Doctor delays federally funded puberty blockers report for political reasons

An influential American physician has admitted to delaying, for nine years, the publication of a taxpayer-funded study on the mental health effects of puberty blockers in youth with gender dysphoria for fear that the results could be used to support prohibitions of so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors.

Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, a leading Los Angeles physician who runs the largest youth gender clinic in the United States, told the New York Times that she and her colleagues have delayed publication of results from a two-year-long study funded by the National Institutes of Health because they worried that the findings would be used by critics of transgender procedures for minors.

“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” Olson-Kennedy told the publication.

The nearly $10 million study followed the development of 95 children from across the country to see if their mental health improved following treatment with puberty blockers.

Olson-Kennedy said that treatment with puberty blockers did not lead to mental health improvements, likely because the children were doing well when the study began.

“They’re in really good shape when they come in, and they’re in really good shape after two years,” she said.

But the unpublished findings contradict preliminary research released by Olson-Kennedy and colleagues in 2022, which found approximately a quarter of adolescents were depressed or suicidal before starting either puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones. 

link

Gender, race, and IQ studies are all politicized. Inverted woke ideology demands it. This is not science, nor is it a good way to run a huge society. It is both obvious and in perfect alignment with evolutionary theory that groups of humans long separated from each other will have multiple differences in all spheres of activity, including IQ. It is also obvious that providing strong drugs to children so adults can act out their fantasies about gender dysphoria does not make good sense. Ideologies that want to remake humans or are based on fantasies like the sameness of all humans are stupid and wrong on the face of it. Hiding a measly research paper because you fear its results will be ‘weaponized’ is itself weaponization of its results. The West today is characterized by fear of facts, fear of discussing facts, fear of facing the factual complexities of human reality. This fear has both been caused by an internecine pathocracy and also has allowed that pathocracy to flourish. ABN

The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths

•To maximize profits, the pharmaceutical industry will often identify vulnerable groups who lack the ability to advocate for themselves and refuse pharmaceutical products.

•When the DPT vaccine was first developed over a century ago, it was tested at Irish orphanages.  Recently mass graves of those early test subjects were discovered.

•Since the DPT vaccine hit the market, physicians around the world have observed waves of infant deaths following its use, which were often sudden and inexplicable (along with many other severe side effects).

•Numerous data sources correlate increasing childhood vaccination rates with increasing infant deaths.  Those deaths played a key role in creating the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That forgotten data compromises the majority of this article.

•When the COVID lockdowns happened, vaccine safety activists predicted the lockdowns would lead to an unprecedented drop in infant deaths since children were skipping their vaccines.  This ended up being exactly what happened, and it was reconfirmed by infant deaths dropping in Florida after the pandemic prompted many parents to begin not vaccinating their children.

link

More evidence of hostile attacks from within against the American people

If true, this is a form of asymmetric warfare against the American people. It is asymmetric because the perpetrators have infiltrated the government and from that position are attacking the American people to weaken their health with intent to completely conquer them. The enemy is already inside the gates and we can see this from these vaxxes and also from almost everything else they do. ABN

What is a ‘replicon vaccine’?

It is a ‘self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, also known as an ‘sa-mRNA vaccine’, which properly is a ‘gene therapy injection’ and not really a vaccine.

A self-amplifying mRNA shot, as the name implies, contains the equipment needed to make more of itself once it enters cells. You do this by not only injecting the mRNA for the antigen of interest (such as one that encodes the coronavirus spike protein) but also mRNAs that get translated into replicase proteins that will in turn produce more of the mRNA species. Picture sending someone a sheet of paper with some important information on it, and then imagine that you’ve sent them a whole pile of copies of that sheet so they can distribute them. Now imagine sending them a bunch of sheets of material that can assemble themselves into a working photocopier and crank out more sheets when they do. That sounds weird and ridiculous, but hey, that’s biology for you. It’s very, very strange down there in the cell.

Long story short, it turns out that sa-mRNA vaccines are much like mRNA vaccines . . . only worse. Whereas the mRNA vaccines required you to keep returning to the doctor’s office every few months for another booster, the sa-mRNA vaccines will be self-amplifying. That means they’ll not only be hijacking your cells’ machinery to create whatever “protein of interest” Big Pharma wants, they’ll also create replicase proteins that will manufacture more of the mRNA that will make even more of that “protein of interest.”

For those of us who managed to avoid falling for the largest propaganda campaign in modern history and who recognize that the mRNA vaccine is itself a bioweapon that has already injured and/or killed vast numbers of people, this new sa-mRNA technology should be very concerning. Why? Because not only does it come with all the same dangers of regular mRNA vaccines, but it presents the additional risks associated with the random, uncontrolled self-amplification process.

link

I am filing this under both ‘medical science’ and ‘anti-science’ because the sa-mRNA platform does have medical promise, but is nowhere near safe enough to give to whole populations now. ABN