Tag: analysis

The truth doesn’t require miracles. It leaves evidence.

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Let’s Dissect Andrew Kolvet’s “Miracle” Statement

Andrew Kolvet, a Turning Point USA media handler, released a statement that reads like it was written by a crisis PR firm scrambling to patch up a failing narrative. Let’s break it down, line by line:

1. “I’m usually not interested in delving into online chatter…”

Translation: “I don’t usually respond to conspiracy drivel… but let me make an exception this time.”

This is the classic defensive opener: discredit public speculation while subtly signaling moral authority — as if his involvement should automatically be trusted.

2. “I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…”

Problem: Charlie died instantly from a gunshot wound that caused decerebrate posturing, massive arterial bleeding, and catastrophic CNS trauma.

Let’s be clear: he wasn’t “worked on”. He was dead on arrival — if not at the scene, then certainly before any meaningful medical intervention. Unless Kolvet thinks surgeons perform autopsies, this claim is either fabricated or a willful misuse of medical terminology to sell emotional closure.

3. “The bullet should’ve gone through… it would’ve killed a moose… but it didn’t…”

This is the “trust me bro” forensic analysis from someone with no background in terminal ballistics, gunshot trauma, or even basic anatomy. If the bullet lodged beneath the skin, that suggests low velocity, deflection, or inconsistency in caliber used — none of which support the idea of a clean high-powered rifle kill.

Also: where’s the actual ballistics report?

4. “His bones were so strong, like the man of steel.”

Now we’re just fully in the realm of myth-making. Turning a human corpse into Superman doesn’t just defy science — it tells you exactly what this is:

A psychological operation meant to close the book on forensic doubt and redirect the public into emotional worship of the martyr.

5. “Even in death, Charlie managed to save others. Remarkable. Miraculous.”

This is narrative closure layered on top of miracle-language. In legal or psychological terms, this is called “preemptive emotional closure” — used to block further questioning by dressing tragedy in divine finality.

When a known TPUSA employee uses miracle-language, contradictory medical claims, and a triple “trust me” format — all without forensic transparency — it’s not just cringe. It’s coordinated damage control.

The truth doesn’t require miracles. It leaves evidence.


This is very well done; concise, succinct, clear as a bell.

Let’s not jump to conclude that Kolvet is a willing or knowing actor in this. ABN

Continue reading “The truth doesn’t require miracles. It leaves evidence.” →

Charlie Kirk’s final miracle revealed by surgeon who examined fatal neck wound

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

The surgeon who operated on Charlie Kirk said the bullet that killed him miraculously did not exit his neck, likely saving others from getting hit.

Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet revealed on Saturday night that he had spoken with the surgeon who made the comments directly to him.

In a post on X, Kolvet wrote: ‘I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.’

The surgeon told Kolvet that the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round’.

‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two,’ the surgeon told Kolvet.

A .30-06 bolt action rifle, the kind that was discovered hidden in the woods after Kirk was killed, is used to kill deer, elk, moose, bears and other big game animals.

link

The assumption is that Kirk was hit from the front and the rifle was a .30-06. But the assumed entry wound on Kirk’s left throat does not conform an entry wound; and neither does no exit wound, not with a round that powerful.

Recall the autopsies of JFK, the first of which said, truthfully, the exit wound was the rear of his head; then the second one said that was the entry would of the ‘magic bullet’ fired by the patsy Oswald.

An event of this importance demands a second or third autopsy by unquestionable experts, and it should be recorded. I doubt that will happen. ABN

Video may show entry wound in Kirk’s right ear, but is not conclusive

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Video below the screen stills.

Immediately after the shot that hit Kirk:

Immediately after the shot:

Immediately after the shot:

Seconds before the shot:

Seconds before the shot, next four stills:

Video from which stills are taken:

The screen stills before the shot that hit Kirk do show his earpiece but that same area is more vivid in the stills immediately following the shot.

This looks suggestive to me but not conclusive.

IF an Israeli-style exploding device armed with a self-destructing projectile is what caused Kirk’s death, what we can see in these stills might support that hypothesis.

IF he was shot from a rearward vantage, the movement of his head is well explained as is the exit wound on his neck’s left side (not seen in the above video).

IF he was hit by a bullet, it would have been a small caliber. But where is it?

IF he was hit by a self-destroying mini-missile, the evidence we see fits well.

IF he was killed by an Israeli-style self-destroying projectile device concealed in his earpiece, the video evidence also supports this.

All of this is speculation based on the low level of information available to the public. I dislike the way the FBI appears to be playing games with us through its meagre releases of information.

This is no longer 1963. Or is it? ABN

What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Story at a Glance:

•After the COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, stories began emerging of unvaccinated individuals becoming ill after being in proximity to recently vaccinated individuals. This confused many, as the mRNA technology in theory should not be able to “shed.”

