’t stop. Ukraine is already destroyed. Over one-half of the population has already fled, never to return. WW3 is already happening. The savagery is wherever you look. ABN