2:12
Tag: analysis
Don’t be fooled by semantics
The real topic is not Epstein but who controls USA
__________
Trump is being evasive but we do not know why.
The ‘ridiculous amount of publicity’ is due not to Epstein but to citizens wondering who really controls USA.
Epstein is a symbol of Jewish Supremist infiltration and clandestine control over USA politics.
Trump appears to be using a redirection technique by focusing on Epstein.
It’s a technique he uses quite often. But it’s not working well on this issue.
The technique worked OK with blaming Musk’s behavior on the EV mandate removal.
But that was just two men fighting and no one cares very much, so the redirection technique worked.
Who controls USA is not a question that can be easily redirected back to Epstein.
Epstein is a symbol, a tangible example, of JS control of USA.
What everyone really wants to know is are you being controlled by them?
ABN
Trump scores own goal equal to Hillary’s ‘deplorables’
The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again! Just like with the FAKE and fully discredited Steele Dossier, the lying 51 “Intelligence” Agents, the Laptop from Hell, which the Dems swore had come from Russia (No, it came from Hunter Biden’s bathroom!), and even the Russia, Russia, Russia Scam itself, a totally fake and made up story used in order to hide Crooked Hillary Clinton’s big loss in the 2016 Presidential Election, these Scams and Hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at – It’s all they have – They are no good at governing, no good at policy, and no good at picking winning candidates. Also, unlike Republicans, they stick together like glue. Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this “bullshit,” hook, line, and sinker. They haven’t learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years. I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country’s history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don’t even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don’t want their support anymore! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
_________
He and his administration could not have handled this worse, or so it appears. Maybe there is something else going on. Maybe he is being poisoned or his family is being threatened. It is true that there are more important issues than Epstein himself, but the core of this tragedy is who is president of USA? Is it Trump or his shadowy handlers? I usually do not ask without answering but in this case, there does not seem to be a clear answer. No serious politician would write the line highlighted above. ABN
The Grand Canyon was probably formed by a meteor strike 56,000 years ago
Researchers connected another Arizona geographical feature, the Meteor Crater to the Grand Canyon’s formation.
The Meteor Crater, located about 130 miles southeast of the Grand Canyon’s South Rim, was formed more than 56,000 years ago by a large iron-nickel asteroid.
The study hypothesizes that the impact triggered landslides in the Grand Canyon that accounted for a hefty portion of its shaping.
These landslides supposedly blocked off the Colorado River and formed a ‘paleolake,’ which is ancient lake that no longer exists, in the canyon.
Ultimately, researchers deemed that since all of these timelines appear to match up, the asteroid that created the massive crater also caused the landslide.
The landslide led to the paleolake, which created a dam in the Colorado River.
This dam allowed for water to build up and eventually cause surging floods that flooded caves in the canyon, causing further erosion.
This theory makes good sense and accounts for all of the evidence, including ancient driftwood in caves at very high elevations within the canyon. ABN
How AI works in the real-world — Ron Unz
OpenAI Text Summary
In recent months, Ron Unz has been extensively utilizing OpenAI’s Deep Research AI for fact-checking his controversial articles, which often explore contentious historical topics like the JFK assassination, 9/11 attacks, and the origins of COVID-19. This advanced AI system, known for its computational resources and depth in research, has become an invaluable tool for Unz, allowing him to substantiate his claims and refine his body of work. Despite its limitations, such as occasional failures in processing complex inquiries and producing garbled outputs, the AI has consistently validated a significant portion of Unz’s assertions, providing a level of confidence in his work that he believes will encourage readers to engage with his findings.
Unz’s articles touch on various controversial subjects, often challenging mainstream narratives. He asserts that the AI’s analyses have generally confirmed the accuracy of his claims, particularly regarding politically sensitive issues, including allegations about the influence of Israeli intelligence in major historical events. For instance, he highlights the AI’s positive evaluations of his pieces on the assassination of prominent figures and the role of sexual blackmail in politics, emphasizing how it has supported his conclusions with credible evidence. This validation serves to bolster his position in a landscape where many of his views are dismissed or ridiculed, especially by the mainstream media.
However, Unz also notes that the AI’s evaluations can be inconsistent, especially concerning topics deemed sensitive or controversial, such as the Holocaust narrative. While the AI has largely endorsed his factual claims, it issued strong critiques when his articles contained skepticism regarding established historical accounts. This discrepancy raises questions about the potential biases ingrained in the AI’s programming, suggesting that it might be conditioned to respond negatively to certain subjects while maintaining a more favorable stance on others. Unz points out that when his articles focus comprehensively on controversial subjects, the AI tends to validate them more favorably, which could indicate an underlying complexity in how the AI processes sensitive content.