•After seeing countless patient cases which can only be explained by COVID vaccine shedding, a year ago, I initiated multiple widely seen calls for individuals to share suspected shedding experiences.

•From those 1,500 reports, clear and replicable patterns have emerged which collectively prove “shedding” is a real and predictable phenomenon that can be explained by known mechanisms unique to the mRNA technology.

•Likewise, after being blocked from publication for over a year, recently, a scientific study corroborating the shedding phenomenon was finally published.

•This article will map out everything that is known about shedding (e.g., what are the common symptoms, how does it happen, who does it affect, does it occur through sexual contact, can it cause severe issues like cancer) along with strategies for preventing it.

link

Videos evidence withheld from public

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

__________

Not sure if this is where the supposed Robinson shot was fired, but the question is still good. If your investigation is honest release the videos. Instead of fighting to keep the public in the dark, release the evidence and let the public help figure it out. Release the video behind Kirk, release all of it. ABN

Liberal vs Conservative

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

My sense is conservatives have always been fundamentally live and let live, you do your thing, I’ll do mine, while liberals tend more to be activists for moral-sounding causes; and once they are activists they will also be ideologues and their whole thing becomes a religion.

This is a fundamental difference that shows very loudly in politics, as the chart above illustrates.

The activist left always wants to get into your head and make you be like them.

Historically and practically much of the fervor of the left comes from Jews who invented and them became fanatical about communism.

Today the same energies have morphed into woke stuff, previously PC stuff, now also Antifa stuff.

The common theme is they want to get into your head and make you be like them (often while robbing you blind).

There are few political happenings today that do not succumb to these energies.

There are also few interpersonal happenings today that do not succumb to these energies.

USA was built on the presumption that it was and would be a nation of White Christians who shared strong moral fiber and wanted to work together to build the nation.

USA today is no longer that and many of its non-Christian, non-Whites hate what they are not, and do activist shit against it relentlessly. ABN

Video showing a shot from behind on Kirk’s right

~ ABN ~ 2 Comments

The FBI must address the many anomalies and omissions not included in their rushed story about what happened.

There is strong evidence the shot came from Kirk’s right and behind him, not the front.

As it stands now, their case against Robinson is weak at best and looks manufactured.

But why would they manufacture it?

If that question is not answered, we will be forced to suspect yet another state-sponsored terrorist attack and coverup. ABN

Critically important camera being removed

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

__________

See this for the video from which this photo was taken: Does this look like a secured scene, or does it look like they just wrapped up filming a movie set? ABN

UPDATE 9/19: I have learned that the guy removing the camera is Kirk’s videographer and that he has turned the SD card over to the FBI. It’s very probable that guy is the videographer but it’s also probable the FBI will not allow us to view the vid, claim it was lost or damaged, or alter it. As of today, the FBI has not been credible or forthcoming in this investigation. ABN

Strong evidence Kirk was shot from his right, slightly above and behind him

~ ABN ~ 5 Comments

This video appears to show the shot came from above and a bit behind on Kirk’s right.

The streak near his right ear is his earpiece wire flying away from his ear upon impact from the bullet.

The impact of the bullet also pulls a further and thicker length of the cord running to his earpiece up, and it is this cord that you see sort of circling upward under the front of his shirt and around the back of his neck.

The wound on his neck’s left side is the exit wound and conforms precisely with how exit wounds appear but not entry wounds.

There have been many reports and videos of super fast, very small drones present at the rally during his talk.

It may be that one of those drones fired the shot that killed Kirk. Mercifully, if that was the case, he would have died instantly.

Another point worth making is that if he was killed by a miniature, military-grade attack-drone, we can be sure his assailants were professionally trained and equipped. And there was more than one.

This video appears to invalidate the lone sniper on the roof story. ABN

Netanyahu offered Kirk $150 million to stay kosher. Kirk refused. One can only assume the names below have accepted similar offers

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

__________

As of today, there is no way to be certain who shot Kirk and why.

But there is also no way it is not suspicious so many influencers are asserting the radical trans left did it.

There’s plenty more than just those four names singing that tune.

Free speech isn’t free when it costs $150 million.

I respect Kirk for turning down the bribe.

Congress is bribed, influencers are bribed, legacy media is bribed, universities are bribed.

It’s either the carrot or a bullet in the neck.

If Israel or US IC killed Kirk, it was not just to stop him and blame the left.

It was also to scare the sh*t out of anyone who turns down the bribes to tell what they see as the truth, as Kirk did.

There are so many holes in the official story as of today, no one should be claiming they know who did it or telling others to stop noticing patterns or the absurdity of the story to date.

I will never believe a word of this story if they don’t release the video from the camera behind Kirk when he was shot. ABN

Israeli Sniper Details Killing Palestinians, Including Children, Waiting for Aid

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

An Israeli sniper from the IDF’s Nahal Brigade detailed in comments to Haaretz the killing of unarmed Palestinians, including children, who were attempting to get aid in Gaza.

