It’s actually really funny if you take a step back and think about it.
Whole cities where you can’t find a single kid in public schools who can do basic math and we have to say stuff like “black girls are magic.”
Illegals butcher a kid and the response is media hosannas about their slop cuisine.
The world’s richest man is subjected to a struggle session and brought to a place so sacred you go to jail if you blaspheme it in most Western countries. This is necessary, we are told, to protect those without privilege.
The Supreme Court says states can’t enforce immigration law because only the federal government can enforce immigration law, and the federal government doesn’t want to. This, we are told, is a triumph for the rule of law.
The most lucrative asset in America is membership in a protected class determined by race, gender, or sexual preference. It’s so valuable that we keep having scandals about supposedly privileged classes faking their membership in oppressed classes. This, we are told, is necessary to defend a meritocratic and individualist society where status isn’t dependent on birth.
And finally, the Great and the Good throughout the Free World earnestly debate which leading candidates and parties we need to ban and arrest in order to defend democracy.
People get offended if you laugh about this and think they’re better than some tribe sacrificing virgins to appease some idol. It’s priceless.
True enough but does Kirkpatrick know this is the result of many decades of clandestine war against Western boys and men? Yes, the result is funny in some ways, but generally Western intellectuals who have survived the parasitic purges, who have survived the decades of violence, are uniquely immune to understanding what has really happened because they have benefitted from it. I am not saying Kirkpatrick is of that ilk. I do not know what he knows or what he is really thinking. I enjoyed his essay. We need to laugh at our plight. But I also know we are laughing at casualties of war, destroyed lives crumpled in the streets around us. The schools and all else have ‘failed’ because they are the institutional rubble of defeat in a clandestine war that is still ongoing. To me, this is so obvious it’s painful. It is multigenerational. Harm their brains, harm their sense organs and victory is yours. Strike them when they are young. It will look like mental illness. They will never get back on their feet. Or, if they do just hit them again. This is an old technique, nothing knew about it. Nothing clever. Israel has been doing it for decades in Gaza. Communist regimes rely on it to first gain and then hold power. Chinggis Khan destroyed entire cities to rule over their ruins. There is nothing new about this technique. Even doing it secretly is nothing new. ABN
Who did it is rarely said because we don’t know. Who is at the top is something else we do not know. Sudden rise to fame is seriously dubious but those that do, do doggedly persevere. Where’s Musk? Where’s Trump? Even smart people can’t think of everything. It’s good to see this out in the open and also we are all living in deeply ambiguous times. The only solid core is Jews consistently telling other people what to do or say. But does that mean they are at the top or scapegoats for the top? Take Eva as a general example. I don’t think she is a knowing gatekeeper. She is young, very busy, and only knows so much. Most of these people belong on this graphic, but not for all the same reasons and it depends how you interpret what it means. In a totalitarian world, people can’t say the whole truth because: 1) they usually don’t know it or 2) it’s so complex it cannot be easily conveyed, even in book form, or 3) your basic fear. Politics is always the art of the possible. So is life. So is analyzing the king without getting killed. Deep down we do not need and should not even want leaders. The only way out is the slim chance a majority of us understand enough to somehow act in concert well enough to bring about something good. One thing I know and very few seem to know and even fewer say is we got here through clandestine violence, secret violence; as much secret violence per capita as there was open violence in the Soviet Union, China or Cambodia. When people talk about that, they are onto the real deal. But they don’t talk about that because usually they don’t know about it. How could they not know about something so obvious? The people that built the Soviet Union killed many millions of Russia’s most intelligent people. They targeted them because they hated their fucking guts and wanted to make the population easy to control. Same in China and Cambodia. Why would anyone believe the people who have seized control of the West are any different? Instead of killing millions, they decided to just maim and poison them secretly. Hit them when they are young and it looks like mental illness. Does whoever made this graphic talk about that? ABN
Emmanuel Todd, historian, demographer, anthropologist, sociologist and political analyst, is part of a dying breed: one of the very few remaining exponents of old school French intelligentzia – a heir to those like Braudel, Sartre, Deleuze and Foucault who dazzled successive young Cold War generations from the West down to the East.
The first nugget concerning his latest book, La Défaite de L’Occident (“The Defeat of the West”) is the minor miracle of actually being published last week in France, right within the NATO sphere: a hand grenade of a book, by an independent thinker, based on facts and verified data, blowing up the whole Russophobia edifice erected around the “aggression” by “Tsar” Putin.
At least some sectors of strictly oligarch-controlled corporate media in France simply could not ignore Todd this time around for several reasons. Most of all because he was the first Western intellectual, already in 1976, to have predicted the fall of the USSR in his book La Chute Finale, with his research based on Soviet infant mortality rates.
Good essay and probably good book but how do these guys not know that the West has been infested with parasites, conquered by them, and thus cannot but suffer defeat? ‘Intellectual’ reasons for defeat are little more than the trail of slime left behind by the parasites who are eating us alive. The defeat of the West can only be understood on a much longer timeline of over 100 years. Infestation and parasitic proliferation require decades to slay and digest such a large beast as the West. Demise on that scale has been brought about by military-grade, deliberate, premeditated, organized, violent, ruthless and relentless asymmetric and clandestine warfare and not a bunch of ideas. Come on guys, every single institution in the West has been taken over by this process, which has been violent. It’s as obvious as the nose on your face.
I am not talking about Escobar or Todd, but generally it is true that Western intellectuals who have survived the parasitic purges, who have survived the decades of violence, are uniquely immune to understanding what has happened because they have benefitted from it. They owe their status to their natural rivals who were more realistic having been taken out along the way, having been destroyed. Just as the West is an empty shell of its former self, so our ‘intellectuals’ for decades have been seated in an empty room, lecturing to a vacant audience. The best of them were destroyed. ABN
This is a true enough schema in general but there is also no doubt the swarm is controlled from within by a small group of top operators and their closest allies who permeate the swarm and the greater society around it. This group is a multigenerational cabal that has infiltrated and taken over the West. Besides mere control and unlimited parasitic wealth, this cabal obviously also hates the West. Members of the swarm who are not cabal are toadies, yes-men, compromised cowards, self-serving doofuses who just wanna YOLO in style. They are spied on every minute of their lives and the moment they piss off cabal they are Harvey Weinsteined or Jeffrey Epsteined. ABN
Boy howdy… when things get interesting, they REALLY get interesting.
In an effort to deflect attention from the gross corruption she initiated in the prosecution of Donald Trump, Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis stepped into the middle of a contentious divorce between Willis’s married lover and appointed Special Prosecutor, Nathan Wade, and his wife, Joycelyn Wade.
After discovering details of the relationship between Nathan Wade and Fani Willis, lawyers representing Mrs. Joycelyn Wade wanted a deposition of Fani Willis. At issue are the finances in the marriage and Mrs. Wade’s discovery that her husband, Nathan Wade, and Fani Willis had been living a life of indulgence from the marital income received (more than $650, 000) as a result of DA Willis hiring Nathan Wade to prosecute Donald Trump.
In an over-the-top court filing trying to avoid the deposition, the Fulton County’s district attorney accused the estranged wife of conspiring to undermine the Trump prosecution by seeking her testimony. Fani Willis does not deny the affair; instead, she accuses Joycelyn Wade of coordinating with Trump people and co-defendants to interfere with the prosecution.
American Buddhist Net 