I hate this but it shows white people have to do it now, too. Traditionally, whites had built a fabulous civilization which was creative, peaceful and worked. Our medical science allowed the rest of the world to grow huge. And now we have been infiltrated and their numbers have grown exponentially inside of us. Parasitism based on mind-controlling Western morality while also working every scam you can get away with, including tribal nepotism and omerta codes, cannot be overcome without doing similar ourselves. It’s terrible but non-Western tribes living in the West are forcing us to become like them or become extinct. Hindu and Jewish tribes are both characterized by self-supremacy. And both invert this by feigning victimization while couching their hatred and exploitation of whites as whites being ‘phobic’ toward them. That’s parasitism and it pays very well. ABN
Krainer talks about Israel being covid’s obedient lab rat as directed by the UK foreign office. Maybe, but it is also very likely that Israel was a witting performer in the covid psyop, only pretending to be a lab rat. This allowed Israelis to receive fake saline vaxxes while Israeli researchers made up all the vax data. By Deception Do War. Worth noting is Israel is the only highly vaxxed country whose birth rate went up during and after the vaxxes, indicating they were probably not real vaxxes. This roughly parallels how China made a huge show of being overrun with covid at the beginning of the plandemic, thus launching the psyop. Then a few years later as covid waned, Xi Jinping faked another wave of covid infections which allowed him to lockdown China and purge many enemies while making it look to the world that China was still suffering from the virus. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Krainer is always interesting and this vid is thought provoking. He says the parasite lives in London, and has controlled the world for three centuries. It’s a very strong point. He also likes Trump and sees hope in his presidency. So do I. ABN
If you could take High Resolution pictures from the J6 crowd and run them through Palantir’s facial recognition software, you would note some of the images are oddly blurred during the result. [I’ve seen it] This outcome is due to definitions in the software that remove certain classified results, per the contracted partnership.
I have been deep into this matrix for more than a moment. Earlier today Mike Benz said, “In 2021, I spent literally hundreds of hours on the Jan 6 pipe bomber. One thing I never published until now still bothers me to this day: I believe the FBI, in addition to nuking the frame rate on the DNC security camera, blurred the eyes so no one could ID based on biometrics.“….. Interestingly, I can not only confirm Benz’s suspicions, I have witnessed the outcome. You might even call this the beta test for what lies ahead.
You see, the product that Palantir (Thiel) and the aligned group of beneficiaries from the NEW, updated, surveillance tech state has created, needs to have certain parameters in order to qualify for lucrative contracts under the auspices of ‘national security.’ They needed a package that allowed control of outcomes. Those specially defined people are ghost walkers.
When you add it all up, we can see a lot of the malfeasance, mind-control, and abusive rule. But it is never enough. The powers that be are like a mammoth bulldozer ripping across the land while we the plebs, at best, pick up bits and pieces of the broken debris they leave behind. If we ever get close to them, they will just turn on WW3—‘creative destruction’—to consolidate even more power while a new and thoroughly ignorant generation grows up behind us. ABN
This is interesting and hard to parse. Our government has without question been infiltrated by ‘scum’. USA is ‘breaking down’. Is there a faction in the CIA that has not been infiltrated? If not, who can we turn to? Many believe Trump is going to usher in a security state we will never get rid of. But what would it look like if he were really trying to clean up the government? Probably no different. We the plebs have little choice in how Trump decides to act. We can offer mass resistance if it goes badly and support if it goes well, but need to be careful how we decide either way. I am inclined to give Trump the benefit of the doubt for at least three months. We can expect a hard crackdown on illegals, and may also see crackdowns on government ‘scum’, human traffickers, cartels, gangs, fentanyl, terrorist sleeper cells, corrupt state and local officials, sanctuary cities and sanctuary states. Let’s hope for the best. There is no way Trump is not part of the elite and no way he is not the public figurehead of that part of the elite. Politics is the art of the possible. I expect Trump to be significantly better than Biden and accept that he has to go full bore or go nowhere at all. ABN
America’s success has not been due primarily to its citizens being smarter than the global average. The main reason is the country’s high level of social trust — a result of equally high levels of empathy, guilt proneness, and rule following.
