The internet is the most revolutionary development of our age, and the fight to protect it from near total control by insidious actors like the ADL may turn out to be one of the most important fights of the century

It’s hard to overstate the importance of Elon Musk’s battle with the ADL.

The rollout of free social media was the most revolutionary development in information dissemination since the printing press.

When the regime realised just how revolutionary it was, they got to work spending years fighting for control through lobbying and financial manipulation. While much of this pressure is informal, through networks and backchannels, the ADL is the institutional, public face of this political racketeering network.

By 2020, their control of the major social media platforms was almost entirely secure. By forcing Facebook to change their terms of service according to his liking after a crushing advertiser boycott, Jonathan Greenblatt demonstrated that he had assumed the role of the final arbiter of speech on the internet.

Last year, it looked like there was little hope for a way out of this situation, until
@elonmusk
‘s surprise purchase of Twitter. The subsequent boycott headed by the ADL showed that even the richest man in the world can be scuppered by the malign influence of this group.

It seemed the only way to reverse the financial damage done by Greenblatt and his co-conspirators would be to gradually return control to the ADL, but now, riding a wave of popular support from X users, Elon has decided to draw a line in the sand and fight back.

The internet was the most revolutionary development of our age, and the fight to protect it from near total control by insidious actors like the ADL may turn out to be one of the most important fights of the century. Let’s all send Elon our prayers, and hope he can be the first to deal a fatal blow to the ADL. Godspeed Elon.

source for text & image

On ‘freedom of speech but not reach’

Exactly right. This same militaristic logic has also been used in destroying individuals in America in a decades-long infiltration and takeover of major American institutions. Besides reputation destruction, educational misdirection, jail-bait traps, and more, many talented American and European young men and boys have been physically disabled in clandestine attacks. This has caused natural leaders to fail to live up to their natural potential, thus demoralizing those who know them. As one informant said to me, ‘They will still be leaders but they will lead people in wrong directions. We want to make examples of people like that, discredit them entirely.’ The online versions of this strategy, now backed by AI, on the one hand may be more effective but on the other may alert far more people to what is being done to the West. When individuals are physically attacked and harmed (poison, psychosurgery, aural damage, etc), it’s hard for most to figure out what happened. When huge swaths of the population are muted or silenced it’s easier to see. What I am saying here is the kind of speech they want out of reach because they know it is true. If I were wrong, why would they bother? ABN

ADL censorship exposed

source w more clips and info

The basis of American civilization is free speech. No free speech = no American civilization. People who don’t want free speech or want to limit its natural reach (which amounts to the same thing) always have ulterior motives, bad motives, lust for power. Maybe a few are simply deluded, but the big money and big players behind limiting free speech always have anti-American motives. The ADL was founded on its defamation of Mary Phagan. Today, it defames all of us who want to live in an America that revels in free and open conversations, not censored by anyone. ABN

People Should be Talking About the ADL’s Support for Extremist Racialist Policies in Israel

Finally, the world is talking about the Jewish/Israeli lobbying group, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). This is a very good thing.

Regardless of my feelings on Elon Musk, I’m thankful he’s promoting this awareness campaign.

After Elon tweeted against the ADL, the group has been trending.

However, most of the discussion we’re seeing is around the idea that this is a “left-wing” advocacy group. This is untrue.

Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, supports really hardcore right-wing policies in Israel.

Because the ADL is not a “left-wing” group. It is more accurate to call it a “Democrat” group, but it’s most accurate to call it a “Jewish” group. They support Jewish interests, and in America, Jewish interests primarily involve silencing freedom of speech as well as promoting mass immigration and child trannies.

The ADL says they want a racially pure Jewish state in Palestine.

source

Contrast GOVERNMENT disinformation with FREE SPEECH

This meme appeared over two years ago. Besides pointing out how bad government sanctioned and enforced speech was (and is), it illustrates how good the censored speech of all of the doctors and scientists who spoke the truth was. The worst misinformation and disinformation all came from the government! And what little misinformation there was not produced by governments was quickly weeded out and discarded along with the government misinformation. The main counterargument to government disinformation on covid saved hundreds of thousands of lives nationally and millions globally. It is important for all of us to see this and remember—free speech won the covid debate! Free speech did not harm anyone during covid. It saved people. This will always be the case. When government or ADL or anyone else demands that the people must be protected from disinformation, remember the covid example (and also the Ukraine War example, and also WMD in Iraq, and also the real story of Mary Phagan, etc). ABN

US Special Operations Command Will Deploy Argus AI Program to Scour Social Media for Disinformation, Misinformation and Malinformation, National Security Authority to Protect U.S. Internet from “Pain Points”

Annnd… Here we go.  If you have not read the background {Go Deep}, you will not have the appropriate context to absorb the latest revelation about how the Dept of Defense will now conduct online monitoring operations, using enhanced AI to protect the U.S. internet from “disinformation” under the auspices of national security.

