This new audio in the Epstein Files. It shows the secret conversation you fear every high-level gov’t official might have with an outside fixer to hook them up the moment they “leave government to enter the private sector.”
Here, Jeffrey Epstein teaches Ehud Barak — while he is still Minister of Defense in Israel but on his way out — how to make millions of dollars in the private sector by first compiling a list of people who owe him favors from his 40 years in government service.
Epstein then told Ehud Barak to pursue Peter Thiel, whose name at that point Ehud Barak did not even know how to spell, and to try to connect with a company called Palantir, which existence Ehud Barak had never heard of, and whose name Jeffrey Epstein didn’t know how to spell.
Credit@RyanGrim whose clip I first saw to look for this. I used Grok to backtrace the source link from the audio. Ryan assesses this meeting took place in February 2013, which seems to line up with the audio saying Ehud Barak is about 71 at the time of the recording, as Ehud Barak is 83 today.
The Palantir connection is what makes this audio so explosive. In 2013, Palantir was still relatively unknown to the public but already deeply embedded in US intelligence infrastructure. Epstein wasn’t just connecting people — he was brokering access to the surveillance-industrial complex before most people even knew it existed.
The fact that a foreign defense minister needed Epstein to even learn Palantir’s name tells you everything about how these shadow networks operate. The real power isn’t in what’s public — it’s in knowing what exists before everyone else does.
It is literally satanic, occult pedophilia. Yes, this is a guiding theology amongst the elite and Nick [Fuentes] is trying to assist them in convincing the world that Satan is a conspiracy theory. This is why he always runs cover Brigitte Macron.
The elites practice ritualistic, satanic, child abuse and even the slightest incursion into the history of Sigmund Freud and his perverted Viennese colleagues (whose offspring are still in power today and whom established Hollywood and our mainstream media apparatus) will lead you to this conclusion.
If Nick would like to debate this topic, I am completely game. Since— ya know, I’m a Sub-Saharan African and he’s so naturally brilliant, this should be a cake walk for him.
Free-speech—real free speech with real, uncensored reach, is the thing that can protect us most of all from totalitarians, authoritarians and a dictatorial AI, should something like that evolve and gain power.
Many of us are willing to do all we can to protect free speech, but few of us have the power and reach of a Durov or Musk.
This is but one example of why it is important for us to support wealthy and powerful elites when they are doing the right thing.
Free-speech is our strongest protection against any form of AI gone wild.
Only a loud and insistent, well-informed public, whose speech cannot be throttled by politicians, bureaucrats or AI, will be able to stop an AI algorithm that is going off the rails. ABN
You have to understand. These people are NOT politicians as we understand the term. They do not represent the interests of their constituents. They’re political constructs. Bad actors sloppily regurgitating scripted rhetoric at the behest of their oligarchical overlords. All to provide the illusion of participatory governance to the peasantry. They represent an international oligarchical order and they’re desperate to hold on to power.
UPDATE: I feel a bit sorry for people who have not been watching Owens’ videos on the Kirk assassination, which now include a plausible French connection. She may have caught not just one big fish, but a net full of them. She is entertaining, which is no flaw but a bonus. Also, to my eye she appears to be honest and reveling in it, rather than struggling with it as Carlson seems to be. ABN
The Club des Cent (sometimes referred to in intelligence literature as the “Cercle des Cent” or simply “Le Cercle”) is a secretive, invitation-only foreign policy group that has operated since the early Cold War period. It is distinct from the gourmet dining club of the same name in Paris (the actual “Club des Cent” for food critics). The intelligence-related group is often called Le Cercle in French sources or The Pinay Circle in Anglo-American ones, named after its most influential early chairman, former French Prime Minister Antoine Pinay.
Origins and Structure
Founded in the early 1950s by Antoine Pinay and French Prime Minister Jean Violet (a lawyer with close ties to French intelligence, particularly the SDECE – the predecessor of DGSE).
Created as a private, anti-communist forum to coordinate Atlanticist (pro-NATO, pro-US–Europe alliance) foreign policy and intelligence efforts outside official channels.
