Chinese used to be called ‘the Jews of Asia’ because in many respects the two cultures resemble each other — clannish, proud of their histories, look down on others, form ethnic business cartels, good with money, which they both value very highly, good at lying and do it often with outsiders. Ofc, both cultures have many exceptions to these crude observations but, generally, there is truth to them. The Western elite was skinned alive by the Chinese CCP when China opened their doors circa 2000. A dim awareness of what happened has only recently dawned. Trump was the first to speak loudly about it. As for Jewish Supremists, sort of the CCP of Jews, Trump seems to be wholly ensnared. Maybe he sees it and has a plan. Maybe he sees it and knows he is powerless. Maybe he sees it and is part of it, but with more compassion for the West, which is fast descending into oblivion. ABN
Memory reconsolidation research by neuroscientists has demonstrated the erasure of emotional learnings.
This article reviews these historic findings and how they translate directly into therapeutic application to provide the clinical field with an empirically confirmed process of transformational change. Psychotherapists’ early use of this new, transtheoretical knowledge indicates a strong potential for significant advances in both the effectiveness of psychotherapy and the unification of its many diverse systems.
The erasure process consists of the creation of certain critical experiences required by the brain, and it neither dictates nor limits the experiential methods that therapists can use to facilitate the needed experiences. This article explains memory reconsolidation, delineates the empirically confirmed process, illustrates it in a case example of long-term depression, indicates the evidence supporting the hypothesis that this process is responsible for transformational change in any therapy sessions, describes the differing mechanisms underlying transformational change versus incremental change, and reports extensive clinical evidence that the basis and cause of most of the problems and symptoms presented by therapy clients are emotional learnings, that is, emotionally laden mental models, or schemas, in semantic memory.
Below is an excerpt that explains how memory reconsolidation works. FIML does precisely what is described below in real-time, real-world situations as they arise between partners, or when they are together and something else arises. ABN
The Erasure of an Emotional Learning
MR research by neuroscientists has demonstrated that an emotional learning is nullified by the following set of three experiences, which have therefore been termed the empirically confirmed process of erasure (ECPE) (Ecker 2018). Hundreds of MR research studies have used a vast range of different procedures and protocols to produce these experiences (reviewed by Ecker 2015, 2018), which means that what the brain requires for erasure of an emotional learning is not any particular external procedure, but rather the internal occurrence of these three subjective experiences, whatever may be the external procedures that create them. Therefore the ECPE does not dictate or favor the use of any particular therapeutic techniques, and psychotherapists are free to facilitate these critical experiences using any of the therapy field’s vast array of experiential methods.
1.Reactivated, Symptom-Generating Target Learning Experienced in Awareness This is the deliberate use of salient cues or contexts that reactivate the target emotional learning or schema underlying the client’s presenting symptom or problem. For example, a woman in therapy for depression and absence of motivation was cued into reactivation of her lifelong schema that had newly come into awareness and was verbalized as, “Mom sees and knows everything I ever care about or do, and then takes over and takes away everything I ever care about or do, which feels devastating for me, and my only way to be safe from her pillaging is for me to care about nothing and do nothing.” To assure that the schema is being directly accessed at its roots in the emotional learning and memory system and is not merely a cognitive insight, it is critically important that the emotions accompanying the reactivated schema are fully felt affectively and somatically while the schema also is cognized verbally and conceptually. Note that the schema is at core a mental model, from which are generated particular emotions, which in the example above would include helplessness, hopelessness, fear, desperation, despair, aloneness, and the deep pain of feeling used, pillaged and eclipsed in this way by her own mother. How that schema was found, brought into awareness, and then disconfirmed and unlearned is described in the case vignette in the next section.
2.Experience of Mismatch/Prediction Error Destabilizes the Target Learning’s Neural Encoding While the target schema is reactivated in awareness as described above, this is an additional, concurrent experience or knowing that contradicts what the client knows and expects according to the schema. This is termed a memory mismatch or prediction error experience by memory researchers. In response to this experience of the world differing from the target learning’s expectations, the client’s brain rapidly transforms the neural encoding of the target learning from its stable, consolidated state in long-term memory into a destabilized, de-consolidated, labile state, which is susceptible to being updated and re-encoded by any relevant new learning that may occur next. This destabilization, which requires and is triggered by the mismatch/prediction error experience, begins the reconsolidation process.Footnote2 The labile, destabilized condition persists for about 5 h, widely termed the reconsolidation window, after which the neural encoding automatically reconsolidates, that is, it returns to a stable state in long-term memory. The case vignette below describes how a contradictory knowing was found for the schema of the depressed woman, creating the needed mismatch experience.