The broader implications of Unz’s findings extend into the realm of AI ethics and the reliability of automated fact-checking systems. His experiences suggest that while AI can significantly enhance research and verification processes, it must be carefully monitored to avoid biases that could distort factual accuracy. As Unz continues to publish articles that challenge mainstream narratives, the interplay between his provocative hypotheses and the AI’s evaluations highlights the importance of rigorous scrutiny in both human and machine-generated analyses. The ongoing dialogue about the role of AI in journalism and research, particularly in relation to controversial topics, remains a critical area for future exploration.
Nearly half of adults worldwide hold antisemitic views
_________
…Antisemitism has surged as the Holocaust is more closely examined by the collective mind, FTFY. ABN
Libertarians’ Jewish Dilemma Fuels Genocide and Nuclear War
OpenAI Text Summary
The article discusses the historical and contemporary roles of three prominent Jewish libertarians—Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand, and Ludwig von Mises—in shaping libertarian thought and their connections to the ruling elite. Friedman and Rand are noted for their strong Jewish identities and Zionist beliefs, while Mises, although rooted in his Jewish heritage, emphasized individual freedom over ethnic concerns. The piece delves into the broader libertarian critique of the state, which is portrayed as an oppressive force driven by an exploitative ruling elite that privatizes gains while socializing losses. This elite is accused of manipulating public perception to support its policies, leading to perpetual conflict and the looming threat of nuclear warfare.
The author argues that exposing the ruling elite’s machinations is essential for reducing state power and preventing war. However, libertarian scholars often shy away from this analysis due to fears of being labeled as conspiratorial or politically incorrect. The article highlights Murray Rothbard as a notable exception, who actively critiqued the ruling elite’s influence and sought to understand its dynamics without succumbing to mainstream taboos. Rothbard’s contributions are framed as an essential framework for analyzing the intersection of economic interests and political power, emphasizing that elite actors engage in purposeful, self-interested behavior rather than acting randomly.
Rothbard identified three ethnic power blocs within the ruling elite: the WASP elite, the Jewish elite, and the Rockefeller dynasty. Each bloc is characterized by its distinct cultural and economic foundations, contributing to a complex interplay of competition and collaboration among these groups. The article elaborates on how these power blocs have historically influenced U.S. foreign policy and domestic governance, particularly during the World Wars, where their conflicting interests dictated the alignment of the U.S. in global conflicts. Rothbard’s analysis suggests that while these factions often cooperated for mutual benefit, their internal rivalries also shaped the course of American history.
The discussion shifts to the role of the Jewish elite in shaping state behavior, particularly in the context of the modern geopolitical landscape. The article posits that the Jewish elite has historically leveraged their position to navigate power dynamics while maintaining a distinct identity. The rise of neoconservative influence within the Republican Party is highlighted as a significant shift, with Rothbard noting the increasing prominence of Jewish interests in shaping U.S. foreign policy towards Israel and broader Middle Eastern engagements. The conclusion emphasizes the current geopolitical tensions and the need for libertarians to critically engage with the ruling elite’s influence, especially as conflicts in Gaza and elsewhere escalate, posing risks of genocide and nuclear war. The author calls for a more open discourse within libertarian circles regarding the Jewish elite’s role, arguing that self-censorship could lead to dire consequences for global peace and individual freedoms.
The entire Middle East is undergoing a tectonic shift. There’s regional understanding, and enforcement that all conflicts must end.
__________
This is what needs to happen in the West, particularly between and among Russia, Europe and USA.
I hope and believe Trump is working on both of these deals to the best of his ability.
Signs of success in ME. Signs of transition in Europe-USA-Russia.
From a game theory KOBK point of view, violent Western divisiveness if pursued without stopping is suicide for the West.
Western leaders must know this.
Those who are furthering violent divisiveness are either: 1) taking profits while they still can; or 2) are not real Westerners but either traitors of foreigners. ABN
‘The US will send weapons to Ukraine THROUGH NATO. And NATO is paying for those weapons 100%’ — Trump
__________
This illustrates the pickle Trump is in.
He does not want the war but he cannot resist the forces within NATO and USA that do want the war.
Some of those forces are economic, some KOBK game theory aimed at destroying Russia AND Europe, and some, perhaps the most influential, are Jewish Supremist forces.
