Many Jews in the fear-inflation business like Jonathan Greenblatt have already reported on the generational disparity in anti-Semitism. The reason for the disparity seems pretty straightforward: Old people were fed a steady diet of programming that was not only filtered through various Jewish studio execs, editors, directors, and writers, but was delivered via a one-way broadcast medium. This allowed Jews to disseminate their ideas uncontested. In other words, Jews placed themselves between boomers and the world, carefully curating their “reality.”
The two-way medium of the Internet used by the younger generations has allowed conversations to occur outside of Jewish jurisdiction, and younger generations are largely rejecting Jewish ideas and the Jewish framing of the world. While old people continue to watch the sanitized version of the Gaza conflict on Fox News, young people are consuming Telegram videos of Jewish crimes against humanity and are disgusted by it.
Conversations about Jewish overrepresentation, influence, and power are no longer avoidable now that the Internet has overtaken the Jewish-dominated mediums of television, print, and radio. For the first time in a century, Jews are in a position where they have to defend themselves, and they’re showing everyone how out of practice they are. Most Jews just “accuse the accuser,” calling their critics “anti-Semites” since there really is no way to defend their ethnic cleansing of Gaze and open borders extremism in the West.
I have watched only a 20 min excerpt of this video, but am posting because what I saw is stimulating to the imagination and provides a serious analysis of what might have really happened to Charlie Kirk and who did it. Surprised to find it on YouTube. ABN
UPDATE: I’ve now watched the whole video. It’s an excellent overview of the Kirk killing, replete with many illuminating details which thoroughly debunk the official narrative we have been told so far. One of the best breakdowns I’ve seen. Highly recommended. ABN
After discussing the PETN hypothesis and showing it is unlikely because an explosive would cause more visible damage, the following drone hypothesis is asserted:
In stark contrast, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a close-range quadcopter sniper drone firing a 5.56mm round, aligning perfectly with documented Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) tactics in Gaza and Lebanon since 2023, where modified commercial drones like Elbit LANIUS or TIKAD models hover at low altitudes (under 100 meters) to deliver single precision shots with 5.56mm or 9mm munitions for targeted killings.
This method produces the exact signatures observed: a soft “pop” (no distant supersonic crack due to proximity), bird-sized overhead shadow in bystander videos, cauterized small entry from muzzle heat/friction, internal tissue shredding from yawing/fragmentation without exit, and the dramatic yet contained shirt puff exaggerated by the necklace and mic—driven by the bullet’s high-velocity temporary cavity (expanding radially to yank fabric without tearing it).
Ballistic studies confirm 5.56mm rounds create large temporary cavities in soft tissue like the neck, causing shock and energy dump that matches the no-exit, vertebral-damage wound path, while avoiding the chaotic external effects of explosives.
Eyewitness and human rights reports from Gaza describe these drones as tools for “minimizing civilian casualties” in urban warfare, but frequently resulting in precise, deniable hits—mirroring the Kirk event’s low-signature execution amid a crowd.
Megyn Kelly saying Tyler Robinson is 100% guilty and she hopes she’s there when they flip the switch doesn’t taint the jury pool?
Jack Posobiec posting edited pictures claiming Tyler Robinson was a gun nut doesn’t taint the jury pool?
Andrew Kolvet posting a video of Tyler in court with fabricated lip reading quotes doesn’t taint the jury pool?
What planet do you people live on???
You think we have a “brain virus” because we can see what’s in front of us doesn’t add up?
Well what the hell are you infected with to believe the official story that Tyler Robinson woke up one day and decided to drive 4 hours from his home to a college he’d never been to but just so happened to know exactly where to go and exactly how to get there in order to fire his single 30-06 round from his recently reassembled WWI rifle which was miraculously stopped by Charlie Kirk’s neck-bones made of steel? Is this some kind of vaccine side effect? Are you all recently boosted???
This is a reasonable, even strong, indication that humanity’s ancient past is very different, more wonderful, dangerous and stranger than we had hitherto ever thought. ABN
New evidence has come to light suggesting Charlie wasn’t taken out by some “lone sniper” bullet. Rewatch the tragic footage frame by frame—you’ll see it clear as day. That long, skinny white wire flying off his body milliseconds after the “shot”? Everyone (including me at first) thought it was his necklace. WRONG.
It’s the thin wire from his microphone transmitter pack—clipped to his belt or pocket, even though the lapel mic was “wireless.” And right then, a mysterious flash and force originates FROM UNDER HIS SHIRT.
Explosives experts and former intelligence assets (including Mossad insiders who know these tactics all too well) are backing this: A tiny but lethal PETN1 charge hidden in the mic wire or transmitter detonated, firing shrapnel straight into Charlie’s neck, severing his carotid artery.
That explains why they only found a “fragment” inside him—no full bullet exit wound, no matching ballistics from a distant rifle. The official story is FALLING APART. Who had access to rig his mic?