“It started about two months ago,” the soldier, who went by the pseudonym Benny, told the Israeli paper as part of a story focusing on the mental toll on IDF soldiers in Gaza. “Every day we have the same mission: to secure the humanitarian aid in the northern Gaza Strip.”

The report said that Benny and his fellow soldiers began their day at 3:30 am when they set up sniper positions near where aid trucks arrive to unload their contents. He said that Gaza residents try to move forward to get a good spot in line, but often cross an invisible line set by the IDF.

“A line that if they cross it, I can shoot them,” Benny said. “It’s like a game of cat and mouse. They try to come from a different direction every time, and I’m there with the sniper rifle, and the officers are yelling at me, ‘Take him down, take him down.’ I fire 50-60 bullets every day, I’ve stopped counting kills. I have no idea how many I’ve killed, a lot. Children.”

“The battalion commander would yell over the radio, ‘Why aren’t you taking them down. They are heading our way. This is dangerous,’” Benny said. “The sense is that we are being positioned in an impossible situation, and no one had prepared us for this. The officers do not care if children die, they also do not care what it does to my soul. To them, I am just another tool.”

“I saw the bodies of two children, maybe 8 or 10 years old, I have no idea. There was blood everywhere, lots of signs of gunfire, I knew it was all on me, that I did this. I wanted to throw up. After a few minutes, the company commander arrived and said coldly, as if he wasn’t a human being, ‘They entered an extermination zone, it is their fault, this is what war is like,’” he added.

Other Israeli soldiers have detailed killing unarmed Palestinian civilians without expressing any remorse. Israeli media outlets have reported extensively on the existence of kill zones in Gaza, where any Palestinian who crosses a line set by the IDF is deemed a “terrorist.”

link

A provision authorizing extrajudicial murder exists within Jewish law. Din rodef — “law of the pursuer,” permits the killing of those who are deemed a threat to individual Jews or the Jewish state, without the benefit of due process.

In the book Torat Hamelekh (The King’s Torah), Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur explain that din rodef “applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly… anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer.” 

link

Din rodef explains what has happened to so many strong men in the West — they have been covertly maimed, poisoned or killed while still boys or young men.

I see the opioid crisis, the fentanyl crisis and the covid vax in this light.

The covid plandemic was the same but used mind-control to bring about widespread death and disabling.

Covert warfare over several generations will destroy any society, and this is especially true if political and other leaders are bought off, paid to not notice. ABN

Qatar’s REAL leverage comes from stable LNG and finance flows, not from acting as a mediator to sheltering actors

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Doha used the strike as a permission structure to pivot away from the hosting model.

It wasn’t a “soft-power failure”.

It was a structural pivot.

Qatar treated “hosting Hamas” as a proxy-asset whose position turned negative.

For a decade, the asset had positive utility. The US got a reliable conduit, Israel tolerated Qatari cashflow management into Gaza, and Doha monetised access into mediator prestige.

That setup existed because the US originally wanted a reachable Hamas channel in a US-aligned host (Al Udeid as the ultimate security umbrella).  

So until now, that channel still priced in that utility.

But now it’s over.

Qatar’s “mediator” brand only worked while those conditions held.

There’s a reason why these conditions no longer remain useful. And i’ve explained this before.

Proxies are time-sensitive assets.

They remain useful during stalemated negotiations. Once they obstruct normalization or capital flows, sponsors reroute;

budgets thin, access tightens, and the proxy gets integrated, contained, or abandoned.

There’s PLENTY of signals we’re at the end of this curve.

Maintaining mediator role is just a toxic position now.

Stop looking at the past to determine what the future should be. That’s not how statesmen think. They evolve all the time.

What Qatar needs to do now, is exit the hosting role, and keep the convening brand. It should facilitate talks without residency.

There’s several reasons why it needs to accelerate this pivot.

The Hamas/Israel deadlock has became a liability.

The mediation channel has stalled.

When a channel stops producing swaps/ceasefire increments, it stops buying Qatar influence and starts costing it.

That’s the first reason.

The second reason,  

Continue reading “Qatar’s REAL leverage comes from stable LNG and finance flows, not from acting as a mediator to sheltering actors” →

‘9/11 — Painful Deceptions, Full Documentary

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

link to video

I have only spot checked this video but it appears to be the original one made by Eric Hufschmid, I believe in 2003, perhaps containing some supplementary material. There are other versions of Painful Deceptions, which seem to be the same or similar but narrated by someone other than Eric and about 20 min shorter than the version above. The one above is clearly in Eric’s voice. Whatever, Hufschmid’s video stands as the earliest comprehensive foundation of the 9/11 story. If you have never seen this video, it is important to watch it. If it’s been awhile since you last saw it, it’s well-worth a quick review. ABN