The fundamental battleline of this world is jew vs. All of Us.
Jews declared this war a long time ago. We didn’t ask for it. We were born into it.
Jews are waging this war against us every day. This war is a hot war. It is happening now.
Jews make no distinctions between Gentiles. They dehumanize all of us as “cattle.”
Jews permit themselves to take any action against us. Whether it’s releasing a virus, engineering a famine, crashing our economy, or instigating a nuclear war, jews put all options on the table.
Jews have one set of ethics for themselves and a different set of ethics for dealing with Gentiles, regardless of whether it’s on a global, national, or personal level.
Each jew knows that he has a special duty to his own people, regardless of superficial disagreements, and that duty is to lie to us and deny that any of this is happening.
Each jew has it in the back of his mind that if Gentiles ever catch on, we can easily go out and win this war. Thus, each jew is a liar and a spy.
Jews have their “decent, average” agents spread out everywhere, blending in, distracting us, and pacifying us as a fifth column, hoping their war against us proceeds uninterrupted.
They soothe gullible Gentiles with venomous lies to psychologically disarm us.
None can be trusted. They all privately regard you as a dumb animal. A jew will only be nice to you if he gets something out of it. A jew will only tell you a truth if it is in the service of a greater lie. A jew will only be generous to you to trap you in the long run.
When you look at your children, know that even the “friendliest” jews privately regard your children as worthless animals.
Elite jews are taking actions right now to ensure that your children are enslaved and killed, and “average, decent” jews are enabling it, running cover for it, and telling you not to say the word ‘jew.’ That’s personal.
Thus, as this is a state of war, Gentiles must get serious. Soft-heartedness has no place here. No distinctions can be made. Remove any pity for the enemy from your heart. To show the slightest bit of mercy to the enemy is to sign our own death warrant.
I have only spot-checked this interview but it seems to be well-worth watching because Lobaczewski’s insights are based on his experiences in communist Poland. First-hand experience with actual communist regimes is essential for understanding communist states of the past and also the usurpation of the Western world now ongoing. The techniques of this usurpation and infiltration of Western institutions is textbook communist power aggrandizement through lying, cheating, infiltrating, and treason. Ask anyone who has lived in a communist country or escaped from one — they will all say much the same: you do not want that to happen here or again. I myself am speaking from personal experience. ABN
You will never beat such an army. This is the Russian people’s army fighting for the Russian people and not some NATO mercenaries fighting for oil and Israel’s interests.
“Dear children! How we have been waiting for you!”
This is how they meet the Russian soldiers in most of the cities.
I believe this video is showing a real scene that is probably common in Russian sectors of what used to be Ukraine: ‘This is the Russian people’s army fighting for the Russian people and not some NATO mercenaries fighting for oil and Israel’s interests’. As we watch the clandestine army now occupying USA and guiding us to our doom and as we watch similar happening in Europe and everywhere else in the Western world (except Russia which is properly part of the West), we all know that our natural patriotism and love of our civilization has been horribly attacked, all but destroyed. Those who are destroying us in the West are also those who have constantly prevented formation of an alliance between Europe and Russia. ABN
Ukraine, which has been destroyed, and which has witnessed all of its strong young men killed in futile battles and massacres, and from which one-half of its population has fled, never to return, has also been soldto Western investment funds. If Israel goes bottoms-up, expect to see millions of Israelis move to Ukraine — now ‘a land without people for a people, yet again, without land’. ABN
A new analysis of dozens of arrowheads is helping researchers piece together a clearer portrait of the warriors who clashed on Europe’s oldest known battlefield 3,250 years ago.
The bronze and flint arrowheads were recovered from the Tollense Valley in northeast Germany. Researchers first uncovered the site in 1996 when an amateur archaeologist spotted a bone sticking out of a bank of the Tollense River.
Since then, excavations have unearthed 300 metal finds and 12,500 bones belonging to about 150 individuals who fell in battle at the site in 1250 BC. Recovered weaponry has included swords, wooden clubs and the array of arrowheads — including some found still embedded in the bones of the fallen.
No direct evidence of an earlier battle of this scale has ever been discovered, which is why Tollense Valley is considered the site of Europe’s oldest battle, according to researchers who have studied the area since 2007.
Studies of the bones have yielded some insights into the men — all young, strong and able-bodied warriors, some with healed wounds from previous skirmishes. But details on who was involved in the violent conflict, and why they fought in such a bloody battle, has long eluded researchers.
The Torah verses convey profound messages that we can insightfully extract for our daily lives. Rabbi Shay Tahan, the Rosh Kollel of Shaarei Ezra in Brooklyn, NY, graciously opens the gates to understand them.
The recent conflict in Lebanon raises the age-old question regarding the northern borders of biblical Eretz Yisrael. Where exactly did Hashem define the boundaries, and are we obligated to conquer those areas? Do the mitzvot of terumah and ma’aser apply to those lands as part of Eretz Yisrael, or are they considered outside the borders?
The Torah provides clear guidelines regarding the areas we were commanded to conquer when taking possession of the land.
In the last generation, the term “Greater Israel” has come to the forefront. It is sometimes used in political or religious discussions about the ideal or future borders of Israel, often in the context of messianic or Zionist aspirations. Some interpret it as a call for the re-establishment of Israel’s biblical borders. However, the concept varies in meaning, ranging from symbolic or spiritual interpretations to literal geographical claims.
