The nascent Sanhedrin in Jerusalem has made an official ruling, calling on Jews outside of Israel to come home.
“We are the beis din (rabbinic court) of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), and we have poskened (officially ruled) that all Jews around the world have an obligation and chiyuv (religious requirement) right now to do whatever is in your power, to come to Eretz Yisrael (the land of Israel), and that is the mitzvah of Torah (Biblical requirement). And that is the mitzvah of today, especially because of what’s happening around the world and the dangers that all the Jews are in around the world. It’s necessary now more than ever to come to EretzYisrael, and we as a beis din have poskened that all the Jews have to come as soon as they can back to eretz Yisrael.”
Wander explained that the Sanhedrin makes this announcement every year, but this year, it is of special significance and is garnering more attention than in the past.
While many Jews do not recognize the authority of this current Sanhedrin, it is, in fact, expressly forbidden by Torah law for Jews to accept the authority of a system of law or a legal body that is not based in the Torah.
“It was about a decade before Hitler took power,” Wander said. “The rabbi wrote that because the Jews are making their Berlin into their Jerusalem, God will have to bring a huge storm, which will wipe out Europe. The rabbi stated that God does not allow the Jews to feel too comfortable in the exile. We’ve seen in history over and over again that when the Jews get too comfortable in exile, God needs to shake things up in order to make them a little less comfortable.”
This mistake not only harms individuals and society through an accumulation of such harms, it also allows parasitic groups to exploit Western societies with abandon. Wise compassion is the premier social virtue in Buddhism, with a strong emphasis on wise. Compassion that brings more harm than good is not wise compassion, to say nothing of compassion that brings only harm and no good. ABN
This conclusion reaches into many other forms of work and endeavor. Academia is now filled with cucked women and the cucked men who can bear being around them. There is something like a 15% difference in several basic instincts between men and women. For example, women are more meticulous and capable with babies and this makes them also more neurotic. Apply the 15% on both sides to yield a ballpark 30% difference, which is deeply significant. For war and fighting, men are better at it physically, instinctually, mentally, and in how they bond in battle. Just these two basic instincts taken together reveal why men are better at taking care of their civilizations, their tribes, their nations. It also reveals why so much lefty politics is bonkers from a man’s point of view. I have heard that virtually all mental healthcare professionals are aware that 90% of their clients are lefties. This kind of reasoning is based on pattern recognition. It can be denied and/or fudged, but it is also obvious. It also obviously applies to races and ethnicities. The concomitant human instinctual susceptibility to brainwashing explains why so many fail to reckon with these obvious basic truths. Brainwashing is a weapon used in savage warfare to make you surrender your own assessment of reality for someone else’s and thereby accept total defeat. ABN
Viewing nature as a signaling network shows its advantage with this question.
Instead of asking where our moral sense comes from, we ask instead what makes for a good signaling network?
The answer is “good organization.”
By “good,” I mean efficient, well-made, good use of resources, easy to maintain, rational, etc.
You are a signaling network.
A well-organized you will probably tend to be morally pretty good and wanting to get better at it, depending on your conditions.
Of course some people view “morality” as whatever is in their best interests. And that is a type of moral thinking. When it is found out, though, most other people, very reasonably, do not like it.
If we view nature as the evolution of signals and signaling networks rather than as the evolution of matter, we will see that changes in signal organization are fundamental to the evolutionary process.
In this sense, it is the most ordinary thing in the world that you, a complex signaling system that is conscious, would consciously seek good organization and/or want to adapt your organizing principles, both objective and subjective, to conditions that impact you.
Conditions that impact you are signals being perceived by the signaling network you think of as yourself.
Your adaptations, both small and large, will encompass many moral considerations and choices.
Morality can be viewed as a kind of organization. The networks that make up your being must organize their relations with the world around them and other sentient beings. We make many moral decisions when we do this. These decisions are an integral part of how we are organized.
Last night I heard a drunk swearing at his friend from the street. “You fucking bastard…” etc. Not well-organized, but still he was yelling a local version of morality and this was fundamental to his networks and behavior.
UPDATE 11/09/22: The above shows that what we scientifically think of today as evolution does not contradict what might be called spiritual evolution, or Buddhist evolution that happens in three ways combined: through 1) morality/ethics; 2) concentration/mindfulness; and 3) wisdom/understanding. Karma is the path of our mind as it wends through its various and numerous realities, sometimes tending toward goodness or the Tathagata, sometimes tending away. By consciously contemplating our signaling networks and describing them to ourselves and close friends we can make our signals clearer and more ethical and thus become wiser, have better understanding. The act of doing this is a kind of concentration or mindfulness. It really doesn’t matter what your religion is, including atheism or even oblivionism, honestly analyzing your signaling will change you probably for the better. ABN
The main miscreants in trying to abolish other people’s histories and cultures are Jews and Blacks.
They form hate-monitoring groups and put other people’s flags on their hate-lists.
They want special protection for themselves, while trying to destroy other people’s heritage.
Not saying you don’t get white people behaving this way, but whites who do this are a minority.