We have seen JS play their hand in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union and in Ukraine during the long run-up to the Ukraine War.
Starmer is Jewish as is Boris Johnson, just two of many who appear to be wholehearted Jewish Supremists and who have fought against peace and in favor of continuing the War. Victorina Nuland in USA is similar.
I have seen analyses saying Trump is fighting against the ‘inertia of war’. Some truth in that but there are people applying force to that ‘inertia’, lots of force. They have an agenda and it is not to benefit Russia or Europe or USA. ABN
This is probably true
__________
If so, it may also be true that Trump has taken full possession of the files and videos and is thus now able to blackmail the blackmailers (mostly Jewish Supremists) while also controlling every Epstein perp anywhere near government or societal power.
I am going to go with this interpretation as most likely, for now. If we observe a respectful silence coming from JS and many other assorted warmongers, parasites and crooks, we will have more signs that the Epstein files have been turned on their nasty little heads and have become a benefit to a properly governed USA.
Another point worth making, is the scenario described above also explains and exonerates Patel, Bondi, and Bongino’s apparently dishonest and cowardly behavior. ABN
Democrats call for violence to counter Trump agenda and tell lawmakers to prepare to ‘get shot’
Democratic voters are asking their representatives to exhibit more violence while resisting Donald Trump‘s agenda – with some even suggesting lawmakers prepare to ‘get shot.’
The party – reeling in the wake of Trump’s November victory – heads toward the 2026 midterms with polls showing their own voters are unhappy with their performance.
Now, liberal politicians fear Trump haters are urging them to bend the law and even resort to violence in a desperate attempt to resist the president.
‘Our own base is telling us that what we’re doing is not good enough…there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public,’ an anonymous Democrat lawmaker admitted.
‘Some of them have suggested…what we really need to do is be willing to get shot.’
‘The expectations aren’t just unreal. They’re dangerous,’ said one more.
Historically, in modern times it has always been the left that provokes the right, forces the right to enact strict controls and harsh laws.
All of the Asian ‘tigers’—Taiwan, Korea, Singapore—went through a right-wing phase. And all of them eventually became representative, so-called democratic countries, which rapidly became wealthy.
Each of those regions started with next to nothing but was led by a strong right-wing leader who brought them out of poverty.
Taiwan under ‘fascist’ Chiang Kai-shek had very good land-reform laws which traded land ownership for a stake in manufacturing. The rest is history.
Hitler was a response to German poverty following WW1 and fear of extreme-left Bolshevik infiltration in Germany.
Similar stories underlie the modern successes of many other nations. And you won’t find even one that became a free and wealthy nation through left-wing, socialist, or communist governance.
The left has always preached morality to beguile gullible populations and then used whatever power it was given or seized to enrich themselves and no one else.
This is happening in USA today. This is why I support strong measures to prevent the burgeoning lefty takeover of USA. ABN
People are being lied to when they’re being diagnosed with gender dysphoria
I cannot find who the speaker is but this is the best short summary of gender dysphoria madness you will hear.
This issue reveals how important uncrossed or uncrossable lines can be in all societies.
The speaker focuses on gay marriage as the line that was crossed at the top of the slippery slope we are still sliding down today.
To be clear, no one especially likes having clear societal lines that cannot be crossed. Those lines are always philosophically and morally weak in many contexts, but removing them makes things even worse.
I personally believe we would be better off if gay marriage had never happened. It is a good example of a line that should not have been crossed.
I am aware of all the reasons in support of gay marriage. But it is also true that by erasing that line we came to allow many thousands of young people to be harmed by extremely deluded if not mentally ill adults.
Gender-affirming care is a truly Orwellian term; evil in its message and even more evil in its preemptive denial of there even being any other possible message. The term is a psycholinguistic torture chamber nightmare.
I hope readers of this site are aware that all psychology, value, philosophy and belief can always be analyzed at the linguistic level because all of it comes from words or ends up with words.
Take anything that bothers you and analyze it at the linguistic level of its psycholinguistic descriptors. Analyze the words. Change the words. Think about them with both psychological and linguistic feeling and you will see what I mean.
Deeply satisfying and beautiful mysteries can be discovered through that method. ABN
Psychophysics gains a new law of sensory perception that also sheds light on subjective perception
First we have to understand Weber’s Law:
Weber’s law, also called Weber-Fechner law, historically important psychological law quantifying the perception of change in a given stimulus. The law states that the change in a stimulus that will be just noticeable is a constant ratio of the original stimulus. It has been shown not to hold for extremes of stimulation. (Weber’s Law)
Hang in with this, it’s interesting.
