I have watched only a 20 min excerpt of this video, but am posting because what I saw is stimulating to the imagination and provides a serious analysis of what might have really happened to Charlie Kirk and who did it. Surprised to find it on YouTube. ABN
UPDATE: I’ve now watched the whole video. It’s an excellent overview of the Kirk killing, replete with many illuminating details which thoroughly debunk the official narrative we have been told so far. One of the best breakdowns I’ve seen. Highly recommended. ABN
After discussing the PETN hypothesis and showing it is unlikely because an explosive would cause more visible damage, the following drone hypothesis is asserted:
In stark contrast, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a close-range quadcopter sniper drone firing a 5.56mm round, aligning perfectly with documented Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) tactics in Gaza and Lebanon since 2023, where modified commercial drones like Elbit LANIUS or TIKAD models hover at low altitudes (under 100 meters) to deliver single precision shots with 5.56mm or 9mm munitions for targeted killings.
This method produces the exact signatures observed: a soft “pop” (no distant supersonic crack due to proximity), bird-sized overhead shadow in bystander videos, cauterized small entry from muzzle heat/friction, internal tissue shredding from yawing/fragmentation without exit, and the dramatic yet contained shirt puff exaggerated by the necklace and mic—driven by the bullet’s high-velocity temporary cavity (expanding radially to yank fabric without tearing it).
Ballistic studies confirm 5.56mm rounds create large temporary cavities in soft tissue like the neck, causing shock and energy dump that matches the no-exit, vertebral-damage wound path, while avoiding the chaotic external effects of explosives.
Eyewitness and human rights reports from Gaza describe these drones as tools for “minimizing civilian casualties” in urban warfare, but frequently resulting in precise, deniable hits—mirroring the Kirk event’s low-signature execution amid a crowd.
New evidence has come to light suggesting Charlie wasn’t taken out by some “lone sniper” bullet. Rewatch the tragic footage frame by frame—you’ll see it clear as day. That long, skinny white wire flying off his body milliseconds after the “shot”? Everyone (including me at first) thought it was his necklace. WRONG.
It’s the thin wire from his microphone transmitter pack—clipped to his belt or pocket, even though the lapel mic was “wireless.” And right then, a mysterious flash and force originates FROM UNDER HIS SHIRT.
Explosives experts and former intelligence assets (including Mossad insiders who know these tactics all too well) are backing this: A tiny but lethal PETN1 charge hidden in the mic wire or transmitter detonated, firing shrapnel straight into Charlie’s neck, severing his carotid artery.
That explains why they only found a “fragment” inside him—no full bullet exit wound, no matching ballistics from a distant rifle. The official story is FALLING APART. Who had access to rig his mic?
Who benefits from silencing Charlie right as he was exposing the deep state? Steve (@stevendenoon ) and I broke this down in detail on the livestream—watch it now below
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), with the chemical formula C5H8N4O12, is a powerful secondary explosive known for its high brisance and sensitivity to shock and friction. It is a white crystalline solid with a melting point of 141.3 °C and a detonation velocity of approximately 8400 m/s at a density of 1.7 g/cm³. PETN is significantly more powerful than TNT PETN is highly sensitive and can be initiated by mechanical shock, friction, or electric sparks, with a minimum energy requirement of 10–60 mJ for direct initiation by an electric spark. It is also capable of being detonated by a laser pulse, such as a Q-switched ruby laser with a duration of 25 nanoseconds and 0.5–4.2 joules of energy. Despite its sensitivity, PETN is stable enough for safe handling and storage ↩︎
_________
Full video available at link above.
This is new to me but makes the best sense of any hypothesis so far. ABN
BERKELEY — A UC Berkeley professor smelled a rat — over the years there had been $46,855 in damage from computers that failed, and nearly all of it seemed to affect one particular Ph.D. candidate at the college’s Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences department.
The professor wondered if the student’s luck was really that bad, or if something else was afoot. So he installed a hidden camera — disguised in a department laptop, and pointed it at the student’s computer.
According to police, the sly move captured another Ph.D. candidate, 26-year-old Jiarui Zou, damaging his fellow student’s computer with some implement that caused sparks to fly out of the laptop.
Now, Zou has been charged with three felony counts of vandalism, related to the destruction of three computers on Nov. 9-10.
Zou was arrested on Nov. 12 at UC Berkeley’s Cory Hall and declined to talk to police, according to court records. He is due for his first court appearance on Dec. 15 and is no longer in custody, records show.
Let me explain the meaning of my headline for those of you unfamiliar with the authority of the FBI to investigate Federal crimes while State and local authorities… The FBI does not have the authority to investigate Charlie Kirk’s murder unless there was foreign involvement or a clear violation of a Federal statute. The FBI is a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction, but it can only investigate crimes that violate federal statutes (codified mostly in Title 18 of the U.S. Code) or that have a clear federal nexus. Typical FBI crimes include:
Crimes that cross state lines (interstate kidnapping, fugitive flight, human trafficking, large-scale drug trafficking)
Crimes against federal property, employees, or programs (bank robbery, federal corruption involving federal funds, mail/wire fraud)
Specifically enumerated federal offenses (terrorism, civil-rights violations under color of law, RICO for interstate organized crime, major cybercrimes affecting interstate commerce, child exploitation material crossing state lines, etc.)
Major crimes on federal land, Indian reservations, aircraft, or maritime jurisdiction
The FBI does not have general police powers. It cannot, on its own authority, investigate ordinary murder, rape, robbery, burglary, assault, theft, or street-level drug dealing unless one of the federal elements above is present. State and local authorities handle almost all “traditional” street crime and routine law enforcement. The FBI steps in only when Congress has specifically made the conduct a federal offense or when a clear interstate/federal interest exists.
Based on the indictment of the alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk — i.e., a Utah resident allegedly committed murder in Utah — the FBI has no role or jurisdiction in the matter. Yet, for some reason, the FBI is involved in the case. Why?
This brings me back to the case of Seth Rich. Seth Rich was a 27‑year‑old staffer at the Democratic National Committee who was shot and killed in Washington, D.C., in the early morning of July 10, 2016. Police found him with two gunshot wounds to the back near his home in the Bloomingdale neighborhood; he was taken to a hospital and died about an hour and a half later.
…The assassination of Charlie Kirk, if the indictment of Tyler Robinson is true, was not a Federal crime. Yet the FBI, Homeland Security and DOJ all responded initially as if it was a Federal crime. Now, the matter is being handled as a state crime with no federal jurisdiction.
Based on the video evidence and public information regarding the destructive power of a .30-06 round, I do not believe that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. In fact, I think there is ample circumstantial evidence that would warrant the FBI taking a leading role in the investigation because of possible foreign involvement in Kirk’s murder. But that apparently is not happening…
They have also released grainy, incongruous videos of ‘Robinson’.
It’s a joke they won’t release, at the very least, clear videos of their suspect.
That campus was loaded with cameras.
Why was the crime scene paved over and completely destroyed?
I am not super interested in getting into the weeds like this.
But this case has become foundational for public participation in solving crimes.
If we had had social media and cameras all over the place when JFK was assassinated, the government would never have been able to keep their role in the case secret for 60 years.
The Zapruder film would never have been kept secret and only shown to Dan Rather who either lied about it or was so dumb he could not understand what he was looking at.
Open discussion and crowd-sourced evidence is bright sunlight on any crime and should become standard and expected for all criminal cases that are important to the public.
Owens, Mel and many others have already done better work and better outreach than the government.
It’s obvious to me, the government wants to hold onto old-fashioned ways of totally controlling any subject they choose, including major crimes like Kirk’s assassination. ABN
American Buddhist Net 