3.Experience of Counter-Learning Drives Unlearning, Nullification, Re-encoding and Replacement of Target Learning This experience consists of just a few repetitions, during the rest of the therapy session, of the same mismatch experience created in the previous step. Each mismatch is a juxtaposition experience, in the sense that the client experiences both reality according to the target learning and a contradictory perception or knowing, with both in the same single field of awareness. Two or three repetitions of that juxtaposition experience serve as counter-learning that functions as an experiential disconfirmation of the target learning. Because the counter-learning is occurring while the encoding of the target learning is labile, the counter-learning rewrites and replaces the encoding of the target schema in memory. As a result, the target learning no longer exists in memory, so it cannot be reactivated and cause a relapse. The target learning is a model of the world in semantic memory, not an episodic memory of specific events and experiences; the latter is not erased. The unlearning of the target learning’s version of reality is the profound resolution of a core emotional issue in the client’s life, as noted earlier.Footnote3 Successful erasure of the target learning is then verified by observing the markers of transformational change beginning to appear immediately: the symptom(s) driven by the target learning cease to occur; the target learning itself, which previously was felt as a potent and horrible truth of the world, no longer feels true or real and is not reactivated by situations that formerly did so, eliminating a problematic, distressed ego state; and those changes persist effortlessly and permanently. If the same counter-learning occurs without first finding, reactivating and destabilizing the target learning (steps 1 and 2 above), the counter-learning only creates its own encoding separate from that of the target learning. In that case, the two learnings compete for control of behavior and state of mind, producing at best only incremental change that is prone to relapse when the emotionally more intense target learning becomes newly retriggered by current circumstances.
ibid
An advantage of FIML as therapy for unwholesome or unwanted schema is FIML is mostly done in real-time, real-world situations so the schema is right there in front of you clear as a bell in your own mind. You can see it and see very clearly how it is distorting reality.
Therapies that work by recalling unwholesome schema in a professional settings have the advantage of: 1) relying on a professional; 2) avoiding doing this work with your spouse or best friend; and 3) aiming for wholesale erasure of the schema once and for all.
FIML practitioners could use a schema method to do this but generally FIML works by focusing on the unwholesome schema the moment it arises and whenever it arises in the real-world (conditions permitting). This method erases or extirpates the unwholesome schema by observing its maladaptive dysfunction as many times as needed.
FIML is also able to deal with more than one maladaptive schema, and in real-life there are many, without causing confusion because when unwholesome schemas are encountered in real-world, real-time, their structure and origins are generally easily seen for what they are.
Many unwanted schema can be extirpated with just a few FIML exchanges. Some are more stubborn and may require more time and multiple occurrences.
Another advantage FIML has is it prevents new schemas from arising and taking hold. Unwholesome schemas do not all come from the deep past or from childhood. Schemas also arise later in life and often are based on serious misinterpretations. FIML is very effective at stopping schemas of this sort immediately, before they can consolidate and cause harm.
I would add that unwholesome schemas exist in virtually everyone and often we are dealing not with our own schemas but those of others. FIML partners can eliminate problem schemas between themselves, but often can do no more than recognize them in others. However, understanding ourselves through FIML practice does help us understand others much better, and how deal with them more compassionately due to that understanding. ABN
As my code advances there will be no doubt left. They should have never gave me access to AI… a hyper focused mind with a powerful tool set is the most dangerous combination to conspirators. You can’t explain these peaks with the official narrative.
