WASHINGTON, Feb 18 (Reuters) – The U.S. State Department is developing an online portal that will enable people in Europe and elsewhere to see content banned by their governments including alleged hate speech and terrorist propaganda, a move Washington views as a way to counter censorship, three sources familiar with the plan said.
The site will be hosted at “freedom.gov,” the sources said. One source said officials had discussed including a virtual private network function to make a user’s traffic appear to originate in the U.S. and added that user activity on the site will not be tracked.
A Biden administration official who launched the Disinformation Governance Board and served as co-chair of the so-called Ministry of Truth has been appointed to advise the powerful Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, prompting concerns from some Republican lawmakers.
The presiding judges of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review appointed Jennifer Daskal on Feb. 1 to serve as amicus curiae for the court. Amici curiae, known as “friends of the court,” advise judges on legal issues related to foreign surveillance warrants in national security cases. Daskal served as acting principal deputy general counsel at the Department of Homeland Security under Biden. In that role, she drafted the charter for the Disinformation Governance Board, according to a Jan. 31, 2022 memo.
According to its charter, the board would track and monitor “disinformation” and “misinformation” about election security, “falsehoods surrounding U.S. immigration policy,” and information about “the origins and effects of COVID-19 vaccines or the efficacy of masks.”
Doesn’t look good. Could be part of a deal for something else, like getting the SAVE act passed, but that smells bad too. The picture of her is good, though. This is an indication of how deep corrupt control of USA goes. Our courts are as compromised as Minnesota healthcare. USA’s system of checks and balances has become so tangled with malfeasance and ideological sludge, it may be beyond fixing, in which case our nation is lost. ABN
Maybe… but wouldn’t it have been obvious your search would be recorded, or could be? Still an interesting insight and relevant consequences appear to have followed.
You can look at USA political events since the new year as a measured buildup toward a really big case, bigger than Epstein, which will include massive states fraud, election theft, massive federal fraud and more; maybe even a deep Epstein reveal. Some see the Trump admin as stalling, but they may actually be building momentum while preparing the public for a much bigger story. The mid-term elections are about eight months away. Politics is theater. ABN
[The anonymous comment I am posting below is better than anything you will read in any newspaper. It’s from 2017 but is even more relevant today. Almost all of us hope X, and other platforms, are training their algorithms to align with the ideas below. ABN]
Having browsed more than enough Chan board content in the last few months as a companion to t_d, the problem of Judaism is similar yet different than Islam. Some people of both religions have done really shitty things to other races and cultures by infiltrating them and undermining the host nation / ethnicity (using justification from the Talmud or Koran) while using similar victimhood claims to deflect blame and shame critics. Neither religious community stops it or does anything significant to warn of it, thus becoming guilty by association in the eyes of the victim nation/culture/ethnicity.
In my opinion, open criticism of every religion and their community should be allowed otherwise you give them absolute power of zero responsibility via blocking criticism and identification of wronghood. Censorship forces critics into more extreme stances, if you criticize Jews or Judaism you’re automatically a Nazi and persecuted as one, if you do the same for Muslims or Islam you’re an Islamophobe and persecuted as one. If you’re facing similar punishment for moderate and extreme criticisms* you’ll tend to take the more extreme stance as it awards more protection against what you’re worrying about with zero increase in social backlash. And that’s how you get moderate critics of Islam/Muslims and Jews/Judaism turning to extreme opinions on the solution to the problems they see.
(ex. “Some Jews like Soros need to be arrested” vs “Deport all the Jews! Ban Judaism!” And “Some Muslims like the Swedish rapists or Linda Sarsour need to be deported” vs “Deport all the Muslims! Ban Islam!”)
This is why I’m concerned about rule 3 of T_D: “No anti-semitism”. Normally you’d think that means “No saying gas the Jews”, which is reasonable, but in effect I’ve seen the mods enforce “No criticism of Jews or Judaism or even pointing out facts”. Criticism of Christianity and Islam is allowed, and we’re moderate and reasonable. Ban criticism of Judaism and youll just send more moderates to the extremist Jewish conspiracy theory sites like Stormfront. At the end of the day we’re fighting radicalism and best way to do that is allow all speech below the bar of advocating genocide or violence against anyone. This leads to moderate and reasonable discussion with reasonable decided solutions. Every religion has extremist douchebags with their own favourite methods of fighting everyone else while covering up their actions, we need freedom of criticism to figure out who that is so we can give them the boot or handcuffs, whichever is deemed appropriate by the justice system. Then all the moderates can go on living peacefully together.
Annnnnd if still reading this, thanks. I hoped this made sense. (Source)
(Archived link if original source is censored, which would prove the commenter’s point)
If USA and the West had fair and honest elections, we would have seen this same response decades ago. Apparently, Japan had real elections and Takaichi won in a landslide. Poll the West and no one but woke idiots and some (subversive) immigrants want open borders or believe any of the excuses corrupt politicians and writers make for them. In Japan, FAFO. You will be ‘sushi wrapped’ and deported without delay. That’s what those wise people want and that is what their duly elected government is giving them. ABN
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has made a massive ruling in favor of President Trump and the ICE removal process [pdf Ruling Here]. In short, throughout the nation 360 immigration judges had previously ruled that illegal aliens (applicants for admission) should be granted bond and released during the removal proceedings.
