UK ban on puberty blockers ruled lawful
Tag: law
European Vaccination Card will be piloted in five countries
‘A European Vaccination Card will enable informed vaccination, according to experts working on the EUVABECO project. Latvia, Greece, Belgium, Germany and Portugal will pilot the new tool from September.’
As Europe transitions from emergency measures to long-term COVID-19 management, there is a critical opportunity to strengthen resilience and increase preparedness for future health threats. The European Vaccination Beyond COVID-19 (EUVABECO) project seeks to leverage this momentum by initiating pilot projects to develop and test implementation plans for tools that support both routine and crisis vaccination practices.[3]
One key tool that EUVABECO will introduce is the European Vaccination Card (EVC).[4] Scheduled for launch in September 2024, the EVC will initially be piloted in five pilot countries: Latvia, Greece, Belgium, Germany, and Portugal. The card aims to empower individuals by consolidating all their vaccination data in one easily accessible location. It will be available in various formats, including printed cards, mailed copies, and digital versions for smartphones.[5]
‘The card aims to empower DISEMPOWER individuals by consolidating all their vaccination data in one easily accessible location.‘ FTFY. I personally will resist any even slightly suspicious attempt by any government or authority to seize more control over our lives through medical mandates, dictates, record-keeping, hallway passes, anti-science, pseudoscience, coercion, bullying, bureaucratic bullshit. No exceptions. Guaranteed they will abuse this power and are seeking it only to further expand illegitimate government control. Medical authority throughout the West has become genocidally dictatorial, as covid proved, and needs to be dismantled and reconfigured, not given more ways to harm populations. I hope citizens of the five ‘pilot countries’ will have the wisdom to destroy these cards, and prevent totalitarian aggrandizement. If EUVABECO gets this, medical and political authorities will without question demand more. ABN
DOJ Reaches Settlement Agreement With Disgraced Former FBI Official Peter Strzok
The Department of Justice (DOJ) reached a settlement agreement with former FBI agent Peter Strzok, ABC News reported.
The former FBI agent, who was dismissed from the bureau in 2018 after text messages he sent that were critical of former President Donald Trump came to light, reached a settlement in his lawsuit against the DOJ. Strzok’s legal team announced that the U.S. government agreed to pay him $1.2 million to resolve the claims that his privacy rights were violated when his private text messages were disclosed, according to ABC News.
Local cops refusing to share info with FBI as agency suffers ‘crisis of confidence’ with DEI hires, damning whistleblower report reveals
As FBI Director Chris Wray performed his usual smarmy stonewalling in Congress Wednesday, a damning report on his $10 billion agency’s “cult of narcissism” was delivered to the House Judiciary Committee by an alliance of retired and active-duty agents and analysts.
The same group gave us the scathing DEI report last year about the FBI’s degraded recruitment standards and coddling of physically unfit, mentally ill, drug-taking or generally useless agents to satisfy diversity requirements at the expense of merit and experience.
This time they have assessed the entire bureau and drawn several worrying conclusions, including that local law enforcement partners have developed a “disturbing loss of trust in the FBI” and are therefore reluctant to share information, with alarming consequences for national security and public safety.
“Police officers and sheriff’s deputies on patrol and detectives investigating illegal activity in their jurisdictions have unparalleled visibility into street-level crime. … When this information is not immediately shared with the FBI, the FBI is left to address complex, evolving threats facing the United States with an unacceptably vast and debilitating ‘blind spot’ because [it] does not have enough personnel and resources to see into every corner of the country.”
Loss of trust
While Wray testified that the FBI is facing a “complex threat environment” that is unprecedented in his experience, the loss of trust in the bureau on his watch only exacerbates the risks, which include terrorist suspects flooding over the southern border.
Is Trump already in control of USA?
Biden transferred his Executive Powers to Trump/Military/Good Guys (through the Department of Treasury) and I will explain how.
*Comments are turned off so I can keep this thread organized. It’s a lot of info/pieces. I’ll turn them back on once I’m done with it.
