Oldest ancient Egyptian astronomical observatory discovered

Archaeologists have identified the first ancient Egyptian astronomical observatory on record, which they say is the “first and largest” of its kind, according to a translated statement from the country’s Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities.

An Egyptian archaeological team discovered the remains of the sixth-century-B.C. structure three years ago during excavations at an archaeological site in the ancient city of Buto, now called Tell Al-Faraeen, in Egypt’s Kafr El-Sheikh governorate.

“Everything we found shattered our expectations,” Hossam Ghonim, director general of Kafr El-Sheikh Antiquities and head of the Egyptian archaeological mission, told Live Science.

The team uncovered the ruins of an L-shaped mud-brick building spanning over 9,150 square feet (850 square meters). Its east-facing entrance, marked by a traditional gateway known as a pylon, leads to a spot where sunlight would have illuminated where the sky observer — known as ‘smn pe’ and who was usually a priest — stood to track the sun and stars, Ghonim said.

link

The Astral Plane

The astral plane, also called the astral realm or the astral world, is a plane of existence postulated by classical, medieval, oriental, esoteric, and new age philosophies and mystery religions.[1] It is the world of the celestial spheres, crossed by the soul in its astral body on the way to being born and after death, and is generally believed to be populated by angels, spirits or other immaterial beings.[2] In the late 19th and early 20th century the term was popularised by Theosophy and neo-Rosicrucianism.

Another view holds that the astral plane or world, rather than being some kind of boundary area crossed by the soul, is the entirety of spirit existence or spirit worlds to which those who die on Earth go, and where they live out their non-physical lives. It is understood that all consciousness resides in the astral plane.[3] Some writers conflate this realm with heaven or paradise or union with God itself, and others do not. Paramahansa Yogananda wrote in Autobiography of a Yogi (1946), “The astral universe … is hundreds of times larger than the material universe … [with] many astral planets, teeming with astral beings.”

link

My sense is the term astral plane has fallen a bit out of favor. In some cases it is replaced by ethereal plane. In Buddhism, it is traditionally referred to as ultimate reality or vaguely as nirvana, or what comes after nirvana. More recently among scientists and philosophers, we are seeing the concept of a conscious universe or a thinking universe, a universe in which consciousness is a primary force, feature or dimension. However we refer to it, we need a term that evokes dimensions or planes of awareness beyond earthly or mundane awareness or ‘relative reality’, as it is put in Buddhism.

The concept of an astral plane dates back to Plato if not before. The Buddha was referring to something like that without using any term when he spoke about nirvana. The Buddha was a Scythian who argued against the strong Scythian belief in an absolute distinction between right and wrong and a single, great God (Ahura Mazda) who created the world and could be known only through doing good.

It’s a good development that scientists and philosophers today are increasingly seeing what the Buddha and many others have seen throughout the ages. I believe deep meditative states and a moral life afford us frequent opportunities to commune with or glimpse dimensions or realms beyond our normal default cultural behavioral realms.

Buddhism is a profoundly ethical teaching but it also rejects absolutes. We humans are characterized by emptiness, impermanence, and the suffering wrought by clinging to any concept, belief or idea, and yet are capable of freeing ourselves from ‘relative reality’ through ethical practice and experiential samadhi states.

The Buddha remained silent on matters related to anything like the astral plane because he knew that focusing on ethereal aims (especially in his day?) tends to reify them, which then leads to ossification, doctrine, worship without reason. I wonder if in our day, the Buddha would reason differently as many reasonable thinkers now accept that consciousness may be inexplicable by rank materialism or particle physics or biology based on those; and thus may/must be a primary aspect of all that we know of.

My current understanding of Buddhism and ancient history has been recently influenced by Christopher Beckwith’s The Scythian Empire: Central Eurasia and the Birth of the Classical Age from Persia to China, which I highly recommend to Buddhists and everyone else. ABN

FLASHBACK: Was Mearsheimer right or was he falling for an even deeper lie?

Sounds reasonable from his angle, but Mearsheimer either pretends he doesn’t know or really doesn’t know that destroying Ukraine was always the plan. Destroying Russia along with or after destroying Ukraine is also the plan. Destroying Europe is also the plan. The people doing this are not irrational. They are aiming for global domination. You have to think like them to understand what they are doing and why. All policies they control are designed to weaken and destroy the entire West so that they can control all of it. It’s a perfectly reasonable strategy and it has worked extremely well for them. Included in this strategy has been multigenerational clandestine infiltration of all Western institutions accompanied by disabling promising young Westerners (especially boys and young men) so there can be no one left to fight back. Notice how virtually all Ukrainian men of military age have been slaughtered, many of them forced to the front, many of them underage teenagers. Zelensky is not Ukrainian but rather a member of the cabal that has destroyed Ukraine. They are happy to kill as many Ukrainians as they can, already 700,000 and counting. Europe and Russia are next. I like Mearsheimer, but like so many other alternate voices to mainstream cabal, he assumes they think like him, or pretends they do. Maybe he believes pure reason (based on his classical assumptions about right and wrong) will convince an incorrigible adversary to change its ways. Mearsheimer is a ‘realist’ who analyzes ‘great powers’ based on their perceived needs. Why has he not realized that the ‘great power’ controlling the West is hidden, secreted behind veils of misdirection? They are behaving exactly as his political philosophy dictates, but based on different assumptions and different goals. ABN