Tag: geopolitics
Col. Doug Macgregor: the truth behind building Ukraine combat power & IDF’s prospects in Gaza
I think Macgregor consistently misses the point that Ukraine has been deliberately destroyed—denuded of population through flight and death and of military men through death. This has to have been part of the plan, the other part being proxy war against Russia. It also looks like, if possible, the neocon NATO people in control want to expand the Ukraine War to include Poland and the Baltics and possibly all of Europe. The goal is world domination and everything has to be seen in that light, including Gaza which is being denuded of its population in a manner not so different from Ukraine. Neither Ukraine nor Gaza are ends in themselves. They are steps along the way to achieving world domination. The neocons main rivals are Russia and China. ABN
White House signals end of funding for Ukraine War: Kirby — funding ‘near to the end of the rope… not going to be indefinite’
The attack in Israel has provided the offramp for US neocon/ NATO hot action in Ukraine, for now anyway. This pot will still be on the stove simmering. If you are going for global domination, you have to have a big stove. Today’s geopolitical conditions can best be understood in light of some assumptions about how top cabal actors understand the world and what they want. What they want is unequivocal global domination and this means all parts of the world are in play and no populations are especially respected. Witness the MIHOP attacks in Israel. An attack on Iran will constitute an attack on BRICS, as will messing with China and Russia. Central Asia was the center of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and appears to be so today as well. ABN
The Israel Attacks: Beyond the Obvious — Efrat Fenigson & Bret Weinstein
This is an excellent discussion, highly recommended. I will only add that I am delighted to learn Bret is a reader of ABN. ABN
Efrat Fenigson interview — ‘There are some forces here that enabled this to happen, that allowed this to happen’
Israelis are experiencing an acute form of what Americans and Europeans have been experiencing for decades—their own government is somehow either complicit, infiltrated, or controlled by outside forces. And this has ‘allowed this to happen’. After 9/11 in the US, there were two main theoretical categories about what happened—our government MIHOP (Made It Happen On Purpose) or LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose). Israelis are also experiencing the Western sense that they do not even know who is in ultimate control of their nation. In USA, we have been experiencing for decades that whoever is in control of our government is doing to us what USA has been doing to the world for an even longer period of time. It seems that Israelis are now experiencing something similar, as are Europeans. There is a weird irony that many believe Israelis or Jews are the sinister power in control of USA and/or USA is the sinister power in control of Israel. Both could be true, of course. However you look at it, all signs do point to a secret cabal pulling the strings throughout the Western world, including Israel. And all signs point to that cabal having the ambition to conquer and control the world. ABN
Efrat Fenigson: Fmr Israeli intelligence — something is very wrong here in Israel
Whatever the full truth, this is another symptom of savage KOBK fighting at the top. This is one part of a much larger operation for total planetary control. Only the winner will live. Nothing will stop it. ABN
China moves into position to support Syria
LNG is the core of US neocon policy in Germany, Europe, and Ukraine
This talk is directed at Musk but the content is much more important than that. ABN
Tucker Carlson: “You have no idea what is coming…”
Prof John J. Mearsheimer: Who Really Started Ukraine War?
US government and media lying about Ukrainian counteroffensive – Seymour Hersh
“‘It’s all lies,’” the source said, according to Hersh. “‘The war is over. Russia has won. There is no Ukrainian offensive anymore, but the White House and the American media have to keep the lie going.’”
Duh. ABN
How the US, Through the Greens and the Reds, Is Destroying Europe
[The excerpt below is preceded by a description of the decline of Europe. I recommend the whole piece but have posted this snippet because it is the core point. The essay is not long and clearly written. ABN]
…Now with the events in the Ukraine serving as a catalyst, it is becoming increasingly clear what is actually at hand: the planned and organized destruction of Europe for the benefit of the United States. Only after the collapse of the Soviet Union and socialism in Eastern Europe was it finally possible for the Washington regime to initiate the final phase of a project begun early in the 20th century.
Few realize that after the US conquest and occupation of much of Europe from 1943 to 1945, the Americans set up a local political organization primarily loyal to the US. Nothing new here, as all conquerors and colonizers have always done this throughout history. The US occupation authorities decided to turn the various European Social Democratic parties into their local loyal supporters. This choice was rather obvious, because Europe’s political conservatives and Roman Catholic and Protestant political parties were in favor of the US anyway. They were counting on the US to protect them from Communism.
As a matter of fact in the mid-1940s, Communists were a formidable political force all over Europe. In elections in 1945 and 1946 (in Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Denmark and Norway), between one eighth and a quarter of the electorate voted Communist. In Czechoslovakia (1946) it was almost forty percent, a record. When between 1944 and 1949 the Iron Curtain had been let down across the continent, the US needed a more solid counterweight to neutralize the communist danger in the lands it occupied. Hence the choice fell on the Social Democrats. Although marxist, they rejected revolutionary tactics in order to achieve political ascendancy.
From that moment, ambitious young and promising Social Democrats were made beneficiaries of travel grants and scholarships to the US and of assorted other junkets, turning them into the most loyal supporters of the US. That is, until the fall of the Berlin Wall and the ensuing collapse of the USSR. At that point, all Western European Social Democratic parties embraced neoliberalism (inherently at odds with their original political philosophy), thus becoming merely a kind of conservative parties. The ideological difference between the political Left and the political Right disappeared on the process and the terms were shorn of their political meaning.
