Video at bottom of linked page. ABN
‘Christian’ Zionist top paygrade
Another war for Israel escalates even more

Respect for those killed and injured, but consider the following:
Perhaps now is the time to ask the Jewish question again. Let’s put it this way: The Jews wrote a book that says God chose the Jews. Should we take their word for it? Should we take this book as the word of God, or as the word of the Jews? This book written by the Jews claims that God gave them a fertile land inhabited by another people. Should we believe it? This book written by the Jews claims that the Jews had a divine right to massacre Amalek. Should we believe it? If we believe it, or if we profess to believe it, or if we don’t denounce it as a lie, then what can we object to Netanyahu when he massacres the Gazans while telling Israelis: “You must remember what Amalek did to you, says our Holy Bible”?
source
We—USA and the West—are already sanctioning genocide in Gaza. We can stop. Christians and Jews who are not insane can stop this. We all know that if we do nothing, there will be regional war, war with Iran and possibly much worse. This does not have to happen. ABN
The Biblical Lens and the Nietzschean Light — Laurent Guyénot
On Christian guilt and responsibility
Christians worship two gods, Christ and Yahweh, but claim they are one. Certainly, the God of the Old Testament plays a secondary role in Christian consciousness. He remains behind the scenes. But he nevertheless pulls a number of strings. It was he who inspired the Christians to promise Palestine to the Jews in 1917 (by the British Balfour Declaration, preceded five months earlier by the French Cambon Declaration), and to give it to them in 1948.
There is a theory attributing geopolitical motives to the British: they needed Israel as a bridgehead in the Middle East, to control the Suez Canal. That’s Chomsky’s theory, and a blatant falsehood. From 1916, British foreign policy in the Middle East favored good relations with the Arab regimes they had set up in Arabia, Jordan and Iraq. The creation of a “Jewish home” in Palestine, leading predictably to the Jews’ full takeover, was deeply upsetting to the Arabs, and conflicted with British Arab policy. That is why in May 1939, the British Government tried to get out of its commitment to the Zionists with a White Paper providing for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state within ten years. It stated:
His Majesty’s Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. … His Majesty’s Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of the their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subject of a Jewish State against their will.[1]
It is a fact that the Balfour Declaration and its inclusion in the British Mandate created an inextricable dilemma that would ultimately be fatal to British-Arab relationships. The British could find no way out but to withdraw in 1948, frustrated and humiliated. They waited a year before recognizing the Jewish state.
FLASHBACK 07/17/2009 — Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits
July 17, 200912:15 PM EDTUpdated 15 years ago
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used, but newly restored copies of the original broadcast look even better, NASA officials said on Thursday.
NASA released the first glimpses of a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon.
The full set of recordings, being cleaned up by Burbank, California-based Lowry Digital, will be released in September. The preview is available at www.nasa.gov.
NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing.
link
This does look like the ultimate fallback position they will take when even better technology proves beyond doubt the videos are all fake. ‘Predictive programming’ CYA from 2009. ABN
Good thread, worth a look
Error correction from Bret Weinstein

Sort of good enough but weakened by tones of self-promotion. In a time when information is widely scattered claiming ‘honor’ and that you already did something most seem not to have noticed takes back with one hand what you gave with the other. I am willing to put that behind us and will continue paying attention to Bret but not without a measure of skepticism. ABN
WEF LOSING CONTROL! WITH TOM LUONGO AND ALEX KRAINER
Especially interesting discussion of democracy at about 43-44 min. ABN
Mark Weber on the Bolshevik Revolution
The video is near the bottom of the linked page, below an article on the same topic. ABN
An example showing that being a good talker does not mean you are a good thinker
Bret is a professional biologist or evolutionary biologist, yet he made this elementary mistake and sounds perfectly reasonable while discussing it. He did similar for early lockdowns when he said extremely strict lockdowns in USA would have ended the ‘pandemic’ in two weeks. I am not trying to run Bret down but to illustrate why his continuous refusal to simply admit he was wrong and correct his mistakes is a problem. I have not deeply studied Bret or his work so I may be wrong on these details, but that’s how the story has appeared to me since his Carlson interview, and before but to a much lesser extent. Covid, climate, vaxxes, diet, sociology and almost all other major topics that lend themselves to corruption are rife with glaring errors and individuals calling themselves professionals who not only fail to correct those errors, but repeat them. ABN
Michael Mann gets hammered in court over deficiencies in his Hockey Stick analysis
Professor Michael Mann took an enormous hammering in court over the deficiencies in his Hockey Stick analysis.
He is suing Mark Steyn (and Rand Simberg) for defamation after they called his graph a fraud. Just listen to Simberg’s lawyer Victoria Weatherford demolish him:Mann said he did not gather the data for the Hockey Stick.
He handled the statistics that showed flat temps for 1000 years and a sudden recent warming and tried desperately to avoid admitting he was not qualified in statistics.W your PHD is not in statistics?
MANN My PHD is in geology and geo ‘s a
broad field involves science data analysis. There’s
lot of statistics I took course work in statistics
during my PHD programW Yes or no? Your PHD is not in statistics? MANN: It’s in geology & geophysics
W:That’s a no, it’s not in statistics
MANN: Obviously No.And then Mann tried to deny, not very convincingly, that he failed to consult a professional statistician when constructing the Hockey Stick graph – possibly the most influential graph of the 20th century.
link
Yet another example of how bad ‘The Science’ is. Wherever you look our usurpers get it wrong, apparently deliberately, and then use that to steal and oppress. Mann is another silver tongue who maybe does not think so clearly.
Leaving Mann aside, I believe self-deception is a trait with both genetic and cultural roots. A person who can self-deceive will always be better at deceiving others and/or getting their way than a person who is resolutely honest and never self-deceives and never tries to deceive others. Nice guys finish last (unless they become monks). Deception and self-deception are major factors in who controls the world, who speaks for the controllers, and who wants to speak for them. In today’s world, there are trillions of dollars at stake. So we should expect to see most, if not all, prominent speakers adept at self- and other-deception. Historically, parasitic cultures and subcultures have not just used self- and other-deception, they have also trained themselves and their children in this devious art. This is a huge factor in our world today since every major topic is rife with deception on more levels than one. ABN