During the Presidential debate with Biden, Trump said he could end the war in Ukraine in 24hrs.
I am taking this as speculation but it’s well-worth considering seriously. I personally accept that we the plebs are now and always have been ruled by elites (with very few exceptions). I hope Trump becomes or already is the new leader of our elites. I know many fear this but, imo, that’s naive. I know many think the deep plan is to fool people like me into willingly accepting totalitarian rule, digital IDs, digital currency, surveillance state, etc. There is a decent chance they are right and I am wrong. But I believe the odds are more in my favor than theirs. Throughout history there have been very few good leaders. USA and the collective West is dying so fast it is as appalling as it is tragic. If an authoritarian Trump leadership can turn our demise around, I am all for it. Trump is not perfect but he was a very good normal conservative president. He was ousted by a fraudulent election and a different faction of elites in a coup d’état. There is no cure for this but a forceful imposition of justice. ABN
WATCH LIVE: FBI Director Wray testifies on investigation into attempted assassination of Trump
I am expecting Christopher Cheatle, but remain optimistic. Members of Congress will be worked-up because a bad Secret Service endangers them personally. The nation, not so much. ABN
‘Despite the fact that the AGR building was within rifle range of the stage, and was flagged as a vulnerability, this building was put outside of the Secret Service’s security perimeter’ — Rep Krishnamoorthi
This is kind of typical of the questions asked at the hearing. Krishnamoorthi makes a strong point and then backs away like a pussy to plead: ‘I respectfully submit that the Secret Service must expand its security perimeter….’
Not one of the congressional questioners brought up the glaringly important audio evidence that there were almost certainly two treasonous shooters, and maybe three. And no one pressed Cheatle on the point that we still do not know how many shell casings were found on the assassin’s roof or that we have credible video evidence that the FBI power washed that roof within days after.
The congressional questioners were exercised and highly critical of Cheatle but as the grandstanding droned on, it became apparent that they were exercised and angry because they knew the compromised Secret Service was a danger to them.
If only 3-5 casings were found on the assassin’s roof and as Cheatle claims only one round was fired by an SS sniper, what explains the other 3-5 rounds that were indubitably fired? And where did the nine bullets finally land? That is easy to figure out and should have been known the day after the treason, if not the day of. It’s obvious we are in the early stages of coverup. But why coverup unless you are guilty of something even more horrible than criminal negligence? Cheatle has already thrown herself under the bus, so can we conclude otherwise than the deep perps have even more to hide? ABN
‘The law dictates what a vaccine is and the CDC did not have the power to change that’ — Dr David Martin
I am quite sure readers of this site know what a dirty scam it was to change the meaning of the word vaccine and then mandate that garbage. Posting this to remind a wider audience. Be sure to share with those who may have missed this crucial point, because it exposes the core of plandemic malfeasance. Changing the definition of a legally defined word—and especially doing that illegally—is a form of violent psycholinguistic mind-control. Many 100s of millions of people were fooled by this criminal legerdemain, which in truth appears to have been an act asymmetric warfare. ABN
Secret Service empty suit Kimberly Cheatle hides behind her own agents as furious US senators chase her down at RNC over Trump shooting
‘You put him within less than an inch of his life,’ Barrasso yelled at Cheatle. ‘So resignation or full explanation.’