Gee, who would have predicted that U.S. internet operations would suddenly have a totally new set of enhanced AI guardians at the gateways? 👀

Read Carefully – Eyes Wide Open:

The US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) has contracted New York-based Accrete AI to deploy software that detects “real time” disinformation threats on social media.

The company’s Argus anomaly detection AI software analyzes social media data, accurately capturing “emerging narratives” and generating intelligence reports for military forces to speedily neutralize disinformation threats.

“Synthetic media, including AI-generated viral narratives, deep fakes, and other harmful social media-based applications of AI, pose a serious threat to US national security and civil society,” Accrete founder and CEO Prashant Bhuyan said.

“Social media is widely recognized as an unregulated environment where adversaries routinely exploit reasoning vulnerabilities and manipulate behavior through the intentional spread of disinformation.

“USSOCOM is at the tip of the spear in recognizing the critical need to identify and analytically predict social media narratives at an embryonic stage before those narratives evolve and gain traction. Accrete is proud to support USSOCOM’s mission.”

But wait… It gets worse!

[PRIVATE SECTOR VERSION] – The company also revealed that it will launch an enterprise version of Argus Social for disinformation detection later this year.

The AI software will provide protection for “urgent customer pain points” against AI-generated synthetic media, such as viral disinformation and deep fakes.

Providing this protection requires AI that can automatically “learn” what is most important to an enterprise and predict the likely social media narratives that will emerge before they influence behavior. (read more)

Now, take a deep breath…. Let me explain.

The goal is the “PRIVATE SECTOR VERSION.”  USSOCOM is the mechanical funding mechanism for deployment, because the system itself is too costly for a private sector launch.   The Defense Dept budget is used to contract an Artificial Intelligence system, the Argus anomaly detection AI, to monitor social media under the auspices of national security.

Once the DoD funded system is created, the “Argus detection protocol” – the name given to the AI monitoring and control system, will then be made available to the public sector.  “Enterprise Argus” is then the commercial product, created by the DoD, which allows the U.S. based tech sectors to deploy.

The DoD cannot independently contract for the launch of an operation against a U.S. internet network, because of constitutional limits via The Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States.  However, the DoD can fund the creation of the system under the auspices of national defense, and then allow the private sector to launch for the same intents and purposes. 

source

This is next-level mind-control. It also shows how they think and what they already have been doing without Argus. ABN

Newest NATO Country Escalates Prosecution Of Christians For Quoting The Bible

In an appeals court Thursday, Helsinki’s top prosecutor said publicly quoting the Bible and publishing a booklet about Christian sexual ethics violates Finland’s “hate speech” law. The appeal escalates this U.S. ally’s prosecution of dissidents from leftist politics, a marker of repressive regimes.

The prosecutor has charged Member of Parliament Paivi Rasanen and Bishop Juhana Pohjola for writing and publishing, respectively, a booklet supporting natural marriage.

“This [case] is a God-given wake up call for Christians and others worried about the direction our society is going,” Pohjola said in a post-court press conference Friday morning U.S. time. He noted convicting a religious leader for publishing theological documents would in effect criminalize Christianity in Finland and encourage similar oppression worldwide. 

Rasanen is also criminally charged with posting a Bible verse to X (formerly Twitter) and stating Christian theology in a radio interview. The prosecutor wants all recordings of the radio interview taken down and the booklet to be unavailable online, and fines levied against both Christians.

source

Good example of why hate speech laws are a disaster for free speech. Hate itself is not illegal. The idea of making an emotion illegal is absurd. When a state defines some kinds of hate as being illegal and some kinds of speech as hate speech, you get the Finnish nonsense above. You can be sure that anyone who supports hate speech laws is either stupid or a totalitarian. ABN

EU’s Draconian Social Media Censorship Laws Are Now Officially Enforceable

Free speech is a problem – Not so much for the general population, but for the establishment class and their grip on social influence.  Much like the invention of the printing press that created an information revolution in the Middle Ages, the internet has created a global platform which almost anyone on the planet can access and speak, hypothetically, to millions or even billions of people.  This level of information sharing is unprecedented in human history and so it is no surprise that governments and globalists want the ability to filter what is said and what is heard to their benefit.

To this end, the EU Commission, using the covid event as a convenient cover, heralded the passage of the ‘Digital Services Act’ (DSA) in early 2022.  The DSA was presented as a tool for the EU to “rein in” the power of social media corporations, but in reality its primary purpose is to give the EU legal precedence to force Big Tech companies to apply EU censorship standards to their platforms even if they are not European based businesses.  In other words, the goal is to force the entire western world to accept the European governance of online speech while ignoring national boundaries and constitutional protections.

