Alvi makes a very good point — Most people are not psychopaths lusting after power at any cost. Most of us want to be good and live wholesome, moral lives. The problem with this is most of us also do not develop enough global street-smarts to realize we are being robbed and destroyed at a societal level by peoples and cultures that do not share our humble values. ABN
The official narrative claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a bullet, but key details don’t add up. My analysis reveals an explosive device hidden in his RØDE Wireless microphone—likely a shaped charge with PETN. Here are the 4 pillars that shatter the official story.
Pillar 1: The Shirt Deformation
The shirt expands rapidly from an epicenter under the collar, mapped via modified pixel flow analysis. This happens in milliseconds, with smoke puffing from the front and back collar lifting away. Videos show shockwaves rippling through flesh—impossible for a distant bullet, but perfect for an internal blast. Inconsistent with official trajectory.
Pillar 2: The Posturing
Seconds after the event, decorticate posturing sets in: arms flexed, legs extended—classic sign of severe brain trauma or massive internal damage. A grazing bullet wouldn’t cause this instantly, but shockwaves from an explosive device can propagate through the body, directly injuring the brain via shear and stress waves, leading to concussion, hemorrhage, edema, and diffuse axonal injury without any penetration. Numerous cases from IED blasts in Iraq and Afghanistan wars document warfighters killed or severely injured by primary blast waves alone, with no external wounds. Official narrative can’t explain the speed or severity.
Pillar 3: The Shrapnel
Fragmentation is visible in multiple videos and photos: pieces falling from the shirt bottom, circuit board bits caught in the collar, and black shrapnel scattered in the SUV that transported him. Explosive residue transfers to the shirt. A bullet doesn’t produce widespread debris like this—only an exploding device does. Documented from stage to vehicle.
Pillar 4: The Necklace
The necklace snaps under the right collarbone, blasts up and around the back of the head, and lands resting on the left shoulder—seen hanging from his shirt en route to the SUV. Expansive gas from the detonation (8,000 m/s force) explains this trajectory. Official bullet story? No way it selectively snaps and flings a necklace like that.
Why These Pillars Matter Together
Individually odd; combined, undeniable. Shirt epicenter ties to mic location; posturing confirms internal lethality; shrapnel matches explosive fragmentation; necklace path traces blast force. Official narrative crumbles—no bullet explains all four. We need recreations with licensed experts to confirm. What are they hiding?
Many of the Epstein files are marred with redactions that should not be there. It’s possible the allegations in this note are not true and thus the name was redacted. It could also be that the redacted name married someone to big to fall. ABN
This beautiful building will be, when complete, the much anticipated White House Ballroom — The Greatest of its kind ever built! It is a rendering from the Treasury Building, directly across the street, and replaces the very small, dilapidated, and rebuilt many times, East Wing, with a magnificent New East Wing, consisting of a glorious Ballroom that has been asked for by Presidents for over 150 years. Being an identical height and scale, it is totally in keeping with our historic White House. This is the first rendering shown to the Public. If you notice, the North Wall is a replica of the North Facade of the White House, shown at the right hand side of the picture. This space will serve our Country well for, hopefully, Centuries into the future! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
The Clintons are political animals; everything they do is with a political strategy at the forefront of their thinking. What Bill and Hillary needed was to provide an excuse for Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to vote against holding them in contempt. That’s what Bill and Hillary have done.
In a somewhat opaque last-minute agreement to testify to the House about their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, rules and limits still to be decided, Bill and Hillary Clinton have simply attempted to stop/stall the House from holding them in contempt.
There are only 2 possibilities, either Epstein is alive or Epstein was murdered.
We all know Epstein didn’t kill himself.
We also know Epstein was working for Israeli intelligence and alongside Jews within our own government to blackmail western politicians.
Given that background, let’s dig deeper into who helped him escape alive, Or who helped to take him out. Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.
Let’s start with the Body. Who viewed the body?
New York Chief medical examiner Barbara Sampson is the one that ruled it a “suicide.”
While her ancestry does not say directly that she is Jewish, one would say it is likely since she is now a VP at the Jewish founded and led Mount Sinai Health system. She also updated NY burial policies for a specific subset of Jews in 2014.
Assuming you think Epstein was murdered and Sampson is lying, you have to assume she is covering either Epsteins death or escape for some reason. Assuming she is not Jewish, one would think she is doing it for her career, (like the VP job at Mount Sinai), or she is Jewish and is protecting a Jewish spy.
This report — Brain oscillations reveal that our senses do not experience the world continuously — supports the core activity of FIML practice, which entails noticing the first instant(s) of the arising of an emotional sensation (that is typically tied to a much more involved “mistaken interpretation” within the brain). By interfering with the first instant(s) of arising, FIML practice forestalls the habitual wave of neurotic interpretation that normally follows. Instead, new information — better data obtained from the FIML partner — is used to replace the cue that led to the initial sensation, thus redefining that cue.
Professor Gregor Thut of the University of Glasgow, where the study was conducted, says of its results: “For perception, this means that despite experiencing the world as a continuum, we do not sample our world continuously but in discrete snapshots determined by the cycles of brain rhythms.”
I would further hypothesize that the same holds true for our “perceptions” of inner emotional states. In this context, recall the five skandhas of Buddhism — form, sensation, perception, activity, consciousness. A form can arise in the mind or outside of the mind. This form gives rise to a sensation (which is the first possible initiation point of a FIML query), which gives rise to perception, followed by activity (mental or physical), and lastly consciousness.
In Buddhist teachings, the five skandhas occur one after the other, very rapidly. They are not a continuous stream but rather a series of “discrete snapshots,” to use Thut’s words. In FIML practice, partners want to interfere with what has become a habitual “firing” of their five skandhas based on (neurotic) learned cues. FIML practice strives to prevent full-blown neurotic consciousness (the fifth skandha) from taking control of the mind by replacing the source of that consciousness with a more realistic interpretation of the neurotic cue. The cue corresponds to form in the five skandhas explanation while our emotional reaction to it begins with the second skandha, sensation. The more realistic interpretation of that cue is based on the true words of the partner.
The five skandhas can also help us understand how FIML is different from more or less normal psychological analysis. In normal, or traditional, analysis we use theories and schema to understand ourselves. In FIML we use a specific technique to interfere with habitual neurotic “firings” of the five skandhas. FIML partners are encouraged to theorize and speak about themselves in any way they like, and it is very helpful to do this, but the core FIML activity cannot be replaced by just theorizing or telling stories.
American Buddhist Net 