Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has today been seen taking a solo drive after photos released in the Epstein files appear to show the disgraced royal crouched on all fours over a woman.
The former Duke of York, 65, has been photographed leaving the grounds of Windsor Castle in his Range Rover.
Andrew cut a solitary figure as he drove alone while exiting the Royal Lodge in heavy rain.
The image of the former prince on Sunday morning comes two days after the latest tranche of documents relating to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein were released by the US justice department.
They included shocking pictures of the former Duke of York on his knees and crouching over a woman lying on the floor. In two disturbing images Andrew appears to be touching the woman’s stomach.
The publication of three million new documents, including 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, has linked Andrew – who was stripped of his royal titles in November – to at least three more victims in Epstein’s vast network of abuse.
It has led to the Metropolitan Police facing calls to reopen a probe into the former Duke of York.
Meanwhile, an extraordinary exchange between Andrew’s shameless ex wife Sarah Ferguson and Epstein was also released in which the former Duchess of York told the financier she was waiting for her youngest daughter ‘to come back from a sh***ing weekend’.
Photos of a man appearing to be Andrew feature among the latest Epstein files dump which show him crouched over a female who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out
Seems Andrew’s being stripped of his titles and kicked out of the Windsor Estate was timed based on knowledge that these files and photos would be released around now. It also seems that Andrew is, so far, the most prominent person to fall the furthest due to Epstein related behaviors. There will be more files. ABN
Russians regard Poland and Lithuania as their greatest enemies among a list of 12 countries (not including Ukraine) presented to them in a survey by the Levada Center, an independent polling organisation.
Asked how they assess the countries, 62% of respondents said that Poland and Lithuania are “enemies”. That was more than for the United Kingdom (57%), Germany (50%), Sweden (40%), United States (27%), Israel (25%), Turkey (3%), Iran (2%), North Korea (2%), China (1%) and India (1%).
Meanwhile, only 2% of Russians see Poland as a “friend”, the same proportion as for the UK and Sweden. The figure was even lower, at 1%, for Lithuania, Germany, and the US. Russians were much more likely to see China (29%), North Korea (28%), India (24%) and Iran (18%) as friends.
While that survey question did not include Ukraine, another part of the study, which asked respondents to name five countries that are the most unfriendly or hostile towards Russia, did.
The question has been asked by the Levada Center since 2005, and its results show that, since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russians have generally been more likely to see Poland, Germany and the US as unfriendly or hostile than Ukraine.
However, the proportion regarding the US as unfriendly or hostile dropped sharply in 2025, with the Levada Center noting that last year saw a “Trump effect” in which attitudes towards the US warmed among Russians.
I don’t believe ‘the truth always comes out’, but it often does, especially within the surface signals of day-to-day news. Good brief video breakdown. ABN
UPDATE: I’m not a big fan of Candace’s interviews, of which I have only watched two. She is a monologue genius but not well suited to the interview format, imo. This one is OK for about 30-40 minutes but did not promise any new information so it felt like just watching two people talk about stuff we already know. Youssef did some general analysis on USA starting at the ~35 min mark; what I saw of it was trite, so I stopped watching. Just my opinions. ABN
What is going on at Turning Point right now should be termed the Scottsdale Witch Trials.
I have now gathered first-person accounts that executives are dragging people into offices asking about their allegiance to Erika. Specifically, one person was told that an uber driver told their CMO that his daughter was friends with an employee who didn’t like Erika.
Andrew Kolvet then hauled the uber-mentioned employee into an office and questioned her about the driver’s account, regarding which, she was totally mystified.
Another person had the Turning Point in-house counsel show up at her personal home, tell her she was fired “hi, I’m outside, you are fired” and then demanded she not delete anything and hand over her company laptop.
Another young woman thought she was going in for a bonus because they had worked so hard on Amfest and have not stopped since Charlie’s assassination. Despite 250 million dollars raised since Charlie’s assassination, she was fired. No reason given. She believes Turning Point may have installed some sort of spyware on their company laptops because the previous evening, she had communicated to another Turning Point employee that she wasn’t fond of Erika’s leadership style.
We have a recording of her firing and will be releasing it later today.
What is especially incredible is that NONE of my actual sources were terminated but these people were.
His shirt movement is difficult to explain with a rifle shot from any angle.
The necklace movement indicates the epicenter, not only from the area where it snaps but from its trajectory up and around his right shoulder around his back where it rest on the back of his left shoulder.
The shirt deformation on the back of his collar indicates a extremely quick gas expansion which is followed by the shrapnel lifting the front of his left collar up around his face. Combine this with the necklace movement and you get the epicenter of the energetic event.
Watch the cavitation of his chest and stomach traveling away from the epicenter. It’s the opposite direction of the cavitation of his neck and face, another sign of the epicenter.
Look at his knees… they quickly close and almost cross as he lifts his body from the chair. His elbows turn as his hands clasp, crossing his knuckles and flexing his wrist. His left leg even extends as he falls out of the chair.
There is a lot of information in this post and follow up comments. The main video shows battery pack shrapnel striking Brian Farnsworth’s arm (initially misidentified as Dan Flood). This segment starts at 7:50 in the video.
The exploding mic/battery pack under Charlie’s shirt appears to be the cause of his death. A detailed analysis here: Explosive shrapnel impacts — Jon Bray.ABN
More evidence of shrapnel impacts causing abrasions on Charlie. The areas underneath the shirt are close to the exiting gases would have been most likely to be impacted and we have visual evidence of just that. His left hand was in-between his legs directly under the bottom of his shirt which expelled gases and shrapnel after the explosive expansion. His right chest would have been closest to the shrapnel and shows abrasion directly underneath where the microphone was mounted. The more we see the more evidence leads us towards the conclusion that Charlie was assassinated by a hidden explosive charge in his wireless microphone and not shot with a .30-06 from the rooftop.
Would a PETN shaped charge hidden in a RØDE Wireless PRO release any visible phenomena?
A small amount of light gray/white smoke or vapor is produced from incomplete combustion products (e.g., trace CO, unoxidized particles) and vaporized liner material (copper or polymer fragments). High explosives like PETN and Comp B have good oxygen balance, so smoke is much less than low explosives (e.g., black powder) or pyrotechnics. For such small quantities (grams), the smoke cloud would be modest — a brief puff dispersing quickly in open air, not a thick lingering plume.
This is speculative but excellent information. ABN
Exploding Mic Theory PART 2 — Jon Bray Reveals His Tests + The Butch Hibbs / Baron Theory
__________
UPDATE: Bray provides the best description I have seen for how Kirk was killed and by what.
To cut to the chase — (all speculation with excellent analysis), Kirk’s microphone apparatus contained a PETN shape charge which forcefully blew a gas at Mach 7 into his chest.
That is what killed him. To most doctors the wound would have looked like a bullet wound.
Shrapnel from the exploded mic or battery case was blown up under his shirt and struck Kirk in the neck.
This explains the odd nature of his neck wound and how it bled.
The neck wound was not what killed Kirk and was not part of the plan.
Be sure to watch the vid when you have time. Bray speaks calmly and with sufficient specificity to make a strong case. Highly recommended. ABN
American Buddhist Net 