Who benefits from silencing Charlie right as he was exposing the deep state? Steve (@stevendenoon ) and I broke this down in detail on the livestream—watch it now below
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), with the chemical formula C5H8N4O12, is a powerful secondary explosive known for its high brisance and sensitivity to shock and friction. It is a white crystalline solid with a melting point of 141.3 °C and a detonation velocity of approximately 8400 m/s at a density of 1.7 g/cm³. PETN is significantly more powerful than TNT PETN is highly sensitive and can be initiated by mechanical shock, friction, or electric sparks, with a minimum energy requirement of 10–60 mJ for direct initiation by an electric spark. It is also capable of being detonated by a laser pulse, such as a Q-switched ruby laser with a duration of 25 nanoseconds and 0.5–4.2 joules of energy. Despite its sensitivity, PETN is stable enough for safe handling and storage ↩︎
_________
Full video available at link above.
This is new to me but makes the best sense of any hypothesis so far. ABN
Let me explain the meaning of my headline for those of you unfamiliar with the authority of the FBI to investigate Federal crimes while State and local authorities… The FBI does not have the authority to investigate Charlie Kirk’s murder unless there was foreign involvement or a clear violation of a Federal statute. The FBI is a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction, but it can only investigate crimes that violate federal statutes (codified mostly in Title 18 of the U.S. Code) or that have a clear federal nexus. Typical FBI crimes include:
Crimes that cross state lines (interstate kidnapping, fugitive flight, human trafficking, large-scale drug trafficking)
Crimes against federal property, employees, or programs (bank robbery, federal corruption involving federal funds, mail/wire fraud)
Specifically enumerated federal offenses (terrorism, civil-rights violations under color of law, RICO for interstate organized crime, major cybercrimes affecting interstate commerce, child exploitation material crossing state lines, etc.)
Major crimes on federal land, Indian reservations, aircraft, or maritime jurisdiction
The FBI does not have general police powers. It cannot, on its own authority, investigate ordinary murder, rape, robbery, burglary, assault, theft, or street-level drug dealing unless one of the federal elements above is present. State and local authorities handle almost all “traditional” street crime and routine law enforcement. The FBI steps in only when Congress has specifically made the conduct a federal offense or when a clear interstate/federal interest exists.
Based on the indictment of the alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk — i.e., a Utah resident allegedly committed murder in Utah — the FBI has no role or jurisdiction in the matter. Yet, for some reason, the FBI is involved in the case. Why?
This brings me back to the case of Seth Rich. Seth Rich was a 27‑year‑old staffer at the Democratic National Committee who was shot and killed in Washington, D.C., in the early morning of July 10, 2016. Police found him with two gunshot wounds to the back near his home in the Bloomingdale neighborhood; he was taken to a hospital and died about an hour and a half later.
…The assassination of Charlie Kirk, if the indictment of Tyler Robinson is true, was not a Federal crime. Yet the FBI, Homeland Security and DOJ all responded initially as if it was a Federal crime. Now, the matter is being handled as a state crime with no federal jurisdiction.
Based on the video evidence and public information regarding the destructive power of a .30-06 round, I do not believe that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. In fact, I think there is ample circumstantial evidence that would warrant the FBI taking a leading role in the investigation because of possible foreign involvement in Kirk’s murder. But that apparently is not happening…
They have also released grainy, incongruous videos of ‘Robinson’.
It’s a joke they won’t release, at the very least, clear videos of their suspect.
That campus was loaded with cameras.
Why was the crime scene paved over and completely destroyed?
I am not super interested in getting into the weeds like this.
But this case has become foundational for public participation in solving crimes.
If we had had social media and cameras all over the place when JFK was assassinated, the government would never have been able to keep their role in the case secret for 60 years.
The Zapruder film would never have been kept secret and only shown to Dan Rather who either lied about it or was so dumb he could not understand what he was looking at.
Open discussion and crowd-sourced evidence is bright sunlight on any crime and should become standard and expected for all criminal cases that are important to the public.
Owens, Mel and many others have already done better work and better outreach than the government.
It’s obvious to me, the government wants to hold onto old-fashioned ways of totally controlling any subject they choose, including major crimes like Kirk’s assassination. ABN
In replies to this Grok analysis, Ethical Skeptic says: With each new confirmation, comes the thrill of a successful model prediction – and then follows the existential reality that it makes this tin-foil hat theory, not only plausible, but a looming possible reality.
Straight up ad hominem attack on a pioneer journalist producing better work than all of US Big Media combined.
Owens is establishing a new paradigm for journalism; one that draws on crowd-sourcing and direct feedback from the public.
Her podcast is booming because it’s very good and her audience can sense this is the right way to do news in today’s super-connected world.
She is a talented rhetorician to boot.
My guess is her main opponents savaging her are being paid, directly or indirectly, by the real perps; are part of the psyop themselves; are simply envious of her swift rise to global prominence due to her talent and content.
Rational and reasonable speculation is real content in the real-world in real-time.
Actively hunting for the truth is the most fundamental content everyone wants.
Candace has established a new formula, guys — crowd-sourcing, which yields tons of info and is deeply engaging; reasonable, focused content, including speculative content and queries; immediacy, authenticity and talent.
Since Kennedy’s piece is behind a paywall, I was not able to read it, but the headline, which itself is truly evil, is so bad I think it makes my fundamental point vividly:
No one else is producing bold, up-to-date content on Kirk’s murder, and that is what the public wants.
Not government, not Big Media, not TPUSA, not $7,000 podcasters.
Only Owens is doing the real work modern civilization deeply wants and requires. ABN
American Buddhist Net 