UPDATE: Owens has been doing a terrific job on the Kirk assassination. It does not make sense that anyone would want to censor her or make her stop. Erika Kirk, herself, even said on her Watters interview that she welcomes openness and independent investigations of her husband’s murder. I am undecided on what happened but doubt the FBI based on their track record and their lack of transparency in this case and others under Patel. Before dumping on Owens, I recommend watching at least two or three of her videos on Kirk’s assassination, some of which can be found here. Also, ask yourself: If you were murdered would you want a full and transparent investigation or not? ABN
Tag: analysis
Allie Beth Stuckey replies to Candace Owens
Candace Owens: Megyn Kelly Goes SCORCHED EARTH On Those Lying About Charlie Kirk. | Candace Ep 263
They all intersect — Ethical Skeptic
They …All …Intersect
The same spot EXACTLY where the Khufu ‘Air Shafts’ point in the sky… ECDO Theory’s Np’
Fuentes on Jewish Supremists attitude
Fuentes does a good job with his cultural analyses and calling out a**holes. From what I have seen, though, is he has only scratched the surface of Jewish Supremacy.
The really big demonic fish he needs to catch is JS covert warfare inside USA and the West.
It has been very violent, but hidden, at interpersonal levels and is a major cause of Western decline.
It’s never been about just ideas or nepotism or money.
It’s mostly been about covert violence against talented young people and the ruination this brings the West, year after year. ABN
Candace Owens: Why Is Everyone Crashing Out Over The Charlie Kirk Investigation? | Candace Ep 262
Short clip from the above:
Another clip:
My AI investment thesis is that every AI application startup is likely to be crushed by rapid expansion of the foundational model providers — Yishan
My AI investment thesis is that every AI application startup is likely to be crushed by rapid expansion of the foundational model providers.
App functionality will be added to the foundational models’ offerings, because the big players aren’t slow incumbents (it is wrong to apply the analogy of “fast startup, slow incumbent” here), they are just big. Far more so than with any other prior new technology, there is a massive and fast-moving wave that obsoletes every new app almost as fast as it can be invented. There is almost no time to build a company and scale it.
There are two ways AI application startup founders can make money:
– Make a flash-in-the-pan app that generates a ton of cash and bank the cash (my estimate is that you have about 12-18 months cashflow generation)
– Make a good enough app that you get acquired by one of the big players for sufficient equity
The situation is highly unstable – we don’t know if it’s going to crash or go to the moon but both scenarios make it very unlikely that any AI application startup will independently become a generational supercompany (baseline odds are low to begin with).
The best odds are finding an application niche in a highly specialized field with extremely unique and specific data barriers, ideally ones relating to real atoms (hardware or world-related) data and not software/finance.
A good lesson in psycholinguistics and how they can go wrong, deliberately or not
In this case, the interviewer is deliberately using psycholinguistics to insinuate an insidious undertone, which Owens disambiguates deftly.
Deliberately misusing words in this fashion is a very common political and journalistic trick.
Words and psychology are always intertwined and thus words are always susceptible to being used maliciously; they can provide an appearance of plausible deniability.
In the past week or so we have seen numerous Jewish Supremists, closeted or not, employ these techniques in addition to their typical name-calling and screaming while denying the obvious.
In this context, it is worth noting that misuse of language can happen in friendly, intimate conversation between good friends nearly as often as it does in political dialog.
It is common for psycholinguistic misunderstandings to happen for completely innocent reasons, with profoundly sad effects for all parties involved, which often snowball.
FIML practice will show all practitioners how insidious the misuse or mishearing of words can be and how to prevent it.
One of the reasons I like Owens is she has a very good understanding of language and psychology and generally uses words very well, with nuance, humor and accuracy. ABN
Candace Owens: Mamdani Wins. Charlie Kirk Questions Haunt “MAGA”. | Candace Ep 259
New 2026 Honda V3R 900 prototype overview
Candace Owens reports 12 Israeli-linked cellphones present at Charlie Kirk’s assassination
Full video:
Owens has done some of the best reporting and analysis of Kirk’s assassination. She has inside information, a wide range of crowd-sourced information, and a very personal animus driving her forward. She also happens to have exceptional rhetorical talent and is thus able to weave an ongoing narrative clearly, with gravitas and scathing humor. ABN
Candace Owens: MATRIX REVELATIONS: Erika Kirk Speaks. Zionists Lie About Charlie. | Candace Ep 257
Women Are Retarded – Part 5
I have not watched this yet, but she is usually funny if you are in the mood. ABN
Study debunks the idea that the universe is a computer simulation
“The fundamental laws of physics cannot be contained within space and time, because they generate them. It has long been hoped, however, that a truly fundamental theory of everything could eventually describe all physical phenomena through computations grounded in these laws. Yet we have demonstrated that this is not possible. A complete and consistent description of reality requires something deeper—a form of understanding known as non-algorithmic understanding.”
The study:
Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything
General relativity treats spacetime as dynamical and exhibits its breakdown at singularities. This failure is interpreted as evidence that quantum gravity is not a theory formulated within spacetime; instead, it must explain the very emergence of spacetime from deeper quantum degrees of freedom, thereby resolving singularities. Quantum gravity is therefore envisaged as an axiomatic structure, and algorithmic calculations acting on these axioms are expected to generate spacetime. However, Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, Tarski’s undefinability theorem, and Chaitin’s information-theoretic incompleteness establish intrinsic limits on any such algorithmic programme. Together, these results imply that a wholly algorithmic “Theory of Everything” is impossible: certain facets of reality will remain computationally undecidable and can be accessed only through non-algorithmic understanding. We formalize this by constructing a “Meta-Theory of Everything” grounded in non-algorithmic understanding, showing how it can account for undecidable phenomena and demonstrating that the breakdown of computational descriptions of nature does not entail a breakdown of science. Because any putative simulation of the universe would itself be algorithmic, this framework also implies that the universe cannot be a simulation.
If conscious thought underlies everything, our ‘individual’ conscious minds should be able to experience it. In Buddhism, this would occur in samadhi states to some extent and in nirvana entirely.
This study is being trashed by some but it tends toward an interesting way of thinking or imagining. ABN
American Buddhist Net 