SC Senate Hearing — USC Professor Dr Phillip Buckhaults describes potentially cancerous DNA segments in covid vaxxes

Buckhaults focuses solely on DNA fragments and how vaccines with these fragments are dangerous, and therefore, he will not take one himself. If we add to this the known dangers of vax lipid nanoparticles, autoimmune attacks against own cells, and the fact that the vaxxes do not stay in the shoulder as originally claimed, it is a wonder that anyone takes these injections. Buckhaults does an excellent job with his testimony but does not leave his narrow area of focus and appears wanting to stay within calling distance of the mainstream covid fiction. He may be doing this to make himself heard by more people. And he may have succeeded because this video has not yet been taken down. Well-worth viewing. ABN

The WHO and pandemics — RFK Jr and Dr Meryl Nass

link to podcast, 42 min

Recommended by a friend. I have not listened yet but he says it contains ‘a  lot of updates on the covid stuff and many other small details.’ And I don’t doubt it. For many of us, the covid topic has become tedious but I believe we should stay on top of it for at least a few more years. It is at the heart of the totalitarian transition we are experiencing in all areas, not just health care. The mind-control techniques used during covid are fresh experiences and are core examples of how the totalitarians will proceed. Both Nass and Kennedy have been silenced and persecuted by mind-controllers and both understand the paramount importance of free speech with reach. ABN

The Evidence for the Holocaust: An Introduction

I am hardly the most likely person to pen an article for the Unz Review. As a PhD student in history, I seek a career in academia, and run a modest history account on social media entitled History Speaks. My politics are mainstream, as are my views on the Nazi Holocaust. But while I recognize that the mainstream historical understanding of the Holocaust is established beyond any reasonable doubt, I part ways from mainstream historians when it comes to my preferred approach to Holocaust denial. I believe that open discussion with and debate against deniers is the most effective way of combating denial, and have repeatedly engaged deniers through my History Speaks handle.

Rational discourse is hardly a foolproof antidote to Holocaust denial. Confirmation bias being what it is—particularly on such an emotionally charged topic—one can only hope to persuade a minority of the other side. Yet dialogue remains the most ethical and effective tool of persuasion at hand.

In the spirit of dialogue, I thank Ron Unz for allowing me the opportunity to write what will be a two-part piece against Holocaust denial. This first piece will outline—in highly abbreviated form—some of the positive evidence for the Holocaust. The second piece will refute the views and arguments Unz himself has made on the Holocaust.

source

Schumer’s First AI Conference Sets Goal of 2024 Election, With Big Tech Embracing Govt Regulation

According to a recent media report, Senator Chuck Schumer led an AI insight forum that included tech industry leaders: Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Tesla, X and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, NVIDIA President Jensen Huang, Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, technologist and Google alum Eric Schmidt, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

Additionally, representatives from labor and civil rights advocacy groups which included: AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights President and CEO Maya Wiley, and AI accountability researcher Deb Raji. The group was joined by a list of prominent AI executives, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.

Notably absent from the Sept 13th forum was anyone with any real-world experience that is not a beneficiary of government spending. This is not accidental. Technocracy advances regardless of the citizen impact. Technocrats advance their common interests, not the interests of the ordinary citizen.

That meeting comes after DHS established independent guidelines we previously discussed {GO DEEP}.

DHS’ AI task force is coordinating with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency on how the department can partner with critical infrastructure organizations “on safeguarding their uses of AI and strengthening their cybersecurity practices writ large to defend against evolving threats.”

Remember, in addition to these groups assembling, the Dept of Defense (DoD) will now conduct online monitoring operations, using enhanced AI to protect the U.S. internet from “disinformation” under the auspices of national security. {link}

So, the question becomes, what was Chuck Schumer’s primary reference for this forum?

Continue reading “Schumer’s First AI Conference Sets Goal of 2024 Election, With Big Tech Embracing Govt Regulation”

Buddhist morality and signaling

The five precepts of Buddhism are no killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, or irresponsible use of alcohol.

These moral guidelines are for non-monastics.

I think most of us tend to think of the five precepts as being about the material world. After all, killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, and getting drunk are all rooted in actions of the material body. Even lying issues forth from the mouth of the body.

But what if we look at the precepts differently? What if we view them as fundamentally signals that issue forth from the mind?

If we look at them that way, then lying, which is often glossed as the least important of the five precepts, becomes the most important.