About 200 years ago, the German physician Ernst Heinrich Weber made a seemingly innocuous observation which led to the birth of the discipline of Psychophysics – the science relating physical stimuli in the world and the sensations they evoke in the mind of a subject. Weber asked subjects to say which of two slightly different weights was heavier. From these experiments , he discovered that the probability that a subject will make the right choice only depends on the ratio between the weights.
For instance, if a subject is correct 75% of the time when comparing a weight of 1 Kg and a weight of 1.1 Kg, then she will also be correct 75% of the time when comparing two weights of 2 and 2.2 Kg – or, in general, any pair of weights where one is 10% heavier than the other. This simple but precise rule opened the door to the quantification of behavior in terms of mathematical ‘laws’. (NEUROSCIENTISTS MAKE MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH IN 200-YEAR-OLD PUZZLE)
What’s new today is Time–Intensity Equivalence in Discrimination (TIED):
We investigated Weber’s law by training rats to discriminate the relative intensity of sounds at the two ears at various absolute levels. These experiments revealed the existence of a psychophysical regularity, which we term time–intensity equivalence in discrimination (TIED), describing how reaction times change as a function of absolute level. (The mechanistic foundation of Weber’s law)
Simply stated TIED says that the intensity of the stimulus determines the time it takes to “just notice” a change in it and that that scales linearaly as intensity changes up or down. For example, changes in louder sounds are noticed quicker than proportionally equal changes in quieter sounds and this can be scaled mathematically.
TIED is a new theory and needs more research, but whether it works out perfectly or not, I think it shows something very important about our individual and shared subjective perceptions of words, gestures, meanings, intentions, implications, and so on including all semiotics.
At present, we do not have machines that can measure our subjective perceptions, but we can surely feel them. And with training, we can also decently calibrate them.
Most of us can already vaguely talk about our subjective perceptions of each other, but few of us know how to do that with the precision of Weber’s Law or TIED. This is because we are all unique and we all react uniquely to each other. On top of that, few are able to employ language efficiently enough to capture significant detail when describing subjective responses or impressions.
FIML provides a very useful method for isolating and calibrating individual, idiosyncratic subjective perceptions.
Consistent, repeated use of FIML gradually recalibrates and reorganizes the entire psychologies of both partners.
FIML has virtually no content.. FIML is a method, and as such it allows partners to gradually identify, isolate, measure, and reorganize their entire body of psychological data, however they construe it.
Trump Holds quiet meeting with Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, MbS younger brother
It was reported last night that President Trump held a quiet meeting with Saudi Arabia Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman in the White House Thursday. This meeting is reported to cover discussions around de-escalation with Iran, the conflict in Gaza and what comes next.
The meeting also comes on the heels of President Trump having a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin and work throughout the middle-east region by President Trump Emissary Steve Witkoff and Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer.
(Via Fox News) Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman secretly met with President Donald Trump and other key officials in the White House on Thursday to discuss de-escalation efforts with Iran, multiple sources confirmed with Fox News.
Khalid, also known as KBS, is the younger brother of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
[…] The talks were also reportedly about ending the war in Gaza and negotiating the release of the remaining hostages – whether dead or alive – and about working toward peace in the Middle East. (more)
Previously it was reported by Israeli media that President Trump was working on a comprehensive solution to Gaza that would encompass peace in the middle-east by normalizing ties with Israel, isolating Iran and giving them fewer options for regional instability. Expanding the Abraham Accords provides the diplomatic vehicle for this approach.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will visit the White House on Monday, July 7th.
It is strongly rumored that Syria and Lebanon would soon join the Abraham Accords, with the possibility of Saudi Arabia joining thereafter. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) is a key figure hoping to bring a new era to the middle east absent of conflict and focused on prosperity.
These negotiations are likely to bear huge fruits. There are significant general parallels between Trump’s work in the Middle East and with Russia. The talks in both regions are larger than just the wars in either region; in both regions Trump has aimed at peaceful accords at the highest levels. In a sense, he has gone above the fray and focused on long-term solutions. By going over the heads of Europe and Israel, Trump has wrestled the crux of these regional dynamics from them. And just as importantly, he appears to have largely seized control of American warmongers overtly and covertly involved in both regions. Neocon RINOs are quiet as are American Jewish Supremists, or at least Trump and most others are not listening to them. ABN
American Buddhist Net 