This is kind of typical of the questions asked at the hearing. Krishnamoorthi makes a strong point and then backs away like a pussy to plead: ‘I respectfully submit that the Secret Service must expand its security perimeter….’

Not one of the congressional questioners brought up the glaringly important audio evidence that there were almost certainly two treasonous shooters, and maybe three. And no one pressed Cheatle on the point that we still do not know how many shell casings were found on the assassin’s roof or that we have credible video evidence that the FBI power washed that roof within days after.

The congressional questioners were exercised and highly critical of Cheatle but as the grandstanding droned on, it became apparent that they were exercised and angry because they knew the compromised Secret Service was a danger to them.

If only 3-5 casings were found on the assassin’s roof and as Cheatle claims only one round was fired by an SS sniper, what explains the other 3-5 rounds that were indubitably fired? And where did the nine bullets finally land? That is easy to figure out and should have been known the day after the treason, if not the day of. It’s obvious we are in the early stages of coverup. But why coverup unless you are guilty of something even more horrible than criminal negligence? Cheatle has already thrown herself under the bus, so can we conclude otherwise than the deep perps have even more to hide? ABN