Jews and Blacks who do this are a majority, at least 80% of their group behave this way. They have two priorities in life: special favors for their group and cancelling other groups.
The only reason we go along with this epic and stunning hypocrisy is that we’re a society that’s become accustomed to hypocrisy and we no longer see anything wrong with it.
Hypocrisy is dishonest, that’s why it’s wrong.
Live not by lies.
Follow the Golden Rule – do as you would be done by.
To ensure that nobody tries to destroy your group, do not try to destroy their group.
The main reason these miscreants want special protection is to shield themselves from facing the types of attacks they launch at others.
“We’re a special legal protected group, that means we can attack you with impunity but if you attack us back that’s racist!”
This is why they need their special legal protection – to enable them to launch attacks on others from a position of artificial safety.
Parasitism is an evolutionary strategy that can pay very well. Outsource real work to others while parasitizing their production. In my opinion, the left has opened its doors to parasites, so there are more than two or three groups doing it. There is even a hierarchy of parasitic groups in USA and the West. To get ‘in’ with the left you just have to agree with the parasitism while pretending you are pursuing a saintly ideology. American academia has become majority parasitic. ABN
This is entirely normal human behavior, predicted by me and many others to be the inevitable response to treasonous massive immigration, illegal or not, fostered and promoted by treasonous government officials. In a world dominated by tribes, individuals are safer when they are members of a tribe. The West has generally attempted to become a non-tribal or post-tribal civilization based on individual rights and fairly administered laws. This attempt has failed not from the bottom up but from the top down. Government officials have grossly abused their powers and overstepped the bounds of human tribal tolerance. The more of this happens and the sooner it happens, the better — because the longer you wait the worse the problem will become. There is no stamping out tribalism without stamping out the British people. These statements apply to the entire West, given small differences due to regional conditions. It is not only not wrong to re-tribe, it is stupid not to. Westerners right now are paying for their own annihilation. ABN
They are from the Kuki-Zo community, according to the Indigenous Tribal Leaders’ Forum, a tribal organization in Manipur.
Ethnic violence in the state was sparked in May by an affirmative action controversy in which Christian Kukis protested a demand from the mostly Hindu Meiteis for a special status that would let them buy land in the hills populated by Kukis and other tribal groups and get a share of government jobs.
The clashes have persisted despite the army’s presence in Manipur, a state of 3.7 million people tucked in the mountains on India’s border with Myanmar that is now divided in two ethnic zones.
Untrue stories exist at each end of Jewish history’s three thousand years – fictional, fabricated and of immense magnitude. We may start in the tenth century BCE, where archaeologists have after diligent study found no trace of King Solomon, his Temple or his empire. Half a century of intensive excavation of the Holy Land has now reached that conclusion. The alleged mighty empire of David and Solomon, stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates – on the basis of which the modern state of Israel was formed – did not exist. Meanwhile the Bible makes no mention of the great empire of Egypt, which really did in that period stretch from the Nile to the Euphrates. These things must be relegated to storyland, like Moses parting the Red Sea. Experts were finally attaining this negative conclusion as the new millennium dawned.
…Christians need to apprehend that it is not a virtue to believe in that which never existed. That won’t save your soul. At both ends of the amazing three-thousand years of Jewish history are tremendous phantoms, imaginations which we the Goyim have been led to believe. That which never was, which never had existence is inscribed as fact in books the whole world over. We need a collective therapy experience of discussing What Really Happened. Only the power of Truth can save us now. Are we capable of that?
Judaism we may conclude must inevitably self-terminate in this 21st century, simply because of the intellectual power of modern Jews, who cannot hope to avoid seeing how their identity-defining narratives have disintegrated. They were tremendous stories, but were never true.
I am reminded by this that the power of Buddhism lies in its philosophy, methods and their results. Buddhism provides an extensive vocabulary of concepts and insights that are dynamic and adaptive, accepting of all truths new or old. Buddhism has many stories but the tradition does not rely on them for its fundamental claims. Buddhism provides a coherent and practical view of human life without demanding belief or loyalty to it. Buddhism connects us to the past and to many varieties of human experience through its long evolution in many parts of the world. ABN
The European National Conservative movement is rising. Their brain trust and clearing house is the Edmund Burke Foundation, a Zionist cut-out run by the heads of the Jerusalem-based Theodore Herzl Institute. This trans-Atlantic alliance hosts leaders from the US Republican Party, Hungary, Poland, Britain, and Italy seeking to implement the “new right” ideology put to paper by Israeli academic Yoram Hazony in his 2018 book TheVirtue of Nationalism, which expresses support for the NATO pact, an anti-racist civic patriotism rooted in “Judeo-Christian” values, and a worldview epistemologically rooted in Anglo-American right-liberal values, which he contrasts against authoritarian continental philosophies such as Marxism and Fascism.
National Conservatives insist that they are a radical departure from Reaganist-Thatcherist right-Atlanticist consensus. They embrace online 4chan lingo and memes, flirt with Peter Thiel (a major backer of the NatCon movement) financed neo-reactionaries promoting Monarchism, Catholic Integralism, libertarianism, “post-leftism” and select strains of Paleo-Conservatism, and actively seek to discipline and integrate (or co-opt) the white populist energy unleashed by both the alt-right and Trumpism, albeit without the racialist core or even Trump himself.