However, with the Communist danger out of the way and the Social Democrats having lost their role as a barrier against Communism, the US still needed a reliable and loyal political support base inside their European vassal states. Reinforcement was soon found in the so-called “green” parties, a kind of Social Democratic parties, but with an added environmental platform and often with a decided feminist equity twist as well. These new parties appealed to the growing category of politically naive young urban professionals with romantic notions about “health food” and other fashionable issues. With their insistent clamor for “development aid” for the “Third World” they were also quintessentially racist, though hidden behind a veil of paternalism.
The above essay reminds me to recommend the book Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War by Gerry Docherty. This book overturns conventional views of US and European history. I am only halfway through but very impressed. The chapter on the founding of the US Federal Reserve, which I read last night, is a masterpiece of brevity and historical analysis. The British Empire never ended. It morphed into a combo British-American Empire. It is controlled by the Big Banks, legacy families with immense fortunes, and nouveau riche billionaires willing to join the elite cabal, which the most visible ones all have done, or so it seems. ABN
American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion — Ron Unz
Israel Shahak and the Middle East
About a decade ago, I happened to be talking with an eminent academic scholar who had become known for his sharp criticism of Israeli policies in the Middle East and America’s strong support for them. I mentioned that I myself had come to very similar conclusions some time before, and he asked when that had happened. I told him it had been in 1982, and I think he found my answer quite surprising. I got the sense that date was decades earlier than would have been given by almost anyone else he knew.
Sometimes it is quite difficult to pinpoint when one’s world view on a contentious topic undergoes sharp transformation, but at other times it is quite easy. My own perceptions of the Middle East conflict drastically shifted during Fall 1982, and they have subsequently changed only to a far smaller extent. As some might remember, that period marked the first Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and culminated in the notorious Sabra-Shatila Massacre during which hundreds or even thousands of Palestinians were slaughtered in their refugee camps. But although those events were certainly major factors in my ideological realignment, the crucial trigger was actually a certain letter to the editor published around that same time.
A few years earlier, I had discovered The London Economist, as it was then called, and it had quickly become my favorite publication, which I religiously devoured cover-to-cover every week. And as I read the various articles about the Middle East conflict in that publication, or others such as the New York Times, the journalists occasionally included quotes from some particularly fanatic and irrational Israeli Communist named Israel Shahak, whose views seemed totally at odds with those of everyone else, and who was consequently treated as a fringe figure. Opinions that seem totally divorced from reality tend to stick in one’s mind, and it took only one or two appearances from that apparently die-hard and delusional Stalinist for me to guess that he would always take an entirely contrary position on every given issue.
In 1982 Israel Defense Minister Ariel Sharon launched his massive invasion of Lebanon using the pretext of the wounding of an Israeli diplomat in Europe at the hands of a Palestinian attacker, and the extreme nature of his action was widely condemned in the media outlets I read at the time. His motive was obviously to root out the PLO’s political and military infrastructure, which had taken hold in many of Lebanon’s large Palestinian refugee camps. But back in those days invasions of Middle Eastern countries on dubious prospects were much less common than they have subsequently become, after our recent American wars killed or displaced so many millions, and most observers were horrified by the utterly disproportionate nature of his attack and the severe destruction he was inflicting upon Israel’s neighbor, which he seemed eager to reduce to puppet status. From what I recall, he made several entirely false assurances to top Reagan officials about his invasion plans, such that they afterward called him the worst sort of liar, and he ended up besieging the Lebanese capital of Beirut even though he had originally promised to limit his assault to a mere border incursion.
I skipped this essay when it first came out because Ron can be long-winded and I was short on time. I just read it this morning and believe it will be of interests to readers of this site. ABN
‘Ukraine is like a drowning person who can pull you to the depths’ — Polish President Duda
This probably signals the beginning of the end of neocon-NATO feeding the fires of war. ABN
Volodymyr Zelensky holds secret NYC meeting with private equity bosses at JPMorgan, Google and Blackstone to discuss rebuilding war-torn Ukraine
Volodymyr Zelensky attended a secret roundtable in New York City with the nation’s top financiers, including private equity bosses at JPMorgan, Google and Blackstone to discuss rebuilding war-torn Ukraine.
The meeting was hosted by the nation’s largest bank, JPMorgan, on Wednesday evening, and included Google CEO Eric Schmidt, billionaire Mike Bloomberg, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, and hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman.
The former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and billionaire Barry Sternlicht were also in attendance, sources told CNN.
Hours earlier, Zelensky met with Larry Fink, CEO of the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock to discuss how to attract US private sector money for the rebuilding effort, According Fox News.
Zelensky is scheduled to meet with President Joe Biden later this week to discuss US aid to Ukraine.
Money rules the world. Through the people that control the money. The more neocon-NATO-Zelensky destroys Ukraine or provokes Russia to destroy Ukraine, the cheaper Ukraine land becomes while investment opportunities soar. Are Poland and the Baltics paying attention? Feeling groovy about supporting ‘Ukrainian democracy’ has brought them to this. Five hundred thousand Ukrainian military dead in the war. One-half of the country has fled, never to return. ABN