If humans vary in their capacity for intelligence, why can’t they also vary in their capacity for empathy, guilt proneness, or willingness to follow rules? These mental traits are likewise heritable, and they likewise vary in adaptive value, being more valuable in some cultures than in others (Frost, 2020).
Perhaps you believe that the above traits form a single package. Perhaps you believe that intelligent people are normally good. Yes, cunning psychopaths do exist, but they’re the exception … aren’t they?
That belief is true, up to a point. As human groups increased in size and complexity, they underwent selection not only for intelligence but also for traits that help people trust each other, get along with each other, and interact peacefully.
However, some human groups have gone farther in that direction than others. Some have created truly large and complex societies, to the point that the sphere of social trust mostly encompasses people who are neither friends nor close kin.
Large high-trust societies have arisen only in Europe, especially northwestern Europe, and in East Asia. In both regions, we see similar trajectories of mental evolution: higher capacity for intelligence, less willingness to use violence to settle personal disputes, and greater willingness to follow and enforce rules. But there are differences. East Asians have created “shame cultures” — wrong behavior is discouraged largely by the feelings of shame you experience when other people know you have broken a rule. In contrast, Europeans have created “guilt cultures” — wrong behavior is discouraged largely by the feelings of guilt you experience after breaking a rule, even when you are the sole witness.
…Of course, high intelligence has not evolved solely in the large high-trust societies of Europe and East Asia. It has evolved elsewhere, typically in small groups that trade with a much larger one while feeling no special responsibility for its wellbeing. Such groups have to adapt to the cognitive demands of trade — literacy, numeracy, planning, budgeting — but this adaptation doesn’t require turning the entire space of social interaction into a high-trust space. Trust has to be maintained only in smaller spaces, particularly the buyer-seller relationship. Although traders may perform acts of philanthropy for their host society, such acts are done to create a friendly climate and are not involuntary acts of guilt or empathy.
In sum, high intelligence does not act alone in creating a high-trust society. It acts in combination with other factors that channel it in the right direction, specifically by constraining behavior through high levels of empathy, guilt, and rule following. Without those constraints, high intelligence may do more harm than good.
…Americans love to play fair. To them, it seems only “fair” that immigration should be based on a single metric that applies equally to everyone — in this case, a college degree. Meanwhile, it also seems “fair” that everyone should get a college degree, with the eventual result that a college degree no longer means much. In this, and in many other ways, “fairness” is piling up one social contradiction on top of another. At some point, Americans will have to accept the limitations of fairness and the reality of human differences.
At present, the best solution would be to let in as few immigrants as possible. Any admission criterion, no matter how “fair” — criminal record, university transcript, letters of reference — will prove to be worthless, either because it can be faked or because it simply fails to measure the innate characteristics that prospective immigrants will pass on to their descendants.
Please read the whole article. It is by Peter Frost and is one of the best articles I have seen on the subject of immigration, H1B visas, and what it takes to make a good American citizen. Frost’s analysis should be a foundation for any and all talk on American immigration policy. ABN
I hate this but it shows white people have to do it now, too. Traditionally, whites had built a fabulous civilization which was creative, peaceful and worked. Our medical science allowed the rest of the world to grow huge. And now we have been infiltrated and their numbers have grown exponentially inside of us. Parasitism based on mind-controlling Western morality while also working every scam you can get away with, including tribal nepotism and omerta codes, cannot be overcome without doing similar ourselves. It’s terrible but non-Western tribes living in the West are forcing us to become like them or become extinct. Hindu and Jewish tribes are both characterized by self-supremacy. And both invert this by feigning victimization while couching their hatred and exploitation of whites as whites being ‘phobic’ toward them. That’s parasitism and it pays very well. ABN
UPDATE: I’ve watched 45 minutes of this and, so far, it is a beautiful model of how to talk. These guys are both trained philosophers and act like it. They listen charitably (means use the best possible interpretation of what they hear) to each other, delight in rebuttals, and quickly and easily clear up misunderstandings with evident pleasure as they move almost seamlessly together deeper and deeper into their topic without losing sight of where they want to go. Maybe at minute 46 they are going to kill each other in a fit of anger, who knows? Up to minute 45, they provide an exquisite example of how to talk about philosophy. And what FIML can teach partners about how to talk to each other.
