‘Ukraine must defend itself’: Washington leaders dismiss Putin’s war talk

US officials and lawmakers shot back after Vladimir Putin said that Nato’s potential lifting of restrictions on Ukraine to launch long-range strikes over the border into Russian territory would mean Nato countries were “at war” with Russia.

The prime minister, Keir Starmer, met with the US president, Joe Biden, on Friday at the White House, where the two were expected to discuss – though not necessarily announce – a loosening of restrictions on Storm Shadow missiles that would allow Ukraine to strike targets as far as 155 miles inside Russia.

“This will mean that Nato countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia,” Putin told Russian reporters on Thursday. “And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.”

The missiles are jointly produced in the UK and France, and both countries appear to be seeking Biden’s go-ahead to loosen restrictions on the use of the long-range missiles. Western officials have indicated that the US is not planning to allow its own missiles to be used to strike targets deeper inside Russia.

link

Like all things political, there are many shells in this game. Escalation of the KOBK ultimate goal of world domination is one shell, while another is interference with the US 2024 elections. In real-world game theory, chaos benefits the strongest player and will be pursued by the player that believes they are the strongest. Hence, endless wars in the Middle east, escalating chaos and war in Europe. Escalating chaotic immigration in Western countries proves the top KOBK rulers of the West are not themselves Westerners. ABN

Vladimir Putin warns the US and NATO will be ‘at war’ with Russia if Ukraine is allowed to use long-range missiles

Vladimir Putin has warned the U.S. and NATO would be ‘at war’ with Russia if the West lets Ukraine use long-range missiles.

US and British foreign ministers met President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv on Wednesday with the war at a pivotal point.

American officials have also been discussing easing restrictions on the use of weapons that could strike deep inside Russia.

Putin said the move from the West would ‘change the very nature of the conflict’, and issued a severe threat against giving Zelensky more firepower.

‘It would mean that NATO countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,’ he told a state TV reporter on Thursday.

‘If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.’

link

All signs point to cabal wanting precisely this — war with Russia. Destroying Russia and Europe at the same time by getting them to fight each other, will leave cabal masters of the rubble, in position to remake the world in their own Satanic image. ABN

9/11 Was an Israeli Job — How America was neoconned into World War IV

Technical impossibilities

Thanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the official explanation of the events of 9/11 were posted on the Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al Jazeera.[1] The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing anti-conspiracy sites.)

For example, members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have demonstrated that it was impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the collapse of the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump understood this. In fact, speaking of “collapse” is perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The pyroclastic dust that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that WTC7, another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane, collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by “controlled demolition.”

Testimonies of firefighters recorded shortly after the events describe sequences of explosions just before the “collapse”, well below the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo testified before Étienne Sauret’s camera for his film Collateral Damages (2011): “You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel—molten steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry—like lava.”

Aviation professionals have also reported impossibilities in the behavior of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing 767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for the hijacking. Hosni Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it. (He is not the only head of state to have voiced his doubts: Chavez and Ahmadinejad are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.

And of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen on any of the numerous photos easily available.

link

Like 10/7, 9/11 was a violent mind-control trick to lure USA into wars against Israel’s enemies. Given the brazen savagery and aftermath of 10/7, Laurent Guyénot’s analysis of 9/11 is worth considering. ABN

Blaming Churchill

It’s often been alleged that ever since World War II ended, Holocaustianity emerged from its ashes as the West’s official state religion.

To dare suggest that human history’s bloodiest war didn’t happen exactly the way we have been commanded to think that it happened is to face the sort of social death that stared down European heretics who questioned the resurrection of Christ 1,000 years ago.

Like most Manichaean belief systems, Holocaustianity draws a stark and unbroachable line between good and evil, one that permits no nuance. Hitler was Satan, and Jews were six million rubber-stamped versions of Christ, shedding their innocent blood to forever redeem humanity from its wretchedness.

And yet it didn’t work out so neatly. For one, the Jews didn’t ascend to heaven, and they are eternally condemned to tremble in fear at existential threats at the hands of humanity’s clearly irredeemable dregs.