The idea that this is something new is hard to believe when all of yesterday’s NeoCons are today’s NatCons. Aside from the Israeli agents who control the Edmund Burke Foundation ( Yoram Hazony, Chairman and Ofir Haivry, VP), figures such as Christopher DeMuth (Conference Chair) and David Brog (President), along with the majority of rank-and-file supporters, fellows, influencers and speakers, are plucked straight from America’s most notorious Jewish neo-conservative think-tanks and NGOs: the Hudson Institute, the Claremont Institute, Christians United For Israel, Young Americans Foundation, and so on. The average National Conservative “popularizer” comes from outlets like the National Review and Wall Street Journal and have transformed themselves as post-liberal Twitter “populists” claiming the mantle of Trumpism despite them having been fanatical Never Trumpers in 2016 almost down to a man.
The sudden rise of this mysterious group, which according to its tax-returns has a modest income, is a mystery in and of itself.
Hazony has somehow been able to attract prominent world leaders, billionaires and famous intellectuals to speak at his event despite being a little known academic at a second-rate Israeli university. There is at least enough evidence to believe it may be a US State Department and Israeli influence project in subject nations, with people in the know at the Heritage Foundation presenting National Conservatism as an important foreign policy tool in Washington’s toolbox.
Both papers are worth reading, but Thomson’s is the better place to start for most people. Here is a sample:
Rather than asking whether a monolithic factor like parental control is primarily responsible for non-shared (unique) effects, it might be necessary to consider many seemingly inconsequential experiences that are tipping points in children’s lives. The gloomy prospect is that these could be idiosyncratic stochastic experiences. However, the basic finding that most environmental effects are not shared by children growing up in the same family remains one of the most far-reaching findings from behavioral genetics. It is important to reiterate that the message is not that family experiences are unimportant, but rather that the salient experiences that affect children’s development are specific to each child in the family, not general to all children in the family.
Here is another:
More than 100 twin studies have addressed the key question of co-morbidity in psychopathology (having more than one diagnosed disorder), and this body of research also consistently shows substantial genetic overlap between common disorders in children and in adults. For example, a review of 23 twin studies and 12 family studies confirmed that anxiety and depression are correlated entirely for genetic reasons. In other words, the same genes affect both disorders, meaning that from a genetic perspective they are the same disorder.
To add a Buddhist point of view to this, we must bring in karma, rebirth, and our earthly lineages. All three are deep and ultimate factors in determining our conditions and how we deal with them. Years ago a Chinese friend’s father invited me to watch him burn incense at his family altar in their home in Taipei. As I saw it, his was an act of ancestor reverence more than worship, though either term is fine. The act recalls a deep and ultimate side of Chinese culture that reaches above and below Western psychology and genetic research. Thich Nhat Hanh spoke and wrote about our ancestral lineages and their importance in how our karma and conditions resolve and are understood. These factors are deep in that they ground our psychologies and affect how we comprehend life; and they are ultimate in that they also hinge on the highest and most transcendent aspects of all conscious life.
I respect Western psychology and also find much of it cramped and vulgar due to its intense focus on the single life (no rebirth or lineage) and a select number of factors that can be abstracted from that or from dubious data based on aggregates of many single lives similarly conceived. Due to this sciencey focus most Westerners are trapped in a middle or mundane layer of spiritual understanding, self-isolated between the deep and the ultimate. The usual Western way out of this entrapment is through stories, which are raised to heights they do not deserve and which reduce Westerners to childlike listeners confined to stock responses. The Western cartography of the pathological mind is very good though and greatly enriches Eastern thought. A healthy personality is as much a part of spiritual growth as is lineage and karma. ABN
After mass riots during the past week shocked France and the world, the former head of France’s powerful DGSE intelligence agency says the root cause of his country’s tragic situation is above all “the dominant ideology, which has justified and even glorified the massive colonizing immigration that has been taking place over the last half-century.”
Pierre Brochand was head of France’s DGSE counter-intelligence agency from 2002 to 2008. Since 2019, he has made repeated calls for a radical change in his country’s immigration policy over what he says is the looming threat of civil war.
In a discussion about immigration on the public radio station France Culture last April, Brochand issued a warning which found its full expression in the week of violent rioting and looting that took hold of France after the shooting of a teenager of Algerian origin on June 27:
“If we do nothing or if we do little, we are going to head either towards a progressive implosion of social trust in France, that is to say towards a society where the quality of life will collapse and where it will be less and less pleasant to live, or, by successive explosions, towards confrontations that will make France a country where one will not be able to live at all.”
Now, in an interview published on July 6 on the website of Le Figaro daily newspaper, Brochand exposes, as Le Figaro puts it, “the deadly cocktail of a society of individuals based on openness and democracy and the arrival of entire diasporas with totally different cultural backgrounds.”
American Buddhist Net 