Membership has always been small, elite, and transnational: senior politicians, intelligence officers, bankers, diplomats, industrialists, and occasionally royalty. Former members or attendees include:
Franz Josef Bach (German diplomat and CDU politician)
Alan Clark (British Conservative MP)
Giulio Andreotti (Italian PM)
Otto von Habsburg
Henry Kissinger (attended at least once)
David Rockefeller
Margaret Thatcher (met with the group)
Senior figures from MI6, CIA, French SDECE/DGSE, German BND, Belgian Sûreté, etc.
Involvement in Covert Operations
Le Cercle has never been an operational intelligence agency, but it functioned as a high-level private intelligence coordination and strategy group. Its documented or strongly alleged involvement includes:
Anti-communist propaganda and psychological warfare
Financed and coordinated anti-Soviet and anti-leftist operations in Europe through linked organizations such as the Interdoc network and the Institut de Politique Internationale.
Funded anti-communist trade union activities and media operations.
Africa and the “Françafrique” network
Jean Violet and other Cercle members were deeply involved in French neocolonial networks in Africa, especially through the Safari Club (a 1970s intelligence alliance between France, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Morocco designed to bypass CIA restrictions after the Church Committee).
Supported interventions in Congo/Zaïre, Chad, and elsewhere.
1980s anti-neutrality campaigns in Europe
Coordinated private funding and strategy against European neutralism and the peace movement (especially in West Germany and the Netherlands). Linked to the creation of front organizations that received covert CIA and MI6 funding.
The “Clockwork Orange”–style operations in the UK
British Cercle members (Julian Amery, Brian Crozier, Nicholas Elliott) were implicated in attempts to destabilize the Labour government of Harold Wilson in the 1970s via smear campaigns involving MI5 and private intelligence networks.
Support for the 1980s Reagan–Thatcher hardline policies
Acted as a back-channel between European conservative circles and the incoming Reagan administration, particularly on intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) deployments in Europe.
Secrecy and Current Status
The group deliberately avoids publicity. Meetings are held twice a year in different countries, always under heavy security and with no minutes published.
After the end of the Cold War, its focus reportedly shifted toward the Middle East, Islamic terrorism, and later Russia/China.
As of the 2010s–2020s, it is believed to still exist in a much reduced form, sometimes under different informal names, with younger Atlanticist politicians and intelligence veterans.
In summary, the Club des Cent / Le Cercle was one of the most important private covert action networks of the Cold War era – not an official agency, but a place where senior Western intelligence officers, politicians, and financiers could plan and fund operations that official agencies could not or would not touch. Its influence peaked in the 1970s–1980s and has significantly declined since, but its model of private–public coordination continues to fascinate researchers of “deep politics.”
UPDATE: The video above worked very well for me. I have a terrible past with somewhat related events and issues. Same kinds of perpetrators, same attitudes, same surreal cruelty. Whether Wick is honest or not, for me, does not matter because her interview works; whether she is describing reality or creating a work of art is fine with me. I tend to believe her. When you are in a position like hers, you know most people will doubt your story or dismiss it outright because there is nothing in their (mind-controlled) experience to allow them to see it.
Prince Leo von Hohenberg is the great-grandson of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and the son of Prince Albrecht of Hohenberg and Rosalind Roque Alcoforado. He delivered a speech on November 16, 2024, at Castle Artstetten in Austria, commemorating the assassination of his great-grandfather, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which triggered World War I.
__________
This is a member of the Western elite I can support. His speech was given one year ago today. I would imagine any progress he has made would be quiet. I hope he is not all-talk and no-action like so many. A year is not a long time for meta-politics, so I believe he deserves the benefit of the doubt. ABN
My feeling is that now it is “safe” to release the info that Epstein was really a sex trafficker as a side gig and was mainly an intelligence asset of Israel and the US, a big-time financial criminal on behalf of transnational capital (i would argue transnational organized crime disguised as transnational capital), and an arms trader because the people he was helping have stolen so much of America’s wealth and have taken control over so much of the government.
That is why even admitting the true breadth of the scandal and operation doesn’t even seem to move the needle. Criminals are in charge and they run both parties, they have created the infrastructure for neo-feudalism enforced by technology and are herding us into the corral.
Opt out of AI, digital ID and the surveillance state that Epstein associates built now because we still can.
American Buddhist Net 