In this state religion, the distribution of guilt is clearly inequitable: The only person who bears ANY blame for World War II, at least while it was happening, was Adolf Hitler. And then after World War II, the guilt must be shouldered by everyone of European ancestry, no matter their forefathers’ role in World War II—they must suffer. Forever.

It’s truly that ridiculous, and meekly attempting to bring facts and reason into the discussion is to be barked at by a pack of rabid bitches in estrus.

link

This book provides an excellent analysis of Churchill’s role in starting WW1: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War. WW1 was the beginning of the end of the West. It is important to understand that official history is as much an illusion of mind-control as was the plandemic and vax mandates. All important societal information is always massaged by mind-controllers if not outright lied about. ABN

Speech control is mind-control

This is an absurd example of brainwashed cops (not all cops are brainwashed) being stupid (not all cops are stupid). When you say someone is a ‘filthy migrant’ that person may well have been filthy (and it does not mean that all migrants are filthy). Furthermore, if someone spat on you isn’t the descriptor filthy about the least you would say about them? UK cops are trained to react to adjectives applied to migrants, but not the crime perpetrated against a citizen. I bet if she had spit on them, she would have been arrested and probably cussed out as well. Note the dead, glaring eyes of those three stupid cops; it’s an example of how mind-control gets deep into the brain. ABN

Continue reading “Speech control is mind-control”

Brief history of the immoral, illegal, and unethical abuse of the UNVAXXED

The campaign against the unvaxxed which was done by all institutions of power, sadly including also all medical institutions, was an example of mind-control. No matter which side you were on, all of us who lived through those months and years learned an extremely valuable lesson in what societal mind-control is, how it works, who does it, and why. It will happen again. Next time there will be differences, most likely a major war will set it off, but the techniques will be the same or similar. Fear, panic, praise for submitting, anger and hatred for not submitting, ostracism, punishment, shaming, loss of employment, and it can get much worse than that. In the Soviet Union, tens of millions of innocents were murdered by the Bolsheviks. In China, the shaming and killing was done by the Red Guards. Worldwide, the covid vaxxes probably killed around 15 million. ABN

Tucker Carlson’s Non-Denial Denialism of the Holocaust

Well, the Jewish Lobby is at it again. In the latest kerfuffle over “Holocaust denial,” Jews and their sycophants are in an uproar over a podcast interview aired on September 2 in which Tucker Carlson spoke at length with a “popular historian” named Darryl Cooper. The two-hour episode is titled “The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe”—a bit of a stretch for a single show, but with the central theme that conventional or orthodox history is often wrong about events small and large, and thus frequently in need of revision. History is not only written by the victors, it is sustained by powerful lobbies that have a vested interest in a certain interpretation of past events. This much is so obvious that it scarcely needs mentioning.

And yet, when it comes to World War Two and especially the Holocaust, all rules go out the window. The “victors” cannot be named; alternate interpretations are not allowed; and revisionism is declared a crime. In the interview, Cooper offers the mildest of mild statements regarding his thoughts on WW2 and on what happened to “civilians and prisoners of war” at that time. Two points seemed to have raised the greatest ire: that Churchill, not Hitler, was the true villain of the war; and that the millions of people who died—presumably meaning millions of Jews—were, in effect, accidental victims rather than targets of a premediated and planned genocide. Our cultural guardians are upset by the first point but truly enraged by the second.

The horror of stating such views was too much for both our Jewish media and for our Jewish-inspired Biden regime. The headlines are alarming: “Tucker Carlson Criticized for Hosting Holocaust Revisionist” (NYT); “Tucker Carlson Welcomes a Hitler Apologist to His Show” (NYT, Michelle Goldberg); “White House condemns Tucker Carlson’s ‘Nazi propaganda’ interview as ‘disgusting and sadistic insult’” (CNN); “Tucker Carlson Blasted for Interview with Holocaust Revisionist” (The Hill). CNN reports that the Biden administration took the unusual step of publicly “denouncing Tucker Carlson” and his guest. Deputy press secretary Andrew Bates issued a formal statement, not only calling the interview “a disgusting and sadistic insult to all Americans” but also condemning Carlson for “giving a microphone to a Holocaust denier who spreads Nazi propaganda.” Bates’ chief concern seems to be with “the over 6 million Jews who were genocidally murdered by Adolf Hitler.” “Hitler was one of the most evil figures in human history,” Bates assures us—“full stop.” Certainly no revisionism allowed in this most “freedom-loving” of nations.