The field of FIML is not philosophy per se. It is the idiosyncratic intermeshed fields of the FIML partners themselves. I have often said FIML has no content save what partners bring to it. FIML is a technique which reveals what our content is, what we are bringing to our relationship. Once both partners see clearly through the eyes and ears of each other what both of you are bringing, you will also delight in the fun of being able to talk as well as Kastrup and Hawkins (but about much more than just philosophy). I doubt either one of them does FIML and both of them might find it difficult since so much of their psycholinguistic constellations are defined by academic philosophy, but I know they could do it if they tried. ABN
This is very good and well-worth the time. Pretty much what your basic American thinks or feels put very well. The parts on Indians ring true. It’s the same story for Jews but with different scenery. Simplicity that actually cuts to the core is always good. But you have to take it for that and not spin off into ‘fuck your own face’ or whatever Musk said. I hope Elon turns this episode around. People will hate you for what you do but will forgive you for what you did if your really reform. That happens to be basic (based?) Buddhism. It’s all transient. Or to say it better, all bullshit is transient but ethical, moral, generous, compassionate deeds and intentions are not. ABN
…Let’s talk about Trump as a cultural phenomenon because I think of two things. The McDonald’s drive-through and the garbage truck, both things that broke into the pop culture conversation, even beyond our world. Could any other candidate do that?
Fabrizio: MMA fights. Joe Rogan. We think of them as very specific things, but the symbolism — It says something about him that she couldn’t capture.
Where she’s doing the big speech or having the big debate, the conventional warfare, traditional campaign tactics. Donald Trump goes to the McDonald’s drive-through. But in the year 2024, when we’re all living on our phones, a big speech at the Ellipse vs. Trump at the drive-through, which is going to break through?
LaCivita: Donald Trump is a man who has made a large part of his living in a visual medium: TV. He understands that politics is a visual medium. And so he looks at everything through the prism of that. And your average candidate for public office doesn’t look at the world that way.
He’s also a celebrity.
LaCivita: Defined outside the realm of politics. He has his own persona and definition outside of politics.
And because of that, some of the stuff he says …
LaCivita: He gets away with, he does.
He’s not graded as a politician. He’s graded as a celebrity.
Fabrizio: I know this is going to sound counterintuitive, but when he says stuff that makes people go — (grimaces) — it only reinforces that …
LaCivita: … He’s not a politician, exactly!
…Is there one big thing that you think we’re missing in this campaign that was enormously consequential or at least significant?
LaCivita: You guys have written about the impact of the assassination attempt. But I don’t think people give enough credit to the fact that the world has a visual. It’s an iconic visual. But I don’t think people have given enough credit to that visual.
Him holding up his fist.
LaCivita: And what that visual means. And what the visual conveys. Not only about him, but the country as a whole. Americans get knocked down, but they always fight back. And that visual is as quintessential America as the fucking flag is.
Fabrizio: I am always amazed, I’ve learned not to be amazed, but he has this ability in most cases to put his finger on something. And you say to yourself: “Where did he come up with that?” But he just does. Then you test it and, holy shit, he’s right.
People say “the Holocaust is one of the most well documented events in history,”
…. But it’s really not documented at all. In fact when you actually dig into the documents you realize how the evidence points into the other direction. Evidence like
-Hitler never ordered the extermination of the Jews
-the allies never spotted any “killing camps” when doing reconnaissance missions
-the allies broke the German codes and were listening to their messages, and heard nothing about death camps.
-all the “death camps” were only on the Soviet side. How did the allies manage to not find any? Why do we believe the Soviet communist?
-there is no physical evidence that Jews were gassed to death
-the worldwide Jewish population numbers did not decrease.
– the entire holocaust narrative is based on ludicrous constantly changing eye witness testimony
Besides all the many reasons to not believe the official story, since it is illegal to doubt this bit of history, I believe we the plebs are morally obligated to doubt it and research those doubts to our own satisfaction. The linked article provides a few of the major areas of doubt, if not total contradiction. ABN
American Buddhist Net 