In much of the world, it is a given that you fuckup this bad you resign in shame and apologize profusely. Then go away for a long time. Not in today’s America. My guess is Cheatle believes she is being ‘tough’, a ‘real leader’, ‘standing her ground’, when it is obvious she is incompetent, a liar (sloped roof and much more), and very likely in on a nefarious plot I dare not mention. The assassination attempt was treason. Not being forthcoming, or worse covering up salient facts, perpetuates the treason, prolongs its impact and deepens its effects. Cheatle epitomizes the worst of today’s USA. ABN
Judge Cannon dismisses Trump documents case, citing violation of appointments clause
Motorcycle Personal Protection Equipment — armor and abrasion — explained
The “EN” stands for “European Norm.” You might also notice armor listed as “CE”. The letters “CE” are the abbreviation of the French phrase “Conformité Européene” which literally means “European Conformity”. The term initially used was “EC Mark” and it was officially replaced by “CE Marking” in the Directive 93/68/EEC in 1993. “CE Marking” is now used in all EU official documents. All of this has to do with the European motorcycle safety standards. America has unofficially adopted these standards, but they are not required by law for street use. In contrast, to ride a motorcycle in Europe, you have to have protective apparel that meets these standards. Since April 2018, all motorcycle garments fall under the scope of the PPE regulation, which basically means that if it is sold as protective motorcycle apparel, it’s deemed to be personal protective equipment and should be tested at an official notified body under a strict set of standards to comply with the PPE regulation.
How are CE-standards and PPE related? Very much, actually. Motorcycle clothing (specifically jackets and pants/trousers, notwithstanding gloves, boots, and impact protectors) is grouped into what’s called Personal Protective Equipment – aka PPE. And like your kitchenware or electronics, PPE is governed by their own specific set of rules and regulations depending on how these products are used and how they are classified, and which group/subgroup they fall under. Here’s where it gets quite complicated. The set of standards that “govern” PPE – specifically motorcycle clothing – for leisure use is CE-standard EN 17092, which has now become a harmonized European standard.
Harmonized standard, meaning that it is a recognized throughout the EU as a tool that’s widely accepted for the certification of PPE motorcycle garments. That said, we’ll disclaimer here and say that this is intended to be a general overview of an incredibly complex subject that is both politically and economically charged. The purpose is to help riders understand that even with an arguably imperfect system in place, the CE-certification label/marking does mean something. It means that the garments have been tested to meet at least the minimum safety requirements, so you actually know what it’s intended use is. And that’s Personal Protective Equipment in the form of motorcycle clothing.
A major impetus behind standard EN 17092 coming into play is because of aforementioned reason: to make sure riders actually get something protective when shopping for motorcycle clothing without any prior knowledge of materials, constructions, or test methods. Just because it looks strong, doesn’t make it so in an emergency situation. And just because it feels sturdy, doesn’t make it appropriate to be worn at riding speeds. The application of the EN 17092 standard means that clothing that looks like protective motorcycle gear, actually is protective motorcycle gear!
Linked article provides a good, clear explanation of European safety standards for motorcycle garments. These standards are unofficially used in USA, which otherwise does not have its own standards. Article explains the reasoning behind the standards and how to determine what fits your needs. ABN
Supreme Court Allows Government Control Over Speech on Social Media Platforms, Rejects Standing in Murthy vs Missouri
The Supreme Court rejected the standing of the State of Missouri and five individuals in the censorship and free speech case surrounding social media. The court came down with a 6-3 decision, Justice Amy Coney-Barrett writing the majority opinion. Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas dissented in the minority.
The background of the case was very familiar to this audience, as the Biden administration was previously blocked by lower courts from telling social media platforms to remove content against their interests. Today, the Supreme Court rejected the standing of the plaintiffs, essentially giving a green light to the USA government to begin controlling social media platforms again.
If you read the opinion [FULL PDF HERE], I would strongly urge readers to focus beginning on page #11 of the Justice Barrett opinion. It is obvious in the three or four pages that follow, the court was looking for an exit from the free speech issue. Denying the case on “standing” grounds became their justification for the cop-out.
Barrett goes out of her way to make the standing issue the crux of the majority opinion. Comey-Barrett dismisses all the instances of censorship and coerced removal under the auspices that the relief sought by the plaintiffs was for future harm, not past injury. The lower courts had ruled the government could not interfere with speech in the future, without establishing that each individual plaintiff was harmed specifically by each action of the government.
Social media platforms did some censorship and content removal on their own, without government direction. Therefore, it becomes impossible for the court to determine which censorship decisions were made by government coercion, and which were made by the social media platform with ordinary moderation rules being applied. {pdf page #11}
American Buddhist Net 