This whole incident is worthy of some reflection. Let me start with what exactly Cooper said. Here are the relevant statements (from 46:30 to 49:00):

When [the Germans] went into the East, in 1941, they launched a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, local political prisoners, and so forth, that they were going to have to handle. They went in with no plan for that. And they just threw these people into camps and millions of people ended up dead there.

You have letters as early as July, August 1941 from commandants of these makeshift camps that they’re setting up for these millions of people who were surrendering or people they are rounding up. And it’s two months after [Operation] Barbarossa was launched [in June], and they’re writing back to the high command in Berlin saying, “We can’t feed these people…” And one of them actually says, “Rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter, wouldn’t it be more humane to just finish them off quickly now?”

At the end of the day, [Hitler] launched that war [against the USSR] with no plan to care for the millions and millions of civilians and prisoners of war that were going to come under [his] control. And millions of people died because of that.

link

Good essay, food for thought. Provides a brief, interesting outline of the information chaos surrounding WW2 and who died the most and why and who to believe. When there are laws against interpretations of historical events, you can be sure something is deeply wrong. ABN

Liz Cheney Says Her and her Father Will Vote for Kamala Harris

There are many people who still do not quite fully understand and accept the role of the Intelligence Community (IC) in the manipulation of American politics. Perhaps this recent announcement by Liz Cheney and her father, Dick Cheney the former Defense Secretary, will awaken a few more.

Go back to the 2016 election and the rise of outsider, then candidate Donald Trump. There was one other genuine outsider in the race, Ben Carson.

Who was moved into position as Carson’s campaign manager during that well-documented “splitter strategy” effort to install the Hillary Clinton/Jeb Bush illusion of choice? Answer: Mary Cheney. Yes, the IC has a lot of ways to wrap their tentacles around any individual they need to control.

During remarks earlier today, Liz Cheney said herself and her father would be supporting Kamala Harris. Additionally, the Cheney family would be working earnestly to defeat Ted Cruz in the Texas senate race. This represents a significant shift in position toward Cruz, following the Bush and Cheney relationship with the Texan.

(Via Politico) – Former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney made clear her war against former President Donald Trump won’t be limited to her endorsement of Kamala Harris.

In an interview Friday at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Cheney said that she would campaign in battleground states this fall, and also endorsed Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) in his Senate race against Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.

In her remarks, Cheney also said her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, would be voting for Harris. The audience erupted in cheers after she mentioned her father’s vote.

“Defeating Donald Trump is frankly important but there are numbers of candidates around the country who have embraced election denialism and I think it’s really important that we defeat them, too,” said Cheney, once the No. 3 leader of the House Republican Conference. “One of the most important things we need to do as a country as we begin to rebuild our politics is we need to elect serious people.”

Her remarks follow a Wednesday speech at Duke University where she announced her vote for Harris and warned of the “danger” she says Trump poses. (read more)

There is a remarkable amount of sunlight upon the control mechanisms in/around American politics. President Trump has been the impetus to reveal the historic “illusion of choice” that has puzzled many Republican voters for decades.

More than at any time in history, right now the great American awakening is showcasing just how the UniParty system in Washington DC operates. All of the professional political institutions of government are fighting desperately to retain their tenuous grip on power.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Personally, I think this is good news!