The reason is that lies send bad signals forth from the mind. And surely killing, stealing, misconduct, and getting drunk are the baddest of bad signals. Each one is a form of lying or deliberately disturbing the mind-stream and karma of self and others.

In a post I put up recently, Ethics, morality, I outlined a simple way to understand morality as that which reduces error and increases efficiency of mental signals, both internal and external (those exchanged with others).

In Buddhism, the great barrier to enlightenment is a confused, deluded mind. Anything that generates delusion or confusion, which lying surely does, is counterproductive. While anything that reduces delusion is good.

Buddhism, of course, recognizes the need for occasional lies—such as sanitizing the truth for children—but we really do not need to lie very often. We do not always have to say everything we think or tell anyone anything they want to know; we can easily and truthfully sidestep issues like that by simply saying we would rather not say.

In a very important way, clear signaling—honest signaling—is the foundation of all morality.

Clinical Trials for Artificial Wombs: A New Era in Neonatal Care

Artificial Wombs Could be Coming Soon

Medical advancements continually push the boundaries of what’s possible, the conception of an artificial womb capable of nurturing a human life has transitioned from the realm of science fiction to a tangible reality. Aided by intricate technology and years of dedicated research, these groundbreaking innovations promise to revolutionize neonatal care, especially for infants born prematurely. However, as with any transformative discovery, the journey of artificial wombs intertwines with a myriad of regulatory, ethical, and societal challenges. As regulators, scientists, and the public grapple with the potential implications, the horizon seems to herald an era where the lines between natural and artificial gestation might blur, bringing forth profound changes in our understanding of birth and life itself.

The Science Behind Artificial Wombs

Evolution of the Technology

The endeavor to create an environment mimicking the human womb outside the female body isn’t a novel concept. Historically, the aspiration has been influenced by both medical necessity and human curiosity. The primary motivation behind the pursuit is the challenge faced by neonatal units across the globe: the care for infants born severely premature. While advancements in neonatal care have significantly improved survival rates, long-term health complications among these infants remain a poignant concern.

Amidst this backdrop, the past decade has witnessed considerable strides in the field of artificial womb technology. Grounded in meticulous research and bolstered by advancements in biomedical engineering, the journey has evolved from rudimentary prototypes to sophisticated systems that can potentially sustain life. Key to this progression has been the rigorous testing on animal models, primarily lambs, given their physiological similarities to human infants in terms of lung development and other essential parameters.

source

UPDATE: As this tech evolves and merges with digital manipulation of gametes and zygotes, an era of post-Darwinian human evolution will begin. A healthy, compassionate, non-harming eugenics will not only vastly improve the human race but also make race, ethnicity, and lineage obsolete. Parents will be able to choose the traits of their offspring without coercion and rear them conveniently in artificial wombs. I can definitely see all kinds of things going wrong with this but the progeny of this process will be extremely intelligent, far more intelligent than anyone who has ever lived. Will those people be totalitarian maniacs? Will they allow parasites to rise to the top of the food chain and topple their societies as we are allowing today? I doubt it. Eugenics of this sort will remove all mutations from individuals and bad genes from the gene pool. Humans have had great success breeding dogs, horses and many other animals. I am much more hopeful than not about the future when I view it in this way. ABN

Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer

When taken together, ivermectin and fenbendazole deliver a one-two punch to cancer. When combined with other anti-cancer nutrients such as quercetin, vitamins C and D, and curcumin, the effects are even more pronounced.

Preclinical studies show that both ivermectin and fenbendazole exhibit cytotoxic effects against cancer cells. The two drugs also inhibit the growth and spread of cancerous tumors.

“The mechanisms underlying these effects appear to involve disruption of critical cellular processes, leading to cancer cell death,” wrote Sid Belzberg in a paper cited by one of 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s readers.

source

Only a deep, sincere, and thorough apology will uncancel this POS in my mind

Great actor, musician or singer does not = great thinker. It’s possible he is just a dumbshit but it’s also possible that he is willingly being used as a malign ‘influencer’ in this and other psyop maneuvers. Virtually all Big Media and Hollywood famous types should be ignored for their canned ‘opinions’ but paid attention to for their deception. They are all psyop sluts and they all know it. When they speak or opine on public matters, you can be all but certain it’s psyop bullshit aimed at fooling you. This is why they all get on the same page at the same time and portray similar vulgar emotions. ABN