So far, Bray seems to have the best explanation for precisely how Kirk was killed. His description covers everything we can see and hear and leaves no loose ends. A small shaped-charge in Kirk’s mic battery pack shot a directed stream of gas into Charlie’s chest. We can see his body curl forward and into itself as the charge strikes; then his head and hair straighten as the charge propagates. The wound in his neck was caused by an unplanned ejection of shrapnel from the battery pack. This also explains why the wound and how it bleeds is anomalous, and does not resemble a bullet entry or exit wound. Also, congratulations, Jon, for not using a music overlay. For a deeper dive into Jon Bray’s work on Kirk’s assassination, see this. ABN
UPDATE: Trump had this video removed because a brief ‘offensive’ image of the Obamas appears at the end. The claim is that the video was posted by a junior staffer. The first part is worth viewing, and since Trump had it posted may indicate we will see real consequences for the crimes committed in the 2020 election, which the Obamas probably had a hand in. ABN
UPDATE2: Here’s the full vid from which a slice was inserted into Trump’s post above. ABN
Videos like this are today’s political cartoons, which date back centuries. Carpetbaggers after the Civil War, big fat cigar-smoking Robber Barons, or the one below which was published in 1894. The EU wants to censor X over the likes of Amelia, who is hugely popular for a reason. ABN
The Condition of the Laboring Man at Pullman (1894).
The emails released so far haven’t provided any prosecutorial evidence for a crime.
Yes, I KNOW what they say. And yes, I KNOW what they mean. But none of this is enough to convict in court.
And that’s BY DESIGN.
You need to understand how the Epstein prosecution actually worked to understand what these files are actually about.
When Epstein was re-arrested in 2019, he was recharged with his crimes from 2001-2006. All the real evidence collected was in pursuit of THOSE crimes… from 2001-2006.
All these 2009-2019 emails released thus far are like 80% bullshit. The other 20% is showcasing networks and showing us the bare minimum required by law.
Does that make them useless?
No. Most definitely NOT.
The average normie knows more about the elite circles that rule our world than they ever have. That’s serious progress.
But you also need to read this nonprosecution agreement and really absorb the implications. Alex Acosta et al gave immunity to Epstein and ALL his associates, both named AND unnamed.
Yes I know Ghislaine Maxwell was still prosecuted, but you have to understand that her case is literally headed all the way to the Supreme Court over THIS nonprosecution agreement.
Don’t expect anyone else to be charged until that’s litigated.
Until then, keep on the pressure and use the court of public opinion to shame those who have yet to be held accountable.
[For receipts click continue reading… The good part of this elite legal scam is: The average normie knows more about the elite circles that rule our world than they ever have. That’s serious progress.ABN]
The video is a 5-minute dramatized excerpt from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (Volume 1, Chapter 2), narrating his claimed “awakening” to antisemitism via observations of Jewish involvement in Vienna’s prostitution and human trafficking around 1908–1913.
__________
I believe this is the first time I have ever posted anything about Hitler. Like most, I am allergic to his name, even though I deeply understand and have experienced the horror of Jewish Supremacism. I am posting this speech because it rings true today. Ofc, today there are many parasites feasting on the West but history shows JS is behind most of them. I believe the best, if not the only, way out of this terrible reality is for Jewish Supremists themselves to repent and reform. That seems impossible today, but noting is impossible, so maybe it will happen. The best revenge is not success but knowing your abusers have repented, reformed and apologized deeply and from the heart and will never do it again. This is all I want, what we all should want. ABN
Other levels could be added — performance, humor, recollection, story-telling, etc..
I believe a major value of religion is to expose and teach people how to speak and hear spiritual/profound speech.
That is a psycholinguistic core of most if not all religions. Religions are where most of us engage in spiritual/profound speech and where most of us learn it.
Consider an honest wholesome prayer as an example.
Buddhism engages spiritual/profound speech on many levels, but does not package any level as an absolute truth because the highest or deepest levels are not verbal and can only be experienced.
Religious profound speech leads us to experience the profundity of existence.
Remove all of the words and keep the experience and you have Buddhism.
I agree with this. Jewish Supremacy is very real and profoundly destructive. It is an arrogant, self-declared enemy of both American Whites and American Blacks, and thus a natural cause for both groups of to unite against it. ABN
Using mathematics in a novel way in neuroscience, the Blue Brain Project shows that the brain operates on many dimensions, not just the three dimensions that we are accustomed to.
For most people, it is a stretch of the imagination to understand the world in four dimensions but a new study has discovered structures in the brain with up to eleven dimensions – ground-breaking work that is beginning to reveal the brain’s deepest architectural secrets.
Using algebraic topology in a way that it has never been used before in neuroscience, a team from the Blue Brain Project has uncovered a universe of multi-dimensional geometrical structures and spaces within the networks of the brain.
