During covid only some 500 American doctors opposed the lockdowns, the banning of early treatments, forced hospital death protocols, Remdesivir, vax mandates, etc.
The vast majority of the 17,000, if not all of them, were silent during our worst health crisis. Many even actively supported the pseudo-science.
Therefore, there is every reason not to listen to them on this topic or any other public health topic.
The study observed a higher reported incidence of COVID-19 infection among vaccinated individuals during the pandemic period, which increased with the number of vaccine doses received. This paradoxical finding may be influenced by various factors, including immune response mechanisms, such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) or original antigenic sin, behavioral changes, and exposure risk. Understanding these factors is crucial for urgently enhancing public health strategies and vaccination programs.
UPDATE: I have watched two hours and forty-three minutes of this discussion. I rarely watch podcasts for this long. I found this one weirdly spell-binding because, though all of the speakers are very articulate, this ‘discussion’ is a remarkable example of how badly real people really talk. The entire content can be summarized in a few words. Jack wants to ban the vax on Trump Day One. Calley wants to go more slowly, be politic about it. Mary agrees with Jack but can see Calley’s POV. Danny is unable to boil it down so it goes on and on. It’s worth watching because the psycholinguistics are so simple and also so tangled it becomes a work of disaster art or disperformance art. ABN
•The medical field has had a long history of exposing mothers to “treatments” that harm their infants. After decades of work to stop the routine x-raying of fetuses, the “safe and effective” practice of prenatal ultrasound (US) was adopted in its place.
•While US is thought to be safe, there are decades of research showing it can harm tissues. Initially, this was well recognized, but as the ultrasound industry took off, it became a forgotten side of medicine, and research in this area became almost impossible to conduct.
• There is a large body of evidence showing fetuses are particularly vulnerable to US. Most concerningly, dozens of trials were conducted in China immediately prior to mothers planning to have abortions, which showed giving an US beforehand clearly damaged fetal tissues.
•The harms of US are dose dependent. Unfortunately, in 1992, despite widespread concerns about the safety of prenatal US (e.g., CNN did a program on it) the FDA chose to raise the permissible US levels 8-fold (and often more). Given that the studies showing the dangers of US were conducted at levels far below the original threshold, this increase is quite concerning, and may have played a pivotal role in the outbreak of chronic childhood illnesses that occurred around this time.
•Conversely, the benefits of prenatal US are often vastly overstated, and in many cases put mothers on unnecessary “treatment” plans which harm them and their infants.
Roughly 56,000 British women each year are given the terrifying news that they have breast cancer.
It’s a life-changing diagnosis not least because, almost always, it is followed by invasive biopsies, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone treatments that, in younger women, induce the menopause.
But could all that be set to change? Indeed, could many thousands of women told they have the disease not need a jot of treatment whatsoever?
The provocative answer, according to a growing number of the world’s leading specialists, is yes. The results of a major trial, announced last week, showed it was perfectly safe – perhaps even a better option – to simply ‘watch and wait’ with certain breast cancers, known as ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS.
No surgery, no medication – just a check-up twice a year. DCIS are tiny tumours, confined to the milk ducts in the breasts, which usually cause no symptoms and cannot be felt.
They account for about a quarter of all breast cancer diagnoses and most are discovered only during routine mammograms (breast X-rays).
This is the power of common understanding among we the plebs. There is no doubt in my mind child vaxxes are harmful to children. And there is very little doubt in my mind their use has been a deliberate act of war against USA and the West. Poison is one of the oldest and most commonly used weapons in the world. If covid itself was not a poison (because it didn’t even exist or was never serious), then it was a mind-poison which led to the covid vax which is a provably harmful but still encouraged by far too many, illustrating the power of mind-control. When we the plebs see through the mind-control and resist and/or do not comply, there is nothing the kleptocrats can do except add more mind-control or fold. They are not succeeding with the covid vax, which has low uptake, and losing rapidly on the child vax schedule scam. ABN
I told you here about Pfizer’s abstract of its Interim Report 5, showing at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the U.K. medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time : “In summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ then no wonder it is sitting on it.”
Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report but I’ve managed to obtain a copy. It looks like I was right – the detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the Hazard Ratios in the abstract which I reported last time (below).
World-leading scientists have called for a halt on research to create “mirror life” microbes amid concerns that the synthetic organisms would present an “unprecedented risk” to life on Earth.
The international group of Nobel laureates and other experts warn that mirror bacteria, constructed from mirror images of molecules found in nature, could become established in the environment and slip past the immune defences of natural organisms, putting humans, animals and plants at risk of lethal infections.
Although a viable mirror microbe would probably take at least a decade to build, a new risk assessment raised such serious concerns about the organisms that the 38-strong group urged scientists to stop work towards the goal and asked funders to make clear they will no longer support the research.
“The threat we’re talking about is unprecedented,” said Prof Vaughn Cooper, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pittsburgh. “Mirror bacteria would likely evade many human, animal and plant immune system responses and in each case would cause lethal infections that would spread without check.”
American Buddhist Net 