I am an economic nationalist. To me, the country comes before the economy; and the economy exists for the people. I believe in free markets, but I do not worship them. In the proper hierarchy of things, it is the market that must be harnessed to work for man – and not the other way around. — Pat Buchanan
The Russian Severodvinsk Shipyard has launched the first Khabarovsk class 10,000 ton nuclear powered submarine, which represents an entirely new type of strategic warship designed specifically to deploy 2M39 Poseidon nuclear-armed underwater drones.
The procurement of Khabarovsk class is expected to complement investments in expanding the fleet of Borei II class ballistic missile submarines, pioneering a second means of delivering mass strategic nuclear attacks by sea.
Attending the ship’s launch ceremony, Russian Defence Minister Andrey Belousov observed:
“Today is a significant event for us: the heavy nuclear-powered missile cruiser Khabarovsk is being launched from the slipway of the renowned Sevmash shipyard.” “Carrying underwater weapons and robotic systems, it will enable us to successfully accomplish missions related to ensuring the security of Russia’s maritime borders and protecting its national interests in various parts of the world’s oceans,” he added.
Microplastics! They’re in everything, from our bodies to the ocean.
And apparently they’re even found in sediment layers that date back as early as the first half of the 1700s, showing microplastics’ pernicious ability to infiltrate even environments untouched by modern humans.
The scientists were studying lake sediment to test if the presence of microplastics in geological layers would be a reliable indicator for the beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch, defined in the study as starting in 1950 and meant to delineate when humans started having a large impact on our environment.
Clearly not, according to this new research, which found microplastics in every layer of sediment they dredged up, including one from 1733.
“We conclude that interpretation of microplastics distribution in the studied sediment profiles is ambiguous and does not strictly indicate the beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch,” the scientists wrote.
Jews are coming out in full force against Tucker Carlson. But we’ve been here before. In the 1990s, America First patriot Patrick Buchanan declared Congress to be “Israeli occupied territory” and then he ran for president to confront it head-on.
Instead of respecting his right to free speech, hateful Israel First jews who posed as “conservatives” did what they still do today: they tried to censor and defame him. They ended up rushing the stage at one of Buchanan’s speaking engagements in an attempt to disrupt him. They held signs calling him a “racist,” which was a career-ending allegation at the time. Their goal was to get conservative voters to disavow Buchanan, much like jews today are trying to turn conservatives against Nick and Tucker.
Unmoved and undaunted, Buchanan defended himself by hurling the jew off the stage. The force behind Buchanan’s push was enough to send the jew’s body flying in mid-air.
As the jew crashed down to the ground, the audience erupted in applause. The jew likely curled up on the floor pretending to be a victim at that point, but it didn’t work. Buchanan calmly regained control of the mic and proclaimed, “Nothing is going to stop us from moving forward to a new era of American Greatness!” The audience went wild.
This was at a time, however, when Americans didn’t have social media. Fearing that the footage of Buchanan’s bravery would inspire millions of other patriots, the jewish-controlled media suppressed it.
Today, if a political candidate were to remove toxic Israel First jews from a stage in self-defense, the footage would go viral. The candidate would gain the support of the entire nation.
Whether the specific premise of this video is right or not, the weaponry discussed is real and probably decades behind what is available to state-level militaries today. I expressed speculation along the lines of this video soon after Kirk’s assassination. All of this is speculative. I found this video interesting because the weaponry is very effective and part of our world today. Lack of a visible entry wound on Kirk makes it unlikely the fatal projectile came from Kirk’s right. So far, every hypothesis has holes in it, including the official story. Is there a projectile that is very small and can enter like a needle and then expand and explode on exit in a way that would fit what we have seen on videos of the assassination? ABN
“The fundamental laws of physics cannot be contained within space and time, because they generate them. It has long been hoped, however, that a truly fundamental theory of everything could eventually describe all physical phenomena through computations grounded in these laws. Yet we have demonstrated that this is not possible. A complete and consistent description of reality requires something deeper—a form of understanding known as non-algorithmic understanding.”
Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything
General relativity treats spacetime as dynamical and exhibits its breakdown at singularities. This failure is interpreted as evidence that quantum gravity is not a theory formulated within spacetime; instead, it must explain the very emergence of spacetime from deeper quantum degrees of freedom, thereby resolving singularities. Quantum gravity is therefore envisaged as an axiomatic structure, and algorithmic calculations acting on these axioms are expected to generate spacetime. However, Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, Tarski’s undefinability theorem, and Chaitin’s information-theoretic incompleteness establish intrinsic limits on any such algorithmic programme. Together, these results imply that a wholly algorithmic “Theory of Everything” is impossible: certain facets of reality will remain computationally undecidable and can be accessed only through non-algorithmic understanding. We formalize this by constructing a “Meta-Theory of Everything” grounded in non-algorithmic understanding, showing how it can account for undecidable phenomena and demonstrating that the breakdown of computational descriptions of nature does not entail a breakdown of science. Because any putative simulation of the universe would itself be algorithmic, this framework also implies that the universe cannot be a simulation.
If conscious thought underlies everything, our ‘individual’ conscious minds should be able to experience it. In Buddhism, this would occur in samadhi states to some extent and in nirvana entirely.
This study is being trashed by some but it tends toward an interesting way of thinking or imagining. ABN
American Buddhist Net 