CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of top COVID officials has officially begun.
Fauci’s top advisor was the first domino.
Criminal referral requests have already been filed against Anthony Fauci and other officials in SEVEN states — Accused of MURDER, TERRORISM, RACKETEERING, FRAUD, & more.
Harrowing news details have emerged of the extreme punishments meted out in North Korea, including prisoners beaten to death with a hammer, a pregnant woman executed, and a farm manager shot after angering Kim Jong Un.
In some of the most shocking cases, inmates were killed in secret ‘indoor executions’ using blunt weapons, while defectors said they witnessed the shooting of minors despite official claims such punishments are banned.
A manager was also executed after all the baby terrapins at a state-run farm died, with sources saying he was shot dead shortly after Kim berated officials during a visit.
The disturbing accounts are laid bare in a new report by Transitional Justice Working Group, which maps executions across the secretive state and reveals how killings surged during the Covid pandemic.
Images included in the report reveal the scale of the killings, showing suspected execution sites across North Korea including firing ranges near airports, football pitches and also in remote fields.
I am posting this because it explains Utah’s unique law on victims rights to a ‘speedy trial’; and also because Erika is not without suspicion, thus rendering her ineligible to invoke this law. Moreover, given the paucity of evidence against Tyler Robinson and the prosecution’s dilatory and incomplete disclosures of said evidence, it looks bad to speed this trial to a hasty conclusion. ABN
Full video:
__________
UPDATE: The full vid is worth watching because De Gregorio very reasonably suggests that Candace Owens file as a ‘close friend’ of the victim and request the trial not be speedy but deliberate, careful and fair. ABN
HB 1802 (Tennessee) and SB 1407 (Tennessee) refer to the same legislation, known as the “Stand Your Ground” property protection bill, which was passed by the Tennessee House on April 23, 2026, with a 62-24 vote and awaits Governor Bill Lee’s signature.
The bill fundamentally alters Tennessee’s self-defense statutes by expanding the permissible use of force to include the protection of property, moving beyond the traditional “life for a life” standard. Key provisions include:
Justified Force: Individuals may use force, and in specific extreme circumstances, deadly force, to prevent crimes such as theft, arson, trespassing, or the harming of livestock and pets.
Conditions: Such force is considered “justified” only when no other reasonable means of protection are available.
Trespasser Nuance: An individual may use intimidation or force against a trespasser or property damager provided the person is not attempting to flee (i.e., their back is not turned).
Opposition: Critics, including Representative Justin Pearson (D-Tenn.) and Representative Greg Martin (R-Tenn.), argue the bill lowers the threshold for lethal force, potentially justifying deadly force over property crimes or against vulnerable individuals like the elderly or those with dementia.
This is very good news. Let’s hope the CDC follows suit. All Americans everywhere should have complete and unquestioned control over which vaccines they want to take or not take. And this right to personal autonomy should also apply to all babies, infants, and minor children as determined by their parents, not the school system, not the governor, not the state legislature. Moreover, all vaccine manufacturers should immediately, if not sooner, lose non-liability for injuries caused by their vaccines. Shielding these companies from liability has opened a Niagara Falls of corrupt money for harmful and even deadly vaccines. ABN
On Friday, I attended Charlie Kirk’s case hearing. There’s a lot to unpack from what happened, and I break it all down in this episode with @danksterintel and @brandisiciliani I may be wrong, but my sense is that this case won’t make it to trial. I think a deal will be reached before proceedings even begin.
The FBI has not produced certain evidence the defense requested. While they may technically have the right to withhold it at this stage, it raises questions. The FBI director has publicly stated that he wants this case to move quickly and smoothly and Erika has also emphasized the importance of a speedy trial. If that’s truly the goal, then why leave any opening for the defense to argue they don’t have the evidence they need and request a continuance? There were several things in this hearing that were conducted poorly.
Sixth Amendment of theConstitution of the United States
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
It is important for everyone to understand that the right to speedy trial is Tyler Robinson’s right, not Erika’s. And this Sixth Amendment right of Tyler’s does not permit the prosecution to withhold evidence or speedily convict someone who looks to many like a patsy. ABN
UPDATE: Sixth Amendment of theConstitution of the United States
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
__________
I keep seeing Erika’s supporters asserting her ‘right’ to a speedy trial. She is not the accused. She does not have this right in this trial. This right belongs to Tyler Robinson. And in this case, speedy does not mean kangaroo-court speedy where the prosecution does not provide to the defense the evidence they hold against the accused — Robinson, which is precisely what the prosecution is doing. To my eye, this trial looks like a blatant set-up to speedily convict a patsy who may well be unalived speedily; case closed. ABN
President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to sign a new executive order that will increase research into psychedelic drugs used to treat mental illnesses, potentially paving the way for their legal use in controlled environments.
