By any reasonable definition, the EU and many Western governments are traitors to their peoples, traitors to their duties as societal elites. Treason is an abhorrent crime. ABN
Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this person’s position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens.
In short, this person claims that the Macrons have executed upon and paid for my assassination. Yes, you read that correctly. More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in National Gendamarie Intervention Group. I am told there is one Israeli that is on this assasination squad and the plans were formalized.
Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus. Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French legion 13th brigade with multi-state involvement. Journalist Xavier Poussard’s life is also at risk.
This is deadly serious. The head of state of France apparently wants us both dead and has authorized professional units to carry this out. I ask that every person RETWEET and share this.
I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware. But I have more specific information which is definitively verifiable, should they care to reach out to me.
To the brave official in France who did this because they were so moved by the evil of Charlie’s public execution to risk their own life— May God bless you. Truly.
__________
Not implausible at all. It is right for her to report this.
She should go into hiding in a place she has never been before. And even that may not be enough.
I have my differences with Christians but I deeply respect their courage and honesty.
It’s possible the warning she received was designed to frighten her, but it’s smartest for her to take it seriously. ABN
UPDATE: Owens has been doing a terrific job on the Kirk assassination. It does not make sense that anyone would want to censor her or make her stop. Erika Kirk, herself, even said on her Watters interview that she welcomes openness and independent investigations of her husband’s murder. I am undecided on what happened but doubt the FBI based on their track record and their lack of transparency in this case and others under Patel. Before dumping on Owens, I recommend watching at least two or three of her videos on Kirk’s assassination, some of which can be found here. Also, ask yourself: If you were murdered would you want a full and transparent investigation or not? ABN
My feeling is that now it is “safe” to release the info that Epstein was really a sex trafficker as a side gig and was mainly an intelligence asset of Israel and the US, a big-time financial criminal on behalf of transnational capital (i would argue transnational organized crime disguised as transnational capital), and an arms trader because the people he was helping have stolen so much of America’s wealth and have taken control over so much of the government.
That is why even admitting the true breadth of the scandal and operation doesn’t even seem to move the needle. Criminals are in charge and they run both parties, they have created the infrastructure for neo-feudalism enforced by technology and are herding us into the corral.
Opt out of AI, digital ID and the surveillance state that Epstein associates built now because we still can.
MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨
This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.
Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn’t new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.
But what’s not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as “a global anti-authoritarian movement,” connecting U.S. officials with “colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly.”
They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, “international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces,” and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.
At what point does this become treason?
Hard to appreciate the scale of this effort. Every blue dot is a NGO.
In this case, the interviewer is deliberately using psycholinguistics to insinuate an insidious undertone, which Owens disambiguates deftly.
Deliberately misusing words in this fashion is a very common political and journalistic trick.
Words and psychology are always intertwined and thus words are always susceptible to being used maliciously; they can provide an appearance of plausible deniability.
In the past week or so we have seen numerous Jewish Supremists, closeted or not, employ these techniques in addition to their typical name-calling and screaming while denying the obvious.
In this context, it is worth noting that misuse of language can happen in friendly, intimate conversation between good friends nearly as often as it does in political dialog.
It is common for psycholinguistic misunderstandings to happen for completely innocent reasons, with profoundly sad effects for all parties involved, which often snowball.
FIML practice will show all practitioners how insidious the misuse or mishearing of words can be and how to prevent it.
One of the reasons I like Owens is she has a very good understanding of language and psychology and generally uses words very well, with nuance, humor and accuracy. ABN
I approve of this video and agree with it and also… while she has the basic idea, the actual reality has been far more savage and violent than endocrine disruption alone.
It is difficult to prove a decades long covert assault on an entire civilization, which is why it’s done covertly.
But it is fairly easy for intelligent observers to recognize the patterns of past and ongoing covert operations being conducted against their societies.
Many people can see the soft stuff — mind-control, censorship, propaganda, bribery and blackmail.
The hard stuff—poison, lobotomy, sensory disablement, endocrine disruption and more—is but a step or two beyond that.
You need to think and reason like a ruthless military strategist who is a member of a ruthless ancient cult which has been striving for world domination for thousands of years.
Funding an army of covert operatives dedicated to disabling an entire civilization is not expensive or even difficult to do.
If you infiltrate the target civilization, you can trick them into paying for their demise. ABN