The Fifth CCA has now ruled the aliens can be detained as they go through the removal process. This means ICE captures the illegal, holds them in detention and then rapidly deports them. The ruling, which will likely be appealed to the supreme court, fast-tracks the removal.
The emails released so far haven’t provided any prosecutorial evidence for a crime.
Yes, I KNOW what they say. And yes, I KNOW what they mean. But none of this is enough to convict in court.
And that’s BY DESIGN.
You need to understand how the Epstein prosecution actually worked to understand what these files are actually about.
When Epstein was re-arrested in 2019, he was recharged with his crimes from 2001-2006. All the real evidence collected was in pursuit of THOSE crimes… from 2001-2006.
All these 2009-2019 emails released thus far are like 80% bullshit. The other 20% is showcasing networks and showing us the bare minimum required by law.
Does that make them useless?
No. Most definitely NOT.
The average normie knows more about the elite circles that rule our world than they ever have. That’s serious progress.
But you also need to read this nonprosecution agreement and really absorb the implications. Alex Acosta et al gave immunity to Epstein and ALL his associates, both named AND unnamed.
Yes I know Ghislaine Maxwell was still prosecuted, but you have to understand that her case is literally headed all the way to the Supreme Court over THIS nonprosecution agreement.
Don’t expect anyone else to be charged until that’s litigated.
Until then, keep on the pressure and use the court of public opinion to shame those who have yet to be held accountable.
[For receipts click continue reading… The good part of this elite legal scam is: The average normie knows more about the elite circles that rule our world than they ever have. That’s serious progress.ABN]
Nawrocki argued that the state should not be allowed to decide what its citizens are permitted to say or think
Polish President Karol Nawrocki (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
WARSAW – Poland’s President Karol Nawrocki on Friday vetoed legislation meant to implement the EU’s Digital Services Act, despite the bill having been adopted by parliament at the end of 2025.
The flight logs. The visitor records. The names that confirm what people suspected for years about certain islands and certain planes and certain parties where the guest list was curated for maximum leverage.
That’s what everyone’s combing through.
But there’s another list. It’s in the same three million files . It’s not hidden. It’s just less interesting to people who came looking for scandal.
The proposals.
The Edge Foundation was John Brockman’s intellectual salon. Annual gatherings of the world’s most influential scientific minds. Dinner parties where Nobel laureates met tech billionaires. Richard Dawkins. Lawrence Krauss. Steven Pinker. A contact sheet for people who shape the future without ever running for office.
Epstein funded Edge. But Edge wasn’t the operation.
Edge was the talent show.
You host dinners. You watch who’s brilliant. You note who’s ambitious, who’s frustrated by institutional constraints, who talks about what they’d do if funding weren’t an issue. Then you invite the interesting ones somewhere more private.
A jet. An island. A ranch in New Mexico.
The emails in the new files aren’t dinner invitations. They’re pitches.
August 2018 . A Bitcoin developer named Bryan Bishop writes to Epstein about “garage biology”. His plan to create the first human designer baby and possibly a human clone within five years. He outlines mouse testing at a lab in Ukraine, amateur human sperm work in Mississippi. He asks for one to three million dollars. He notes that once the first birth happens, “everything changes and the world will never be the same.”
Bishop discusses secrecy requirements. Anonymity about the babies would be essential. Identifying them publicly “would brand the child as a freak for life in the media.”
This wasn’t a grant application to the NIH.
December 2018. Robert Trivers, Harvard evolutionary biologist, writes to Epstein about hormone intervention in children. The subject line is “Trans.” The email discusses blocking testosterone receptors, increasing estrogen production. Trivers notes they’re “pushing the intervention earlier” and mentions identifying “trans tendencies” in children as young as three years old.
“I would be frightened to do that,” Trivers writes. “But who knows?”
December 2015. Epstein emails about designing a pig with non-cloven hoofs to make kosher bacon. Gene editing as intellectual amusement.
These aren’t academic discussions. They’re project updates sent to a man with funding, facilities, and reasons to keep everyone quiet.
The pattern emerges when you stop looking for the salacious details.
Wine and dine to identify the talent. Private invitations sorted who was willing to work outside institutional oversight. The islands and ranches and jets provided venues where proposals could be discussed without record. And the compromising situations that happened in those venues, the ones everyone’s reading about now, those weren’t the product.
They were the insurance policy.
You don’t fund off-books research with people who can walk away.
Many of the Epstein files are marred with redactions that should not be there. It’s possible the allegations in this note are not true and thus the name was redacted. It could also be that the redacted name married someone to big to fall. ABN
American Buddhist Net 