Multiple Shooters? | John Cullen & Clay Martin (TPC #1,538)

UPDATE: I have watched about one-half of this video. A major question I have had about there being a professional sniper involved is, why did he miss? This question was answered by Clay Martin when he said that since Crooks had raised his head too soon and been killed before he got off any shots, the pro sniper who was allegedly in a room below Crooks was forced to switch rifles and had to stand instead of using his tripod. This made the shot more difficult and thus he missed by, literally, a hair. So far (at the video halfway point) nothing has been said about the windows in the ARG building apparently being closed. Cullen has mentioned that the person he suspects as being the shooter cut his hand on glass while picking up shell casings. I suppose that glass is from the broken window. Is there post-event evidence of a broken window? This video is so long I am adding some comments now to pique interest and to alert viewers of some things to look for. Cullen claims we can see the SS sniper bullet that killed Crooks in flight in the video. And we do seem to see that. Cullen’s audio analysis also appears to show that subsonic rounds were used by the sniper in the room below Crooks before the first three shots we can hear on most recordings of the event. Subsonic rifle rounds are quiet, so their audio signature has not been widely noticed so far. ABN

UPDATE: Cullen claims 14 subsonic sniper shots from the window, the majority of them after the same sniper fired the loud supersonic shots we hear in recordings. This brings me back to the same question as before: if the sniper is still firing at Trump as he moves toward his car, was anyone hit? Is there any evidence of those shots landing in that vicinity? There is some discussion related to this point which assumes the bad guy sniper in the room was second string, not the best. This OK for a few shots, but fourteen hitting no one? Cullen hypothesizes the snipers are not direct US government people, but interested parties that US would look the other way for. Possibly Ukrainian snipers already in USA being trained for the war in Ukraine and whose interests were killing Trump to keep the war going. Israel or Netanyahu are also considered as possibilities. It’s a good vid, well-worth watching. ABN

Crooks seen running on roof, Secret Service still lying

Besides all the many signs Crooks gave off, don’t SS snipers and agents use binoculars or sights? At the second congressional hearing after Cheatle bombed at the first one, the new boss said SS snipers could only see the ‘crown of Crooks’ head’. How is that not enough? Recall new boss showed a still photo of the crown of Crooks’ head as part of his show-and-tell excuse. That’s disgracefully absurd, ridiculous. Our government needs a total overhaul. ABN

Senators Hawley, Cruz and Johnson Question Secret Service Director and Deputy FBI Director

In the interests of reader time, here’s a few key excerpts from Senate questioning of Acting Director of the Secret Service Ronald Rowe Jr. and Deputy FBI Director Paul Abbate.

Senator Josh Hawley focuses on “accountability”:

.

An ancillary point that just keeps nagging me.

DATAPOINT: Everyone knows, literally prior to this event – everyone knew, that Secret Service protection had been continually denied to Robert F Kennedy Jr, by the people behind Joe Biden.  Not only did everyone know this, but RFK Jr and every pundit on the right-side of the spectrum, continually reminded everyone of this.

CONTEXT: Using hindsight as a review of political narrative assembly and knowing how the IC operates within the dark arts of Machiavellian schemes, a question surfaces.

QUESTION: Was the office of the presidency (that’s Biden) prepositioned, by intent or coincidence, to receive the political fallout from an assassination of his political opposition?  Was the RFK Jr security refusal, entirely purposeful and prepositioned for the political intents of a planned event?

Take out Trump with a bullet. Take out Biden with the consequence.

link

Paris Olympics admits opening ceremony drag show was based on ‘Last Supper’

A Paris 2024 Olympics spokesperson admitted the controversial drag show version of “The Last Supper” seen in Friday’s opening ceremony was indeed inspired by the iconic da Vinci mural — despite attempting to vehemently deny it following fierce backlash.

“Thomas Jolly took inspiration from Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting to create the setting,” an Olympics spokesperson admitted to The Post in a statement on Saturday, referring to the opening ceremony creative director.

“He is not the first artist to make a reference to what is a world-famous work of art. From Andy Warhol to ‘The Simpsons,’ many have done it before him,” the statement continued.

link

I like looking at the Daily Mail and NY Post to keep in touch. Each publication often runs very good stories in the midst of everything else they run. Right now, I am going to switch from mainly looking at the Daily Mail to mainly looking at the NY Post for that kind of material. The reason I am switching is the Daily Mail has for some time been writing every headline as a clickbait tease. They provide a hint and expect you to click to find out what’s inside. I can’t stand that and plan to stop spending more than a few seconds on that publication. From now on, the NY Post will get my few minutes in the morning when I check to see if the world is still here. ABN