Similar to China’s “Great Fire Wall”, the EU plans to use the DSA as a means to shut down domestic access to offending websites and content.  But where the EU situation is unique is in their focus on controlling speech outside of Europe as well.  That is to say, information and speech among non-Europeans could still be identified as a threat to their leftist sensibilities and cited as a reason for sanctioning a website altogether. 

This means, for example, that an EU-friendly (censored) version of Twitter might still not be allowed to operate, not because of information shared by Europeans, but because of information shared on Twitter outside of Europe.  The EU will not be happy until every other country follows the same online rules they follow.   

These rules would include EU “hate speech” and “disinformation” restrictions.  Keep in mind that in many parts of Europe using the wrong pronouns for a trans person is considered punishable hate speech, and pointing out that medical masks are useless for stopping covid transmission is considered dangerous disinformation.  Scientific facts don’t play into such determinations, they are purely political. 

source

I bet most readers of this site will see that law as self-parody, the EU foolishly mocking itself with laws (which are speech) conjured out of dying imaginations. A civilization must be bold and not fear itself, or perish. I hope this stupid act is violated in every way we can think of. ABN

‘The Digital Service Act is nothing but a censorship act’ — Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Conditions in USA are the same since none of our censorship has ever been voted on or fashioned by representatives fairly elected. In fact, due to widespread election fraud, the powers that control Biden, MSM, social media, our schools, and other major institutions are exactly what Ursula is—a wicked tyrant. The only difference is we don’t even know who they are, not exactly. Tyrannical rule by stealth and deceit, truly a wicked formula. ABN

‘It only takes about five minutes to complete, but requires submitting photos of your government-issued ID and a snapshot of yourself’ — new verification protocol for X

That context added by readers is describing the rollout. It will escalate. They already have all of our information but are programming us to accept the idea of them having it, even liking it. This ID is a way of erasing anonymity of speech, a fundamental unalienable right guaranteed by the US Constitution. ABN

Stop Scientific Censorship Via the Backdoor — Hold Journals Accountable

Scientific censorship (in all its myriad forms) is a threat to free-speech, free-thought and for our ability to apply the scientific method to understand our world. 

Two of the greatest tools that humanity has developed (telecommunications and the scientific method) are now being manipulated to suppress “inconvenient” data and shape a narrative that does not serve our quest for objective fact finding and truth.  Anonymous targeting of high-impact studies to produce retractions is censorship – and is a backdoor method by publishers to control information and provide a veneer of legitimacy to their actions.

Integrity, transparency and self-correction are at the heart of ethical and moral publishing (in all forms), but it is vital and central to science, medicine and engineering publications.  If we let one type of censorship blossom in our publication system without calling out the perpetrators, we are allowing for the wholesale control and debasement of a critical tool that provides objective facts to a wider community.  Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, chlorine dioxide, vaccine-injury and many other studies have been blocked, censored, or retracted via non-transparent and questionable methods in journals.  

source with petition

Surprised to see this correction on X

I am not a scholar of this topic but have read a few detailed essays on it. Far as I know, at the time, it was widely believed among Jews in Atlanta that Frank was guilty of murdering Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old employee. Somewhat weirdly, the ADL was founded in reaction to Frank’s murder conviction, which they claimed was antisemitic. Now, Greenblatt has to bring it all up again 108 years later. Whatever, today ADL seems bent on censoring as much American speech as it can get its hands on. In my view, ADL is not a good look for the American Jewish community, which is very powerful on its own and does not need the constant heckling of others served up far too often by the ADL. Nor the stirring up of very questionable old embers from 1913. ABN

Dr Meryl Nass sues Maine medical board over suspension, alleging board violated her First Amendment rights

Dr. Meryl Nass today filed suit against the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine and its individual members, alleging the board violated her First Amendment rights and her rights under the Maine Constitution.

The complaint alleges the board engaged in retaliatory conduct against Nass, a practicing internal medicine physician and member of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientific advisory board, when the board suspended her medical license for publicly expressing her dissenting views on official COVID-19 policies, the COVID-19 vaccine and alternative treatments.

“Because she was outspoken, the board targeted Dr. Nass as someone to silence,” her attorney, Gene Libby told The Defender.

In fall 2021, the board issued a position statement, quoted in the complaint, stating that licensees could face disciplinary action if they “generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation.”

source

Speech control = mind control. Those who censor never have good motives. Those who punish speech, especially in a case like this, are at best themselves mind-controlled slaves. ABN