The Deep State is in panic mode…

Very important to see this clearly and fully understand it. Posted in full with permission from Sundance. ABN

The importance of choosing what is BETTER, politically and historically

Musk is better than Zuckerberg, RFK Jr is better than Fauci, Carlson is better than Maddow, Trump is better than Harris. Modern history has provided many examples of societies that failed to stop communism when they still could have, and having failed to do that fell into communist massacres that killed tens of millions while also completely destroying their cultures. The two main examples are Russia and China. Many in Russia were aware of the danger of communism many decades before the nation was destroyed. Too many of those who were aware played nice, dithered, were complacent, did nothing when they could have done a lot. We are now living in something akin to early 20th Century Russia. Is today 1905, 1912, 1914? I don’t know but we are close to full totalitarian takeover and destruction that will be every bit as bad as what happened to Russia. It won’t be called communism but it will be a civilizational disaster. This applies to every nation in the collective West and all of our closest allies, like Japan, Taiwan, etc. It is the West that is going to fall hard, not just USA, UK, NZ, or whatever single nation you choose to focus on.

There is an argument out there that it’s all a circus. The elite have total control. Trump has been chosen to usher in digital IDs and currency. Etc. There is truth to this POV and it should be kept in mind that we are not going to get a perfect government. Digital everything is probably inevitable, including digital babies. We live in a quickly evolving world and we have to negotiate that. But remember, Russia could have saved itself if it had reformed in time. It didn’t, so the Bolsheviks won and destroyed everything. If it weren’t for Putin, Russia would look like Ukraine today. Making the right choices in muddled circumstances is the mark of great thinkers. It’s never all black-and-white. ABN

If China wants Taiwan it should also reclaim land from Russia, says president

If the Chinese Communist party truly believes it has a territorial claim to Taiwan, then it should also be trying to take back land from Russia, Taiwan’s president, Lai Ching-te, has said.

Lai made the remark in an interview to local media on Sunday, noting Beijing’s very different approach to two similar historical moments of territorial loss.

Under the rule of Xi Jinping, the CCP claims Taiwan is a Chinese province run by illegal separatists, and he has vowed to annex Taiwan under what it calls “reunification”.

Beijing says Taiwan has been part of China since “ancient times” but was taken by Japan during the “century of humiliation”, the period between 1839 and 1949 during which China was repeatedly subject to defeat and subjugation. Complete restoration of China’s losses in that time is a driving narrative of the CCP, and today is largely focused on Taiwan.

However, Lai, who was elected president in January, noted that China also lost land to Russia during that period but was not making any effort to take it back. He said this showed Beijing’s plans to annex Taiwan – which it has not ruled out using force to achieve – were not driven by territorial integrity.

link

Not an earth-shaking comment but I do not recall hearing a president of Taiwan saying it publicly before this. ABN

YouTube Has Removed 1 Million Videos About Covid, CEO Says

Her thoughtless spiel proves the value of free speech. She was dead wrong. Millions knew she was wrong and tried to warn but were censored out of fear, greed and darker motivations. Official covid trusted and authoritative information, as claimed by Wojcicki, was actually anti-science mind-control, which killed tens of millions worldwide. It’s one thing to say something stupid and wrong, people will figure it out eventually. It’s another thing—a much worse thing—to censor millions of people who were right. We figured that out too but it took a much long time than if we had not been censored. Censorship is mind-control done by people with dimmer minds than many of those they are censoring. A dim mind is prone to self-righteous control over others. It is fundamentally a parasitic mind-set. Culturally, free speech is the only thing that stops people of that ilk. That’s why we have laws protecting free speech and that’s why people of that ilk constantly undermine those laws or try to change them. ABN

RFK Jr on childhood vaccines and the perverse incentives behind them

The more of us know this, the more doctors will feel pressure to cut their shit. Voting is always dubious in USA, but our collective grapevine is always strong when enough of us have the right information. Share what you know with others. No need to argue. Just let others know what you think — that someone else has different information, a different opinion. Being too polite and not talking is big part of what got us into the mess we are in today, on this and many other issues. ABN

Why should the state control all communications? They have consistently abused their powers. We the plebs can best affect this travesty by understanding it and being mostly on the same page with each other. On a side note, I can’t help but suspect EU bureaucrats are jealous of Durov. ABN