This term refers to the concept of the biblical boundaries of the Land of Israel as promised to the Jewish people in various parts of the Torah. It is often associated with the land described in the Covenant with Avraham (Brit Bein HaBetarim), which stretches from the “River of Egypt” (interpreted by some as the Nile or a smaller river in Sinai) to the Perat River. This expansive region includes parts of modern-day Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq.
When Hashem promised Avraham Avinu the Land of Israel at the Brit Bein HaBetarim, the pasuk says (בראשית טז): “On that day, Hashem made a covenant with Avram, saying: To your descendants, I have given this land—from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”
Let’s pretend the racial-demographic census figures are all wrong, the data on how quickly bodies can be processed via cremation is all wrong, let’s pretend the ground penetrating radar is all wrong, the Soviet admission to doctoring camps + faking pictures is all wrong, that pictures of wooden doors with one or two inch gaps beneath are all fake – let’s even pretend the internal German documents repeatedly mentioning ‘deportation to the east’ is actually top secret coded language for ‘exterminate an entire race’ – shouldn’t the Jewish people be forever thankful to Europeans for being rescued, in 1944/1945?
I sense virtually nothing but aggressive animosity, malevolence, and an open/proactive desire to destroy Western peoples and homelands – even while we’ve collectively paid (and continue to pay) countless billions to Jewish organizations.. and haven’t yet received a single dime in compensation for the bolshevik/communist revolutions and massacres, targeting specific races and demographics..
to the foremost Judeophiles in our midst (Murray, Peterson, Hanson, Pool, etc), please make this make sense?
Gage’s statements can also be understood as pre-programming aimed at the American people and the world. Scenario: Cabal kills Trump with a bomb that also kills many others or with a surface-to-air missile that also kills everyone on his plane. USA and world will be thrown into a frenzy and easily duped into nuking Iran, which Kamala’s handlers will do promptly. This is the same kind of mind-control we see at the beginning of every war — Pearl Harbor, Tonkin, WMD, NATO push into Ukraine, massive government-sponsored illegal immigration. ABN
The problem of the criterion is a fundamental issue in epistemology, which is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge. It is a problem that arises when trying to determine the extent of knowledge and formulate the criteria for epistemic values, such as truth, justification, and evidence.
The problem can be phrased as a pair of questions: “What do we know?” and “What is the extent of our knowledge?” However, these questions seem to be circular, as it appears that we cannot answer the first question without already having an answer to the second, and vice versa.
This problem has been discussed by philosophers for centuries, with ancient roots dating back to the works of Pyrrho and Sextus Empiricus.
The problem of the criterion is closely related to the issue of justification, as it is difficult to determine what criteria should be used to justify our beliefs and knowledge claims. This problem has been addressed in various ways, including the development of different epistemological theories and the exploration of the nature of truth and evidence.
In essence, the problem of the criterion highlights the difficulty of determining the starting point of knowledge and the criteria for evaluating knowledge claims. It is a problem that has puzzled philosophers for centuries and continues to be a topic of ongoing debate and inquiry.
the above was AI generated in Brave browser
Pyrrho’s tripartite statement is completely unprecedented and unparalleled in Greek thought. Yet it is not merely similar to Buddhism, it corresponds closely to a famous statement of the Buddha preserved in canonical texts. The statement is known as the Trilakṣaṇa, the ‘Three Characteristics’ of all dharmas ‘ethical distinctions, factors, constituents, etc.’ Greek pragmata ‘(ethical) things’ corresponds closely to Indic dharma ∼ dhamma ‘(ethical) things’ and seems to be Pyrrho’s equivalent of it. The Buddha says, “All dharmas are anitya ‘impermanent’…. All dharmas are duḥkha ‘unsatisfactory, imperfect, unstable’…. All dharmas are anātman ‘without an innate self-identity’.”
~Beckwith, Christopher I.. Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia
The quote from Beckwith just above highlights how Beckwith has very convincingly connected Pyrrho’s skepticism with early Buddhism. The Trilaksana or Three Characteristics are the foundation of the Four Dharma Seals, belonging to the very earliest (attested) teachings of the Buddha. They are the heart of virtually all Buddhist philosophy and practice. They also define the Problem of the Criterion in Buddhist terms. The Fourth Seal is nirvana or freedom from the anxiety and suffering of not fully understanding the the first Three Dharma Seals.
I am also making this point because the Problem of the Criterion, or the Four Dharma Seals, are very real and impact our daily lives at every level all the time. And this is not just an abstract philosophical problem. It affects all of our relationships and everything we say and hear. In this vein I want to say that FIML (without my specifically knowing it at the time) is designed to address the Problem of the Criterion as it arises between two people in a close relationship.
I have said more than a few times over the years that it is hard for me to understand why ancient philosophers, including the Buddha, did not discover FIML or teach it. I believe it is possible Buddhist monks in the Buddha’s day were given instructions that amounted to some form of FIML, but there exists no evidence of this.
Whatever the case, FIML is designed to deal with interpersonal conundrums that arise out of the Problem of the Criterion, our inability to solidly nail what we know to the wall. FIML cannot completely fix the problem. It does not solve the Problem of the Criterion but it does make everything much clearer and better by at least an order of magnitude and probably more. By fully recognizing this inherent problem within all communication FIML partners can cooperatively work to solve it for the most part between themselves. ABN
American Buddhist Net 