The research, published today in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience__, shows that these structures arise when a group of neurons forms a clique: each neuron connects to every other neuron in the group in a very specific way that generates a precise geometric object. The more neurons there are in a clique, the higher the dimension of the geometric object.
Topology in neuroscience: The image attempts to illustrate something that can not be imaged – a universe of multi-dimensional structures and spaces. On the left is a digital copy of a part of the neocortex, the most evolved part of the brain. On the right are shapes of different sizes and geometries in an attempt to represent structures ranging from 1D to 7D and beyond. The “black-hole” in the middle is used to symbolise a complex x of multi-dimensional spaces, or cavities. Courtesy of the Blue Brain Project
When the researchers presented the virtual brain tissue with a stimulus, cliques of progressively higher dimensions assembled momentarily to enclose high-dimensional holes, that the researchers refer to as cavities. “The appearance of high-dimensional cavities when the brain is processing information means that the neurons in the network react to stimuli in an extremely organized manner,” says Levi. “It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks, starting with rods (1D), then planks (2D), then cubes (3D), and then more complex geometries with 4D, 5D, etc. The progression of activity through the brain resembles a multi-dimensional sandcastle that materializes out of the sand and then disintegrates.”
Sent by an alert reader. This describes what probably happens when a FIML query interrupts a stimulus, thus preventing an erroneous interpretation, either habitual or just arising, to flourish in the mind. If the querier’s interpretation is correct, a FIML query will confirm that to the benefit of both partners. If it is incorrect, the wrong interpretation can be corrected, also to the benefit of both partners. Hundreds of FIML queries increasingly establish a very secure ground for communication and mutual psychological understanding. There is not another way to get there but through FIML practice. FIML will completely change how you understand human psychology because the practice is based on real-world, real-time objective (agreed upon by both partners) data. ABN
The flight logs. The visitor records. The names that confirm what people suspected for years about certain islands and certain planes and certain parties where the guest list was curated for maximum leverage.
That’s what everyone’s combing through.
But there’s another list. It’s in the same three million files . It’s not hidden. It’s just less interesting to people who came looking for scandal.
The proposals.
The Edge Foundation was John Brockman’s intellectual salon. Annual gatherings of the world’s most influential scientific minds. Dinner parties where Nobel laureates met tech billionaires. Richard Dawkins. Lawrence Krauss. Steven Pinker. A contact sheet for people who shape the future without ever running for office.
Epstein funded Edge. But Edge wasn’t the operation.
Edge was the talent show.
You host dinners. You watch who’s brilliant. You note who’s ambitious, who’s frustrated by institutional constraints, who talks about what they’d do if funding weren’t an issue. Then you invite the interesting ones somewhere more private.
A jet. An island. A ranch in New Mexico.
The emails in the new files aren’t dinner invitations. They’re pitches.
August 2018 . A Bitcoin developer named Bryan Bishop writes to Epstein about “garage biology”. His plan to create the first human designer baby and possibly a human clone within five years. He outlines mouse testing at a lab in Ukraine, amateur human sperm work in Mississippi. He asks for one to three million dollars. He notes that once the first birth happens, “everything changes and the world will never be the same.”
Bishop discusses secrecy requirements. Anonymity about the babies would be essential. Identifying them publicly “would brand the child as a freak for life in the media.”
This wasn’t a grant application to the NIH.
December 2018. Robert Trivers, Harvard evolutionary biologist, writes to Epstein about hormone intervention in children. The subject line is “Trans.” The email discusses blocking testosterone receptors, increasing estrogen production. Trivers notes they’re “pushing the intervention earlier” and mentions identifying “trans tendencies” in children as young as three years old.
“I would be frightened to do that,” Trivers writes. “But who knows?”
December 2015. Epstein emails about designing a pig with non-cloven hoofs to make kosher bacon. Gene editing as intellectual amusement.
These aren’t academic discussions. They’re project updates sent to a man with funding, facilities, and reasons to keep everyone quiet.
The pattern emerges when you stop looking for the salacious details.
Wine and dine to identify the talent. Private invitations sorted who was willing to work outside institutional oversight. The islands and ranches and jets provided venues where proposals could be discussed without record. And the compromising situations that happened in those venues, the ones everyone’s reading about now, those weren’t the product.
They were the insurance policy.
You don’t fund off-books research with people who can walk away.
American Buddhist Net 