“We show you how they lied and murdered. #1, 2 and 3 ranked deaths in 15 – 54 year olds, are not going down”

COVID vaccines linked to Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) a fatal degenerative brain disorder

Studies suggest a link between an incurable and fatal prion disease known as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) and COVID-19 vaccines.

Researchers believe the prion region from the original Wuhan COVID-19 variant’s spike protein was incorporated into mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines — given to hundreds of millions of humans — and that it can cause a new type of rapidly progressing sporadic CJD.

Although the Omicron variant does not have a prion region on its spike protein, current COVID-19 vaccines still use the genetic material — including the prion region — of the parent Wuhan strain.

link

There is no value to a “vaccine” that does not prevent transmission or infection

Corroborates with: New UK Gov. report confirms COVID Vaccination significantly increases the risk of Death and kills hundreds of thousands after five months and much more. There is no value to a “vaccine” that does not prevent transmission or infection. Moreover, these same “vaccines” are causing all-cause mortality to rise well above non-vaccinated rates. Mandating, requiring, or even strongly recommending these “vaccines” constitutes anti-science as well as a serious infringement on human rights. More graphs here. ABN

The Foegen effect: A mechanism by which facemasks contribute to the COVID-19 case fatality rate

…These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.

The cause of this trend is explained herein using the “Foegen effect” theory; that is, deep re-inhalation of hypercondensed droplets or pure virions caught in facemasks as droplets can worsen prognosis and might be linked to long-term effects of COVID-19 infection. While the “Foegen effect” is proven in vivo in an animal model, further research is needed to fully understand it.

link

Vaccine Exemption Letter For a 16 Year-Old Camp Counselor: Required reading if you are the parent, guardian, or youth to be vaccinated

Parents have consulted me on the health risks and benefits of complying with summer camp vaccination mandates. Here is my letter documenting the informed consent discussion I held with one family.

link

How can anyone not know by now that covid is not dangerous to young people? Why impose a nonsensical, anti-scientific risk on them? ABN

New UK Gov. report confirms COVID Vaccination significantly increases the risk of Death and kills hundreds of thousands after five months

New figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics reveal the Covid-19 vaccinated population are much more likely to die of any cause than the unvaccinated population in England among all age groups.

This is unequivocal proof that the Covid-19 injections have been and are still killing people, and patterns within the ONS data suggest it takes five months after vaccination for the deadly consequences to be fully realised.

link to text and more graphs

link to text and graph

UK statistics are more accurate that US statistics and they tend to be more honest. These findings corroborate what many other researchers have determined through other means. Excess deaths is virtually irrefutable evidence. This is appalling (from the article): “We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. ABN

Dr Paul Marik one of the most published doctors in critical care reviews UK and Israeli data showing the mass mandated products don’t work at all and make it worse those who contract the illness

Dr Paul Marik one of the most published doctors in critical care reviews UK and Israeli data showing the mass mandated products don’t work at all and make make it worse those who contract the illness. @Covid19Critical

Originally tweeted by Peter McCullough, MD MPH (@P_McCulloughMD) on June 5, 2022.

Whisteblower’s Lawyer: Pfizer Got Away With Vaccine Fraud Because Government Was Co-Conspirator

Pfizer has asked a U.S. court to throw out a whistleblower’s lawsuit on the basis that the company can’t be guilty of fraud, abuse, and protocol violations in its COVID Vaccine clinical trials because its contract with the U.S. government allowed them to skirt regulations and federal laws that typically apply to government contracts.

In other words, Pfizer was allegedly able to make false statements to the government, and lie about the safety and efficacy of its product,  “because the government was in on it with them!” according to Robert Barnes, the lead lawyer in the case.

The whistleblower, Brook Jackson, was the regional director for the Ventavia Research Group, the company that was conducting Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial in Texas in 2020.

In September of 2020, Jackson emailed a complaint to the FDA, informing the agency of the company’s allegedly dangerous and shoddy research practices. The FDA took no action on her email, and Pfizer continued to use the company.

link

Doctors Accuse FDA Of Unlawfully Blocking Their Ability To Treat COVID-19 Patients With Ivermectin

A group of doctors has filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration claiming it unlawfully attempted to block the use of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

It names the Department of Health and Human Services, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the Food and Drug Administration, and FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf as defendants.

In the filing, plaintiffs Mary Talley Bowden, Paul E. Marik, and Robert L. Apter argued that by publicly ordering health professionals and patients to avoid ivermectin, the FDA both acted outside of its authority and inhibited the doctors’ ability to practice medicine.

Though the FDA has approved ivermectin to treat certain infections, the department has urged the public not to use the drug to treat COVID-19. Neither HHS nor the FDA  immediately responded requests for comment for this story.

“Attempts by the FDA to influence or intervene in the doctor-patient relationship amount to interference with the practice of medicine, the regulation of which is—and always has been—reserved to states,” the lawsuit said. “The FDA breached this critical boundary between federal and state authority by directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use.”

link