The commander in chief is in talks to draft the order, which would release new guidance for medical research on drugs such as psilocybin and ibogaine, multiple insiders told The Washington Post.
While speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump teased an upcoming announcement scheduled for Saturday morning on something he feels ‘strongly about.’
The president called the impending revelation a ‘very positive thing,’ adding that he would be joined by a ‘very good, very smart, very caring’ person to make the official announcement.
I sympathize deeply but all creators of anything are being plagiarized by AI, which ‘trains’ on our work. To date, there is no authority or law to stop companies from doing that. This case appears to involve a single artist, so she may have some leverage, but they could just mix material plagiarized from her with a few other artists to conceal it. Big Brother has become Big Robot.
PS: In following up, I just read that the company in question (Vidia?) has withdrawn all of its copyright claims on her music. ABN
American livestreamer Johnny Somali, who caused outrage in South Korea by kissing a statue representing World War Two sex slaves, has been sentenced to six months in jail.
Seoul authorities charged him for public nuisance in November 2024 after he posted a clip of himself kissing and performing lap dances on the statue while visiting South Korea. He has been barred from leaving the country since then.
The 25-year-old, whose real name is Ismael Ramsey Khalid, is known for his provocative content which has led to him being banned from several streaming platforms.
He has also been accused of harassing people while travelling in Japan and Israel.American livestreamer Johnny Somali, who caused outrage in South Korea by kissing a statue representing World War Two sex slaves, has been sentenced to six months in jail.
Seoul authorities charged him for public nuisance in November 2024 after he posted a clip of himself kissing and performing lap dances on the statue while visiting South Korea. He has been barred from leaving the country since then.
The 25-year-old, whose real name is Ismael Ramsey Khalid, is known for his provocative content which has led to him being banned from several streaming platforms.
He has also been accused of harassing people while travelling in Japan and Israel.
Catholic nuns who have been looking after dying patients for decades have sued the state of New York over gender laws which could see the carers jailed.
The Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne filed a lawsuit against Governor Kathy Hochul on Tuesday opposing a bill that requires facilities to assign rooms by gender identity, not biological sex – something the nuns said clashes with their religion.
Hochul signed the bill into law in November, 2023, which states that long-term care facilities and their staff cannot discriminate against ‘any resident on the basis of a resident’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or HIV status.’
The Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne claim that the bill forces them to choose between their mission and faith and facing fines, license loss or jail time.
The group takes patients into their care at the 42-bed Rosary Hill Home in Hawthorne, New York and ‘provide comfort and nursing care for patients who are poor or suffering from incurable cancer.’
‘We are consecrated religious Sisters and have one mission,’ Mother Marie Edward OP told Fox News. ‘It is to provide comfort and skilled care to persons dying of cancer who cannot afford nursing care.’
Pfizer toxicologist stands in the German Bundestag and says what everyone knew who didn’t want to look away.
60,000 additional deaths in temporal connection with the COVID-19 vaccination. Not estimated by fringe thinkers, but the result of a pharmaco-epidemiological analysis, presented by an expert who no longer lets himself be fobbed off with the usual “that’s complex” platitudes.
The system was simple:
Emergency authorization without long-term data. Pressure instead of enlightenment. Reports of side effects were collected, but not evaluated. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut documented, but drew no consequences. The Robert Koch-Institut communicated excess mortality in such a way that the numbers fit. Children, young people, pregnant women – everything without sufficient data basis, without legally binding enlightenment, without those responsible ever being asked if they knew what they were doing.
The legal category is called: prohibited human experiments. Not as a comparison, but as a criminal classification. Whoever pushes a novel active substance without sufficient testing into a population and systematically circumvents the statutory duties of pharmacovigilance has crossed the line that is not crossed even in wartime.
The demand is called: Nuremberg Trials. Not as revenge fantasy, but as constitutional state. If the democratic basic order allows state authorities together with private corporations to turn people into test subjects, then this order must account for itself in court.
Reminder that children who do not receive one or more vaccines due to their parent’s convictions are not locked away in an attic. They are going to church, participating in sports leagues, enrolled in ballet class, are part of large homeschool meetups, etc. They are just denied, in a few states, an in-school education. In this instance, let’s be more like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc., that have no school mandates. Persuade parents on the merits and, if you can’t, that is called informed consent. They were informed and didn’t consent; mandating over their objection is immoral and illiberal.
American Buddhist Net 